Guest guest Posted May 31, 1999 Report Share Posted May 31, 1999 In a message dated 5/31/1999 6:38:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, mlmccoy@... writes: << One solution is I could put something in the subject line indicating it is from that forum >> maybe if you just put SCI-MED lyme in the header....actually the double posts do not bother me..maybe because Lyme is something I would rather read twice than miss once B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 1999 Report Share Posted May 31, 1999 Hi Bernadette, That's a good idea, I am sure not everyone who subscribes here gets to read the newsgroup. I welcome anyone who does read it and sees something that would be of general interest to us to please copy it and post it here. I was way behind in reading the newsgroup, it seemed insurmountable, but I am proud to say I got all caught up this morning. It used to be my daily ritual, now I devote most of my time here, and fear missing something important being related on the newsgroup. From now on when I steal something from there, I will put SCI-MED in the subject header....have to laugh about you reading the information twice, my short term memory is so bad, I often worry that I am posting the same stuff twice. Have you ever gone to do something, and found to your surprise you had already done it, yet have no memory at all that you did it? Weird feeling! Hugs, Marta >From: BratDet@... > >In a message dated 5/31/1999 6:38:25 AM Eastern Daylight Time, >mlmccoy@... writes: > ><< One solution is I could put something in the subject line > indicating it is from that forum >> >maybe if you just put SCI-MED lyme in the header....actually the double posts >do not bother me..maybe because Lyme is something I would rather read twice >than miss once B Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 31, 1999 Report Share Posted May 31, 1999 Hi Marta, I really don't mind what you put on here. I can't seem to get anywhere else, so it really helps me. Thanks for all your work, Hugs, Connie, MI Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 1, 1999 Report Share Posted June 1, 1999 I am not in the least bothered by any duplicate posts. I may not get to the sci.med.diseases.lyme group but twice a week, so I appreciate you posting the information on Lyme Aid. My .02 cents worth of opinion. Wishing us all health and freedom from pain, both physical and emotional - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 1999 Report Share Posted August 3, 1999 I, for one, love it when someone asks a question and we can compare answers. Annette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 3, 1999 Report Share Posted August 3, 1999 --- XxMarchxX@... wrote: > Since we are all kind of comparing things and > looking for similarities. I was wondering if we > should make some form or questionniare then put it > all on a spread sheet???? I don't want to overstep > my bounds as I am new here on this list -- No, I don't think you are overstepping your bounds, March. And I think that the newest member on the list should have the same say as the oldest, right? That is one of the great things about e-communication -- race, sex, sexuality, age, religion, seniority -- none of that matters. As for the survey, I might be able to write a program on the web page and feed it into a SQL database, generate some charts and graphs and all those lovely things that are possible using the web. Hell, in a few years I might be able to write some code that will produce smells over the web . . . But that is tomorrow. Today there are ample tools to run surveys on the web. If anyone is interested I can look into it. Of course this is a lot of work -- If I write the code I'll need help assembling the survey. A group project? === , NJ Highlands raharris@... _____________________________________________________________ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 4, 1999 Report Share Posted August 4, 1999 In a message dated 8/3/99 9:33:09 PM, XxMarchxX@... writes: << I was wondering if we should make some form or questioner then put it all on a spread sheet???? >> It sounds like a terrific idea! Diane Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 1999 Report Share Posted August 5, 1999 Hi Kim! I sure never want anyone to think I am complaining. We waited 11 years before we were able to adopt and add a son to our family of two daughters. God has blessed us with 2 daughters by birth and one daughter and two sons by adoption! Far beyond what I had ever dreamed! Now I think it really is time to quite. I always wanted to be the Waltons! But with two who have special needs and my recent diagnosis I think I really do need to leave it at 5. I had my heart set on more and this is difficult. In fact I got a call two days ago about a little 3 year old with triple x syndrome. I am going to have to say no and have them take us off of the list. This is a call that I have not made yet - do not want to make either. But I think I have too. As I am understanding it, this disease is progressive - right? - so I think it would not be wise to adopt again. Lee Ann Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 