Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Fair enough. However, in thinking over what's been happening the past few days, my feeling is we, as admins, ought to watch ourselves a bit more carefully and not de-evolve into the same sort of mudslinging that we receive. Therefore we ought to apologize first even if no apology is returned to us. Tom Administrator In a message dated 3/5/2006 6:18:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, no_reply writes: " , " Maurice can believe whatever he wants, even if you don't agree with it. We ought to respect his right to have his beliefs even if some of us don't agree with them. " " Please apologize to Maurice for your sarcasm. " " Tom Administrator " " Tom, " Maurice was being offensive toward me and others. I demonstrating the same in return in an attempt to let him see how his comments affect others on the board. If I get an apology, then I will reciprocate. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Fair enough. However, in thinking over what's been happening the past few days, my feeling is we, as admins, ought to watch ourselves a bit more carefully and not de-evolve into the same sort of mudslinging that we receive. Therefore we ought to apologize first even if no apology is returned to us. Tom Administrator In a message dated 3/5/2006 6:18:22 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, no_reply writes: " , " Maurice can believe whatever he wants, even if you don't agree with it. We ought to respect his right to have his beliefs even if some of us don't agree with them. " " Please apologize to Maurice for your sarcasm. " " Tom Administrator " " Tom, " Maurice was being offensive toward me and others. I demonstrating the same in return in an attempt to let him see how his comments affect others on the board. If I get an apology, then I will reciprocate. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Hi Strict, Forgive the brevity of my response, but my computer is on the fritz here. " If life were fair and just and remotely logical, tobacco for smoking and chewing would be as controlled/illegal as marijuana for non- medicinal purposes. Once again, I mention " medicinal purposes " as both have valid uses, though a very small percentage of it is used legitimately. " I think tobacco SHOULD be illegal. It would be the only way to get some people to stop smoking it. I quit for a while this year and intend on quitting again precisely because it will have adverse effects on people I care about. I DO believe it should be legal for " medicinal purposes " and for religious or ceremonial purposes. Same with pot. But at prestent, pot is illegal and tobacco isn't. If someone doesn't like this hypocrisy, then they should write their legislators in Congress and get the law changed, and until the law is changed, they should obey the law. At present, tobacco smokers are slowly but surely losing their supposed " rights " to smoke in public places all around the country. But as rightly pointed out, tobacco smokers have no such rights when a law is passed AND ESPECIALLY because I RIGHT to smoke in public was never granted iin the constitution. So I personally don't mind all these laws being passed and obey them without a qualm. " And finally, it's really funny: morphine is no less problematic for addiction than marijuana, tobacco, etc. and yet, it is prescribed regularly, including very large amounts for palliative purposes, which is what the medicinal prescription of marijuana would exist for. " There are drugs even more addictive than morphine that are prescribed regularly. The difference is, morphine is not so abundant on the streets because it requires a bit of chemistry to culture. Pot can be grown alomost anywhere. " Believing medicinal marijuana for palliative purposes is wrong and should be illegal while believing that recreational usage of tobacco is right and should be legal for anyone at all (over 18 or not) is the height of hypocrisy, and should be left smoldering in the ash tray of history. " I agree with you 100% except for the fact that pot use for any reason is not allowed by Federal law. When it becomes legal, then I will shut my mouth. Let me add one thing here... There are plants all over the word still used by aboriginal peoples which we would consider drugs and surely outlaw. South American natives chew coaca leaves as a mild stimulant. Some may indeed be addictive. And as I have mentioned in the past, the Lakota and Cheyenne and others have used Peyote and many cultures use this in religious ceremonies now days. If people would use these plants and/or substances and not abuse them, then we would need no laws to control them. If these plants and/or substances could be controlled and prescribed for medicinal purposes, then that's great. But we have to ask ourselves at present if we want to legalize this stuff for medicinal use and have a bunch of drug addicts running around the country committing crimes to support their habit. We would not be having this discussion at all if we could rely on people not to abuse drugs. So even though I appear to be the bad guy here, the blame goes squarely on the addicts who can't seem to live without their dope and will kill to make it, manufacture it, and distribute it. If we legalized it, the killing might go away, but then the problem becomes an economic problem of people getting body parts cut off in machinery and car accidents while high etc. You just cannot win. In short, I believe that God put everything here on earth for a reason. I bet pot is here specifically to help people with pain feel that pain much less than they do. But man, once he gets ahold of this stuff, can not use it in a Godly way, and so it's the abusers that should be blamed for the whole fiasco. Tom Administrator Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 > > Did he have to pay back the merchants for the damages? > He was crucified for it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 6, 2006 Report Share Posted March 6, 2006 Then remember this please: Mat 5:10 God blesses those who are persecuted because they live for God, for the Kingdom of Heaven is theirs. Mat 5:11 " God blesses you when you are mocked and persecuted and lied about because you are my followers. Mat 5:12 Be happy about it! Be very glad! For a great reward awaits you in heaven. And remember, the ancient prophets were persecuted, too. New Living Translation However, I do get rather tired of people thinking they can bad mouth Christians and conservatives and think they can have it all their way. Been seeing a lot of that this past week or so. