Cancer cure

[Guest guest]

>If you want to move beyond the limitations of medical degrees and the

>academic community from which they come, and the adversary point of view

>from which it fosters its conclusions, email me. My name is J

>Bentley.

Speaking for everyone, at the risk of being presumptuous, this is the forum

to speak on such matters.

We are all waiting to hear what you have to say next. Good start so far.

Please continue.

Be well,

[Guest guest]

I agree with you, but not all humans will ever as a whole follow the same

path, agenda, or philosophy regardless how it may benefit them. That is

why we have a diverse society. What I dislike is the fact that people are

taken advantage of, daily. I would like to see both the alternative and

conventional methods work in harmony. I probably won't see it in my life

time.

God bless you sir.

Norvil

Bentley wrote:

Curing Disease....the simple truth

Dorlands Illustrated Medical Dictionary defines "cure" as:

1. The course of treatment of any disease, or of a special case.

2. The successful treatment of a disease or wound.

3. A system of treating diseases.

4. A medicine effective in treating a disease.

Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary defines "cure" as:

1. Restoration of health.

2. A method or course of medical treatment for restoring health.

3. A restorative agent, as a drug: REMEDY

4. Something that relieves or corrects a harmful or disturbing

situation.

Notice the differences between the medical dictionary and the

non-medical dictionary in the definitions and their orientation.

The Dorland’s medical dictionary orientation is about "treating" the

disease. Dorland's also defines a treatment as: "The management

and

care of a patient for the purpose of combating disease or disorder."

The non-medical dictionary orientation is about a method or process

of

restoration or correction.

While Dorland's dictionary does not define the word "combating",

Webster's dictionary defines it as:

1. To fight against in battle.

2. To oppose vigorously: RESIST < drugs that combat infection

> -vi. To

engage in fighting: STRUGGLE. -n. Fighting, esp. armed

conflict:

BATTLE.

A conclusion can be made that modern medicine is about "fighting,

combat, armed conflict, battle and struggle". All of these

events

usually produce casualties and almost anyone that has experienced our

medical system can in someway relate to these definitions. Using

this

strategy, can we honestly relate to our problem being cured or our

wellness being restored, or has the problem simply been suppressed?

As in the all too common headache, we typically take aspirin or some

other pain medication, but it does not get rid of the cause of the

headache. It suppresses the most obvious symptom, pain.

There can be

numerous causes of a headache from a misaligned spine or neck, an

allergenic response to a substance, cranial pressure, a tumor,

inflammation, or even sinus congestion, to name a few. To infer

that

pain medication fixes all of these plus the other numerous possibilities

is missing the opportunity to take responsibility for our healing and

authentically make a difference. Unfortunately, all to frequently

and

without much thought, we use the easy and most convenient strategy,

even

if it is ultimately harmful. We rarely consider the harm (side

effect)

until it also starts to produce its own obvious symptom.

What is a cure and how does it occur?

No thing cures! Not surgery, not radiation, not a drug, not a

vitamin,

not a mineral, not a salve, not an herb, not a thing. While the

statement may sound ridiculous at first, it is nevertheless true.

We

are taught to believe that "taking something" can cure a problem in

the

body as if the "something" knows what to do and how to do it.

When we

look at the most obvious elements that participate in the curing

process, we can only find one thing that "knows" what is going on and

that is the body itself. The body uses many resources.

Most of them

come from what we ingest. Each individual cell in the body makes

the

distinction as to what it is going to use and how to use it.

It decides

what to allow into itself, what to use and what to avoid. If

it didn't,

there would be no such thing as immunity. This is the basis of

all

immunological function to the point of the cell being overwhelmed by

a

substance or event that exceeds its resistance to being changed.

This

phenomenon is called Gene Amplification and it is the determinant factor

in the cell’s resistance to being stressed by anything harmful to the

cell’s function. The cell will initially resist any attempted

change or

alteration to the point of being overwhelmed. The information

regarding

the surviving cell’s resistance is passed on in the genes of a new

cell

following cellular division. The new generation of cell is more

resistant to the stress because of the information passed on to it,

and

this is how cells basically become stronger and more resistant to

challenges to their well being. We call it immunity. Collectively,

the

cells work as a team (holistically) creating what we interpret as an

"immune system". You can see that something external to the cell’s

function can not cure anything because the so-called cure can only

be

induced by the cell and not by the tool the cell uses. The cell

is

alive, it breathes, eats, excretes waste material and replicates

itself. The universe it does this in, along with all its friends

and

relatives, is called the body.

