Guest guest Posted March 29, 2000 Report Share Posted March 29, 2000 > I have had 2 parents who came to the workshop we hosted in NC with > Carbone/McGreevy email me and say that their therapists are not willing to > change their teaching style. Their main concern is that they think the kids > will become prompt dependent and that their is no research to support this. > So..any ideas?? I do not want to overwhelmed them with issues of JABA. I am > at a lost for words here b.c all the therapists I work with were so excited > about this method and were very willing to change! Jenn, many therapists (and parents ) are leery on change until they experience this teaching first hand. (Other parents informed me we needed to do this with Zach almost a year before we made the switch. It was not until after I attended Dr. Carbone's workshop that I understood what they were trying to tell me.) It should be the parents decision and the therapists needs to learn the skills. Therapists are professionals and need not to have closed minds in the field of ABA. ABA expands so much further then the traditional method of teaching kids with autism. I do know that ALL the therapists I have talked to have praised the switch after they learned more about it. You need to tell these therapists to be open minded. Try it for several weeks, if they feel it is not working, they can move on. But the key to remember is the child and to do what is best for the child. Nobody likes change and learning something new is hard especially when we have been told " you have to do it this way or it is confusing for the child " . Now, things are confusing for the therapists! From my understanding this ABA avenue is easier for the child, harder for the therapist (at first) but becomes easier in the long run. Rhonda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 29, 2000 Report Share Posted March 29, 2000 Jenn, When I got back from my Carbone conference last May I thought my lead therapist would be as excited as I was about this new technique. He had the same problems as you described. Basically he thought Carbone was the autism " flavor of the month " and what was wrong with what they were doing. He was working with another family and they were doing quite well with the Lovaas type program. I was flabbergasted......and what about prompt dependence. One thing we told him was the when applied correctly the child does not become prompt dependent because prompting is tied to the reinforcer. The child learns that when he waits for a prompt it delays delivery of the reinforcement. This is especially true if you always go back and try for an independent before delivery the reinforcer. Child learns " if I say it right away we move quickly to next task and quickly to reinforcement, if I wait for a prompt they ask the question again and it takes longer to get my reinforcement " . Also through differential reinforcement you can give more or longer contact with the reinforcer for independent responses vs just a few seconds with reinforcer for prompted responses. Finding someone who is doing this technique and allowing the therapist to view it and see the child is not prompt dependent is also good. This can be done live or by video. In my area we volunteer my now fully converted lead to talk with other reluctant therapist. Hope some of this helps. Patty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 30, 2000 Report Share Posted March 30, 2000 In a message dated 3/28/00 11:04:22 PM Central Standard Time, ABAqueen1@... writes: << I have had 2 parents who came to the workshop we hosted in NC with Carbone/McGreevy email me and say that their therapists are not willing to change their teaching style. Their main concern is that they think the kids will become prompt dependent and that their is no research to support this. >>>As you know, Dr. Carbone says the children will become prompt dependent if the therapist does not know how to properly fade prompts. This requires on the spot problem solving, analyzing skills and multi-tasking. So their concerns are valid if they don't have those skills...but this would also be evidence that they needed further training or to reconsider their jobs. So..any ideas?? I do not want to overwhelmed them with issues of JABA. >>You are right though, Dr. Carbone sites much research in JABA and the therapists should be willing and wanting to read it, as it is their chosen career. I am at a lost for words here b.c all the therapists I work with were so excited about this method and were very willing to change! >> As were mine... as are many. Mine have looked at it not as change but as improving, bettering what they do...improving fluency, responding, etc. I know this is very hard for you to know what to say. My thoughts are that the therapists are questionable if they will not investigate fully the therapy techniques...continuing education is a must in all professions but in the sciences it is critical. That JABA data is there...they need to read it before they are willing to tell a parent no. much love and support, kat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.