7, 2002 Report Share Posted October 7, 2002 Hi , Sorry about missing your post. One of the questions on the survey asks what was the diagnosis received, so I am going by the DSM-IV diagnoses of PDDs. Thats why I phrased it as " autistic disorder " and so on because that is what they are called in the DSM. So the survey is for parents of any child diagnosed with any PDD. Sorry about any confusion. Again the survey can be accessed at http://www.carleton.ca/copewell/autism/ Kerry Re: [ ] survey > Kerry, > > I think you may have overlooked a post of mine. > > For the purposes of your questionnaire, how are you defining Autism? > > Since you are asking parents here to contribute, perhaps you could define your parameters. > > > Best regards, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 In a message dated 11/27/02 8:05:42 PM, MUGGYPC@... writes: << Just My View 15 yrs on AP and thank you everyone Happy Thangsgiveing from Ohio. >> You mean this therapy has been around THAT long and still is (apparently) not mainstream? This does not make sense to me. If it does work, and has been around for almost decades, why is it not commonly used? Pris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 Pris , I was on tetra afew yrs before for acne, then went to Arlington to get IV's. This may be hard to believe but AMA wants their money for research and drs. some for their Perks. Alot of drs. are just not willing to learn anything new and do whatever the AMA tells them too. Change seems to be a fight, always has been in this world. It would be a very nice world if MONEY didn't rule it, but the big boys have and do. Just My View from Ohio. The time and money I have wasted on Drs. is really sinful and the tears and pain were alot. Be glad you have this line and group who will help and really do try to educate all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 Pris wrote: > > " You mean this therapy has been around THAT long and still is (apparently) > not mainstream? This does not make sense to me. If it does work, and has > been around for almost decades, why is it not commonly used? " Hi Pris, Actually, you will be even more surprised to find out that this therapy has been around about 50 years. The sad fact is that most doctors don't want to believe it works. It's not accepted by mainstream medicine...which to me is a crime! But it's like antibiotics for ulcers. The doctor who discovered that antibiotics would cure most ulcers with the h pylori bacteria (don't think I spelled that right) was poo pooed that he was a quack until he proved it by giving himself the bacteria, getting ulcers and curing himself. Now this treatment is used by some doctors to help cure ulcers but there are still quite a few doctors out there who don't or won't use it. Dr. Brown pioneered this field of AP but was labled a quack until his dying day. We have much to be thankful for to him for his courage in keeping on in spite of the opposition! Jeanette Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 I am a parent of a child with autism and I am conducting research for my Master's thesis in Communications Disorders. The title of the research is " Familial Perceptions of the Effects of Immunizations on the child with Autism " . Please help by filling out the survey and sending it to cbostx@... or mailing it to Cheryl Bost, 510 on Pl, Corpus Christi, TX 78411. Thanks! From: Binstock Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 5:21 PM Subject: [ ] Canada: Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/front/RTGAM/20021128/wxpox1128/Fr\ ont/homeBN/breakingnews Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine By PETER CHENEY From Thursday's Globe and Mail Thursday, November 28 – Online Edition, Posted at 2:30 AM EST Responding to the possibility of a terrorist attack with biological weapons, the federal government is buying enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate everyone in Canada. " Given the heightened concern about terrorism, we believe it's prudent to take steps to protect the Canadian public, " Health Canada spokesman Gully said. Canada was named as a potential terrorist target two weeks ago by al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in an audiotape warning of attacks on Western countries. Under the terms of a contract announced Wednesday, the government will acquire 10 million doses of the vaccine. Each dose can be diluted, producing enough for 30 million inoculations. " Considering the advice we've received, we believe this is the right amount, " Dr. Gully said. Some of the vaccine will be used for a carefully planned program designed to prevent a mass outbreak of smallpox. Five hundred people who have been identified as being at the highest risk of contracting or spreading the disease will be inoculated immediately, Dr. Gully said. Many of these 500 people will be doctors, nurses and others most likely to be exposed to the disease in the event of an outbreak. The rest of the vaccine will be stored at a secret location, to be used for mass inoculations in the event of what Dr. Gully referred to as " a national health