The body developed from a single cell about the size of this dot "."

and

to presume that it doesn't know what it is doing at any given moment

is

to deny the body's very act of creation itself. The body always

knows

what it is doing and it has always known how to do it even from the

time

it was as small as that dot. That the body makes mistakes is

a myth.

If the body were prone to mistakes, its evolution would have ceased

long

ago. We (that which is not the body) may not understand what

the body

is attempting to do and all to frequently, we misinterpret what it

is

attempting to do or communicate. But given the raw materials

it needs

to heal and to minimize, or more desirably, eliminate what interfered

with its health in the first place, it heals itself according to its

own

priorities and methodology. After all, the body is recreating,

replacing, healing, repairing and maintaining its own status to various

degrees and from moment to moment anyway. The weakest link in

its

ability to maintain its health is us. Or put in a more philosophical

way, the personality or being which occupies the body.

A clue to this

is that we cannot even talk about the body except as a possession of

ours. If, in fact we possess it, then "who" is the "we" that is doing

the possessing? It begs the question, who is it that is responsible

for

supporting and helping maintain the body that we use? Something

to

think about!

The body relies entirely on our ability to gather the raw materials

and

resources it ultimately needs to function qualitatively. To the

extent

that is denied or ignored, the body suffers. The quality of the

raw

material makes a difference. The body is made out of what we eat and

drink (ingest), and the old engineering phrase "quality in, quality

out," applies in the most literal sense. How safe would we feel

if the

next time we flew on a jet plane we found out that the nuts and bolts

used to put it together were purchased at our local hardware store

instead of being custom made to the exceptionally high standards for

the

specific purpose for which they are used. The same reasonable

expectation of quality should apply to what we eat and drink, but when

you look around and see what most of us are using for raw materials

in

the ongoing rebuilding of our own body it explains the advanced

degeneration of health and rapid proliferation of disease in most

industrial societies today.

When it comes to health, as well as human behavior, can we deny the

influence the quality of raw materials being used in the ongoing

recreation and maintenance of the body has? Are we being

respectful of

what nature has so exquisitely presented and made available to us?

What happens when we introduce deficient and processed food, nonfoods

and other unnatural substances in quantity into the body and for long

periods of time? How does it interfere with the body's

ability to

follow it's own rules of health? How does it effect our own thinking

processes? How does it influence our behavior and our emotions?

What

effect does it have on reproduction? What genetic effect does

it have

in our children? Are we being as responsible as we could

be? Can we

do better than we have been? Do we want to do better? Do

we have what

it takes to do better? Are we too lazy? Do we want someone else

to do

it for us?

"Let the government do it" is a good answer, except history has shown

that putting our well being in the hands of others hasn't worked very

well.

When we look around to see who is ultimately responsible for the job,

there is no one else but us--the individual that occupies the body.

If

we own and drive a car, there are certain inherent responsibilities

in

maintaining the car to a qualitative standard in order to provide

ourselves with a sense of security when driving it. We also want to

provide that sense of security to any passengers. If we want

the sense

of security, we have to take the time and spend the money to produce

the

result we want. As there are always choices available to us, we can

also

pretend that we are secure and ignore the needs of the car. If

we don't

pay any attention to the brakes, we may eventually pay a price for

our

neglect. If we don't maintain fluid levels such as engine coolant and

oil, the engine may be damaged by overheating or ultimately be destroyed

by seizing completely. If we don't keep it fueled, it will eventually

stop. Abuse and neglect can shorten the life of a car, sometimes

substantially. With the body, as well as the car, we are free to cheat

and think we're getting away with it. But eventually somewhere

down the

road there is a higher price to pay.

And it is usually our children who eventually get the bill.

Foot Note: It is an experiential fact that almost every kind of cancer

in existence today is being reversed most often in less than 90 days

by

numerous natural and safe methods. I and numerous people that I know

are

and have been involved in participating in it for many years. It is

a

virtual certainty that an industry that makes more than 100 billion

dollars per year treating Cancer cannot afford for it to disappear.

Whether you choose to believe what has been written here is true or

not

is up to you. I wish not to seem arrogant or flippant, but I know from

experience and not from concept what I am talking about.

