Guest guest Posted March 21, 2011 Report Share Posted March 21, 2011 .......challenges are calling for higher standards in regulating how and where the tests are done, better data to determine their value and cost effectiveness, and new approaches to determining their optimal uses for today's patient populations. Dr. Gottlieb pointed out that molecular tests are currently regulated by how they are marketed, not by claims for what the test can do, and that there is enormous heterogeneity in how and where the tests are performed. He supports having the FDA or Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA), regulate the analytic validity of molecular testing while leaving decisions about clinical validity to the clinical community. Dr. von Eschenbach agreed that there was a great need to assure that tests are consistent in their claims and results regardless of where they are performed and conceded that presently, this is not always the case. He argued for a system that would allow the FDA to develop the infrastructure necessary to, in his words, " bring order out of chaos. " Dr. Jacques, described the field of molecular testing as immature, and predicted that it would take a number of years and additional experience before it became possible to assess either the true analytic or clinical validity of the growing number of molecular tests. The coding is so antiquated that we don't know what we are paying for. It just says 'genetic test,' which doesn't allow us to assess either the upfront costs or the downstream benefits that might result from this kind of testing, " said Dr. Newcomer. " We are aspiring to an era of personalized medicine, but we aren't there yet, " said Dr. Kolodziej. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/219180.php ****************************** How to Be Ready Against HBOC. Take our Be Ready Quiz to see if genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer is an option you should consider. http://www.bracnow.com/considering-testing/be-ready.php#brp **************************** THE CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY WELCOMES TODAY'S ANNOUNCEMENT BY PRIME MINISTER STEPHEN HARPER TO RENEW ITS SUPPORT FOR THE CANADIAN PARTNERSHIP AGAINST CANCER (CPAC) - (11 Mar 2011) ________________ CPAC will receive $250 million over five years to continue the implementation of the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control, which draws on the strengths of many committed organizations, including the Canadian Cancer Society, to work together to lessen the impact of cancer in this country, " says Goodhand, CEO and President, Canadian Cancer Society. " This renewed funding will allow valuable work to continue in preventing cancer, saving lives and supporting people living with cancer. " In November 2006, the Federal Government announced the creation of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer - an independent, not-for-profit organization which works to reduce the impact of cancer in Canada through the implementation of the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control. " The Society was a pivotal member of the cancer community that came together to develop the Canadian Strategy for Cancer Control and we advocated strongly for its funding and implementation, " says Goodhand. " We have been contributing to the work of CPAC and we look forward to continuing to work with our partners in fighting cancer in Canada. " Together we are driving excellence in cancer and chronic disease prevention, screening, and cancer care, and focusing on improving the cancer journey for patients and their families. An important part of this work is continuing joint efforts with First Nations, Inuit and Métis partners to address their unique cancer control needs and reduce the impact of cancer and chronic diseases in their communities. Our ultimate goal is to make more inroads into preventing cancer so we'll see fewer Canadians diagnosed with this disease in the future. " http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/218868.php ********************* March 11, 2011.....The number of cancer survivors in the United States increased to 11.7 million in 2007, according to a report released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Cancer Institute (NCI), part of the National Institutes of Health. There were 3 million cancer survivors in 1971 and 9.8 million in 2001. A cancer survivor is defined as anyone who has been diagnosed with cancer, from the time of diagnosis through the balance of his or her life. The study, " Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2007, " is published today in the CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/218813.php ******************** Web Cam by Dr. Schiffer Ordinarily, the number of white blood cells is tightly controlled by the body—more white blood cells are produced during infections or times of stress, but then return to normal when the infection is cured. In CML, the abnormal BCR-ABL enzyme is like a switch that is stuck in the “on” position—it keeps stimulating the white blood cells to grow. In addition to the elevated white blood cell count, the number of blood platelets (cells that help the blood to clot) often increase, and the number of red blood cells, which carry oxygen, may decrease. http://tinyurl.com/4z2nr3v ******************* FYI, Lottie Duthu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.