Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

TOTD 090808: accords

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Do you make an accord first and once you're happy with it add it to a

would-be perfume? Or do you make the perfume at once, bottom to top?

_____

I much prefer to make a perfume all at once then figure out what's

working and what's not after it's aged a bit. For me, it's very

similar to being on a roll when I'm writing--I don't want to stop in

the middle of it. When I have a recipe in hand to put together, I

have a clear idea of what I'm going for. That idea is often quite

visceral and needs to be expressed quickly or its reason for being is

in danger of becoming alien to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Gottschalk wrote:

> Do you make an accord first and once you're happy with it add it to a

> would-be perfume? Or do you make the perfume at once, bottom to top?

I usually build a perfume ngredient by ingredient. I do play around with

accords (in fact I've got a whole bottle library of them) but I find

that each oil or essence interacts in it's own individual way with each

other one...so you can't just combine different accords. It's too

unpredictable.

I'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

fragrance around it. Or I will start with a particular accord that I've

built, and add little bits a drop at a time of different things to

create a particular effect from it.

It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils can be

so totally different from the oils on their own.

Ambrosia

http://www.perfumebynature.com.au

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Gottschalk wrote:

> Do you make an accord first and once you're happy with it add it to a

> would-be perfume? Or do you make the perfume at once, bottom to top?

I usually build a perfume ngredient by ingredient. I do play around with

accords (in fact I've got a whole bottle library of them) but I find

that each oil or essence interacts in it's own individual way with each

other one...so you can't just combine different accords. It's too

unpredictable.

I'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

fragrance around it. Or I will start with a particular accord that I've

built, and add little bits a drop at a time of different things to

create a particular effect from it.

It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils can be

so totally different from the oils on their own.

Ambrosia

http://www.perfumebynature.com.au

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

> fragrance around it.

Ditto.

> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

> can be

> so totally different from the oils on their own.

This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

> fragrance around it.

Ditto.

> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

> can be

> so totally different from the oils on their own.

This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

> fragrance around it.

Ditto.

> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

> can be

> so totally different from the oils on their own.

This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Gottschalk wrote:

>

>

>> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

>> fragrance around it.

>

> Ditto.

>

>> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

>> can be

>> so totally different from the oils on their own.

>

> This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

I t also means that I go through an incredible number of " experiment "

bottles.

I've got a whole shelf full of them, just from 3 perfumes I've been

working on. And it also means I keep the " failures " for future reference

too.

My current frustration is a specific " spring flowers " scent I've got in

mind....I want it green, and softly flowery without being overpowering.

So far I've got a lovely collection of delightful scent, but none of

them are what I have in mind.

I wanted to build it around rose and neroli...and somehow it always ends

up with an intense fruity sharpness I really don't want.

I'm beginning to think I may have to abandon the two and start with

totally different flowers.....mutter mutter......

Ambrosia

http://www.perfumebynature.com.au

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Gottschalk wrote:

>

>

>> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

>> fragrance around it.

>

> Ditto.

>

>> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

>> can be

>> so totally different from the oils on their own.

>

> This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

I t also means that I go through an incredible number of " experiment "

bottles.

I've got a whole shelf full of them, just from 3 perfumes I've been

working on. And it also means I keep the " failures " for future reference

too.

My current frustration is a specific " spring flowers " scent I've got in

mind....I want it green, and softly flowery without being overpowering.

So far I've got a lovely collection of delightful scent, but none of

them are what I have in mind.

I wanted to build it around rose and neroli...and somehow it always ends

up with an intense fruity sharpness I really don't want.

I'm beginning to think I may have to abandon the two and start with

totally different flowers.....mutter mutter......

Ambrosia

http://www.perfumebynature.com.au

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Gottschalk wrote:

>

>

>> 'll often start off with one particular ingredient...and weave a

>> fragrance around it.

>

> Ditto.

>

>> It never ceases to amaze me how the synergy of two (or more) oils

>> can be

>> so totally different from the oils on their own.

>

> This alchemical nature of our art is I think the crux of it all.

I t also means that I go through an incredible number of " experiment "

bottles.

I've got a whole shelf full of them, just from 3 perfumes I've been

working on. And it also means I keep the " failures " for future reference

too.

My current frustration is a specific " spring flowers " scent I've got in

mind....I want it green, and softly flowery without being overpowering.

So far I've got a lovely collection of delightful scent, but none of

them are what I have in mind.

I wanted to build it around rose and neroli...and somehow it always ends

up with an intense fruity sharpness I really don't want.

I'm beginning to think I may have to abandon the two and start with

totally different flowers.....mutter mutter......

Ambrosia

http://www.perfumebynature.com.au

Link to comment
Share on other sites

" Adam Gottschalk wrote:

> Do you make an accord first and once you're happy with it add it to a 

> would-be perfume? Or do you make the perfume at once, bottom to top?

Oddly I associate scent with people I've known or people I love, colors they

remind me of so I'm more abstract. Then I'll find one scent that defines them to

a point and buld around that...but I do make lists of their qualities (the

people), interests and what I think a scent would be symbolic of their

character.evie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...