Guest guest Posted June 20, 2000 Report Share Posted June 20, 2000 Blue Cross Valuecare of Utah let me do the antibiotic IV three times, and then they refused to approve it after that. The last one I did was in July of 1997. They are still trying to decide if they want to process the bill and pay the Home Health for it. Good luck... Larene Re: rheumatic insurance > Just wanted to throw this in if it might help. I have Blue Cross/ Blue > Shield and they have paid all of my iv home treatment costs . They pay all > dr.'s visits (except for 20.00 co-pay) and all but the co-pay for my minocin > scrip(10.00). I'll be happy to fax you the paid bills so you can show your > insurance co. if you need them. T. > > aewinchell@... wrote: > > > I have Kaiser, an HMO, as insurance and on their home page when I > > looked up minocycline under uses for it RA was listed. So if you > > have Kaiser this could help you, and even if you have an other HMO > > you can refer to this. I didn't look up other antibiotics yet. > > Kaiser is very big in USA, it is in most states. > > I hope this helps somebody, > > Agmes > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Find long lost high school friends: > > 1/5535/0/_/532797/_/961525478/ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > To unsubscribe, email: rheumatic-unsubscribeegroups > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Looking for Airfare deals? > Visit Expedia.com for limited time offers > 1/5205/0/_/532797/_/961548166/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe, email: rheumatic-unsubscribeegroups > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 20, 2000 Report Share Posted June 20, 2000 Just wanted to throw this in if it might help. I have Blue Cross/ Blue Shield and they have paid all of my iv home treatment costs . They pay all dr.'s visits (except for 20.00 co-pay) and all but the co-pay for my minocin scrip(10.00). I'll be happy to fax you the paid bills so you can show your insurance co. if you need them. T. aewinchell@... wrote: > I have Kaiser, an HMO, as insurance and on their home page when I > looked up minocycline under uses for it RA was listed. So if you > have Kaiser this could help you, and even if you have an other HMO > you can refer to this. I didn't look up other antibiotics yet. > Kaiser is very big in USA, it is in most states. > I hope this helps somebody, > Agmes > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Find long lost high school friends: > 1/5535/0/_/532797/_/961525478/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe, email: rheumatic-unsubscribeegroups Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2002 Report Share Posted October 9, 2002 HI, From the home page click on files and then click on help folder then click on insurance help. Also check out these web pages: http://www.cranialtech.com/ParentsArea/library.html http://www.plagiocephaly.org http://www.cappskids.org/PlagioInsuranceHelp.htm I'm sure on one of those pages you'll find what your looking for. Good luck and welcome to the group! > I am getting ready to do a 1st appeal to my insurance company. They > told me on 3 occasions it would be covered. They went as far as to > call the place where she would have it put on and had the initial > deposit waived. They said it would be covered 100! About 4 days > letter I received a letter in the mail saying it wasn't covered. > > Where can I find more facts on the necessity of treatment. I have > found things from other parents which is extremely helpful to me but > won't be acceptable to the insurace. Isn't there any articles out > there from Dr's. My daughter will be getting the starband helmet. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2002 Report Share Posted October 9, 2002 Hi " tiredmom " and welcome to our group! Sooo sorry to hear of the runaround your ins. company has given you. What ins. company do you have? Check out the great links replied to you for more help. You can also look in our " files " section, " help folder " then " insurance " . Below, I've copied & pasted a sample letter of med. necessity a former member put in our files section. Hope that'll help. How old is your daughter? Has she been casted for the band yet? Good luck - welcome again, and please be sure to keep us updated. Debbie Abby's mom DOCGrad MI >>>>Letter of Medical Necessity Re: Luck To Whom It May Concern: I am writing on behalf of the above named patient for whom we are requesting orthotic correction of his cranial malformation of non- synostotic origin. is a child with a skull deformity as a result of a number of complicating factors. These have included that is one of twin who suffered twin-to-twin syndrome, requiring C-section because of tachycardia, prematurity at 29 weeks, postpartum requiring intubation and NICU care for six weeks for management of airway, hydronephrosis, anemia and hypertension. Because of early birth and supine positioning throughout this care this has resulted in deformational forces on a prematurely developed calvarial vault. Moreover, this has been compounded by right side torticollis and appropriate positioning to avoid sudden infant death as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatricians. These factors have resulted in an obvious cranial vault asymmetrical deformity characterized as a parallelogram with right occipital flattening, right frontal prominence and anterior positioning of the right ear. Attempts to positionally correct this without more aggressive intervention has been limited. Because of this, is a candidate for non-surgical molding therapy. While there are some centers that may correct this type of positional deformity with surgery, the surgery is not without