If you want to move beyond the limitations of medical degrees and the

academic community from which they come, and the adversary point of

view

from which it fosters its conclusions, email me. My name is J

Bentley.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net

for cancer info or to unsubscribe

------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you took Podimin™, Redux®, or the combination "Fen-Phen,"

visit the OFFICIAL site. Request the Court authorized notice package

explaining your rights under the class settlement.

1/833/5/_/378/_/950519074/

-- Talk to your group with your own voice!

-- VoiceChatPage?listName=cures for cancer & m=1

[Guest guest]

Hello

What a wonderful article, am looking forward to seeing more of your

posts.

Debbie

j bentley <j-@...> wrote:

original article:cures for cancer/?start=5801

> Curing Disease....the simple truth

>

> Dorlands Illustrated Medical Dictionary defines " cure " as:

>

> 1. The course of treatment of any disease, or of a special case.

> 2. The successful treatment of a disease or wound.

> 3. A system of treating diseases.

> 4. A medicine effective in treating a disease.

>

> Webster's II New Riverside University Dictionary defines " cure " as:

>

> 1. Restoration of health.

> 2. A method or course of medical treatment for restoring health.

> 3. A restorative agent, as a drug: REMEDY

> 4. Something that relieves or corrects a harmful or disturbing

> situation.

>

> Notice the differences between the medical dictionary and the

> non-medical dictionary in the definitions and their orientation.

>

> The Dorland's medical dictionary orientation is about " treating " the

> disease. Dorland's also defines a treatment as: " The management and

> care of a patient for the purpose of combating disease or disorder. "

>

> The non-medical dictionary orientation is about a method or process of

> restoration or correction.

>

> While Dorland's dictionary does not define the word " combating " ,

> Webster's dictionary defines it as:

>

> 1. To fight against in battle.

> 2. To oppose vigorously: RESIST < drugs that combat infection > -vi.

To

> engage in fighting: STRUGGLE. -n. Fighting, esp. armed conflict:

> BATTLE.

>

> A conclusion can be made that modern medicine is about " fighting,

> combat, armed conflict, battle and struggle " . All of these events

> usually produce casualties and almost anyone that has experienced our

> medical system can in someway relate to these definitions. Using this

> strategy, can we honestly relate to our problem being cured or our

> wellness being restored, or has the problem simply been suppressed?

>

> As in the all too common headache, we typically take aspirin or some

> other pain medication, but it does not get rid of the cause of the

> headache. It suppresses the most obvious symptom, pain. There can be

> numerous causes of a headache from a misaligned spine or neck, an

> allergenic response to a substance, cranial pressure, a tumor,

> inflammation, or even sinus congestion, to name a few. To infer that

> pain medication fixes all of these plus the other numerous

possibilities

> is missing the opportunity to take responsibility for our healing and

> authentically make a difference. Unfortunately, all to frequently and

> without much thought, we use the easy and most convenient strategy,

even

> if it is ultimately harmful. We rarely consider the harm (side

effect)

> until it also starts to produce its own obvious symptom.

>

> What is a cure and how does it occur?

>

> No thing cures! Not surgery, not radiation, not a drug, not a

vitamin,

> not a mineral, not a salve, not an herb, not a thing. While the

> statement may sound ridiculous at first, it is nevertheless true. We

> are taught to believe that " taking something " can cure a problem in

the

> body as if the " something " knows what to do and how to do it. When we

> look at the most obvious elements that participate in the curing

> process, we can only find one thing that " knows " what is going on and

> that is the body itself. The body uses many resources. Most of them

> come from what we ingest. Each individual cell in the body makes the

> distinction as to what it is going to use and how to use it. It

decides

> what to allow into itself, what to use and what to avoid. If it

didn't,

> there would be no such thing as immunity. This is the basis of all

> immunological function to the point of the cell being overwhelmed by a

> substance or event that exceeds its resistance to being changed. This

> phenomenon is called Gene Amplification and it is the determinant

factor

> in the cell's resistance to being stressed by anything harmful to the

> cell's function. The cell will initially resist any attempted change

or

> alteration to the point of being overwhelmed. The information

regarding

> the surviving cell's resistance is passed on in the genes of a new

cell

> following cellular division. The new generation of cell is more

> resistant to the stress because of the information passed on to it,

and

> this is how cells basically become stronger and more resistant to

> challenges to their well being. We call it immunity. Collectively,

the

> cells work as a team (holistically) creating what we interpret as an

> " immune system " . You can see that something external to the cell's

> function can not cure anything because the so-called cure can only be

> induced by the cell and not by the tool the cell uses. The cell is

> alive, it breathes, eats, excretes waste material and replicates

> itself. The universe it does this in, along with all its friends and

> relatives, is called the body.