emergency. " The contract announced Wednesday calls for the vaccine to be supplied by Aventis Pasteur Ltd., an Ontario firm that is considered the only one in the country capable of filling the order. Other companies will have 15 days to contact Health Canada if they have a competitive proposal. The cost of the vaccine will be negotiated once a decision is made on who will be the supplier, Dr. Gully said. Observers say the cost of the Canadian vaccine will probably be comparable to the vaccine being acquired by the U.S. government, which paid $509-million (U.S.) for 250 million doses. Based on that, the Health Canada stockpile will probably cost about $30-million to $40-million (Canadian). The decision to acquire the vaccine caps a long debate over the new risks posed by smallpox, which has been referred to as " the poor man's nuclear weapon. " Before the introduction of vaccination in the late 18th century, the disease swept repeatedly across several continents, killing up to 50 per cent of the population. Although smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, the virus still exists in laboratories, raising the possibility terrorists could acquire it. That risk has created a new demand for the vaccine. Officially, the virus exists only at two World Health Organization laboratories. One is the United States, the other in Russia. But there is widespread concern that others have managed to acquire the virus as well, increasing the possibility that it could fall into the wrong hands. Dr. Gully said it would take " considerable " skill for a terrorist group to successfully introduce the disease on a widespread scale. Federal emergency plans are based on what is known as a " search and contain " system, where smallpox victims are isolated, while the people in the surrounding area are inoculated. Health officials said the vaccine is effective in treating smallpox within four days of exposure to the virus. After that, it becomes less and less effective. In most cases, the disease becomes fully developed within two weeks. There are several strains of smallpox, with mortality rates that range from 30 per cent to 100 per cent. Despite the deadly nature of the disease, universal inoculation is not considered the best approach to combatting the current risk, experts say. There is a one-in-a-million risk of dying from the vaccination, and a one-in-300,000 risk of serious side effects. These risks outweigh the risk of infection, Dr. Gully said. He added that it was ironic that the world is once again concerned about a disease that had been defeated by medical science: " It tells us a lot about the heightened concern over terrorism. So it's only prudent that we take steps to protect the Canadian public. " Copyright © 2002 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 [ ] Canada: Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/front/RTGAM/20021128/wxpox1128/Fr\ ont/homeBN/breakingnews Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine By PETER CHENEY From Thursday's Globe and Mail Thursday, November 28 – Online Edition, Posted at 2:30 AM EST Responding to the possibility of a terrorist attack with biological weapons, the federal government is buying enough smallpox vaccine to inoculate everyone in Canada. " Given the heightened concern about terrorism, we believe it's prudent to take steps to protect the Canadian public, " Health Canada spokesman Gully said. Canada was named as a potential terrorist target two weeks ago by al-Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in an audiotape warning of attacks on Western countries. Under the terms of a contract announced Wednesday, the government will acquire 10 million doses of the vaccine. Each dose can be diluted, producing enough for 30 million inoculations. " Considering the advice we've received, we believe this is the right amount, " Dr. Gully said. Some of the vaccine will be used for a carefully planned program designed to prevent a mass outbreak of smallpox. Five hundred people who have been identified as being at the highest risk of contracting or spreading the disease will be inoculated immediately, Dr. Gully said. Many of these 500 people will be doctors, nurses and others most likely to be exposed to the disease in the event of an outbreak. The rest of the vaccine will be stored at a secret location, to be used for mass inoculations in the event of what Dr. Gully referred to as " a national health emergency. " The contract announced Wednesday calls for the vaccine to be supplied by Aventis Pasteur Ltd., an Ontario firm that is considered the only one in the country capable of filling the order. Other companies will have 15 days to contact Health Canada if they have a competitive proposal. The cost of the vaccine will be negotiated once a decision is made on who will be the supplier, Dr. Gully said. Observers say the cost of the Canadian vaccine will probably be comparable to the vaccine being acquired by the U.S. government, which paid $509-million (U.S.) for 250 million doses. Based on that, the Health Canada stockpile will probably cost about $30-million to $40-million (Canadian). The decision to