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Tom is correct. It was just a warning, based on a combination of percieved tone of voice & previous pattern of behavior, but perhaps coming down a bit heavier than called for at that particular time. If so, I'm sorry. Let me also say that I've been glad to find you more supportive and respectful of other members lately, as well as excellently informative as ever. Your not-so-nicely-worded complaint against me, I find rather humorous in the light of you on an earlier occasion complaining about me tolerating another member being " potty-mouthed. " :-D Inger > > So, I guess " discussion " and " debate " are only allowed if it fits > EXACTLY within a very narrow range of expression with no allowances > for anything deemed less-than-anally-retentively " nice and pure " > according to one's interpretation without questioning, if the whole > attack made on that post that I made that fulfilled the rules in > spirit and letter of the laws that presumably refer to this list. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 > (In ninth grade, I had a teacher > of English who literally misspelled more words than she spelled > correctly - even quite simple words like " typwrittor " (her spelling of > " typewriter " ). In her class, one could not do well on a spelling test > (or even on an essay, since she took points off for spelling) unless > one misspelled in just the same way she did > (Knowing that she spelled " stain " as " stian, " spelled " rain " as > " wraine, " and spelled " train " as " tiran " provided no clue as to how on > Earth she would expect you to spell " pain. " It turned out that she > wanted it " plain " - yes, with an L - and she wanted you to spell the > actual " plain " as " palin. " Oh, yes, she would also mark you wrong if > you *or* your parents asked her to check the dictionary, or mentioned > that the dictionary spelled something differently and in fact had your > *correct* spelling that she had marked wrong and deducted five points > for: " I am the teacher. I *know* proper English. One should not insult > the teacher by making references to the dictionary or otherwise > suggesting that the teacher may be ignorant or mistaken. If I was > mistaken or ignorant, I would not be the teacher. First learn to spell > - THEN you can criticize my spelling. " WHAT?! How was that crazy lady allowed to go on like that? (Probably had tenure) No wonder correct spelling is so important to you. I once had a argument (discussion ) with a boyfriend about words. He said it's okay to missuse a word as long as everyone knows what he means. I said you have to have a standard and stick to it, otherwise, communication will be compromised. He might have meant idolatry. > > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 There's a lot of prophecies and foreshadowing regarding the coming Messiah in the scriptures. It's just that Christianity believes Jesus fulfilled those prophecies and is the Messiah. > > Re: > > > The animal sacrifice > > was symbolic to teach about the coming sacrifice that Jesus would > > fulfill ... > > People actually practicing/belonging to the religion didn't (and > don't) see it that way: not at the time we did sacrifices, and not now > when we don't do them. > I find it strange, very strange, to learn what the Christian > religion believes about the Jewish religion: to learn that, > apparently, Christianity regards Judaism as a set of symbols about > Christianity. (Rough analogy for Christians here: imagine how you > would feel if someday you overheard a Muslim explaining to a mixed > audience of Muslims and non-Muslims that Christian > beliefs/holidays/scriptures " were symbolic to teach about the coming > of Muhammad " ... ) > > > Re: > > > > ... sacrifice was done away with when > > > Jesus was crucified ... > > Jesus got crucified in the year 33. > Sacrifice (in Judaism, at least) didn't end till the year 70. > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 There's a lot of prophecies and foreshadowing regarding the coming Messiah in the scriptures. It's just that Christianity believes Jesus fulfilled those prophecies and is the Messiah. > > Re: > > > The animal sacrifice > > was symbolic to teach about the coming sacrifice that Jesus would > > fulfill ... > > People actually practicing/belonging to the religion didn't (and > don't) see it that way: not at the time we did sacrifices, and not now > when we don't do them. > I find it strange, very strange, to learn what the Christian > religion believes about the Jewish religion: to learn that, > apparently, Christianity regards Judaism as a set of symbols about > Christianity. (Rough analogy for Christians here: imagine how you > would feel if someday you overheard a Muslim explaining to a mixed > audience of Muslims and non-Muslims that Christian > beliefs/holidays/scriptures " were symbolic to teach about the coming > of Muhammad " ... ) > > > Re: > > > > ... sacrifice was done away with when > > > Jesus was crucified ... > > Jesus got crucified in the year 33. > Sacrifice (in Judaism, at least) didn't end till the year 70. > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 In the Jewish religion, we believe the world will end when the Messiah comes. We are all still here therefor Jesus couldn't have been the Messiah, because the world would have ended. Bethmikecarrie01 <mikecarrie01@...> wrote: There's a lot of prophecies and foreshadowing regarding the coming Messiah in the scriptures. It's just that Christianity believes Jesus fulfilled those prophecies and is the Messiah.>> Re:> > > The animal sacrifice> > was symbolic to teach about the coming sacrifice that Jesus would> > fulfill ...> > People actually practicing/belonging to the religion didn't (and> don't) see it that way: not at the time we did sacrifices, and not now> when we don't do them.> I find it strange, very strange, to learn what the Christian> religion believes about the Jewish religion: to learn that,> apparently, Christianity regards Judaism as a set of symbols about> Christianity. (Rough analogy for Christians here: imagine how you> would feel if someday you overheard a Muslim explaining to a mixed> audience of Muslims and non-Muslims that Christian> beliefs/holidays/scriptures "were symbolic to teach about the coming> of Muhammad" ... )> > > Re:> > > > ... sacrifice was done away with when> > > Jesus was crucified ...> > Jesus got crucified in the year 33.> Sacrifice (in Judaism, at least) didn't end till the year 70.> > > Yours for better letters,> Kate Gladstone> Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest> handwritingrepair@...