>

> The body developed from a single cell about the size of this dot " . "

and

> to presume that it doesn't know what it is doing at any given moment

is

> to deny the body's very act of creation itself. The body always knows

> what it is doing and it has always known how to do it even from the

time

> it was as small as that dot. That the body makes mistakes is a myth.

> If the body were prone to mistakes, its evolution would have ceased

long

> ago. We (that which is not the body) may not understand what the body

> is attempting to do and all to frequently, we misinterpret what it is

> attempting to do or communicate. But given the raw materials it

needs

> to heal and to minimize, or more desirably, eliminate what interfered

> with its health in the first place, it heals itself according to its

own

> priorities and methodology. After all, the body is recreating,

> replacing, healing, repairing and maintaining its own status to

various

> degrees and from moment to moment anyway. The weakest link in its

> ability to maintain its health is us. Or put in a more philosophical

> way, the personality or being which occupies the body. A clue to

this

> is that we cannot even talk about the body except as a possession of

> ours. If, in fact we possess it, then " who " is the " we " that is doing

> the possessing? It begs the question, who is it that is responsible

for

> supporting and helping maintain the body that we use? Something to

> think about!

>

> The body relies entirely on our ability to gather the raw materials

and

> resources it ultimately needs to function qualitatively. To the

extent

> that is denied or ignored, the body suffers. The quality of the raw

> material makes a difference. The body is made out of what we eat and

> drink (ingest), and the old engineering phrase " quality in, quality

> out, " applies in the most literal sense. How safe would we feel if

the

> next time we flew on a jet plane we found out that the nuts and bolts

> used to put it together were purchased at our local hardware store

> instead of being custom made to the exceptionally high standards for

the

> specific purpose for which they are used. The same reasonable

> expectation of quality should apply to what we eat and drink, but when

> you look around and see what most of us are using for raw materials in

> the ongoing rebuilding of our own body it explains the advanced

> degeneration of health and rapid proliferation of disease in most

> industrial societies today.

>

> When it comes to health, as well as human behavior, can we deny the

> influence the quality of raw materials being used in the ongoing

> recreation and maintenance of the body has? Are we being respectful

of

> what nature has so exquisitely presented and made available to us?

> What happens when we introduce deficient and processed food, nonfoods

> and other unnatural substances in quantity into the body and for long

> periods of time? How does it interfere with the body's ability to

> follow it's own rules of health? How does it effect our own thinking

> processes? How does it influence our behavior and our emotions? What

> effect does it have on reproduction? What genetic effect does it have

> in our children? Are we being as responsible as we could be? Can we

> do better than we have been? Do we want to do better? Do we have

what

> it takes to do better? Are we too lazy? Do we want someone else to do

> it for us?

>

> " Let the government do it " is a good answer, except history has shown

> that putting our well being in the hands of others hasn't worked very

> well.

>

> When we look around to see who is ultimately responsible for the job,

> there is no one else but us--the individual that occupies the body.

If

> we own and drive a car, there are certain inherent responsibilities in

> maintaining the car to a qualitative standard in order to provide

> ourselves with a sense of security when driving it. We also want to

> provide that sense of security to any passengers. If we want the

sense

> of security, we have to take the time and spend the money to produce

the

> result we want. As there are always choices available to us, we can

also

> pretend that we are secure and ignore the needs of the car. If we

don't

> pay any attention to the brakes, we may eventually pay a price for our

> neglect. If we don't maintain fluid levels such as engine coolant and

> oil, the engine may be damaged by overheating or ultimately be

destroyed

> by seizing completely. If we don't keep it fueled, it will eventually

> stop. Abuse and neglect can shorten the life of a car, sometimes

> substantially. With the body, as well as the car, we are free to cheat

> and think we're getting away with it. But eventually somewhere down

the

> road there is a higher price to pay.

>

> And it is usually our children who eventually get the bill.

>

>

> Foot Note: It is an experiential fact that almost every kind of cancer

> in existence today is being reversed most often in less than 90 days

by

> numerous natural and safe methods. I and numerous people that I know

are

> and have been involved in participating in it for many years. It is a

> virtual certainty that an industry that makes more than 100 billion

> dollars per year treating Cancer cannot afford for it to disappear.

