Jump to content
RemedySpot.com

Weight vests

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Mel -- with respect to your recent comments on the use

of extra-loading via the use of weighted vests:

Here's a perspective on bodymass increases via weighted vests:

Over our eight week outdoor season, my high school sprinters, (most of whom

do not train year round) make improvements as they reduce body weight. When

I visited the Harvard locomotion lab last summer, I asked if these athletes

might actually stronger by late season from doing a variety of drills for

several weeks under the " resistance " of their own mass. Could it be that

athletes who lower body mass during the course of the season (and all our

sprinters do) are, in effect, using their mass as a form of event specific

strength work?

Athletes often use weighted vests, diver's belts, etc. in order to increase

mass without altering motor patterns which, as you pointed out, is the

problem with using weights at the extremities.

My question was: might my athletes be " using " their slightly heavier bodies

early in the season as a form of strength work, and that, as they get in

shape, are losing the mass while gaining strength? For example, one of our

sprinters began the outdoor season (early April) running the 200 in 23.92. By

the third week of May, his time dropped to 22.54. In that time period, he

lost ten pounds. Of course, performance drops by way of reduced body mass

would not apply to athletes who have advanced training ages and extended

training cycles. We would assume their weight would be fairly consistent.

The locomotion group felt this was correct, and that lowering body mass

(which many refer to as getting in shape) may be the major effect of training

in many cases. They concurred with the idea that reducing body weight without

compromising the ability to produce Favge will confer greater speed, because

the critical variable for speed is Favge/Wb). This would result from losses

in body fat that reduce weight. Simply put, the lighter the better, or

perhaps the leaner the better for speed.

Dr. has also reviewed the research on weighted vests, and I would

recommend checking the Running Research News (Jan-Feb 1996) for the article:

Can Ankle Weights and Weight Vests Help You Run Faster?

In a study done at Texas Tech, thirteen athletes used traditional strength

training, while fourteen athletes used traditional strength training plus

plyometric training with weight vests. The traditional strength training

carried out by all 27 athletes consisted of power cleans, bench presses,

sit-up, pull-ups, leg extensions, and leg curls (five sets of five reps at

about 65-75% of max). Near max weight and lower numbers of reps were used on

every fourth workout. Athletes trained three times per week for six weeks.

Those in the weighted/plyometric group had 10 to 12% of their body weight

loaded into vests

The 40 yard dash, what Owen mentioned as the test of " real significance for

runners who want to enhance their leg speed, " verified the merits of

added-weight plyometric training. The group went from an average time of

5.07 to 4.74 in six weeks. (The added-weight group had also improved by 13%

in the vertical jump and 7% in the standing long jump).

Heikki Rusko of Finland also conducted a weight vest study a few years

earlier, and his test subjects improved their maximal running velocity by 3%

within the same six-week time frame used in the Texas Tech study. Rusko's

athletes also had about ten percent of their body weight in the vests.

Kindest regards,

Ken Jakalski

Lisle, Illinois

* Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you

wish them to be published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

f wrote:

> The most serious concern with weighted vests is their compaction of

> discs in the spine with ballistic types movements. Also, they do

> change the technique as the resistance is not applied against the

> movement specifically. The athlete is challenged to some degree to

> stand up straight.

>

> Weighted shorts in the overspeed cycle would be far more effective

> as they do not compromise the spine and will be more useful to

> provide resistance through the precise motor pathway. It should also

> be noted that the weights need to be placed appropriately around the

> hip/top of the thigh and no where near the knees. One should also

> start with only a few weights in the shorts as to not change proper

> technique.

Mel Siff:

> Of course, someone will argue that weighted shorts will overstress

> the hips and joints of the lower extremities - and for apparently good reason.

** This simply relates to the athletes fitness and the amount of

weight used. Having the weight push down however, can put the discs

in a precarious position

[studies have also shown that the a very high incidence of back pain

and dysfunction occurs among those who lead sedentary lives. Those who

very heavily load their spines (like lifters) have a significantly lower

incidence of back problems than the general population. Apparently

studies of African women who regularly carry heavy loads on their

heads has shown similar results. As is so often the case in exercise,

it is not so much the exercise per se, but the way in which that exercise

is carried out which leads to damage. Mel Siff]

> I am not discounting the vests with certain movements, like pitching.

> However, they do not provide a safe and most effective means for

> runners.

Mel Siff:

> The research which showed benefits from wearing weighted belts and vests

> simply involved walking and doing one's daily activities throughout one's

> entire waking day, not during running.

** If I am not mistaken, the original post was in regards to running.

Again, the amount of weight and the person's fitness still has to be

considered even with walking.

[The responses referred to the training for running, not simply

running with extra loading - this thread started when I cited a study

which focused on walking with what they called " extra-loading " . Mel Siff]

Yosef

Muskegon Mi

* Please sign all letters with full name and city if you wish to

have them published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

f wrote:

> The most serious concern with weighted vests is their compaction of

> discs in the spine with ballistic types movements. Also, they do

> change the technique as the resistance is not applied against the

> movement specifically. The athlete is challenged to some degree to

> stand up straight.

>

> Weighted shorts in the overspeed cycle would be far more effective

> as they do not compromise the spine and will be more useful to

> provide resistance through the precise motor pathway. It should also

> be noted that the weights need to be placed appropriately around the

> hip/top of the thigh and no where near the knees. One should also

> start with only a few weights in the shorts as to not change proper

> technique.

