Guest guest Posted September 6, 2001 Report Share Posted September 6, 2001 Not for the vegetarian crowd! Be well! ron Meat - NOT a Nutritional Pariah Meat has been a subject of great controversy. Many of you have heard that meat causes anything from colon cancer to heart disease. Let's analyze these accusations one by one. First, let's look at the meat - colon cancer connection. Several studies have shown NO correlation between meat and the incidence of colon cancer, others have shown a correlation with processed meats, others have shown a correlation between meat and colon cancer, and still others have shown a correlation with overcooked, burnt meat, although others have shown no such connection. However, most nutritionists will agree that there is no definitive mechanism by which meat causes cancer. My opinion is that meat in it of itself does NOT lead to cancer. This is supported by many studies, especially those measuring fresh meat consumption. I think that two main things contribute to the contention that meat causes colon cancer. First is the stuff that is eaten with the meat, namely refined, processed starches and sugars. Think about it. In this country, a hamburger goes along with a white bun, french fries and a large soda, a steak with steak fries or some other type of potato, a hot dog with a bun and some kind of starch or fried food, a deli sandwich with white bread and potato chips. Very rarely in this country do you see people eat fresh meat with just a salad. Furthermore, a large amount of the meat eaten is cured or processed with carcinogenic preservatives. This includes bacon, hot dogs, sausage, and most deli meats. It is thus not surprising that some studies show a correlation between meat and cancer. In fact, if we delve even further into the matter, we will find that in fact, many studies find a correlation between the consumption of starches and other refined carbohydrates, and colon cancer. There is no reason to believe that fresh meat will lead to any disease. Why? Well, hunter-gatherers who ate very high meat diets in the absence of processed, refined foods had practically non existent levels of colon cancer. But doesn't wild meat contain very little fat? Yes - and no. This leads us to the saturated fat content of meat. Today's cattle, unfortunately, are for the most part stuffed with pesticide laden grains and soybeans to fatten them up. They get very little exercise, and as a result have high levels of unnatural fat in their muscles and elsewhere. Now, to be fair, there are cattle farmers out there who raise free range cattle which eat grasses and organic feed, and get more exercise, but even those don't approach the fat levels and content of wild animals (who tend to be lean and have more healthy Omega 3 FA's in them). So what should we do? I personally choose the leanest cuts of meat, and trim all visible fat off of my meat. Other than that, I'm not too worried. Why? Because most of the fat from beef is fine. That's right. Perfectly okay. It turns out that about half of the saturated fat in meat is stearic acid, a saturated fat that doesn't raise LDL levels. Meat also contains conjugated linoleic acid (CLA), a powerful anti-carcinogen and fat burner. Furthermore, about half of the fat in meat is monounsatured (the same type of fat found in olive oil). Although hunter-gatherers ate lean, wild animals, they also ate the organs of these animals which contain large amounts of fat (including saturated fat). Meat contains nice amounts of B vitamins, which lower blood levels of homocysteine, a marker for heart disease. Finally, there is no evidence in the literature (outside of poorly controlled studies) to support the contention that meat consumption leads to heart disease. In fact, the French have one of the highest per capita consumption of meat yet low rates of heart disease. In Greece, too, meat consumption is higher than average but there too rates of heart disease are low. Finally, in Spain, an increase in meat consumption (with a corresponding decrease in sugar and high carbohydrate foods) led to a decrease in heart disease. The bottom line is that eating a balanced, varied diet such as the TBK diet with some meat and some fish, as well as poultry, is healthy and nutritious. Meat contains all of the B-vitamins, vitamin A, vitamin D, zinc, iron, phosphorous, potassium, magnesium, and lots of high quality protein. It's a mistake to exclude it from your diet. Just be smart and stay away from cured and preserved meats, and don't burn or overcook your meat and you'll reap the benefits of meat without having to worry about potential side effects. References Thun MJ, et al. Risk factors for fatal colon cancer in a large prospective study. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 1992;84(19):1491-1500. Forman D. Meat and cancer: a relation in search of a mechanism. The Lancet. 1999;353:686-7 De Stefani, E. et al. Dietary nitrosamines, heterocyclic amines, and risk of gastric cancer: a case-control study in Uruguay. Nutrition & Cancer 1998;30(2):158-62 Chatenoud, et al. Refined-cereal intake and risk of selected cancers in Italy. American of Clinical Nutrition 1999;70:1107-10. La Vecchia C, et al. A case-control study of diet and colo-rectal cancer in northern Italy. International Journal of Cancer. 1988;41:492-498. Augustsson K, et al. Dietary heterocyclic amines and cancer of the colon, rectum, bladder, and kidney: a population based study. The Lancet. 1999;353:703-707. Goldbohm RA, et al. A prospective cohort study on the relation between meat consumption and the risk of colon cancer. Cancer Research. 1994;54:718-723. Steinmetz KA, and Potter JD. Food -group consumption and colon cancer in the Adelaide case-control study. II. Meat, poultry, seafood, dairy foods and eggs. Giovannucci E, et al. Intake of fat, meat, and fiber in relation of risk of colon cancer in men. Cancer Research. 1994;54:2390-7. Krosner JA, et al. Colorectal carcinoma: Risk factors for the development of colorectal carcinoma and their modification. Hematology/oncology Clinics of North America. 1997;11(4):548-578 Zhuo, XG and Watanabe S. " Factor analysis of digestive cancer mortality and food composition in 65 Chinese counties. " Journal of Epidemiology. Aug. 1999. 9(4):275-84 Renauld S, and DeLorgeril M. Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for heart disease. The Lancet. 1992;339:1523-6. Ulbright TLV, and Southgate DAT. Coronary heart disease: seven dietary factors. The Lancet. 1991;338:985-992. Serra-Majem L, et al. How could changes in diet explain changes in coronary heart disease? The Spanish paradox. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 1995;61:1351S-9S. USDA nutrient database Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.