>

> Whether you choose to believe what has been written here is true or

not

> is up to you. I wish not to seem arrogant or flippant, but I know from

> experience and not from concept what I am talking about.

>

> If you want to move beyond the limitations of medical degrees and the

> academic community from which they come, and the adversary point of

view

> from which it fosters its conclusions, email me. My name is J

> Bentley.

>

>

[Guest guest]

I also am VERY INTERESTED to in what you have to say Mr. Bently. Please

don't keep us in suspense too long.

It's very possible I'm missing the obvious because I'm new to the

computer world, but I didn't see your email address in this message. Could

someone please help me out with this.

GOD BLESS & HAVE A HEALTHY DAY!! Eddie

[Guest guest]

>I also am VERY INTERESTED to in what you have to say Mr. Bently. Please

>don't keep us in suspense too long.

> It's very possible I'm missing the obvious because I'm new to the

>computer world, but I didn't see your email address in this message. Could

>someone please help me out with this.

>GOD BLESS & HAVE A HEALTHY DAY!! Eddie

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>eGroups eLerts!

>Itís easy. Itís fun. Best of all, itís free.

>1/1231/5/_/378/_/950594864/

>

>eGroups.com Home: cures for cancer/

> - Simplifying group communications

Greetings Eddie,

Stay tuned. I will be putting up information on an independent web site

this month.

Warm regards

J Bentley

[Guest guest]

Thank you Mr. Bently or Mike which ever you prefer,

I'm looking forward to visiting your web site. There is another web

site that I believe is going to be very educational opening after the first

week in March. I'll visit it and let you know about it.

GOD BLESS & HAVE A HEALTHY DAY Eddie

[Guest guest]

>Thank you Mr. Bently or Mike which ever you prefer,

> I'm looking forward to visiting your web site. There is another web

>site that I believe is going to be very educational opening after the first

>week in March. I'll visit it and let you know about it.

>GOD BLESS & HAVE A HEALTHY DAY Eddie

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Visit http://cures for cancer.evangelist.net for cancer info or to unsubscribe

>

>------------------------------------------------------------------------

>Earn extra money at calypso.com by creating your own web store. For a

>limited time, join calypso.com and receive a FREE calypso whistle.

>Also learn how you can win up to $25! Click to

>1/1591/5/_/378/_/950673415/

>

>-- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!

>-- cal?listname=cures for cancer & m=1

Thank you Eddie,

J Bentley

[Guest guest]

Hello J. Bentley.

I have been diagnosed at having prostate cancer. And have been advised there

are two courses of " cures. "

Each these so called " cures " doe not set well with me after I explored these

" cures " in the library and then on the net.

In turn, decided to learn something about the body and finally got to the

cellular level.

Glad I did. For now I understand that the problem is on the cellular level

and only the cells and the material the cells have to work with will in fact

bring on a cure of whatever disease has taken hold of the cells of the body.

Also unfortunately for the cells of the body there are materials that can

damaged or kill cells without their permission to gain entrance to the inner

workings of the cell.

Poisons, radiation and some chemicals can't be recognized by our T cells and

manage to mutate or damage our cells.

Curare and snake venomous are good examples of proteins that can get into the

body and cause great damage yet there isn't a thing that the immune system

can do...

So, it appears to me that our immune system needs to be educated as to how to

identify and attack some of these substances which can shut down the

operation of the cells and therefore the entire body.

So, I am exploring all avenues in the herbal field (organic substances) to

find an herbal compound that is acceptable to the immune system yet can be

used by the cancer cell thus making changes to the cancer cell which either

cures its disease (mutation) or makes it identifiable as a foreign substance

allowing the immune system to remove this diseased cell from the body.

So, I enjoyed your essay on " Cures " and now I understand much better not only

the words from the two sources of knowledge, but also just how our body's

construction plays the most important role in defending our body's from all

it's enemies.

Sincerely,

W. Huebner

[Guest guest]

>Hello J. Bentley.

>

>I have been diagnosed at having prostate cancer. And have been advised there

>are two courses of " cures. "

>

>Each these so called " cures " doe not set well with me after I explored these

> " cures " in the library and then on the net.

>

>In turn, decided to learn something about the body and finally got to the

>cellular level.