> http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair> 325 South Manning Boulevard> Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA> telephone 518/482-6763> AND REMEMBER ...> you can order books through my site!> (Amazon.com link -> I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold)> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 In the Jewish religion, we believe the world will end when the Messiah comes. We are all still here therefor Jesus couldn't have been the Messiah, because the world would have ended. Bethmikecarrie01 <mikecarrie01@...> wrote: There's a lot of prophecies and foreshadowing regarding the coming Messiah in the scriptures. It's just that Christianity believes Jesus fulfilled those prophecies and is the Messiah.>> Re:> > > The animal sacrifice> > was symbolic to teach about the coming sacrifice that Jesus would> > fulfill ...> > People actually practicing/belonging to the religion didn't (and> don't) see it that way: not at the time we did sacrifices, and not now> when we don't do them.> I find it strange, very strange, to learn what the Christian> religion believes about the Jewish religion: to learn that,> apparently, Christianity regards Judaism as a set of symbols about> Christianity. (Rough analogy for Christians here: imagine how you> would feel if someday you overheard a Muslim explaining to a mixed> audience of Muslims and non-Muslims that Christian> beliefs/holidays/scriptures "were symbolic to teach about the coming> of Muhammad" ... )> > > Re:> > > > ... sacrifice was done away with when> > > Jesus was crucified ...> > Jesus got crucified in the year 33.> Sacrifice (in Judaism, at least) didn't end till the year 70.> > > Yours for better letters,> Kate Gladstone> Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest> handwritingrepair@...> http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair> 325 South Manning Boulevard> Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA> telephone 518/482-6763> AND REMEMBER ...> you can order books through my site!> (Amazon.com link -> I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold)> Bring photos to life! New PhotoMail makes sharing a breeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Why does the world need a Messiah? beth sullivan <dksunglsses@...> wrote: In the Jewish religion, we believe the world will end when the Messiah comes. We are all still here therefor Jesus couldn't have been the Messiah, because the world would have ended. BethI'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2006 Report Share Posted March 7, 2006 Why does the world need a Messiah? beth sullivan <dksunglsses@...> wrote: In the Jewish religion, we believe the world will end when the Messiah comes. We are all still here therefor Jesus couldn't have been the Messiah, because the world would have ended. BethI'm from this planet, the rest of you are not.Please go back to Mars or Venushttp://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 " I once had a argument (discussion ) with a boyfriend about words. He said it's okay to missuse a word as long as everyone knows what he means. I said you have to have a standard and stick to it, otherwise, communication will be compromised. " Ahhhhhhhhh but it does happen so much in language - like the word 'cool', which many people use to mean something really good/great? like in 'he's a really cool guy'. I don't suppose they mean the guy is cold :-) Also confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this one has been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people say it and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. I suspect from what I have seen of language that it evolves - like the word 'gay' seems to have changed meaning and there even ends up being new words added. The word 'phat', pronounced as fat seems to be one of these new made up words. > > > (In ninth grade, I had a teacher > > of English who literally misspelled more words than she spelled > > correctly - even quite simple words like " typwrittor " (her spelling > of > > " typewriter " ). In her class, one could not do well on a spelling > test > > (or even on an essay, since she took points off for spelling) unless > > one misspelled in just the same way she did > > (Knowing that she spelled " stain " as " stian, " spelled " rain " as > > " wraine, " and spelled " train " as " tiran " provided no clue as to how > on > > Earth she would expect you to spell " pain. " It turned out that she > > wanted it " plain " - yes, with an L - and she wanted you to spell the > > actual " plain " as " palin. " Oh, yes, she would also mark you wrong if > > you *or* your parents asked her to check the dictionary, or > mentioned > > that the dictionary spelled something differently and in fact had > your > > *correct* spelling that she had marked wrong and deducted five > points > > for: " I am the teacher. I *know* proper English. One should not > insult > > the teacher by making references to the dictionary or otherwise > > suggesting that the teacher may be ignorant or mistaken. If I was > > mistaken or ignorant, I would not be the teacher. First learn to > spell > > - THEN you can criticize my spelling. " > > WHAT?! How was that crazy lady allowed to go on like that? (Probably > had tenure) No wonder correct spelling is so important to you. > > I once had a argument (discussion ) with a boyfriend about words. > He said it's okay to missuse a word as long as everyone knows what he > means. I said you have to have a standard and stick to it, otherwise, > communication will be compromised. > > He might have meant idolatry. > > > > > > > > Yours for better letters, > > Kate Gladstone > > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > > handwritingrepair@ > > http://learn.to/handwrite, > http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > > 325 South Manning Boulevard > > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > > telephone 518/482-6763 > > AND REMEMBER ... > > you can order books through my site! > > (Amazon.com link - > > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 The world certainly needs something, looking at the state of it, thinking yet again of humans here. > In the Jewish religion, we believe the world will end when the Messiah comes. We are all still here therefor Jesus couldn't have been the Messiah, because the world would have ended. > > Beth > > > I'm from this planet, the rest of you are not. > Please go back to Mars or Venus > http://www.simplecomplexities.org/community/ > > --------------------------------- > > Use Photomail to share photos without annoying attachments. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 When Jesus overturned the tables of the moneychangers he did it because they were cheating the people, making exhorbitant profits by charging high prices and taking advantage. People came from far away and needed their money changed and high fees were charged to do so. Also if they brought an animal for sacrifice it had to be approved by an inspector at the temple. Often these inspectors were corrupt and the person was told their animal was not approved and they would then have to buy a high-priced one from the corrupt dealer. Since Jesus was someone who stood up for the poor and unfortunate, he was angry at the extortion of the poor. The Mishnah tells of a time when the price of a pair of doves was a golden denar, which was an exhorbitant price for a dove. This prompted Simeon the son of Gamaliel to declare: " By this Temple! I will not suffer the night to pass by before they cost but a [silver] denar. " On that day the price was reduced - Keritot 1:7. > > Re: > > > Jesus once destroyed a market because the market in question was > > established inside a church. > > Remember that this church (temple, actually) required sacrifices. > Sacrifice in that time and place contributed *the* major method of > prayer and ritual. People came to this temple not just from all over > Israel, but from many parts of Asia and even some parts of Africa and > Europe. So? > So ... if you came from miles away to sacrifice in Jerusalem, > you usually wouldn't bring your own sacrificial animal. It might get > sick or hurt on the way, or die, or at least lose its fat from the > rigors of the journey, or otherwise not pass the priestly > quality-control when you finally got there from Rome or Egypt or > wherever. The congregants wanted to offer (and the priests wanted to > sacrifice) animals of fine quality. (Remember that the priests got to > eat various parts of most types of sacrifice.) So ... instead of > bringing their own lambs or whatever, people in those times would > usually rear a lamb at home, sell it in their own country, take the > money on their trek to the Temple, buy a lamb there, and offer that. > So ... > ... to make all this work, they had to have a market there: with > money-changers too, to take the different currencies from all over the > world and exchange them for currency valid at the temple. (For one > thing, the coins from other parts of the world often had images of > non-Jewish gods and goddesses, which you couldn't bring into the > actual temple because these images would desecrate the temple). So you > had to stop at the porch and get your currency changed before you > could go in further, buy your animal, then bring it to the priests. > By disrupting the market, Jesus prevented his fellow Jews from > performing sacred ceremonies that God had commanded for them (or that, > anyway, they believed that God had commanded) - to the other Jews, > Jesus probably seemed like (modern analogy) a Catholic who showed up > at the Vatican one day and started smashing things. > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Re: > ... confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this one has > been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people say it > and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. For the surprising origins of " raining cats and dogs " and many other common expressions, see http://library.thinkquest.org/13681/data/tut/origin.htm Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Thanks, Mike, for your accurate info and for actually quoting a *Jewish* source. Yes indeed, corruption has (at times, at least) inhabited Judaism and every other religion, that I know some history of (I can't talk about the ones whose history I do not know - but within Judaism as [i think] anywhere else, things did not always work out as they should have worked: yes, corrupt people *did* take advantage of others because the corrupt ones had, basically, a " captive audience " - if you absolutely, positively needed to buy a sacrifice, then you would just have to buy it whatever it cost.) I still think (and apparently Rabbi Simeon ben Gamaliel thought, too) that there exist better ways of combating price-gouging (and other forms of corruption) than wrecking the store. Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 > Jewish World Review Feb. 20, 2003 / 18 Adar I, 5763 Lederer another view... Spook etymology on the Internet http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Recently, all around the Internet has been sparking an item called " Life in the 1500s. " The color and romance of the word and phrase explanations in the message are as beguiling as can be. But as soon as I opened the messages (sent to me by more than 50 people because I'm on everybody's list), I knew that most of the so-called historical revelations therein were false. Take (please!) this electronic explanation of a common meterological phrase: " Houses had thatched roofs. Thick straw, piled high, with no wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so all the pets -- dogs, cats, mice, rats and bugs -- lived in the roof. When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying, 'It's raining cats and dogs.' " Dubious. The literal explanation is that during heavy rains in not so Merry Olde England some city streets became raging rivers of filth carrying many dead cats and dogs. But there is also strong evidence that the phrase " it's raining cats and dogs " may not be literal. In the dark Ages, people believed that animals, including cats and dogs, had magical powers. Cats were associated with storms, especially the black cats of witches, while dogs were frequently associated with winds. The Norse storm god Odin was frequently shown surrounded by dogs and wolves. So when a particularly violent storm came along, people would say " It's raining cats and dogs, " with the cats symbolizing the rain and the dogs representing the wind and storm. This folkloric explanation is supported by such expressions as " it's raining dogs and polecats " and " it's raining pitchforks. " The e-message continues, " The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had something other than dirt, hence the saying 'dirt poor.' The wealthy had slate floors which would get slippery in the winter when wet. So they spread thresh on the floor to help keep their footing. As the winter wore on they kept adding more thresh until when you opened the door, you would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was placed at the entry way, hence a 'thresh hold.' " Nonsense. " Threshold, " first recorded in the year 1000, descends