acquire the vaccine caps a long debate over the new risks posed by smallpox, which has been referred to as " the poor man's nuclear weapon. " Before the introduction of vaccination in the late 18th century, the disease swept repeatedly across several continents, killing up to 50 per cent of the population. Although smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, the virus still exists in laboratories, raising the possibility terrorists could acquire it. That risk has created a new demand for the vaccine. Officially, the virus exists only at two World Health Organization laboratories. One is the United States, the other in Russia. But there is widespread concern that others have managed to acquire the virus as well, increasing the possibility that it could fall into the wrong hands. Dr. Gully said it would take " considerable " skill for a terrorist group to successfully introduce the disease on a widespread scale. Federal emergency plans are based on what is known as a " search and contain " system, where smallpox victims are isolated, while the people in the surrounding area are inoculated. Health officials said the vaccine is effective in treating smallpox within four days of exposure to the virus. After that, it becomes less and less effective. In most cases, the disease becomes fully developed within two weeks. There are several strains of smallpox, with mortality rates that range from 30 per cent to 100 per cent. Despite the deadly nature of the disease, universal inoculation is not considered the best approach to combatting the current risk, experts say. There is a one-in-a-million risk of dying from the vaccination, and a one-in-300,000 risk of serious side effects. These risks outweigh the risk of infection, Dr. Gully said. He added that it was ironic that the world is once again concerned about a disease that had been defeated by medical science: " It tells us a lot about the heightened concern over terrorism. So it's only prudent that we take steps to protect the Canadian public. " Copyright © 2002 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 28, 2002 Report Share Posted November 28, 2002 [ ] Canada: Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine http://www.globeandmail.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/front/RTGAM/20021128/wxpox1128/Fr\ ont/homeBN/breakingnews Ottawa to buy smallpox vaccine ,$30-million to $40-million (Canadian). The decision to acquire the vaccine caps a long debate over the new risks posed by smallpox, which has been referred to as " the poor man's nuclear weapon. " Before the introduction of vaccination in the late 18th century, the disease swept repeatedly across several continents, killing up to 50 per cent of the population. Although smallpox was declared eradicated in 1980, the virus still exists in laboratories, raising the possibility terrorists could acquire it. That risk has created a new demand for the vaccine. Officially, the virus exists only at two World Health Organization laboratories. One is the United States, the other in Russia. But there is widespread concern that others have managed to acquire the virus as well, increasing the possibility that it could fall into the wrong hands. Dr. Gully said it would take " considerable " skill for a terrorist group to successfully introduce the disease on a widespread scale. Federal emergency plans are based on what is known as a " search and contain " system, where smallpox victims are isolated, while the people in the surrounding area are inoculated. Health officials said the vaccine is effective in treating smallpox within four days of exposure to the virus. After that, it becomes less and less effective. In most cases, the disease becomes fully developed within two weeks. There are several strains of smallpox, with mortality rates that range from 30 per cent to 100 per cent. Despite the deadly nature of the disease, universal inoculation is not considered the best approach to combatting the current risk, experts say. There is a one-in-a-million risk of dying from the vaccination, and a one-in-300,000 risk of serious side effects. These risks outweigh the risk of infection, Dr. Gully said. He added that it was ironic that the world is once again concerned about a disease that had been defeated by medical science: " It tells us a lot about the heightened concern over terrorism. So it's only prudent that we take steps to protect the Canadian public. " Copyright © 2002 Bell Globemedia Interactive Inc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2002 Report Share Posted November 29, 2002 Hi Pris! Geoff here. You wrote: " You mean this therapy has been around THAT long and still is (apparently) not mainstream? This does not make sense to me. If it does work, and has been around for almost decades, why is it not commonly used? " Dr. Brown was vilified by his peers because he told people about his therapy success by publishing a book. Not the way things are done, you see. His peers weren't able to criticize his basic work, so instead they criticized the man personally over his choice of publication, and in private conversations with their