>Glad I did. For now I understand that the problem is on the cellular level

>and only the cells and the material the cells have to work with will in fact

>bring on a cure of whatever disease has taken hold of the cells of the body.

>

>Also unfortunately for the cells of the body there are materials that can

>damaged or kill cells without their permission to gain entrance to the inner

>workings of the cell.

>

>Poisons, radiation and some chemicals can't be recognized by our T cells and

>manage to mutate or damage our cells.

>

>Curare and snake venomous are good examples of proteins that can get into the

>body and cause great damage yet there isn't a thing that the immune system

>can do...

>

>So, it appears to me that our immune system needs to be educated as to how to

>identify and attack some of these substances which can shut down the

>operation of the cells and therefore the entire body.

>

>So, I am exploring all avenues in the herbal field (organic substances) to

>find an herbal compound that is acceptable to the immune system yet can be

>used by the cancer cell thus making changes to the cancer cell which either

>cures its disease (mutation) or makes it identifiable as a foreign substance

>allowing the immune system to remove this diseased cell from the body.

>

>So, I enjoyed your essay on " Cures " and now I understand much better not only

>the words from the two sources of knowledge, but also just how our body's

>construction plays the most important role in defending our body's from all

>it's enemies.

>

>Sincerely,

> W. Huebner

>

Dear ,

Thank you for your email and I'm sorry to hear about your challange. As you

already concluded, cures are not introduced from outside the body and do

not exist as such. Only the body can cure if it has the right tools.

Everything that enter's the body by what ever method is known by the body

because the body interprets the resonance frequency or vibration of the

molecules. Cells refine this interpretation to produce a more appropriate

response. The cells can resond to just about anything short of being

overwhelmed. In case of curare and other snake venoms the cells can cope

and actually create custom enzymes that can take apart the proteins in the

venom, if there is not too much venum. If the amount is small enough the

cells will mediate their response and create an immune strategy against the

venom proteins. If there is too much, which is usually the case, they will

be overwhelmed, which also is the case when we take in too much of anything

in nature.

The immune system is nothing but an individual cells resistance to being

changed. A little bit of change such as stress from something will cause

the cell to resist to the point of being overwhelmed. It the cell is not

overwhelmed, it will become stronger because of its resistance and pass on

the new found strength to daughter cells upon division. This is called Gene

Amplification. The daughter cells inherit the strength. This is how

anything in the body gets stronger. This is how muscles grow.

The problem is, do the cells have the appropriate tools to use? The tools

they would use or the raw material they would use to make the tools come

entirely out of what is ingested. Quality in...quality out. Bad or

deficient food in...bad or no tools to use.

On to your challange. With prostate cancer at least two areas need

attention. One is to flood the body with a naturally dense food complex

rich in anticarcinogenic " tools " and to address the probability of a

hormone deficiency. In this case we look at the hormone progesterone which

is usually deficient when cancer is present in the reproductive system in

the body.

Suggestion: Call my office between the hours of 9am and 5pm California time

and ask for me. If I am unavailable, leave you name and phone number so I

can call you back. I will suggest that you take between 9 and 15

tablespoons of stabilized soluble rice bran with water or juice per day and

also to use a premium progesterone cream made by Kokoro for women. I will

need to ask you some questions about your diet and your history to acertain

what should be eliminated from you diet. In the mean time don't take any

thing containing " acetametophen " which is the active ingredient in Tylenol

and about 100 other products. Acetametophen uses up Glutathione, the body's

main antioxidant and detoxifier. Deficiencies in it are associated with

more than 200 different diseases including all forms of cancer and the body

won't typically use it in supplemental form. It has to be made in the

liver. Also stay away from aspartame, as found in NutriSweet and Equal and

also some canned fruit and ice cream. Read the labels. It is about 10%

methyl alcohol, a poison that cannot be anecdoted or made non-poisonous and

it is extmemely harmful.

Also stay away from all products that contain white sugar and white flour,

hydrogenated fat, margarine, shortening and any vegetable oil that has been

exposed to light with the exception of extra virgin olive oil or grapeseed

oil (from Italy) that is in a dark bottle or a can. Also eliminate any form

of " Deli " meat such as bacon, salami, pastrami, sausage, etc. This helps

reduce the immune respose to ingestion of extremely processed and

chemicalized meat and takes a lot of stress off of the pancreas. The body

has an immune response to any food heated above 118 degrees. How about

that? It does not have the same response to the same food eaten raw

(uncooked).

