Guest guest Posted September 19, 2002 Report Share Posted September 19, 2002 Just to play devil's advocate Dr Siff, what evidence is there that overhead squats require greater core stability than ball balancing exercises? Although ball balancing adepts may get buried with a light overhead squat, isn't it also true that athletes adept in overhead squatting would find ball balancing equally as challenging? [You, of course, are referring to what Chad Ikei stated at the recent SWIS symposium - and the point that he was making is that ball evangelists are missing one important fact, namely that the ability to balance on a ball does not necessarily enable one to balance more competently in any other situation. In all of my presentations on this subject, I always stress that stability training tends to be situation and context specific, which is exactly what you are focusing on. If you would care to read more on this topic, I have discussed it in much greater detail in my book, " Facts & Fallacies of Fitness " 2002, pp287-289. One reason why exercises such as overhead squats tend to offer superior " core strength " and stabilising ability during strength and impact sports is that the exercise is much more heavily loaded and the athlete is free to involve the stepping reflex and many changes of direction to facilitate change of base. Mel Siff] Shanahan, Melbourne Australia. * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.