significant risks and associated costs. The medical literature currently supports the use of a non- operative, non-invasive correction of this condition through use of dynamic orthodic cranioplasty. This involves correction of the abnormal head shape with external forces. We feel that in 's case the deformity is significant enough and that he is an appropriate age for head molding to help improve the asymmetric deformity. The results of dynamic orthodic cranioplasty typically show good improvement and there are certainly many children who have near complete improvement. The success correlates with the age at the beginning of treatment and with the severity of the deformity. It is important that the treatment be started early enough in development to take advantage of the flexibility of the infant's skull. Beyond a certain age, external molding will not be possible and surgery is the only alternative if the deformity remains significant. It makes the most sense, from and economic and risk standpoint, to correct these problems when they are easily corrected non-invasively rather than to either leave them uncorrected and suffer natural consequences or to offer a surgical solution that adds expense and risk. It is on this basis that a treatment approach which involves dynamic cranioplasty is medically indicated in cases like these. We will continue to follow throughout the course of his treatment. If further information is needed, please contact us directly. Sincerely, Pravin K. Patel, M.D. Attending Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeon Director, Cleft-Craniofacial Team Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2002 Report Share Posted October 10, 2002 tons and tons of articles check out these links and more in the files link look under insurance help and another folder for information. Let me know fiyou have difficulty accessing any of them and if we can do anything else to help. We are glad tyou are here and would love to know more about you. Beck files DOC look on their site for info and articles STATEINSDEPT Click here: Plagiocephaly Information Web Click here: Insurance Issues Click here: Research Links Click here: Pediatrics -- and Clarren 105 (2): e26 as a parent take this article with a grain of salt but it is good for appeals' Click here: CranialTherapies.com Articles: Gentle Force, Headband help correct head shape: Green Bay oPress Gazette Click here: Plagiocephaly Resources Click here: Other online resources Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2002 Report Share Posted October 10, 2002 My daughter was casted a week ago. She is suppose to get the starband on the 17th. We have BcBs. I am just so angry that we as parents have to go through things like fighting the insurance co. to help our children. Re: insurance Hi "tiredmom" and welcome to our group!Sooo sorry to hear of the runaround your ins. company has given you. What ins. company do you have?Check out the great links replied to you for more help. You can also look in our "files" section, "help folder" then "insurance". Below, I've copied & pasted a sample letter of med. necessity a former member put in our files section. Hope that'll help.How old is your daughter? Has she been casted for the band yet?Good luck - welcome again, and please be sure to keep us updated.Debbie Abby's mom DOCGradMI>>>>Letter of Medical NecessityRe: LuckTo Whom It May Concern:I am writing on behalf of the above named patient for whom we are requesting orthotic correction of his cranial malformation of non-synostotic origin. is a child with a skull deformity as a result of a number of complicating factors. These have included that is one of twin who suffered twin-to-twin syndrome, requiring C-section because of tachycardia, prematurity at 29 weeks, postpartum requiring intubation and NICU care for six weeks for management of airway, hydronephrosis, anemia and hypertension. Because of early birth and supine positioning throughout this care this has resulted in deformational forces on a prematurely developed calvarial vault. Moreover, this has been compounded by right side torticollis and appropriate positioning to avoid sudden infant death as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatricians. These factors have resulted in an obvious cranial vault asymmetrical deformity characterized as a parallelogram with right occipital flattening, right frontal prominence and anterior positioning of the right ear.Attempts to positionally correct this without more aggressive intervention has been limited. Because of this, is a candidate for non-surgical molding therapy. While there are some centers that may correct this type of positional deformity with surgery, the surgery is not without significant risks and associated costs. The medical literature currently supports the use of a non-operative, non-invasive correction of this condition through use of dynamic orthodic cranioplasty. This involves correction of the abnormal head shape with external forces. We feel that in 's case the deformity is significant enough and that he is an appropriate age for head molding to help improve the asymmetric deformity. The results of dynamic orthodic cranioplasty typically show good improvement and there are certainly many children who have near complete improvement. The success correlates with the age at the beginning of treatment and with the severity of the deformity. It is important that the treatment be started early enough in development to take advantage of the flexibility of the infant's skull. Beyond a certain age, external molding will not be possible and surgery is the only alternative if the deformity remains significant.It makes the most sense, from and