from an Old English compound " threscold, " " doorsill, point of entry. " The " hold " has nothing to do with keeping one's footing. The original meaning of " thresh " was " to tread, to trample. " Farmers originally threshed wheat, separated the grain from the chaff, by treading on piles of it. The treading seemed similar to wiping one's feet at the doorway of a house, and that entrance took the name " threshold " from such threshing, or treading. The e-drivel continues flowing: " Sometimes they could obtain pork and would feel really special when that happened. When company came over, they would bring out some bacon and hang it to show it off. It was a sign of wealth and that a man 'could really bring home the bacon.' They would cut off a little share with guests and would all sit and 'chew the fat.' Ridiculous. Here the bacon refers to the greased pig that once figured so prominently in American county fairs. The slippery swine was awarded to whoever caught it, and the winner could take (bring) it home. " Chew the fat " is unknown before the American Civil War. One theory contends that sailors working their jaws on the tough salt pork rationed out when supplies ran low constantly grumbled about their poor fare while literally chewing the fat. What seems clear is that chewing the fat, like shooting the breeze, provides little sustenance for the amount of mastication involved. Which is just what happens with jerry-built, jury-rigged etymologies. The Greek " etymon " means " true, original, " and the Greek root " - logia " means " science or study. " Thus, etymology is supposed to be the science or study of true and original word meanings. But I have learned that the proud house of etymology is populated by all manner of ghoulies and ghosties and long-leggety beasties miscreated by spook etymologists. ( " Spook " reaches back to the Dutch " spooc, " " ghost, specter. " ) These sham scholars would rather invent a word origin after the fact than trace it to its true source. Spooks prefer drama and romance to accuracy and truth. A dramatic example of spook etymology is dragging its chains around the Internet even as I write. " Life in the 1500s " purports to explain all sorts of words and phrases on the basis of life 500 years ago. Alas, almost all the etymologies in " Life in the 1500s " are spookily haunted. Some of the most bogus explanations pertain to death: " Lead cups were used to drink ale or whiskey, " proclaims the Internet message. " The combination would sometimes knock people out for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would them for dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. Hence the custom of holding a 'wake.' Folderol! " Wake " descends from the Middle English " wakien, " " to be awake, " and is cognate with the Latin " vigil. " " Wake " simply means, traditionally at least, that someone stays awake all night at the side of the casket on the night before the funeral. Now for the tour de farce of the spook etymologies that clank throughout this e-message: " England is old and small, and they started running out of places to bury people. So, they would dig up coffins and would take their bones to a house and re-use the grave. In reopening these coffins, one out of 25 coffins were found to have scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying people alive. So they thought they would tie a string on their wrist and lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it to a bell. " Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night to listen for the bell. Hence on the 'graveyard shift' they would know that someone was 'saved by the bell' or he was a 'dead ringer.' Complete balderdash!. In factories that work around the clock, employees report for work at 8 a.m. for the " regular " or " day " shift; at 4 p.m. for the " swing " or " night " shift; and at midnight for the " graveyard " shift, lasting until 8 a.m. According to Harold Wentworth and Stuart Berg Flexner's Dictionary of American Slang, the name " graveyard shift " refers to " the ghostlike hour of employment " -- and nothing more. Now the plot deepens, and our subject turns grave: " Dead ringers " actually originated at the race track. To take advantage of the long odds against an inferior horse's winning a race, unscrupulous gamblers would substitute a horse of superior ability and similar appearance. Nowadays, " dead ringer " means any close look-alike. Why " ringer " ? Probably because " ringer " was once a slang term for a counterfeiter who represented brass rings for gold ones at county fairs. And " dead " here means " absolute, exact, " as in " dead heat " and " you're dead right. " Should I even dignify the above explanation of " saved by the bell " with a logical explanation. Oh well, here 'tis, and it's just what you thought in the first place. " Saved by the bell " is nothing more than the obvious -- a reference to the bell signaling the end of a round of boxing. No matter what condition a fighter is in during a boxing contest, even if he is being counted out, he is saved by the bell and gains a reprieve once that bell rings. I do hope that we all gain a reprieve from these idiotic spook etymologies that clank around the Internet and haunt the proud house of our English language. > Re: > > > ... confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this one has > > been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people say it > > and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. > > For the surprising origins of " raining cats and dogs " and many other > common expressions, see > http://library.thinkquest.org/13681/data/tut/origin.htm > > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Thanks to you (and to Lederer) for explaining that the amusing " explanations " piece actually belongs to the misty and often-hard-to-unveil world of " spook etymology " : often called " folk etymology. " A pity ... Yours for better letters, Kate Gladstone Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest handwritingrepair@... http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair 325 South Manning Boulevard Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA telephone 518/482-6763 AND REMEMBER ... you can order books through my site! (Amazon.com link - I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Thanks for the link - I've added it to my favourites :-) > > Re: > > > ... confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this one has > > been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people say it > > and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. > > For the surprising