I will supply you with the stabilized soluble rice bran but will ask that

you pay for the Kokoro progesterone cream and the shipping. We use the

womens cream because it has a little more than three times more

progesterone in it than the mens cream and will work faster.

It has been shown that progesterone added to dividing cancer cells will

stop cancer cell division almost immediately. The scientist that has proven

this cannot get his evidence published in the mainstream because of the

politicized medical peer review system. Kind of a prevailing flat earth

mentality in the medical system. Progesterone deficiencies are particularly

evident in women who have been on the " pill " or estrogen replacement

therapy.

The rice bran is the most dense complex food source known to exist and the

body produces profound effects and responses when supplied with theraputic

amounts of it. With more than 80 antioxidants and several types of

anticarcinogenic properties, it supply's lots of raw material for making

" tools " . We have been monitoring some amazing results using the rice bran.

Please know that I am not a doctor and do not have the limitations imposed

by a medical education. I do not give medical advice. My orientation is

healing, restoration and nutrition. I do have some experience with what

works. Call me at your earliest convenience. We have some things to take

about.

Warm regards

J Bentley

[Guest guest]

pleae take me off the mailing list !!!!!

[Guest guest]

Dear Bob Hurt,

I just read the " cancer therapies " you gave to

for his father. Our daughter Heidi Lee has cancer of

the colon, and is trying to lick it by natural means.

She refused surgery, chemo, and radiation. (We'd

read that MGN3 is able to dissolve tumurs, and

she daily takes this product.) She refused surgery,

because they told her she'd need a permanent

colostomy, and from all we've read, we're convinced,

that after one has had chemo & radiation, one's

IMMUNE SYSTEM never again will be normal.

She eats no meat, eggs or fish, and she's done the

complete Paragon colon cleanse. But my husband,

Wayne, and I are so afraid she's not getting enough

protein, because she's lost 20 pounds since she was

diagnosed on July 21, 2000. She looks good! Doesn't

look emaciated, is 5'6 " (I believe,) but we want to

help her not to lose any more weight. This is why I'm

writing to you. Would you please take the time to tell

me how she DAILY is able to eat enough protein?

She now began with Rice Protein, (and we thought

she'd found the answer to eating enough protein) but

now she feels it's making her constipated.

I'd sent her some Laboratories Brewer's Yeast,

but now I see on your web site that cancer patients

aren't supposed to eat Brewer's Yeast.

She has a lot of trouble with her bowels, and becomes

very fearful and uncomfortable, when she isn't able to

have a daily bowel movement. (She lives in San Diego,

CA -- and Wayne and I live up here, in Milwaukee, WI.)

I so wish we'd live closer to each other. I'm trying to

help her from here as much as I possibly can. She's

taking the cottage cheese & flaxseed oil, and the

Essiac Tea, plus MGN3. I so want her to take

POLY-MVA, but she feels she's already doing more

than she can do by herself. (I was surprised that you

didn't mention POLY-MVA on your web site at all.

Or did I miss it?) I thought this product actually is

supposed to cure cancer when the full 10 doses are

taken -- (which cost $3000.00). What is your opinion

on this product?

Heidi Lee has one child, 10-year-old (our

precious grandson). He's an extremely precocious

little fellow, and always UP! Always thinking and

talking POSITIVELY! He's a complete blessing to

Heidi Lee (and also to us).

We are a family of Wisconsin Synod Lutherans (Wayne

and I both are teachers by profession, and graduates

of Dr. Luther College, New Ulm, MN). So,

besides everything we're doing, to help Heidi Lee

with vitamins and cancer therapies, we also daily

put our trust in our Lord, for guidance, strength,

and HELP in the healing of our precious daughter.

Heidi Lee & I talk a great deal by phone, and we

also pray together when we talk.

Thanks for letting me share this with you. I'm so hoping

you'll be able to give the information to me, as to how

Heidi Lee is able to get enough DAILY PROTEIN into

herself.

Thanks, Bob.

With warm regards,

Esther

[Guest guest]

esther-my name is jerry ..here are some things that mite help

1.pleasant valley ministry-spiritually rooted diseases..1-706-646-2074

2.forbiddenmedicine.com

3.pancreatic enzymes 600mg 18003233842/by healthexcel.com

4.blacksalve or can-x...find in search engine google..excellent stuff

Re: Cancer Cure

Dear Bob Hurt,

I just read the " cancer therapies " you gave to

for his father. Our daughter Heidi Lee has cancer of

the colon, and is trying to lick it by natural means.

