Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 to find out about Toxi mold home kit, but they didn't have it i or the co email. I would LOVE to get that kit. The Home Depot Pro Lab kit isn't very good quality. Thanks for letting me know HOW I can buy it for WHAT price? Thanks...if there are other tests that you recommend, thanks for sharing. Thanks Shybasset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 They have a simple test that tests for stachybotrys and aspergillus niger. I don't know who carries it but you could call them to find a local dealer. On 9/2/06, shybasset <shybasset@...> wrote: > to find out about Toxi mold home kit, but they didn't have it i or the > co email. I would LOVE to get that kit. The Home Depot Pro Lab kit > isn't very good quality. Thanks for letting me know HOW I can buy it > for WHAT price? Thanks...if there are other tests that you recommend, > thanks for sharing. Thanks Shybasset > > > > > > > > > FAIR USE NOTICE: > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 2, 2006 Report Share Posted September 2, 2006 shybasset, I you aren't impressed with the Home Depot culture kits, get the ones from Dallas Environmental Clinic, 25.00 each includes analyis after 6-8 weeks of culturing. I have had been pleased with the Home Depot kits. I DO think the culture plates you get from Dallas are of higher quality and they test sample for longer period of time, since some mold takes longer to grow. They ask for 6-8 weeks. Plates referred to on POA site ask for turn around time of 7-10 days. That's too short for many molds to appear. I don't remember time frame given for ProLab but it was closer to the Dallas time. I DO think the Dallas plates are probably handled in way to keep them cleaner, just knowing how carefully they do things there. They send them by two day priority delivery so they don't get hot. Since mine arrived in three days by regular ground delivery, they said to throw those away and they shipped me a new set. However I didn't throw them away. I figured I could use them for taking spore counts only. Regular price of Dallas kits include plates and analysis, so I wouldn't be able to get them analyized but could use them for spore counts only. They tell you to keep refrigerated until you use them but just as an experiment with these freebees, I left them out in room temperature. Idea was to see if they grew something without being exposed to anything at all. I've had them for three weeks now and nothing has grown in them. Last week I took one to the Candlewood Suites, a temporary living place with kitchenette that was offering me a good rate for staying over a month, $41 a day which included everything, telephone, cable, free laundry facilities, room cleaned just like hotel, etc. Of course for over a month, that is over a $1k but...compared to hotel/motel rates it is good. So I looked at efficiency they had and asked if I could do a half hour culture plate due to allergies. She said yes. That was a few days ago and now stuff growing in it looks identical to what was growing in plate I tested right next to wear I sleep at home, whitish goo. I will not send this off for testing, but goes to show you I may have spent over a $1k to stay someplace else and air quality may not be any different than room I am sleeping in at home. Now my culture plates from bedroom may come back as just catching some yeast, so not bad, but not bad at home either. If so, problem in my own home is probably just summer bringing down attic air and sealing off attic may solve that problem. Anyway, I think advantage of Home Depot plates is this: you pay separately just to buy the plates which is about $10. You can use it to just count spores to see how moldy in general it is. If you already know what kind of mold you have around house, this may be sufficient and you don't need to pay the extra $35 to send it off for analysis. If you have never done culture plates before in building and have no idea what kind of mold is there, I recommend getting the Dallas plates as they are the least expensive, probably good or best quality, and they will culture them for 6-8 weeks and identify what kind of mold you have. As people here will tell you, you are unlikely to catch stachybotra, (or fusariam I believe), two of the nastier molds. You can only do that by finding mold and doing sending a swab of it (or tape lift) to a lab. If you can't find visible mold, can't test for stachy. I did catch ONE fusarium in mold plate. I have read though that you are much likierly to ingest fusarium, than inhale it. Anyone know any different than that? Also undesireable is aspergillus niger but they can be caught in culture plate. Maybe these Quicktox kits may help to detect these nastier toxic molds. That would be great. It will be awhile before we can tell if those work. Anyway, point to all this is if you are 1) in a hurry, the Home Depot plates can be picked up 24/7; 2.) if counting the number of spores present will be sufficient the Home Depot plates are good because cost of analyizing them is NOT built into price. If you have the time to order them and receive them, take about 3-4 days and want them analyized, I recommend Dallas plates. However I paid for professional air testing from someone recommended on IA quality group organization and his testing although much more expensive did not differ much from results I got from the Pro Lab. I think it is a little snooty to turn up nose at these just because they 'the best'. They aren't bad either. If you are pinched for time, they are better than nothing. Only thing I would be cautious of is something there is contamination. I got one contaminated vial of culture liquid. I called them and they replaced it. Got replacement promptly. I have had enough testing done I know what type of mold is around my house and all I want know is to know my efforts to clean up are succeeding, so all I need is to see count collected in dish go down to level I am happy with. For that I know no where else I can buy culture plates without paying for analysis also which I don't want right now. As for quality, if I come up with goofey result -higher count than seems reasonable or different looking mold than I am used to seeing around here, I can retest with plates from Dallas. As for the Quicktox test kits, these are new so untested by