Guest guest Posted September 25, 2010 Report Share Posted September 25, 2010 Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " I take great offence to this statement. Zavie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Hi everyone I haven't posted in a loooonnng time but am always reading the post and this one got to me. How dare anyone say mothers that don't breastfeed are poor excuses for mothers. Who gives you the right to judge someone. I personally feel if you are on gleevec or any type of strong medication you shouldn't be breastfeeding. We still don't know the effects of the gleevec I had didn't breastfeed but I consider myself a damned good mother Some woman can't or just don't want to breastfeed this doesn't make them bad mothers Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 Just adding to this discussion. I have been a good mother for 37 years, and I was not even on Gleevec or anything else. I chose not to breastfeed, and it did not do any damage to my daughter in any way. She grew up to be a beautiful healthy young lady. > > Hi everyone > > I haven't posted in a loooonnng time but am always reading the post and this one got to me. How dare anyone say mothers that don't breastfeed are poor excuses for mothers. Who gives you the right to judge someone. I personally feel if you are on gleevec or any type of strong medication you shouldn't be breastfeeding. We still don't know the effects of the gleevec > > I had didn't breastfeed but I consider myself a damned good mother > > Some woman can't or just don't want to breastfeed this doesn't make them bad mothers > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F > [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 ________________________________ From: d'Araille <darajek@...> Sent: Fri, September 24, 2010 6:00:51 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 I completley stand by my opinion on breastfeeding. There is no excuse not to breastfeed an infant. Unfortunately there isn't enough support for young mothers as breastfeeding has to be learned by us (it comes natural to many species but not humans) and older women are there to help but not those who themselves were bottle feeding. My own mother claimed the bottle was best and easiest and she told me she didn't have enough milk. Very common misconception (very convenient for the companies which produce infants formulas). Milk comes in as it's needed in quantity required for the baby who suckles. Mom just needs to stick with it. Breastfeeding did not come easy to me, not without a lot of pain at the beginning, each time I had my baby. Moms who did not breastfeed don't even know what they missed. I can't explain it in any words, it's just so absolutely amazing and powerful a woman can only experience that kind of feeling when she breastfed her babies Nobody can take that from me. I have nothing to say to mums who didn't breastfeed their infants, especially those who could but chose not to. What else can we do but give the BEST start in life to a completely innocent baby? Cows milk has to be modified to be suitable for our babies, our milk is perfect as it is, not need to do anything. I could go on an on about it but what's the point? We all make choices, I made mine, other mums made theirs and that's it. I don't claim that bottle feeding damages the children, if it did, we wouldn't have it on the market. In my opinion infant formulas should only be available at doctors prescription if the mother is medically unfit to feed her baby and breastfeeding should be an obligation by law. You want to have a baby, they come with a lot of responsibilities and the first basic right the baby has is to their mother's milk. Why should a woman who wanted to have a baby refuse to feed him or her? I truly cannot understand this kind of choice. p.s. > " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " > > I take great offence to this statement. > > Zavie WHY? From: A Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 5:28 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Just adding to this discussion. I have been a good mother for 37 years, and I was not even on Gleevec or anything else. I chose not to breastfeed, and it did not do any damage to my daughter in any way. She grew up to be a beautiful healthy young lady. > > Hi everyone > > I haven't posted in a loooonnng time but am always reading the post and this one got to me. How dare anyone say mothers that don't breastfeed are poor excuses for mothers. Who gives you the right to judge someone. I personally feel if you are on gleevec or any type of strong medication you shouldn't be breastfeeding. We still don't know the effects of the gleevec > > I had didn't breastfeed but I consider myself a damned good mother > > Some woman can't or just don't want to breastfeed this doesn't make them bad mothers > Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry > > Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F > [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 WHY? From: Zavie Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 1:27 PM Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " I take great offence to this statement. Zavie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 who r u to make such a strong untrue selfish illiterate statement? That is totally out of line! Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 > > who r u to make such a strong untrue selfish illiterate statement? That is totally out of line! > Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T _____________________________ Remember that this is the same list-mate who recently wrote her opinion that we create our own diseases (cancers) and that those who are not successful with treatment have a wish to die prematurely! someone honestly said that. Just because you believe something, that does not mean that it is true! it is just something that You believe. C. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 2, 2010 Report Share Posted October 2, 2010 You have and are putting your baby in danger breastfeeding and being on gleevec. So one can say and probably would be justified to say then you are an unfit mother oh sorry a poor excuse for a mother. Some mothers just can't breastfeed that doesn't make them poor excuses for mothers you can stand by what you say but it was still and ignorant and hurtful thing to say. I agree it is a great experience to be able to breast feed but again if you don't it doesn't make you a poor excuse for a mother. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F > [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Because you don't know our situation. My wife is a wonderful mother. We have two girls ( ages 37 and 40). Our first daughter was breast fed. Our second daughter didn't leave hospital for many days. She was born severely jaundiced because of an ABO blood factor problem and had to remain in hospital. My wife pumped her breast milk but it wasn't enough to nourish her. The doctors at the hospital made the decision to feed her cow's milk formula to save her life. We took the doctor's advice to continue with the formula. This is a CML support group list, not a list for a La Leche League zealot. You owe us all an apology for your outlandish statement. Zavie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: October-02-10 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec WHY? From: Zavie Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 1:27 PM <mailto:%40> Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " I take great offence to this statement. Zavie From: <mailto:%40> [mailto: <mailto:%40> ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM <mailto:%40> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Couldn't have said it any better zavie!!!!!! Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Agreed. I'm a man, without children and I too am offended. Thanks [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Yes I agree with Zavie!an apology is in order. Even if a mom chooses not to nurse and she can! It is no ones business what she does! U have no business stating your feelings that way! Keep it to yourself! U have no idea if your children will or will not be affected from the gleevec! It may not show up till later in life. I think our doctors know more then we do at this point. Sharon Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Sorry , I agree with Zavie. I bottle fed both my babies, but only because they both refused to take from me and were very distressed. Every mother has their own opinion, either for medical reasons or personal, and they should NOT be judged! Your comment is totally out of line and very offensive! Why does that make me a poor excuse for a mother, might I ask?????????!!!!!!!!!!!! I think there are many women out there who would say the same thing! Jackie _____ From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of Zavie Sent: Sunday, 3 October 2010 11:04 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Because you don't know our situation. My wife is a wonderful mother. We have two girls ( ages 37 and 40). Our first daughter was breast fed. Our second daughter didn't leave hospital for many days. She was born severely jaundiced because of an ABO blood factor problem and had to remain in hospital. My wife pumped her breast milk but it wasn't enough to nourish her. The doctors at the hospital made the decision to feed her cow's milk formula to save her life. We took the doctor's advice to continue with the formula. This is a CML support group list, not a list for a La Leche League zealot. You owe us all an apology for your outlandish statement. Zavie From: <mailto:%40> [mailto: <mailto:%40> ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: October-02-10 4:58 PM <mailto:%40> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec WHY? From: Zavie Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 1:27 PM <mailto:%40> <mailto:%40> Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " I take great offence to this statement. Zavie From: <mailto:%40> <mailto:%40> [mailto: <mailto:%40> <mailto:%40> ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM <mailto:%40> <mailto:%40> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 , You had made another statement before this one: " For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying " . it was something along the lines of people causing their disease and choosing to die.... do you practice trying to piss people off or does it come naturally??? A Mother that breastfeeds her baby while taking oral chemotherapy drugs in my opinion is a nutter? As Zavie said this is a CML support group site lets keep it relevant eh???? Regards Donna 1:27 PM > > Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > > > > > " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " > > I take great offence to this statement. > > Zavie > > From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of > d'Araille > Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM > > Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed > off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up > until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the > bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would > in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything > else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became > enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more > bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The > amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount > contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it > simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. > Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper > conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could > get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! > Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have > trust in, told me the following: > a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she > supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after > 41 weeks of