origins of " raining cats and dogs " and many other > common expressions, see > http://library.thinkquest.org/13681/data/tut/origin.htm > > > > Yours for better letters, > Kate Gladstone > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > handwritingrepair@... > http://learn.to/handwrite, http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > 325 South Manning Boulevard > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > telephone 518/482-6763 > AND REMEMBER ... > you can order books through my site! > (Amazon.com link - > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Interesting - I hadn't had chance to look at previous link - glad you wrote the below post though. I don't always believe what I read, but it is hard to know now what is truth and not with so much info' available - thanks for this info' though :-) > > > > > Jewish World Review Feb. 20, 2003 / 18 Adar I, 5763 > Lederer > > another view... > > > > > > > Spook etymology on the Internet > > > > > > > http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Recently, all around the Internet > has been sparking an item called " Life in the 1500s. " The color and > romance of the word and phrase explanations in the message are as > beguiling as can be. But as soon as I opened the messages (sent to > me by more than 50 people because I'm on everybody's list), I knew > that most of the so-called historical revelations therein were false. > > > > > > > > Take (please!) this electronic explanation of a common meterological > phrase: " Houses had thatched roofs. Thick straw, piled high, with no > wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so > all the pets -- dogs, cats, mice, rats and bugs -- lived in the > roof. When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals > would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying, 'It's raining > cats and dogs.' " > > Dubious. The literal explanation is that during heavy rains in not > so Merry Olde England some city streets became raging rivers of > filth carrying many dead cats and dogs. But there is also strong > evidence that the phrase " it's raining cats and dogs " may not be > literal. > > In the dark Ages, people believed that animals, including cats and > dogs, had magical powers. Cats were associated with storms, > especially the black cats of witches, while dogs were frequently > associated with winds. The Norse storm god Odin was frequently shown > surrounded by dogs and wolves. So when a particularly violent storm > came along, people would say " It's raining cats and dogs, " with the > cats symbolizing the rain and the dogs representing the wind and > storm. This folkloric explanation is supported by such expressions > as " it's raining dogs and polecats " and " it's raining pitchforks. " > > The e-message continues, " The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had > something other than dirt, hence the saying 'dirt poor.' The wealthy > had slate floors which would get slippery in the winter when wet. So > they spread thresh on the floor to help keep their footing. As the > winter wore on they kept adding more thresh until when you opened > the door, you would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was > placed at the entry way, hence a 'thresh hold.' " > > Nonsense. " Threshold, " first recorded in the year 1000, descends > from an Old English compound " threscold, " " doorsill, point of > entry. " The " hold " has nothing to do with keeping one's footing. The > original meaning of " thresh " was " to tread, to trample. " Farmers > originally threshed wheat, separated the grain from the chaff, by > treading on piles of it. The treading seemed similar to wiping one's > feet at the doorway of a house, and that entrance took the > name " threshold " from such threshing, or treading. > > The e-drivel continues flowing: " Sometimes they could obtain pork > and would feel really special when that happened. When company came > over, they would bring out some bacon and hang it to show it off. It > was a sign of wealth and that a man 'could really bring home the > bacon.' They would cut off a little share with guests and would all > sit and 'chew the fat.' > > Ridiculous. Here the bacon refers to the greased pig that once > figured so prominently in American county fairs. The slippery swine > was awarded to whoever caught it, and the winner could take (bring) > it home. > > " Chew the fat " is unknown before the American Civil War. One theory > contends that sailors working their jaws on the tough salt pork > rationed out when supplies ran low constantly grumbled about their > poor fare while literally chewing the fat. What seems clear is that > chewing the fat, like shooting the breeze, provides little > sustenance for the amount of mastication involved. > > Which is just what happens with jerry-built, jury-rigged etymologies. > > The Greek " etymon " means " true, original, " and the Greek root " - > logia " means " science or study. " Thus, etymology is supposed to be > the science or study of true and original word meanings. > > But I have learned that the proud house of etymology is populated by > all manner of ghoulies and ghosties and long-leggety beasties > miscreated by spook etymologists. ( " Spook " reaches back to the > Dutch " spooc, " " ghost, specter. " ) These sham scholars would rather > invent a word origin after the fact than trace it to its true > source. Spooks prefer drama and romance to accuracy and truth. > > A dramatic example of spook etymology is dragging its chains around > the Internet even as I write. " Life in the 1500s " purports to > explain all sorts of words and phrases on the basis of life 500 > years ago. Alas, almost all the etymologies in " Life in the 1500s " > are spookily haunted. Some of the most bogus explanations pertain to > death: > > " Lead cups were used to drink ale or whiskey, " proclaims the > Internet message. " The combination would sometimes knock people out > for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would them for > dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen > table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and > eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. Hence the > custom of holding a 'wake.' > > Folderol! " Wake " descends from the Middle English " wakien, " " to be > awake, " and is cognate with the Latin " vigil. " " Wake " simply means, > traditionally at least, that someone stays awake all night at the > side of the casket on the night before the funeral. > > Now for the tour de farce of the spook etymologies that clank > throughout this e-message: " England is old