economic and risk standpoint, to correct these problems when they are easily corrected non-invasively rather than to either leave them uncorrected and suffer natural consequences or to offer a surgical solution that adds expense and risk. It is on this basis that a treatment approach which involves dynamic cranioplasty is medically indicated in cases like these.We will continue to follow throughout the course of his treatment. If further information is needed, please contact us directly.Sincerely,Pravin K. Patel, M.D.Attending Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonDirector, Cleft-Craniofacial TeamFor more plagio info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2002 Report Share Posted October 10, 2002 Hello and welcome to the group! I'm sorry to be so late in responding so I'm sure you've already gotten all sorts of great tips and advice. We have files section that has some great articles in it. We also have a bookmark section that includes some links to helpful information. I had to battle the insurance company as well so I know how frustrating this process can be. Be sure to keep very good notes and a call log as well as copies of absolutely everything. The denial can be overturned - many parents here have been successful in getting their denials overturned (I'm one of them!). We'd love to hear more about your little cutie! I'm glad you have joined us! Marci (Mom to - helmet grad) Oklahoma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2002 Report Share Posted October 10, 2002 Hi, I saw your post. At the time my son was 9 yrs old and finally correctly diag. with oral Apraxia. I had to fight the insurance co. as well. I have Health Net PHS (Guardian) I live in New Jersey and I went through the 2 insurance co. appeals, and then contacted the NJ Health and Senior Service Department. I filled an appeal in which I enclosed a letter I drafted, all of the Dr's and spec. paper work. I won, but it was only for 30x a year. Any questions let me know. Kathy Bence Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2002 Report Share Posted October 10, 2002 Buffy, What is the status of the appeal at this point? What is the insurance company asking that you provide to them? Did you file a claim with the state insurance commissioner? If so, what is the status of the claim (ie what do they say is the next step)? ----- Original Message ----- From: " russell " <jesscale@...> > Hi, I have a son who is 5 yrs. old. I am so frustrated. We have been fighting our insurance company for 3 years. Their plan requires Apraxia must be do to illness, injury, or congenital condition. I have 2 neurologists that say it is congenital and results from a congenital brain anomaly. The neurologist is from the Mayo Clinic. He also states speech therapy is medically indicated for my son Cale. He is making such great improvements at the clinic where he is going but it is very expensive. He receives speech therapy 4x per week as well as one on one educational. The federal dept of labor has been notified as well as the state insurance commissioner. I don't understand what the problem is they are paying for other kids with the same diagnosis and not even as severe as Cale. Where do I go from here??? I would appreciate any input. Thanks, Buffy (MOM OF CALE) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2002 Report Share Posted October 11, 2002 I am going through the exact same thing with my insurance company (Aetna US Helthcare). My plan tates theat they will cover speech for illness, disease, etc. I sent them a letter stating that ASHA defines verbal apraxia as " a medical condition consistent with the definition of illness and disease...a disorder of body function. " (Keystater, the official publication of the Pennsylvania Speech Hearing Laguage Ass'n, Sept, 1992; Source: ASHA, Rockville, MD). Good luck! Ilene, NJ [ ] Insurance Hi, I have a son who is 5 yrs. old. I am so frustrated. We have been fighting our insurance company for 3 years. Their plan requires Apraxia must be do to illness, injury, or congenital condition. I have 2 neurologists that say it is congenital and results from a congenital brain anomaly. The neurologist is from the Mayo Clinic. He also states speech therapy is medically indicated for my son Cale. He is making such great improvements at the clinic where he is going but it is very expensive. He receives speech therapy 4x per week as well as one on one educational. The federal dept of labor has been notified as well as the state insurance commissioner. I don't understand what the problem is they are paying for other kids with the same diagnosis and not even as severe as Cale. Where do I go from here??? I would appreciate any input. Thanks, Buffy (MOM OF CALE) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2002 Report Share Posted October 11, 2002 Hi, I think the first thing to do is to find out the " diagnosis code " for our kids' condition. According to speechville.com, " a great code to use is 781.3 which is " lack of muscle coordination/coordination disorder " . Find out with your insuracne company to see if they cover for this code and how much they cover. FYI, there is another code 784.5 for other speech disturbance, dypraxia..etc. is also good. We have OXFORD insurance (we are in NY), they don't cover 781.3 but do cover 784.5. However, these insurance companies have a way to get around things. Even though Oxford covers 784.5, but they pay less than $20 for HMO plan. Then you will still pay the difference to the SLP. Does anyone know which insurance companies cover speech therapy? Maybe we can exchange info adn possibly change insurance company. Regards Agnes --- Ilene Martire <olsby@...