patients they openly called him a quack. Thousands of peoples lives were salvaged, but his peers were sorely offended; he had stolen their thunder, and their authority. O'Dell, et al, got funding for the MIRA study but their protocol was different -- higher doses, higher frequencies, lack of individual tailoring, etc. If one was to compare the two methodologies one might could conclude that Dr. Brown's protocol was more " patient " friendly, requiring quite a lot of Physician time. The O'Dell method is more " practice " friendly, taking only seconds to repeat the mantra: RA=200mg mino BID, thus minimizing the use of physician time while maximizing profit, an important consideration for a practice. Anytime anyone has a question about drugs or medicine, they must include the financial factor. Not to do so is foolishness. Geoff soli Deo gloria www.HealingYou.org - Your nonprofit source for remedies and aids in fighting these diseases, information on weaning from drugs, and nutritional kits for repairing damage; 100% volunteer staffed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2002 Report Share Posted November 29, 2002 Hi Mark, I agree with some of what you said but Dr. Atkins just had the trials and the news was on the news last week and all very good too. I know as I have been on it for 2 yrs and plan to spend the rest of my life with the diet. I really do feel that good No sugars and No starches. I think most people think or get the impression that you just eat cheese and fatty meats, well you can but I don't think that is too wise maybe once in awhile, but I eat mainly fish and chicken and veggies. I also am down to almost normal weight. You do eat more protein and some fats but seems to be a great diet for people with a problem beats surgey. Also about the tests drs. should do and would do if the AMA wanted it. There is alot of money being made by you and me being in the so called system and the big boys like that very much. Of course there are some careing drs. like Dr. Brown, just not many and we suffer so the medical can be rich and right. Just My View from Ohio Be Pain Free Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 29, 2002 Report Share Posted November 29, 2002 Geoff wrote: " O'Dell, et al, got funding for the MIRA study but their protocol was different -- higher doses, higher frequencies, lack of individual tailoring, etc. If one was to compare the two methodologies one might could conclude that Dr. Brown's protocol was more " patient " friendly, requiring quite a lot of Physician time. The O'Dell method is more " practice " friendly, taking only seconds to repeat the mantra: RA=200mg mino BID, thus minimizing the use of physician time while maximizing profit, an important consideration for a practice. Anytime anyone has a question about drugs or medicine, they must include the financial factor. Not to do so is foolishness. " I can't speak for either doctor, since I have not had either doctor as my physician. However, I would hesitate to label Dr. O'Dell as somone just out for money. A person from this list recently wrote me privately, who has Dr. O'Dell as their physician, and thinks he is wonderful. And it appears O'Dell finds good results (which apparently he has according to his trials) with his regimen. I understand that Dr. Brown was a caring individual or so I have been led to believe. Ethel knows much more about him than I ever will. It's too bad that he wasn't able to combine his book with a number of published trials as well. This would have put much of this controversy to rest. I think that's why the medical community casts aspersions upon him, and of course due in part to their belief that if it hasn't been proven in those confounded double blind trials, then it's not worth considering. The same could be said for Dr. Atkins, who also cranks out the books and may very well care about all his patients, yet is scoffed at because he won't spend the money or get the money to run trials. That debate goes on forever, too. Just my .02 Mark Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2002 Report Share Posted November 30, 2002 Since I too, cannot seem to access the main board, I cannot get into the survey. I want to let everyone know.....YES this did work great for me. Complete remission. I have had one lady I corresponded with who tried it for four months and decided it would not work. She informed me it was " Too late for her " . As we speak, she is in her new wheelchair taking dozens of meds to keep the pain at a dull throb, and I am out horsebackriding. In fact yesterday I took a 3 hour trailride...O.K. so we got lost in the park and it took us that long to find our way out!! At any rate the only pain I had was NOT from the RA. Hey! does anyone know if they make orthopedic saddles??? Martha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2002 Report Share Posted November 30, 2002 Skip...................I had been diagnosed with RA for eight years before starting on AP. I am embarrassed to say it only took me 5 months to complete remission. I was on a new combo offered by DR. S in Chattanooga. It worked for me like a charm and I had NO