Mel Siff:

> Of course, someone will argue that weighted shorts will overstress

> the hips and joints of the lower extremities - and for apparently good reason.

** This simply relates to the athletes fitness and the amount of

weight used. Having the weight push down however, can put the discs

in a precarious position

[studies have also shown that the a very high incidence of back pain

and dysfunction occurs among those who lead sedentary lives. Those who

very heavily load their spines (like lifters) have a significantly lower

incidence of back problems than the general population. Apparently

studies of African women who regularly carry heavy loads on their

heads has shown similar results. As is so often the case in exercise,

it is not so much the exercise per se, but the way in which that exercise

is carried out which leads to damage. Mel Siff]

> I am not discounting the vests with certain movements, like pitching.

> However, they do not provide a safe and most effective means for

> runners.

Mel Siff:

> The research which showed benefits from wearing weighted belts and vests

> simply involved walking and doing one's daily activities throughout one's

> entire waking day, not during running.

** If I am not mistaken, the original post was in regards to running.

Again, the amount of weight and the person's fitness still has to be

considered even with walking.

[The responses referred to the training for running, not simply

running with extra loading - this thread started when I cited a study

which focused on walking with what they called " extra-loading " . Mel Siff]

Yosef

Muskegon Mi

* Please sign all letters with full name and city if you wish to

have them published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

f wrote:

> The most serious concern with weighted vests is their compaction of

> discs in the spine with ballistic types movements. Also, they do

> change the technique as the resistance is not applied against the

> movement specifically. The athlete is challenged to some degree to

> stand up straight.

>

> Weighted shorts in the overspeed cycle would be far more effective

> as they do not compromise the spine and will be more useful to

> provide resistance through the precise motor pathway. It should also

> be noted that the weights need to be placed appropriately around the

> hip/top of the thigh and no where near the knees. One should also

> start with only a few weights in the shorts as to not change proper

> technique.

Mel Siff:

> Of course, someone will argue that weighted shorts will overstress

> the hips and joints of the lower extremities - and for apparently good reason.

** This simply relates to the athletes fitness and the amount of

weight used. Having the weight push down however, can put the discs

in a precarious position

[studies have also shown that the a very high incidence of back pain

and dysfunction occurs among those who lead sedentary lives. Those who

very heavily load their spines (like lifters) have a significantly lower

incidence of back problems than the general population. Apparently

studies of African women who regularly carry heavy loads on their

heads has shown similar results. As is so often the case in exercise,

it is not so much the exercise per se, but the way in which that exercise

is carried out which leads to damage. Mel Siff]

> I am not discounting the vests with certain movements, like pitching.

> However, they do not provide a safe and most effective means for

> runners.

Mel Siff:

> The research which showed benefits from wearing weighted belts and vests

> simply involved walking and doing one's daily activities throughout one's

> entire waking day, not during running.

** If I am not mistaken, the original post was in regards to running.

Again, the amount of weight and the person's fitness still has to be

considered even with walking.

[The responses referred to the training for running, not simply

running with extra loading - this thread started when I cited a study

which focused on walking with what they called " extra-loading " . Mel Siff]

Yosef

Muskegon Mi

* Please sign all letters with full name and city if you wish to

have them published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Perhaps there is a study of Armed Forces, i.e., Marines, Army, that have walked

and/or jogged for miles with packs from 70lbs to 100+ lbs to show the resultant

effect on back and performance.

Charlie Newkerk, C.S.C.S.

Rockledge, Fl

newkfit@...

-----------

f wrote:

> > The most serious concern with weighted vests is their compaction of

> > discs in the spine with ballistic types movements. Also, they do

> > change the technique as the resistance is not applied against the

> > movement specifically. The athlete is challenged to some degree to

> > stand up straight.

> >

> > Weighted shorts in the overspeed cycle would be far more effective

> > as they do not compromise the spine and will be more useful to

> > provide resistance through the precise motor pathway. It should also

> > be noted that the weights need to be placed appropriately around the

> > hip/top of the thigh and no where near the knees. One should also

> > start with only a few weights in the shorts as to not change proper

> > technique.

Mel Siff:

> > Of course, someone will argue that weighted shorts will overstress

> > the hips and joints of the lower extremities - and for apparently good

reason.

Yosef

> This simply relates to the athletes fitness and the amount of

> weight used. Having the weight push down however, can put the discs

> in a precarious position

Mel Siff:

> [studies have also shown that the a very high incidence of back pain

> and dysfunction occurs among those who lead sedentary lives. Those who

> very heavily load their spines (like lifters) have a significantly lower

> incidence of back problems than the general population. Apparently

> studies of African women who regularly carry heavy loads on their

> heads has shown similar results. As is so often the case in exercise,

> it is not so much the exercise per se, but the way in which that exercise

> is carried out which leads to damage. ]

Yosef

> > I am not discounting the vests with certain movements, like pitching.

> > However, they do not provide a safe and most effective means for

> > runners.

Mel Siff:

> > The research which showed benefits from wearing weighted belts and vests

> > simply involved walking and doing one's daily activities throughout one's

> > entire waking day, not during running.

Yosef

> If I am not mistaken, the original post was in regards to running.

> Again, the amount of weight and the person's fitness still has to be

> considered even with walking.

Mel Siff:

> [The responses referred to the training for running, not simply

> running with extra loading - this thread started when I cited a study

> which focused on walking with what they called " extra-loading " . ]

* Please sign all letters with full name and city if you wish to

have them published!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...