> wrote: > I am going through the exact same thing with my insurance company (Aetna US Helthcare). My plan > tates theat they will cover speech for illness, disease, etc. I sent them a letter stating that > ASHA defines verbal apraxia as " a medical condition consistent with the definition of illness > and disease...a disorder of body function. " (Keystater, the official publication of the > Pennsylvania Speech Hearing Laguage Ass'n, Sept, 1992; Source: ASHA, Rockville, MD). > > Good luck! > > Ilene, NJ > ----- Original Message ----- > > > Hi, I have a son who is 5 yrs. old. I am so frustrated. We have been fighting our insurance > company for 3 years. Their plan requires Apraxia must be do to illness, injury, or congenital > condition. I have 2 neurologists that say it is congenital and results from a congenital brain > anomaly. The neurologist is from the Mayo Clinic. He also states speech therapy is medically > indicated for my son Cale. He is making such great improvements at the clinic where he is going > but it is very expensive. He receives speech therapy 4x per week as well as one on one > educational. The federal dept of labor has been notified as well as the state insurance > commissioner. I don't understand what the problem is they are paying for other kids with the > same diagnosis and not even as severe as Cale. Where do I go from here??? I would appreciate > any input. Thanks, Buffy (MOM OF CALE) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Hi Debbie. My husband's company is switching to Aetna come January 1. I will be watching the replies to your message with anticipation! I've heard stories from people who have had good luck with them as well as those stories like your own. It just all depends on what the employer has chosen to have the insurance company pay for as a part of the policy that the employer offers to their employee. Good luck to you! Mom to (4 years old this past Friday) and (2 years) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Hi, I am a very " disgruntled " client insured by Aetna. You can try fighting it but it probably won't get you far. Aetna's policies are very outlined and they are very clear. I have tried to fight it and have gotten no where. They claim since my son's apraxia does not show up on medical tests (MRI's) that they don't have to pay for developmental problems. That is not part of their contract. Good luck. I took my 60 days and ran with it. The other thing you could try is to see if they will switch the OT or PT premium (60 days also) to speech. I know someone who tried that and won so she got 6 months of speech. It is too stressful for us to persue it any further. Good luck Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 I remember a few people having this situation and successfully appealing it. They made the case based on the treatment being " medically necessary " , that because it was medically necessary that the child receive ongoing speech therapy, the limitation would not provide for the medical needs of the child. Others have stretched out the benefit by submitting for different types of therapy, oral motor speech therapy at one point, speech therapy at another point, occupational therapy at another point. My sense about it would be that it would be a hard battle to wage. Have you checked into lower cost speech therapy through ish Rites, Easter Seals, or a local university's speech-language clinic? > I have Aetna insurance. The policy allows for 60 consecutive days of therapy - that's it. They tell me that's not a yearly max - that's a lifetime max. Has anyone fought this battle before and won? How would I go about it? > > Thanks, > Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 We have Aetna. Each companies' policies are different. Ours policy said that they would only cover speech if the person lost speech when they had an accident or illness. Well, my daughter was 6 weeks old when she was sick. Our company insurance person changed the wording of the company's policy to include children. You may want to talk to your company's insurance rep to see if they can help you. By the way, they will not cover my other daughter. We don't have proof that she has brain damage, and we're not trying to get coverage for her. Good luck. Suzi > I have Aetna insurance. The policy allows for 60 consecutive days of therapy - that's it. They tell me that's not a yearly max - that's a lifetime max. Has anyone fought this battle before and won? How would I go about it? > > Thanks, > Debbie > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 hi, i am new to this apraxia stuff,but have you ever applied for any type of social security help or anything? i was just wondering. thanks, stacey --- timari3@... wrote: > Hi, > I am a very " disgruntled " client insured by Aetna. > You can try fighting it > but it probably won't get you far. Aetna's policies > are very outlined and > they are very clear. I have tried to fight it and > have gotten no where. > They claim since my son's apraxia does not show up > on medical tests (MRI's) > that they don't have to pay for developmental > problems. That is not part of > their contract. Good luck. I took my 60 days and > ran with it. The other > thing you could try is to see if they will switch > the OT or PT premium (60 > days also) to speech. I know someone who tried that > and won so she got 6 > months of speech. It is too stressful for us to > persue it any further. Good > luck > Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Along the same lines, I couldn't even get the initial consultation covered by Blue Cross/Blue Shield. JJ has his eeg scheduled for this Thursday and his MRI scheduled for November 21st and to my chagrin our insurance refuses payment on all of it, and so does the state. Where does one go from here? Who knows. Kim, Disgusted in Michigan --- Stacey <staceymiller30@...