Guest guest Posted January 17, 2008 Report Share Posted January 17, 2008 as Shane Ellison has said, they use ghost writers to write up the results so that the negative results look positive then they pay a doctor or doctors to put their names to it as if they were involved with the study to make the study look even better. Its a pretty sick habit that harms those who take those drugs. phine - In Lipitor , " Carlisle " <nancarl@...> wrote: > > > From http://news./s/nm/20080117/hl_nm/drugs_studies_dc_2 > <http://news./s/nm/20080117/hl_nm/drugs_studies_dc_2> posted > today, the story is that drug companies sort of neglect in many > instances to report on unfavorable outcomes of their clinical trials. > This particular story concerns antidepressants, but do we think they > behave any differently when it comes to reporting on their biggest > money-makers? And haven't we all heard that Lipitor is the biggest of > the big? No doubt some of its competitors aren't far behind. > > Here's a little snippet from the story, " For example, of the seven > negative studies done on GlaxoKline's Paxil, five were never > published. The researchers found three studies for GSK's Wellbutrin SR, > but the two negative ones never reached print. > > " There were five studies for Pfizer's Zoloft, but the three showing the > drug to be ineffective were not published. A fourth study, ruled > questionable by the FDA, was written and published to make it appear > that the drug worked. " > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2008 Report Share Posted January 19, 2008 Had to take Hubby to hospital Thursday night, had not been feeling well. Took 3 nitro's, it eased some, called our insurance nurse, said to call 911 or go to the hospital now.. so off I took him. was in over night of course. all blood work was good. showed no heart attack. had 3 different drs in the ER keep asking why he was not on the all the heart meds, I kept and hubby to, try to explain to them that he could not take them all, he would have side effects. the last dork came in, had a attitude anyway. he started in on hubby I turned around and said well aren't you cocky. he wanted to know what I meant. I said we have explained ourselves 3 times why and here you are questioning us about a statin again, we are not taking one. the stress test showed the damage done with the first big HA. said everything else looked good. Thursday night Hubby said that was the best he has felt since the heart attack and by pass. still feeling good today, has not had any tums at all and never took his protonix either... not sure if the nitro helped whatever it was or what... I will request all his records as I usually do when he is in the hospital or has test ran... Just had to let you all know.. JudyinMO Re: Sometimes the truth does come out! as Shane Ellison has said, they use ghost writers to write up theresults so that the negative results look positive then they pay adoctor or doctors to put their names to it as if they were involvedwith the study to make the study look even better. Its a pretty sickhabit that harms those who take those drugs.phine- In Lipitor , " Carlisle"<nancarl@...> wrote:>> > From http://news./s/nm/20080117/hl_nm/drugs_studies_dc_2> <http://news./s/nm/20080117/hl_nm/drugs_studies_dc_2> posted> today, the story is that drug companies sort of neglect in many> instances to report on unfavorable outcomes of their clinical trials.> This particular story concerns antidepressants, but do we think they> behave any differently when it comes to reporting on their biggest> money-makers? And haven't we all heard that Lipitor is the biggest of> the big? No doubt some of its competitors aren't far behind.> > Here's a little snippet from the story, "For example, of the seven> negative studies done on GlaxoKline's Paxil, five were never> published. The researchers found three studies for GSK's Wellbutrin SR,> but the two negative ones never reached print.> > "There were five studies for Pfizer's Zoloft, but the three showing the> drug to be ineffective were not published. A fourth study, ruled> questionable by the FDA, was written and published to make it appear> that the drug worked."> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.