and small, and they > started running out of places to bury people. So, they would dig up > coffins and would take their bones to a house and re-use the grave. > In reopening these coffins, one out of 25 coffins were found to have > scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying > people alive. So they thought they would tie a string on their wrist > and lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it > to a bell. > > " Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night to listen > for the bell. Hence on the 'graveyard shift' they would know that > someone was 'saved by the bell' or he was a 'dead ringer.' > > Complete balderdash!. In factories that work around the clock, > employees report for work at 8 a.m. for the " regular " or " day " > shift; at 4 p.m. for the " swing " or " night " shift; and at midnight > for the " graveyard " shift, lasting until 8 a.m. According to Harold > Wentworth and Stuart Berg Flexner's Dictionary of American Slang, > the name " graveyard shift " refers to " the ghostlike hour of > employment " -- and nothing more. > > Now the plot deepens, and our subject turns grave: " Dead ringers " > actually originated at the race track. To take advantage of the long > odds against an inferior horse's winning a race, unscrupulous > gamblers would substitute a horse of superior ability and similar > appearance. Nowadays, " dead ringer " means any close look-alike. > > Why " ringer " ? Probably because " ringer " was once a slang term for a > counterfeiter who represented brass rings for gold ones at county > fairs. And " dead " here means " absolute, exact, " as in " dead heat " > and " you're dead right. " > > Should I even dignify the above explanation of " saved by the bell " > with a logical explanation. Oh well, here 'tis, and it's just what > you thought in the first place. " Saved by the bell " is nothing more > than the obvious -- a reference to the bell signaling the end of a > round of boxing. No matter what condition a fighter is in during a > boxing contest, even if he is being counted out, he is saved by the > bell and gains a reprieve once that bell rings. I do hope that we > all gain a reprieve from these idiotic spook etymologies that clank > around the Internet and haunt the proud house of our English > language. > > > > Re: > > > > > ... confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this one > has > > > been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people say > it > > > and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. > > > > For the surprising origins of " raining cats and dogs " and many > other > > common expressions, see > > http://library.thinkquest.org/13681/data/tut/origin.htm > > > > > > > > Yours for better letters, > > Kate Gladstone > > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > > handwritingrepair@ > > http://learn.to/handwrite, > http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > > 325 South Manning Boulevard > > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > > telephone 518/482-6763 > > AND REMEMBER ... > > you can order books through my site! > > (Amazon.com link - > > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2006 Report Share Posted March 8, 2006 Your welcome... greebohere wrote: > Interesting - I hadn't had chance to look at previous link - glad you > wrote the below post though. I don't always believe what I read, but > it is hard to know now what is truth and not with so much info' > available - thanks for this info' though :-) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jewish World Review Feb. 20, 2003 / 18 Adar I, 5763 > > Lederer > > > > another view... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Spook etymology on the Internet > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.NewsAndOpinion.com | Recently, all around the Internet > > has been sparking an item called " Life in the 1500s. " The color and > > romance of the word and phrase explanations in the message are as > > beguiling as can be. But as soon as I opened the messages (sent to > > me by more than 50 people because I'm on everybody's list), I knew > > that most of the so-called historical revelations therein were > false. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Take (please!) this electronic explanation of a common > meterological > > phrase: " Houses had thatched roofs. Thick straw, piled high, with > no > > wood underneath. It was the only place for animals to get warm, so > > all the pets -- dogs, cats, mice, rats and bugs -- lived in the > > roof. When it rained it became slippery and sometimes the animals > > would slip and fall off the roof. Hence the saying, 'It's raining > > cats and dogs.' " > > > > Dubious. The literal explanation is that during heavy rains in not > > so Merry Olde England some city streets became raging rivers of > > filth carrying many dead cats and dogs. But there is also strong > > evidence that the phrase " it's raining cats and dogs " may not be > > literal. > > > > In the dark Ages, people believed that animals, including cats and > > dogs, had magical powers. Cats were associated with storms, > > especially the black cats of witches, while dogs were frequently > > associated with winds. The Norse storm god Odin was frequently > shown > > surrounded by dogs and wolves. So when a particularly violent storm > > came along, people would say " It's raining cats and dogs, " with the > > cats symbolizing the rain and the dogs representing the wind and > > storm. This folkloric explanation is supported by such expressions > > as " it's raining dogs and polecats " and " it's raining pitchforks. " > > > > The e-message continues, " The floor was dirt. Only the wealthy had > > something other than dirt, hence the saying 'dirt poor.' The > wealthy > > had slate floors which would get slippery in the winter when wet. > So > > they spread thresh on the floor to help keep their footing. As the > > winter wore on they kept adding more thresh until when you opened > > the door, you would all start slipping outside. A piece of wood was > > placed at the entry way, hence a 'thresh hold.' " > > > > Nonsense. " Threshold, " first recorded in the year 1000, descends > > from an Old English compound " threscold, " " doorsill, point of > > entry. " The " hold " has nothing to do with keeping one's footing. > The > > original meaning of " thresh " was " to tread, to trample. " Farmers > > originally threshed wheat, separated the grain from the chaff, by > > treading on piles of it. The treading seemed similar to wiping > one's > > feet at the doorway of a house, and that entrance took the > > name " threshold " from such threshing, or treading. > > > > The e-drivel continues flowing: " Sometimes they could obtain pork > > and would feel really special when that happened. When company came > > over, they would bring out some bacon and hang it to show it off. > It > > was a sign of wealth and that a man 'could really bring home the > > bacon.' They would cut off a little share with guests and would all > > sit and 'chew the fat.' > > > > Ridiculous. Here the bacon refers to the greased pig that once > > figured so prominently in American county fairs. The slippery swine > > was awarded to whoever caught it, and the winner could take (bring) > > it home. > > > > " Chew the fat " is unknown before the American Civil War. One theory > > contends that sailors working their jaws on the tough salt pork > > rationed out when supplies ran low constantly grumbled about their > > poor fare while literally chewing the fat. What seems clear is that > > chewing the fat, like shooting the breeze, provides little > > sustenance for the amount of mastication involved. > > > > Which is just what happens with jerry-built, jury-rigged > etymologies. > > > > The Greek " etymon " means " true, original, " and the Greek root " - > > logia " means " science or study. " Thus, etymology is supposed to be > > the science or study of true and original word meanings. > > > > But I have learned that the proud house of etymology is populated > by > > all manner of ghoulies and ghosties and long-leggety beasties > > miscreated by spook etymologists. ( " Spook " reaches back to the > > Dutch " spooc, " " ghost, specter. " ) These sham scholars would rather > > invent a word origin after the fact than trace it to its true > > source. Spooks prefer drama and romance to accuracy and truth. > > > > A dramatic example of spook etymology is dragging its chains around > > the Internet even as I write. " Life in the 1500s " purports to > > explain all sorts of words and phrases on the basis of life 500 > > years ago. Alas, almost all the etymologies in " Life in the 1500s " > > are spookily haunted. Some of the most bogus explanations pertain > to > > death: > > > > " Lead cups were used to drink ale or whiskey, " proclaims the > > Internet message. " The combination would sometimes knock people out > > for a couple of days. Someone walking along the road would them for > > dead and prepare them for burial. They were laid out on the kitchen > > table for a couple of days and the family would gather around and > > eat and drink and wait and see if they would wake up. Hence the > > custom of holding a 'wake.' > > > > Folderol! " Wake " descends from the Middle English " wakien, " " to be > > awake, " and is cognate with the Latin " vigil. " " Wake " simply means, > > traditionally at least, that someone stays awake all night at the > > side of the casket on the night before the funeral. > > > > Now for the tour de farce of the spook etymologies that clank > > throughout this e-message: " England is old and small, and they > > started running out of places to bury people. So, they would dig up > > coffins and would take their bones to a house and re-use the grave. > > In reopening these coffins, one out of 25 coffins were found to > have > > scratch marks on the inside and they realized they had been burying > > people alive. So they thought they would tie a string on their > wrist > > and lead it through the coffin and up through the ground and tie it > > to a bell. > > > > " Someone would have to sit out in the graveyard all night to listen > > for the bell. Hence on the 'graveyard shift' they would know that > > someone was 'saved by the bell' or he was a 'dead ringer.' > > > > Complete balderdash!. In factories that work around the clock, > > employees report for work at 8 a.m. for the " regular " or " day " > > shift; at 4 p.m. for the " swing " or " night " shift; and at midnight > > for the " graveyard " shift, lasting until 8 a.m. According to Harold > > Wentworth and Stuart Berg Flexner's Dictionary of American Slang, > > the name " graveyard shift " refers to " the ghostlike hour of > > employment " -- and nothing more. > > > > Now the plot deepens, and our subject turns grave: " Dead ringers " > > actually originated at the race track. To take advantage of the > long > > odds against an inferior horse's winning a race, unscrupulous > > gamblers would substitute a horse of superior ability and similar > > appearance. Nowadays, " dead ringer " means any close look-alike. > > > > Why " ringer " ? Probably because " ringer " was once a slang term for a > > counterfeiter who represented brass rings for gold ones at county > > fairs. And " dead " here means " absolute, exact, " as in " dead heat " > > and " you're dead right. " > > > > Should I even dignify the above explanation of " saved by the bell " > > with a logical explanation. Oh well, here 'tis, and it's just what > > you thought in the first place. " Saved by the bell " is nothing more > > than the obvious -- a reference to the bell signaling the end of a > > round of boxing. No matter what condition a fighter is in during a > > boxing contest, even if he is being counted out, he is saved by the > > bell and gains a reprieve once that bell rings. I do hope that we > > all gain a reprieve from these idiotic spook etymologies that clank > > around the Internet and haunt the proud house of our English > > language. > > > > > > > Re: > > > > > > > ... confusing sayings such as 'raining cats and dogs' - this > one > > has > > > > been used a fair bit, but I certainly do not know why people > say > > it > > > > and fail to see any connection between rain and cats and dogs. > > > > > > For the surprising origins of " raining cats and dogs " and many > > other > > > common expressions, see > > > http://library.thinkquest.org/13681/data/tut/origin.htm > > > > > > > > > > > > Yours for better letters, > > > Kate Gladstone > > > Handwriting Repair and the World Handwriting Contest > > > handwritingrepair@ > > > http://learn.to/handwrite, > > http://www.global2000.net/handwritingrepair > > > 325 South Manning Boulevard > > > Albany, New York 12208-1731 USA > > > telephone 518/482-6763 > > > AND REMEMBER ... > > > you can order books through my site! > > > (Amazon.com link - > > > I get a 5% - 15% commission on each book sold) > > > > > > > > > > > > FAM Secret Society is a community based on respect, friendship, > support and acceptance. Everyone is valued. > > Don't forget, there are links to other FAM sites on the Links page in > the folder marked " Other FAM Sites. " > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.