anyone we know, so those are to be suspicious until tested in use and found to be accurate. Don't assume since lab looks impressive, these tests are any more valuable than the Home Depot plates. I've used the Home Depot plates and professional testing that cost me much, much money came out virtually the same as far as identifying problem areas and the same kind of molds caught. I WILL see if there is BIG difference in culture plates when I get test results back from Dallas. Dr Rae the environmental doctor down there who is considered an expert depends on them and recommends them. One of first questions he asked me was have I done culture plates. I had and hadn't gotten results back and he said when I got them, to forward them on to him...so that expert doesn't think they are worthless wastes of time. Other plates referred to at POA had a turn around time of 7-10 days. That is muchm much too short a time, as many molds just don't even start to grow or can't be seen by then, so that is same source of recommendation as recommending Ouicktox strips. Just because it's mentioned there, don't assume it's a good product. They may be paying to advertise their products there. Still I am going to try Quicktox strips as nothing else I know of is offered right now to detect mycotoxins quickly so choice is easy...nothing versus something. --- shybasset <shybasset@...> wrote: > to find out about Toxi mold home kit, but they > didn't have it i or the > co email. I would LOVE to get that kit. The > Home Depot Pro Lab kit > isn't very good quality. Thanks for letting me > know HOW I can buy it > for WHAT price? Thanks...if there are other > tests that you recommend, > thanks for sharing. Thanks Shybasset Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2006 Report Share Posted September 3, 2006 The problem with mold culture plates is that they will grow spores that fall on them but the spores that grow won't necessarily be what would grow on wet building materials.. And what does it tell you, that there are spores in the air? Some mold growing on plates might be able to be identified to the species level, but some might also not.. (asp/pen spores look very similar) It takes experts to really do that well.. A toxin test may directly identify a toxic situation. bear in mind that any mold test should not be used to say a situation is safe (its just one data point) but a test that is taken from a direct sample.. like a tape lift.. can sometimes show you that you do have a problem.. I think the whole concept of clearance air testing is particularly, really, profoundly flawed because its so easy to do the test in an unoccupied apartment or early in the morning on a calm, cold dry day.. which might be very unlikely to show spores under almost any conditions.. Also, as we all know.. stachybotrys rarely sporulates.. - see the problem? The only test that I thnk is meaningful is either a complete and total visual inspection.. even inside walls and attics, crawl spaces, etc.. (how practical is that? not very) or a functional test.. by whoever was being made sick by it in the first place.. If a place is safe - people who react to the mold there don't react to it anymore. Even if its being lived in, there is a typical spectrum of weather, etc.. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2006 Report Share Posted September 3, 2006 Actually, I forgot.. There is a much better way to do air testing but its expensive and takes time.. Mycotoxin testing using high volume air testing and a buffered solution to catch the particles that impinge upon it.. They need equipment that sucks a very large amount of air into the sampler... The Spector Omni 3000 that Hayley posted some info on a few months ago is one example.. Spin Con is another impingement sampler.. The amount of air they sample is very high, much higher than the several liters of air that is typically used to sample for microscopically identifiable spores.. Those methods don't have any way of identifying mycotoxin problem buildings. They can't even identify molds to species level, often.. Asp/pen spores can be identified as such, but not to species level there. The spores they catch might not be viable.. Thats the advantage of plates, they show spore viability.. but to fully identify some species you would need PCR, which is super expensive. If an impingement or bulk toxin test shows toxins, that tells you THIS SITE IS TOXIC... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 3, 2006 Report Share Posted September 3, 2006 I will keep this information but how to put this to work when shopping from apartment to apartment. Also if you are looking to buy a new home as Leigh is that is empty of furniture and freshly painted, I wonder how many toxins would be detected in completely emptied and cleaned out place. If family still is living there, you could do it with their things still there if they will let you. That might work in a particular situation but if expensive you would probably have better paid already an inspector to do alot of work already and any problems that are there probably found I would imagine. --- LiveSimply <quackadillian@...> wrote: > Actually, I forgot.. There is a much better way > to do air testing but > its expensive and takes time.. > > Mycotoxin testing using high volume air testing > and a buffered > solution to catch the particles that impinge > upon it.. They need > equipment that sucks a very large amount of air > into the sampler... > > The Spector Omni 3000 that Hayley posted some > info on a few months ago > is one example.. Spin Con is another > impingement sampler.. > > The amount of air they sample is very high, > much higher than the > several liters of air that is typically used to > sample for > microscopically identifiable spores.. Those > methods don't have any way > of identifying mycotoxin problem buildings. > They can't even identify > molds to species level, often.. Asp/pen spores > can be identified as > such, but not to species level there. The > spores they catch might not > be viable.. Thats the advantage of plates, they > show spore viability.. > but to fully identify some species you would > need PCR, which is super > expensive. > > If an impingement or bulk toxin test shows > toxins, that tells you THIS > SITE IS TOXIC... > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.