pregnancy) > b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my > heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) > c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go > on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really > worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or > after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) > d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied > (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! > e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was > told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess > what! green tea sorted it! > f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T > SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were > suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is > today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to > be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT > NIGHTMARE! > g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take > glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become > resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' > fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR > (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet > another useless consultation oct 21st) > Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a > half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart > as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as > early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly > communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious > side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side > effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping > enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double > buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not > noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. > > For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't > breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for > bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth > mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm > certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I > stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that > nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, > people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so > they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. > > I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak > but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! > > > > From: Lottie Duthu > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM > CML > Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Very well said by you and Zavie. People really need to think before they speak, because they never know what anothers situation is or why they choose to do what they do. From: onthewtr@... <onthewtr@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Date: Saturday, October 2, 2010, 8:22 PM  Yes I agree with Zavie!an apology is in order. Even if a mom chooses not to nurse and she can! It is no ones business what she does! U have no business stating your feelings that way! Keep it to yourself! U have no idea if your children will or will not be affected from the gleevec! It may not show up till later in life. I think our doctors know more then we do at this point. Sharon Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 I too was diagnosed at only 10 weeks with my twin girls. I had wonderful docs who just said we will wait and see how you do. My girls were born early at 32 weeks and I pumped for a month before they came home. I actually started gleevec the night before they did go home. I was happy to have pumped that long but truth be told I was also happy to stop. It wasn't worth passing the drug to them even if its only 10 percent. Long story short failed both gleevec and sprycel and ended up in 2007 with a stem cell transplant and I'm doing great now. But to each their own on nursing or formula my girls are healthy and smart and are tall for their age. People always think they are 6 or 7 and they just turned 5.let's just support each other on here! Hope your fine with your decision years from now.oh and I know I'm an awesome mom! Gillian Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! ----- Reply message ----- From: " d'Araille " <darajek@...> Date: Sat, Oct 2, 2010 4:56 pm Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec < > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Hi Gillian, I'm sure you are a terrific mum to your girls and you tried with breastfeeding as long as you could having cml. I was fortunate enough to manage 5 months without glivec (and against doctor's advice who by the way new nothing about breastfeeding) up until Matilda started eating solids and went on bottle feeds during the day. I took it day by day and week by week after she was born hoping to be able to carry on as long as possible and by July it was obvious I reached my limits. Since 3rd of July when I started glivec she only gets a feed or two at night and by now I'm almost dried up. She doesn't get much of my milk and it's more for comfort than nutrition at this stage. I wish I could carry on for longer, just like with my other 2 daughters and my son, each one of them breastfed for 2 years plus. When I expressed my strong opinion about mums who don't breastfeed their infants I had those in mind who make this choice without any valid reason not to breastfeed. Unfortunately it's fashionable to bottle feed babies and it's against babies needs and birth right to his/hers mother's milk. I can't even express how strongly I feel about it. Unless there is a good damn reason not to breastfeed a newborn baby up until at least 6 months I cannot get my head around any other option. Why should a mother who's healthy and able to breastfeed without any problems for as long as she can or wants to or her baby needs to choose not to breastfeed? Nothing will convince me this is a good decision. Soon it's going to be a year since diagnosis and it's been the hell of a year for me. In that time we moved house, I had my baby on my own at home despite cml, we got a puppy dog who's 4 moths now and I discovered a new hobby of breeding pedigree guinea pigs. Cml is the last on my list to think about or even take notice of. From: gilfish_15@... Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 10:24 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I too was diagnosed at only 10 weeks with my twin girls. I had wonderful docs who just said we will wait and see how you do. My girls were born early at 32 weeks and I pumped for a month before they came home. I actually started gleevec the night before they did go home. I was happy to have pumped that long but truth be told I was also happy to stop. It wasn't worth passing the drug to them even if its only 10 percent. Long story short failed both gleevec and sprycel and ended up in 2007 with a stem cell transplant and I'm doing great now. But to each their own on nursing or formula my girls are healthy and smart and are tall for their age. People always think they are 6 or 7 and they just turned 5.let's just support each other on here! Hope your fine with your decision years from now.oh and I know I'm an awesome mom! Gillian Sent from my HTC on the Now Network from Sprint! ----- Reply message ----- From: " d'Araille " <darajek@...> Date: Sat, Oct 2, 2010 4:56 pm Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec < > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 No apology will be forthcoming and I stand by my opinions. It's obvious by now I don't fit in here. I simply don't let cml and cml experts run or ruin my life. If I'm fanatic about breastfeeding which is the most natural connection mother can have with her baby what does it make you Zavie? From: Armour Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 3:10 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Very well said by you and Zavie. People really need to think before they speak, because they never know what anothers situation is or why they choose to do what they do. From: onthewtr@... <onthewtr@...> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Date: Saturday, October 2, 2010, 8:22 PM Yes I agree with Zavie!an apology is in order. Even if a mom chooses not to nurse and she can! It is no ones business what she does! U have no business stating your feelings that way! Keep it to yourself! U have no idea if your children will or will not be affected from the gleevec! It may not show up till later in life. I think our doctors know more then we do at this point. Sharon Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Hi Donna, The subject of breastfeeding is relevant to those concerned, young women in their 20-ies and 30-ies who are either diagnosed in pregnancy or are planning on having a baby despite cml and being on glivec, a minority group among cml-ers as most diagnosed are men in their 60-ies so this matter is not for anyone under 40 and rather not for men. Glivec is not a chemotherapy drug and I'm not the first mother to make this decision. You'd have to read all my posts really carefully to raise any valid opinion about me. So far you and others chose few statements that only forms a part of what I stated which makes no sense. I don't hide my opinions and if they piss people off or shake them up so be it. Part of life is confrontation. If you prefer to be stack up in your attitudes, your choice, that doesn't make me shut up if I've got something to say. From: donnaberry99 Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 3:04 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec , You had made another statement before this one: " For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying " . it was something along the lines of people causing their disease and choosing to die.... do you practice trying to piss people off or does it come naturally??? A Mother that breastfeeds her baby while taking oral chemotherapy drugs in my opinion is a nutter? As Zavie said this is a CML support group site lets keep it relevant eh???? Regards Donna 1:27 PM > > Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > > > > > " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " > > I take great offence to this statement. > > Zavie > > From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of > d'Araille > Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM > > Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed > off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up > until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the > bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would > in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything > else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became > enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more > bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The > amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount > contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it > simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. > Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper > conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could > get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! > Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have > trust in, told me the following: > a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she > supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after > 41 weeks of pregnancy) > b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my > heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) > c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go > on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really > worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or > after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) > d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied > (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! > e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was > told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess > what! green tea sorted it! > f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T > SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were > suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is > today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to > be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT > NIGHTMARE! > g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take > glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become > resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' > fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR > (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet > another useless consultation oct 21st) > Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a > half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart > as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as > early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly > communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious > side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side > effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping > enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double > buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not > noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. > > For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't > breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for > bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth > mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm > certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I > stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that > nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, > people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so > they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. > > I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak > but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! > > > > From: Lottie Duthu > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM > CML > Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Hi Sharon, Doctors know some things but not everything. Hematologist knows nothing about babies, obstetrician knows nothing about leukemia, general practitioner only goes by opinions of other doctors... Try to piece it together. My baby was born at home at 41 weeks instead of being delivered by c-section at 30 weeks despite me having cml and no medical treatment up until she was almost 5 moths old. What does it say about doctors? Not much to me. Thanks to me being strong and not falling for doctor's opinions Matilda was born at her time and is healthy baby now. You may not be aware of that but children also get cml and they would be treated with glivec as well. I've done my research, only 10% of glivec gets through in the milk and only a fraction of it is actually absorbed so the danger is minimal. I know the benefits of breastfeeding and that outweighed my concerns. Why should I keep it all to myself? There are women with cml who are struggling with the most important decisions in their lives about having a baby or not and further decision about breastfeeding or not is more than relevant to them. It's not a small matter. From: onthewtr@... Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 1:22 AM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Yes I agree with Zavie!an apology is in order. Even if a mom chooses not to nurse and she can! It is no ones business what she does! U have no business stating your feelings that way! Keep it to yourself! U have no idea if your children will or will not be affected from the gleevec! It may not show up till later in life. I think our doctors know more then we do at this point. Sharon Sent via BlackBerry by AT & T [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Zavie, you don't know my situation either. In all honesty I didn't know this about myself, how committed I was to breastfeeding and how far I was determined to go. It looks like I come across as a fanatic but the truth is I can't stand hearing numerous excuses of healthy mothers who decide not to breastfeed. Those for me are poor excuses for mothers, they shouldn't have babies in first place. This discussion is far beyond this group and probably I should join La Leche League group instead of tiring people of my parents age about things they may have experienced 30 something years ago. This past year since diagnosis 13th Oct '09 has been a rollercoaster ride for me and since joining this group I only got bitten, first about green tea which helped my baby being born when she supposed to be, now about breastfeeding issue. It's certainly not a place for me. From: Zavie Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2010 1:04 AM Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Because you don't know our situation. My wife is a wonderful mother. We have two girls ( ages 37 and 40). Our first daughter was breast fed. Our second daughter didn't leave hospital for many days. She was born severely jaundiced because of an ABO blood factor problem and had to remain in hospital. My wife pumped her breast milk but it wasn't enough to nourish her. The doctors at the hospital made the decision to feed her cow's milk formula to save her life. We took the doctor's advice to continue with the formula. This is a CML support group list, not a list for a La Leche League zealot. You owe us all an apology for your outlandish statement. Zavie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: October-02-10 4:58 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec WHY? From: Zavie Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 1:27 PM <mailto:%40> Subject: RE: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec " Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. " I take great offence to this statement. Zavie From: <mailto:%40> [mailto: <mailto:%40> ] On Behalf Of d'Araille Sent: September-24-10 7:01 PM <mailto:%40> Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec Thank you Lottie. As you can imagine it wasn't an easy decision. I stayed off glivec as long as I could when Miatilda was exclusively on the breast up until she was almost 5 months. That gave me some time to get her used to the bottle, artificial milk and start her on solids (much earlier than I would in a normal situation) From the day I got on glivec (only because anything else I tried failed to keep my WBC down consistently and my spleen became enlarged again causing a lot of pain) Matilda started receiving a lot more bottle feeds and solids but I can't entirely stop breastfeeding her. The amount of glivec that gets through in breast milk is about 10% of the amount contained in blood. It's my personal decision, doctors don't recommend it simply because they can't say anything different what the novartis says. Everybody covers themselves. I find it very difficult to have a proper conversation with any doctor. They simply will not say anything that could get them embroidered in court case. It's crazy! Just to remind everybody, the health professional,s we supposed to have trust in, told me the following: a.. Baby out by cesarean around 30 weeks of gestation (she was born when she supposed to be and where she supposed to be, at home (without midwife) after 41 weeks of pregnancy) b.. Baby will be underweight and may need to be resuscitated (she was my heaviest baby weighing 3.7 kg!) c.. when leukapheresis fails to keep the WBC count down, you will have to go on interferon, later on I was told by the same doctor that it never really worked and caused a lot of pain! (I never took any drugs for CML during or after birth up until Matilda was almost 5 months) d.. if interferon is not working then hydroxyurea will have to be applied (later I was told that can cause secondary cancer!) I've never been on it! e.. when I was diagnosed at 22 weeks pregnant, me spleen was enlarged, I was told it will not get back to normal until stronger drugs are used, guess what! green tea sorted it! f.. I was told drinking green tea in pregnancy may damage my baby! I DON'T SEE ANY DAMAGE IN HER and I'm convinced what health professionals were suggesting would definitely damage her health, she might not be what she is today, a perfectly healthy 7 month old baby, not a baby that would have to be in ICU for weeks after being cut out of me THAT I CALL A BIG FAT NIGHTMARE! g.. every time I went for consultation, before I decided to finally take glivec, I was told if I don't go on glivec immediately I will become resistant to it and die, so far my response to it was 'unexpectedly' fabulous, my blood count is normal and I'm waiting to see what's my PCR (just had it sent off yesterday, will know the result when I go for yet another useless consultation oct 21st) Matilda is perfectly normal baby. She was sitting up by herself at 5 and a half months, by now she's 7 months and she's already crawling. She's smart as anything (what can I say, I'm her mother!) and I expect her to speak as early as my first daughter who was very early talker and could clearly communicate with full sentences by the age of 2. I, myself see no serious side effects from glivec, it's not even mild, It's... like non existent side effects. I do wonder if an odd headache is from glivec or not sleeping enough (I've got 4 kids) or muscle pain from actually pushing the double buggy with basket full of shopping or again effect from glivec. I've not noticed any change in Matilda since I went on glivec. For me breastfeeding is the meaning of motherhood. Women who don't breastfeed their babies are poor excuses for mothers. There is no excuse for bottle feeding infants unless absolutely necessary like when the birth mother is actually dead or dying. I'm neither. I'm not dead and I'm certainly not dying. I would cause more emotional damage to my daughter if I stopped breastfeeding altogether than any potential damage from glivec that nobody can explain. The thing is, they (novartis, health professionals, people in general) don't know because there isn't enough evidence for so they safely go against. Just so nobody sues. I'm on glivec only because anything else nature offered was simply too weak but as soon as I'm PCRU I'm dumping it and trying for my baby number 5! From: Lottie Duthu Sent: Friday, September 24, 2010 5:26 AM CML Subject: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their webpage: Who should NOT take GLEEVEC Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used during pregnancy. " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse reactions in nursing infants. " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking GLEEVEC. " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these issues before taking GLEEVEC " http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v --_________________ I further give you warnings from the following information published in the Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that department. She would not have been given permission to write this article without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I respect her authority on the subject of CML. You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that may affect the fetus and patient. " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST MILK. " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years without evidence of disease progression. " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2010 Report Share Posted October 3, 2010 Pennyhon? I've done my research and I'm not putting Matilda in any danger whatsoever. That took months of reading medical journals, numerous discussions with my husband before I decided to continue with breastfeeding on glivec. She got 5 months of exclusive breastfeeding before I started taking glivec, now she only gets night feeds. Your opinion is weak and based on emotional distress my statements caused. You don't seem to have anything to say in your own words, you don't even sign your e-mail so I can't take you seriously. From: pennyhon2003@... Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 11:24 PM Subject: Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec You have and are putting your baby in danger breastfeeding and being on gleevec. So one can say and probably would be justified to say then you are an unfit mother oh sorry a poor excuse for a mother. Some mothers just can't breastfeed that doesn't make them poor excuses for mothers you can stand by what you say but it was still and ignorant and hurtful thing to say. I agree it is a great experience to be able to breast feed but again if you don't it doesn't make you a poor excuse for a mother. Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry Re: [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I agree Zavie. while I don't post much about CML anymore I am concerned with the absurd theory that if you don't breastfeed you are a bad mother. My own daughter who just recently gave birth did not make milk for health reasons and she is a wonderful Mom. Which is worse, no breast or a Mom who can't admit she isn't making enough milk to sustain her child? I believe I was on the evaporated milk and karo diet and survived because of a great mom. Everyday at school I help care for children who were breastfed and now have autism, learning disabilities etc. Moms who have this bad attitude certainly will not foster caring children as they grow. Sorry if I hurt anyone but I feel many young mothers who have to make the decision not to breastfeed are being given a very bad rap! Lynn F > [ ] Breast feeding while on Gleevec > > I am gravely concerned about a member who posted recently that she was > breast feeding her baby while on Gleevec. I want her to know that I am not > judging her, but merely reiterating what has been passed down to us > repeately. In speaking directly to her, I hope you have permission, dear > member from your doctor or you could be playing Russian roulette with your > baby's health. This is the warning that comes with Gleevec. Women who want > to become pregnant should not do so while taking Gleevec or any other TKI. > If you need further proof, I urge you to please contact the Novartis Hotline > or the instructions that comes in your package. This comes from their > webpage: > > Who should NOT take GLEEVEC > Women who are or could be pregnant. Fetal harm can occur when administered > to pregnant women; therefore, women should not become pregnant, as well as > be advised of the potential risk to the unborn child if GLEEVEC is used > during pregnancy. > > " Women who are breast-feeding because of the potential for serious adverse > reactions in nursing infants. > > " Sexually active females should use adequate birth control while taking > GLEEVEC. > > " Be sure to talk to your doctor and/or healthcare professional about these > issues before taking GLEEVEC " > > http://tinyurl.com/29fl97v > --_________________ > > I further give you warnings from the following information published in the > Internet Journal of Oncology. This article was written by Ault MS, > RN, FNP-BC, ANP-BC Family Nurse Practitioner, Adult Nurse Practitioner > School of Nursing The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston > and I quote from her article (noted in 2010 Volume 7 Number 2). > > I have known Pat Ault for a long time, also most of the doctors in that > department. She would not have been given permission to write this article > without the blessings of the doctors at MDACC that she works under and I > respect her authority on the subject of CML. > > You will note that everything I copied is in " quotations " . Some quotes I > have excerpted are posted here, but the entire article can be seen at the > recited website listed below the quotes, however, it is very lengthy: > > " Management of CML during pregnancy poses challenges to both hematologists > and obstetricians. Currently, consensus is lacking in management of CML in > pregnancy; therefore, clinical observations have become important. Most of > these observations are derived from small case series or case reports. > > " Therefore, leukapheresis may be an intermittent short-term alternative > option for pregnant patients, and prevents fetal exposure to TERATOGENIC > drugs. However, leukapheresis is cumbersome, costly, and a time consuming > procedure, with risk of infection, thrombosis and hypotensive events that > may affect the fetus and patient. > " ........... high concentrations of imatinib are DETECTED IN BREAST MILK. > " Investigation of the placentas included standard pathologic analysis, > computer assisted morphometry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) > analysis. This patient was treated with a targeted tyrosine inhibitor during > first trimester of a first pregnancy and during the third trimester of a > second pregnancy. The umbilical cord blood and breast milk findings were: 1) > low imatinib and metabolite concentration levels found in the umbilical > blood suggest limited placental transfer in late pregnancy, and 2) HIGH > CONCENTRATION LEVELS OF IMATINIB AND METABOLITES WERE FOUND IN THE BREAST > MILK. > > " Rousselot et al (2007) reported imatinib may be discontinued in patients > who achieved a complete molecular remission for a period of at least 2 years > without evidence of disease progression. > > " Gambacorti-Passerini et al (2009) reported the IMATINIB CONCENTRATION IN > BREAST MILK REACHES A STEADY-STATE LEVEL AT 0.8 ug/ml. The milk intake in > infants is known to average 728 to 777 ml/d, (range of 450 to 1165 ml/d); > considering this milk intake and the infants are unlikely to receive more > than 3 mg/d imatinib daily. This amount is far from therapeutic range, > therefore, concluding that mothers with CML could safely breast-feed the > infant. However, the effects of low-dose chronic exposure of infants to > imatinib are not known, and have not undergone long-term investigation; > THEREFORE, BREAST FEEDING SHOULD NOT BE RECOMMENDED AFTER RESUMING THERAPY. > > ttp://tinyurl.com/2g82tpc > > FYI, > > Lottie Duthu > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.