herxes. The only thing I can say, except to admit to being VERY, VERY lucky, was that I fully expected this treatment NOT to work. My husband and I discussed this before I went for my first appointment, and as I got out of the car on that first visit my husband said to me... " just don't get your hopes up too much, if it doesn't work we'll keep looking. " Little did we know that something that was so simple, could work so well. We just felt surely the medical profession would use this if it worked...right??? We were trained to believe that if it looked too good to be true, it probably wasn't true. Thank God we were wrong. As for the medical profession turning their noses up at a possible remission for many of its patients, it makes you wonder. Figuring that most information a doc gets once they leave med school comes from the drug companies via their salesmen, means to me the fox is guarding the henhouse!!! Just my opinion of course. Martha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2002 Report Share Posted November 30, 2002 Martha You have posted a few times but you have never gave us any details. I'm sure alot of us would like to know. For instance how long did you have RA & how severe was it.? How long before you noticed improvement & how long before you went into remission? I'm very glad to hear about your remission but also very curious. I think this would help alot of us to hear more of the details of one's success. Thank you for your time if you answer this post. I'm not looking for remission. I would be very happy if I could just function!!. nne RA5Yrs.AP8Mos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted November 30, 2002 Report Share Posted November 30, 2002 Nice reply Martha, however, why don't you describe what you felt like in general from the time you started the AP and the time you were in remission. I think some of these people do not realize that it can be painful, and very long doing the steps. 3 ahead and 2 back. How long did you have the RA before starting the AP? Skip rheumatic re:survey Since I too, cannot seem to access the main board, I cannot get into the survey. I want to let everyone know.....YES this did work great for me. Complete remission. I have had one lady I corresponded with who tried it for four months and decided it would not work. She informed me it was " Too late for her " . As we speak, she is in her new wheelchair taking dozens of meds to keep the pain at a dull throb, and I am out horsebackriding. In fact yesterday I took a 3 hour trailride...O.K. so we got lost in the park and it took us that long to find our way out!! At any rate the only pain I had was NOT from the RA. Hey! does anyone know if they make orthopedic saddles??? Martha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 1, 2002 Report Share Posted December 1, 2002 Thanks for the reply, You were very lucky to get remission in such short time. I hope it holds forever for you. I agree with your take and the medical profession not even trying this. Sounds like your hubby is like mine. We just kept looking until we found the AP. Seen Dr. Sinnott finally as we could not find anyone here to do it for us. We now have a Dr. who works with Dr. Sinnott over the phone when we have a problem. He has also started others on the AP also. Just don't let stress put you down. I did this summer and am paying for it now. Good luck SKip Re: rheumatic re:survey Martha You have posted a few times but you have never gave us any details. I'm sure alot of us would like to know. For instance how long did you have RA & how severe was it.? How long before you noticed improvement & how long before you went into remission? I'm very glad to hear about your remission but also very curious. I think this would help alot of us to hear more of the details of one's success. Thank you for your time if you answer this post. I'm not looking for remission. I would be very happy if I could just function!!. nne RA5Yrs.AP8Mos. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 post the survey and im sure youwill get many answers which might be interersting to your program to see how many of us are actually sufffering from the disease....i will complete it if you post it online....Laurie jacluwil01 <jacluwil01@...> wrote: Would anyone mind completing a very short 10 question survey on basic demographics and experience with Lyme disease. I am in a Masters in Nursing program and am doing a paper for an assignment. This group is so interesting and may indeed be the answers to my prayers for support with this disease. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 3, 2005 Report Share Posted January 3, 2005 i, too, would be glad to do your survery, deb email debob@... [ ] Survey Would anyone mind completing a very short 10 question survey on basic demographics and experience with Lyme disease. I am in a Masters in Nursing program and am doing a paper for an assignment. This group is so interesting and may indeed be the answers to my prayers for support with this disease. Questions and/or comments can be directed to the list owner at -Owner ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.