> wrote: > hi, i am new to this apraxia stuff,but have you > ever > applied for any type of social security help or > anything? i was just wondering. thanks, stacey > > > --- timari3@... wrote: > > Hi, > > I am a very " disgruntled " client insured by Aetna. > > > You can try fighting it > > but it probably won't get you far. Aetna's > policies > > are very outlined and > > they are very clear. I have tried to fight it and > > have gotten no where. > > They claim since my son's apraxia does not show up > > on medical tests (MRI's) > > that they don't have to pay for developmental > > problems. That is not part of > > their contract. Good luck. I took my 60 days and > > ran with it. The other > > thing you could try is to see if they will switch > > the OT or PT premium (60 > > days also) to speech. I know someone who tried > that > > and won so she got 6 > > months of speech. It is too stressful for us to > > persue it any further. Good > > luck > > Janet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 I am in the process of trying to get more speech therapy covered for my son. We have Aetna US Healthcare. I've had some luck in getting more than 60 days covered, but they said payment was made in error (?). My plan does not have a lifetime max, but does have the 60 consecutive day coverage. The last letter that I had written, explained that Apraxia is an illness (I quoted ASHA) and should be treated like one, meaning that speech therapy is a medical necessity. I haven't heard anything, yet. Feel free to contact me privately. Ilene, NJ [ ] Insurance I have Aetna insurance. The policy allows for 60 consecutive days of therapy - that's it. They tell me that's not a yearly max - that's a lifetime max. Has anyone fought this battle before and won? How would I go about it? Thanks, Debbie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 28, 2002 Report Share Posted October 28, 2002 Ilene's post reminded me of something... Check your states' regulations because those regulations can override the insurance policy. For example, this New Jersey legislation (below) indicates that if a physician states that speech therapy is medically necessary, and the speech therapy will be provided by a speech-language pathologist, then the person will not be denied the benefit. This should enable any child in New Jersey to get speech therapy as long as the pediatrician states that it's medically necessary (regardless of 60 day limitations in the contract). ---------------------------------------- http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=219452 & Depth=2 & de pth=2 & expandheadings=on & headingswithhits=on & hitsperheading=on & infobase=statu tes.nfo & record={69E7} & softpage=Document42 17B:26-2.1p Health insurance policy to cover certain audiology, speech-language pathology services. 4.Notwithstanding any other provision of chapter 26 of Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes, benefits shall not be denied to any eligible individual for eligible services, as determined by the terms of the policy or as otherwise required by law, when the services are determined by a physician to be medically necessary and are performed or rendered to that individual by a licensed audiologist or speech-language pathologist within the scope of practice. The practices of audiology and speech-language pathology shall be deemed to be within the provisions of chapter 26 of Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes and duly licensed audiologists and speech-language pathologists shall have such privileges and benefits in the scope of their practice under that act as are afforded thereunder to licensed physicians and surgeons in the scope of their practice. L.1997,c.419,s.4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 I am currently battling this out too! We are under Blue Cross, and my son (has apraxia) has used all the sessions he is allowed for the year..which is 25 visits. When our therapist sent in the notes, re -eval and so forth, requesting an additional 25 visits..it was denied. We are now in the process of appealing-and all therapy visits have ceased until appeal is approved. My heart just sinks...my son needs this so much. I understand that the insurance companies have to be cautious in making these kind of decisions...but.............oh well. charlotte ----- Original Message ----- I am in the process of trying to get more speech therapy covered for my son. We have Aetna US Healthcare. I've had some luck in getting more than 60 days covered, but they said payment was made in error (?). My plan does not have a lifetime max, but does have the 60 consecutive day coverage. The last letter that I had written, explained that Apraxia is an illness (I quoted ASHA) and should be treated like one, meaning that speech therapy is a medical necessity. I haven't heard anything, yet. Feel free to contact me privately. Ilene, NJ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 Hello, I felt like I needed to speak words of encouragement to all that are in the appeals process with insurance companies for any form of therapy for our little angels. I just went through this process, and we won our 2nd level appeal with Blue Shield. Both for speech and occupational therapy. Just make sure to keep your chin up, and work very hard with your doctors to get all the information needed into the insurance companies. I was originally told that with a diagnosis of Apraxia both motor/oral, that would not constitute an approval - but we did win. I think it had to do with a lot of God and the doctor's