She refused surgery, chemo, and radiation. (We'd

read that MGN3 is able to dissolve tumurs, and

she daily takes this product.) She refused surgery,

because they told her she'd need a permanent

colostomy, and from all we've read, we're convinced,

that after one has had chemo & radiation, one's

IMMUNE SYSTEM never again will be normal.

She eats no meat, eggs or fish, and she's done the

complete Paragon colon cleanse. But my husband,

Wayne, and I are so afraid she's not getting enough

protein, because she's lost 20 pounds since she was

diagnosed on July 21, 2000. She looks good! Doesn't

look emaciated, is 5'6 " (I believe,) but we want to

help her not to lose any more weight. This is why I'm

writing to you. Would you please take the time to tell

me how she DAILY is able to eat enough protein?

She now began with Rice Protein, (and we thought

she'd found the answer to eating enough protein) but

now she feels it's making her constipated.

I'd sent her some Laboratories Brewer's Yeast,

but now I see on your web site that cancer patients

aren't supposed to eat Brewer's Yeast.

She has a lot of trouble with her bowels, and becomes

very fearful and uncomfortable, when she isn't able to

have a daily bowel movement. (She lives in San Diego,

CA -- and Wayne and I live up here, in Milwaukee, WI.)

I so wish we'd live closer to each other. I'm trying to

help her from here as much as I possibly can. She's

taking the cottage cheese & flaxseed oil, and the

Essiac Tea, plus MGN3. I so want her to take

POLY-MVA, but she feels she's already doing more

than she can do by herself. (I was surprised that you

didn't mention POLY-MVA on your web site at all.

Or did I miss it?) I thought this product actually is

supposed to cure cancer when the full 10 doses are

taken -- (which cost $3000.00). What is your opinion

on this product?

Heidi Lee has one child, 10-year-old (our

precious grandson). He's an extremely precocious

little fellow, and always UP! Always thinking and

talking POSITIVELY! He's a complete blessing to

Heidi Lee (and also to us).

We are a family of Wisconsin Synod Lutherans (Wayne

and I both are teachers by profession, and graduates

of Dr. Luther College, New Ulm, MN). So,

besides everything we're doing, to help Heidi Lee

with vitamins and cancer therapies, we also daily

put our trust in our Lord, for guidance, strength,

and HELP in the healing of our precious daughter.

Heidi Lee & I talk a great deal by phone, and we

also pray together when we talk.

Thanks for letting me share this with you. I'm so hoping

you'll be able to give the information to me, as to how

Heidi Lee is able to get enough DAILY PROTEIN into

herself.

Thanks, Bob.

With warm regards,

Esther

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 5/25/04 1:49:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,

nstone2000@... writes:

> Where can I find more information about using anthrax to cure cancer ?

>

>

Anthrax? Am I in the twilight zone?

[Guest guest]

Interesting concept, it is for real? You decide.

" That's why cancer is so widespread in our modern society -- because most

people suffer from oxygen deprivation. What most people don't know is that lack

of oxygen is not only the underlying cause of cancer but is also the cause of

most diseases -- from AIDS to yeast infections. In order for oxygen to

eradicate disease, it must be delivered not just to the lungs -- and not just to

the bloodstream -- but to the cells and tissues of the body. That's why other

oxygen-based therapies -- such as oxygenated water, oxygen-rich foods or

supplements, or treatments that release oxygen into the bloodstream -- are not

always effective in treating disease. While they may supply the body with

oxygen, they don't always have an efficient mechanism for breaking the oxygen

free from the hemoglobin molecule, which means the oxygen is not delivered to

the cells and tissues. Such oxygen-based therapies, therefore, are seldom

effective in preventing and curing disease. "

http://theoneminutecure.com/

http://www.thecures for cancervideo.com/

[Guest guest]

I found that interesting.

 

Immunotec (Immunocal people) are recently working on clinical trials on lung

cancer and Immnuocal and about to do the 3rd and final dbl blind test.

The results have been excellent I am told but they also said.

If they find very high efidence it can cure this one type of cancer they can not

use the word cure only that it CAN get rid of.

 

I found that interesting

 

dennis