Guest guest Posted January 13, 2002 Report Share Posted January 13, 2002 I have the best suggestion for anyone who wonders about the taste or effectiveness of one EFA (fish oil) product over another for their child. Try it yourself. That's what we did with Tanner. Tanner was switched around so much because back then I didn't know there was any difference between stinky fish oil formulas. I didn't know from DHA and GLA that one was Omega 3 and one was Omega 6. All we did know is that Efalex was the only one that worked. Efalex was the first formula we used for Tanner -and we used it for quite a while. The first time you hear Tanner on the Talking Page http://www.debtsmart.com/talk was after 9 months of Efalex. 9 months! I talked many times to the owner of Nordic Naturals about that because I loved the DHA Jr. cute little strawberry flavored cod liver oil capsules. I loved that they tried to make something so nasty -fish oil -more child friendly. But most fish oils outside of Efalex didn't work. Tanner would not progress -or worse he would regress when switched or taken off the Efalex. I kept saying " there must be something in the Efalex that is not in the DHA Jr. or other fish oils I tried " It was about a year later I learned what the difference was - the mixture of Omega 3 and Omega 6 which is what Efalex was. The owner of NN who I had been talking to about this told me that ProEFA was their version of Efalex. My husband Glenn and I were afraid to again switch Tanner to another EFA product after all the other attempts. But are we ever glad we did! ProEFA works better for Tanner - no question, and at a much lesser dosage. We saw significant results on a much less dose than Efalex when we switched Tanner to ProEFA (and you will be able to hear him on TV tomorrow. I could just hear the Talk Show host thinking " why are we doing this show this child talks fine " and sure enough she asked a similar question to what I thought she was thinking. I told her it was after much hard work of years of therapy and EFA that brought him to where he was) Efalex -as it was stated here by another parent- is not stronger than ProEFA -however like EyeQ - because of research the companies are allowed to advise you to take more capsules a day -which in turn would make them stronger. (just check the doses yourself online or on shelf) Since research is not yet done on ProEFA they can only state one or two capsules a day. As far as which one works -and works better for most speech impaired children with apraxia? Anecdotally it's the ProEFA first and Efalex second. That does not mean that a few children will have no results on EFAs or that some will do better on other formula. Each child is an individual. Again -try them yourself. As far as taste? Ha ha that's a real easy one! I can't help but laugh while writing this. Please just try it yourself. They are both nasty as far as I'm concerned -but hands down winner of most disgusting fish oil between Efalex and ProEFA is the Efalex. After I tried Efalex -it took me three days to get that nasty taste out of my mouth and believe me I tried eating everything after I tried it to cover up the taste. It took me awhile to try the ProEFA because of that. ProEFA does not have that strong fish smell or taste. Tanner hid from Efalex and likes the ProEFA - I still can't believe that either. Here is an archived post on how to give nasty fish oil to your child if they don't like it. From: " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.