Guest guest Posted February 22, 2011 Report Share Posted February 22, 2011 , that's very interesting! It also goes to show just how differently some doctors look at and interpret the same information. Actually, I'm happy for you, that you are doing so well without the medication. My side effects are not too bad at this time, mostly just fatigue... it fluctuates between mild to moderate... don't know how much is from age, from being out of shape or the medication... I suspect a little of all three. As a side note, I was diagnosed on 2/10/3003... Happy Anniversary! Troxel On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 1:37 PM, <dickie_64012@...> wrote: > > > I just returned from receiving the results of my blood test. While the CML > leukemia still present and active the counts are only increasing at a very > slow rate. The Dr. agrees that if I would go back on the drugs they would be > harder on me than living without them. The Dr. thinks that it is possible > that the Gleevec probably eliminated the fast growing cells and only the > slow growing ones are left, based on a two year review of three sections of > my blood tests. > > H. > dxd 2/2003 > 400mg Gleevec 3/2003 > Undetectable 11/03 > RT-PCR negative 11/04 > QT-PCR .003 11/05 > RBC 8. > Gleevec Vacation 11/06-6/07 > Iron infusion 11/06 > Transfusions 12/06-5/07 > QT-PCR .7 > Gleevec 1/08 -5/08 > Procrit 8/08-11/08 > Gleevec Vacation 7/08-Present > QT-PCR .03 4/09 > QT-PCR .015 6/09 > QT-PCR .021 9/09 > QT-PCR .028 1/10 > QT-PCR .01+ 4/10 > QT-PCR .0438 10/10 > QT-PCR .05 2/11 > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 The fatigue part is the most grueling part for me. It probably reduced 50% or more since I have not been on Gleevec. The other 50% is combined lack of activity (most of my life unless I was on a remodel or repair project) and age. The age and other problems keep me distracted from excerise(LOL). I don't remember the exact date in Feb. that I was told. I had my BMB the middle of the month, and the results a week or so later. Then I had about 4 weeks of pills and consulting BMT specialists preparing to take Gleevec. H. > > > > > > > I just returned from receiving the results of my blood test. While the CML > > leukemia still present and active the counts are only increasing at a very > > slow rate. The Dr. agrees that if I would go back on the drugs they would be > > harder on me than living without them. The Dr. thinks that it is possible > > that the Gleevec probably eliminated the fast growing cells and only the > > slow growing ones are left, based on a two year review of three sections of > > my blood tests. > > > > H. > > dxd 2/2003 > > 400mg Gleevec 3/2003 > > Undetectable 11/03 > > RT-PCR negative 11/04 > > QT-PCR .003 11/05 > > RBC 8. > > Gleevec Vacation 11/06-6/07 > > Iron infusion 11/06 > > Transfusions 12/06-5/07 > > QT-PCR .7 > > Gleevec 1/08 -5/08 > > Procrit 8/08-11/08 > > Gleevec Vacation 7/08-Present > > QT-PCR .03 4/09 > > QT-PCR .015 6/09 > > QT-PCR .021 9/09 > > QT-PCR .028 1/10 > > QT-PCR .01+ 4/10 > > QT-PCR .0438 10/10 > > QT-PCR .05 2/11 > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2011 Report Share Posted February 23, 2011 The date is easy for me to remember, my grandmother's birthday was 1/10 and my brother's is 3/10... 2/10 right in the middle. Can I blame the typo on the Gleevec, it was 2003 not 3003? On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 8:25 PM, <dickie_64012@...> wrote: > > > The fatigue part is the most grueling part for me. It probably reduced 50% > or more since I have not been on Gleevec. The other 50% is combined lack of > activity (most of my life unless I was on a remodel or repair project) and > age. The age and other problems keep me distracted from excerise(LOL). I > don't remember the exact date in Feb. that I was told. I had my BMB the > middle of the month, and the results a week or so later. Then I had about 4 > weeks of pills and consulting BMT specialists preparing to take Gleevec. > > H. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just returned from receiving the results of my blood test. While the > CML > > > leukemia still present and active the counts are only increasing at a > very > > > slow rate. The Dr. agrees that if I would go back on the drugs they > would be > > > harder on me than living without them. The Dr. thinks that it is > possible > > > that the Gleevec probably eliminated the fast growing cells and only > the > > > slow growing ones are left, based on a two year review of three > sections of > > > my blood tests. > > > > > > H. > > > dxd 2/2003 > > > 400mg Gleevec 3/2003 > > > Undetectable 11/03 > > > RT-PCR negative 11/04 > > > QT-PCR .003 11/05 > > > RBC 8. > > > Gleevec Vacation 11/06-6/07 > > > Iron infusion 11/06 > > > Transfusions 12/06-5/07 > > > QT-PCR .7 > > > Gleevec 1/08 -5/08 > > > Procrit 8/08-11/08 > > > Gleevec Vacation 7/08-Present > > > QT-PCR .03 4/09 > > > QT-PCR .015 6/09 > > > QT-PCR .021 9/09 > > > QT-PCR .028 1/10 > > > QT-PCR .01+ 4/10 > > > QT-PCR .0438 10/10 > > > QT-PCR .05 2/11 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2011 Report Share Posted February 24, 2011 Yes, you can blame the typo on whatever you want. I notice that my keyboard is always jumping around and causing me to j(hit) the wrong keys. LOL H. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 26, 2011 Report Share Posted February 26, 2011 - That is wonderful news. I am very happy for you. Keep up the good work. Sandi > > > > > > > I just returned from receiving the results of my blood test. While the CML > > leukemia still present and active the counts are only increasing at a very > > slow rate. The Dr. agrees that if I would go back on the drugs they would be > > harder on me than living without them. The Dr. thinks that it is possible > > that the Gleevec probably eliminated the fast growing cells and only the > > slow growing ones are left, based on a two year review of three sections of > > my blood tests. > > > > H. > > dxd 2/2003 > > 400mg Gleevec 3/2003 > > Undetectable 11/03 > > RT-PCR negative 11/04 > > QT-PCR .003 11/05 > > RBC 8. > > Gleevec Vacation 11/06-6/07 > > Iron infusion 11/06 > > Transfusions 12/06-5/07 > > QT-PCR .7 > > Gleevec 1/08 -5/08 > > Procrit 8/08-11/08 > > Gleevec Vacation 7/08-Present > > QT-PCR .03 4/09 > > QT-PCR .015 6/09 > > QT-PCR .021 9/09 > > QT-PCR .028 1/10 > > QT-PCR .01+ 4/10 > > QT-PCR .0438 10/10 > > QT-PCR .05 2/11 > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.