Guest guest Posted September 21, 2010 Report Share Posted September 21, 2010 <http://email.theheart.org/cgi-bin1/DM/z/hC6OD0YAFah0b4b0LLLe0Ef> Warfarin, move over: Dabigatran gets unanimous thumbs-up from FDA advisory panel Warfarin, move over: Dabigatran gets unanimous thumbs-up from FDA advisory panel September 20, 2010 | <http://www.theheart.org/viewAuthorBio.do?primaryKey=114351> Steve Stiles Silver Spring, MD - One of cardiology's fondest wishes moved closer to fulfillment as an FDA advisory panel unanimously recommended approval of a potential replacement for warfarin <http://www.theheart.org/viewDocument.do?document=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.theheart. org%2Fcollection%2FNew-warfarin-competitors.do> in one of the most common heart disorders. Barring any unforeseen damning revelations about the drug, the FDA's approval of the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) is all but certain. The panel, with its nine voting members, made the decision based on what's generally seen as the well-designed, solidly executed 18 000-patient Randomized <http://www.theheart.org/article/995769.do> Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy (RE-LY) trial, which showed dabigatran was noninferior to warfarin at a lower dosage and superior at a higher one for preventing thromboembolic stroke in paroxysmal or permanent AF. Debate among the advisory panel throughout the day was tame; there were few criticisms of the RE-LY trial's design, little disappointment in the results, and clear enthusiasm for replacing warfarin in such a widespread indication. The panel wasn't charged with voting on a question that provided some of the only suspense throughout the day, whether the approval should include only the higher dose, which demonstrated superiority in RE-LY, or perhaps both dosage levels. They voted informally nonetheless, with those expressing a preference for both dosages, generally wanting to give clinicians more flexibility, edging out those favoring only the higher dose. Some of the latter panelists felt the lower dose would become the default for clinicians concerned about safety but at the expense of efficacy. Warfarin is distinguished in being one of the oldest, one of the most widely used, one of the most effective, and one of the most disliked drugs in cardiology: it dramatically cuts ischemic stroke risk in AF but generally requires tight anticoagulation monitoring to get the dosage right, which can be arduous for patients and the healthcare system. Patients must also banish a lot of healthy, vitamin-K-containing foods from their diet. The kicker with dabigatran, even when " noninferior " to warfarin, is that it doesn't require anticoagulation monitoring-or major diet changes, for that matter. And, as the trial suggested and some panelists agreed, at the higher dose it seems more stroke-preventive than warfarin. As previously reported by heartwire, RE-LY compared the two dabigatran dosage levels against a conventional warfarin regimen for the stroke-prevention indication. Dabigatran was noninferior to warfarin at the lower dosage and superior at the higher one, the latter achieving a 34% decline in risk (p<0.001) over a median of two years. Zavie (age 72) 67 Shoreham Avenue Ottawa, Canada, K2G 3X3 dxd AUG/99 INF OCT/99 to FEB/00, CHF No meds FEB/00 to JAN/01 Gleevec since MAR/27/01 (400 mg) CCR SEP/01. #102 in Zero Club 2.8 log reduction Sep/05 3.0 log reduction Jan/06 2.9 log reduction Feb/07 3.6 log reduction Apr/08 3.6 log reduction Sep/08 3.7 log reduction Jan/09 3.8 log reduction May/09 3.8 log reduction Aug/09 4.0 log reduction Dec/09 4.4 log reduction Apr/10 e-mail: zmiller@... Tel: 613-726-1117 Fax: 613-482-4801 Cell: 613-282-0204 ID: zaviem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.