Guest guest Posted July 26, 2002 Report Share Posted July 26, 2002 I am stepping in with a response to your question for Marc. Dr. Goldberg treats he does not treat autism. His medical records are extremely thorough and complete with data that proves improvement (which does indeed vary proving the need for better agents) but again dealing with not autism. Autism is a Psychiatric diagnosis and as Dr. Goldberg's does not have a psychiatric practice that kind of documentation is not present. I read over 150 records and found enough descriptive comments from Dr. G and quotes from parents to see that all of the charts that I read without exception showed improvement in autistic symptoms but that is not publishable material. I considered pulling a random sample then contacting parents to see if they could provide me with pretreatment and current standardized testing results and what I found was a random sample of charts represents a lot of states and many countries. Estimating the amount of work that I would have to do without any guarantees that I would find enough kids with pre and post testing that would be standardized quickly put that out of my mind, however it is still a possibility and we are looking into doing that. What we are doing in our clinic here is collecting all pretreatment testing which in NYS is standardized. All of the kids in NYS are tested yearly so by next spring I will have test results to compare with my baselines and plan on having a paper out by next summer. As a Health Care Provider whose background is in Public Health I have done thirty years of research and would never have planned a program without it but as a parent I have a very different view. I started looking for a physician to treat my daughter's immune system when she was 5. It took me 5 years to find Dr. Goldberg. I know how different her life would have been had we found him earlier. Having seen children who are better, having seen children who are so normal that I had to ask their parents to describe them to me before treatment, having seen my own child start speaking in sentences two years ago and now lose speech therapy because her speech is normal I feel morally that I have no other choice but to spread the word. We have a choice. We can thoroughly study this protocol, publish in a few years, we can hope that others will replicate and publish and meet the needs of the medical scientific community OR we can spread the word, activate parents, get the money that we need for new drugs and meet the needs of the children that are alive now not decades from now. By letting the word out now we are giving parents a choice they would not otherwise have. My cousin died two years ago this month. Eight months after her death a new cancer drug came out that has absolutely phenomenal success in treating the kind of cancer that killed her. Despite exhaustive searching we were never able to find out anything about the trials for that drug. The drug is out now. My cousin Barbara is still dead Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 27, 2002 Report Share Posted July 27, 2002 Kathy: Excellent note re: the need for speed, although some informal data would help the marketing process...I will check the cost of the NY Times. Also very happy to hear your daughter is starting to flourish again!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2002 Report Share Posted July 28, 2002 Thanks! Kathy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.