documentation also helped some too. Rowena -----Original Message----- I am currently battling this out too! We are under Blue Cross, and my son (has apraxia) has used all the sessions he is allowed for the year..which is 25 visits. When our therapist sent in the notes, re -eval and so forth, requesting an additional 25 visits..it was denied. We are now in the process of appealing-and all therapy visits have ceased until appeal is approved. My heart just sinks...my son needs this so much. I understand that the insurance companies have to be cautious in making these kind of decisions...but.............oh well. charlotte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 Charlotte: I can definitely respond to this one! I, too, have Blue Cross/Blue Shield - PPO and they cover only 25 visits per year, and only 80% of those 25 visits. So, if my son goes to speech therapy 2x a week, then we are all done within 3 months! Oh and by the way, these 25 visits also includes OT therapy. We will be done with our therapy coverage in 2 months now. But, I also know that BC/BS does not cover more for a developmental delay, but needs a medical reason....so I will be in the process of obtaining that paperwork.....and I will let you know what I come across. I have to tell you a funny story (not too funny). While I was in the waiting room during my son's therapy, the receptionist is quite an expert on insurance and has successfully appealled almost ALL of BC/BS claims. And I guess the president (?) of Chicago's BC/BS is also an owner of the Chicago Bears football team (which isn't doing so well!). She actually had a parent make a video of her son trying to ask for something.......to show how he can't ask for his basic needs and how they desperately needed this therapy. They then sent this in to the president to show him what they denied......and they finally did approve their therapy. Good luck, and let's keep eachother posted....Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 hi charlotte, have you tried applying for social security or anything? --- Charlotte Klimchock <charlotte.klimchock@...> wrote: > I am currently battling this out too! We are under > Blue Cross, and my son (has apraxia) has used all > the sessions he is allowed for the year..which is 25 > visits. When our therapist sent in the notes, re > -eval and so forth, requesting an additional 25 > visits..it was denied. We are now in the process of > appealing-and all therapy visits have ceased until > appeal is approved. > > My heart just sinks...my son needs this so much. I > understand that the insurance companies have to be > cautious in making these kind of > decisions...but.............oh well. > > charlotte Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 , Thank you so much for your information. I had no idea that this existed. Ilene Re: [ ] Insurance Ilene's post reminded me of something... Check your states' regulations because those regulations can override the insurance policy. For example, this New Jersey legislation (below) indicates that if a physician states that speech therapy is medically necessary, and the speech therapy will be provided by a speech-language pathologist, then the person will not be denied the benefit. This should enable any child in New Jersey to get speech therapy as long as the pediatrician states that it's medically necessary (regardless of 60 day limitations in the contract). ---------------------------------------- http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/cgi-bin/om_isapi.dll?clientID=219452 & Depth=2 & de pth=2 & expandheadings=on & headingswithhits=on & hitsperheading=on & infobase=statu tes.nfo & record={69E7} & softpage=Document42 17B:26-2.1p Health insurance policy to cover certain audiology, speech-language pathology services. 4.Notwithstanding any other provision of chapter 26 of Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes, benefits shall not be denied to any eligible individual for eligible services, as determined by the terms of the policy or as otherwise required by law, when the services are determined by a physician to be medically necessary and are performed or rendered to that individual by a licensed audiologist or speech-language pathologist within the scope of practice. The practices of audiology and speech-language pathology shall be deemed to be within the provisions of chapter 26 of Title 17B of the New Jersey Statutes and duly licensed audiologists and speech-language pathologists shall have such privileges and benefits in the scope of their practice under that act as are afforded thereunder to licensed physicians and surgeons in the scope of their practice. L.1997,c.419,s.4. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 29, 2002 Report Share Posted October 29, 2002 Hi, I was wondering which Blue Cross Plan you have, and how many visits are approved. I won my appeal on state level with PHS healthnet and only received approval for 30. [ ] Re: Insurance > Hello, > > I felt like I needed to speak words of encouragement to all that are in > the appeals process with insurance companies for any form of therapy for > our little angels. > > I just went through this process, and we won our 2nd level appeal with > Blue Shield. Both for speech and occupational therapy. Just make sure > to keep your chin up, and work very hard with your doctors to get all > the information needed into the insurance companies. I was originally > told that with a diagnosis of Apraxia both motor/oral, that would not > constitute an approval - but we did win. I think it had to do with a > lot of God and the doctor's documentation also helped some too. > > Rowena Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.