Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 The Yo-Yo is an inventing of Hans Berg and Per Tesch. Per wrote the book: " Muscle meets magnet " (now published at Human Kinetics under a different title) he analyses the effects of important weight exercises by MRI, and wrote a chapter in the book: Strength and power in sport (P.V.Komi). He is an outstanding exercise scientist with an interest in musclefibres and the effects of training ( type in his name at PubMed). [Dr Per Tesch is indeed a very erudite scientist, but those books were written years after the use of inertial training machines was written about in Russia. Does what you have written suggest that those two invented inertial training before scientists such as Zatsiorsky and Verkhoshansky were using them in Russia? Mel Siff] Working for NASA one of the main issues is to find an effective way to maintain muscular strength under microgravity-weightlessness. Since free weights don't work, for obvious reasons, they tried electrostim, the penguin suit, elastic bands, but these were not effective enough. [The story goes that small isokinetic devices were also devised and decided upon instead of inertial devices. Does anyone know the true details about the design and use of strength training machines in space? Mel Siff] The simple concept of the flywheel solved the problem: Light, since the wheels are synthetic (weight is an important issue too in space travel) Versatile (most important exercises can be done and muscle groups can be trained using this principle. Take an exercise on a cable machine, e.g. seated rowing, adding the load that the concentric movement is heavy, the eccentric part of the movement is hardly a sufficient load for stimulating the muscle. While in the Yo-Yo: the concentric pulling movement is heavy, but at the end it flips around and on has to resist the eccentric movement, which is in this case not dependent of the weight but on the velocity of movement. In other words: the faster you pull (concentric) the faster the flywheel will pull back (eccentric). Especially in muscle groups that need eccentric work in order to function optimally e.g. hamstrings, the Yo-Yo leg curl has helped us a lot in getting stronger and preventing hamstring injuries! The forces generated by the flywheel are not to be underestimated! [Nobody here has suggested that the forces generated by a spinning flywheel should be underestimated. The angular momentum developed can be very great indeed, especially as the angular velocity increases, so that inertial training machines can subject muscles to extremely large forces. Indeed, if used in place of a weight stack on a pulley machine, inertial devices can certainly produce a most effective type of strength training machine. Mel Siff] Henk Kraaijenhof Amstelveen Holland ---------- Dale E Wallace: Since it seems that we still cannot seem to find out the names of any Olympians who have trained with Nautilus machines, here is yet another concept with machines: The company, " YoYo Technology " , found at this address: http://www.yoyotechnology.com .... makes the advertising claim, " Olympic and World Champion hurdler Ludmilla Engquist and fitness friend enjoy the benefits of strength training using no weights. " The site explains its patented principle's and also the Concentric and Eccentric movement. From the web page is the patented principle; " Yo Yo Technology AB(Inc.)has developed a revolutionary new strength training system using a patented rotatable flywheel-hence the name " YoYo " -which replaces weight plates and other resistance training devices relying on gravity. YoYo's resistance is provided by spinning flywheels, very much like a child's yoyo, with the strap being wound and unwound around the axle of a fixed flywheel. A concentric(positive) muscle action overcomes the inertia of the flywheel of the flywheel setting it spinning on low friction bearings, while a subsequent eccentric(negative) muscle action is used to overcome the inertial force of the spinning flywheel. This is the patented YoYo principle. " That is what the website claims and I heard about this on a website that a high school football coach writes for who rushed out and purchased one of the machines. At least they will claim an Olympian. This was not enough to make me drop the money nor take a second look, but they claim to have cutting edge technology and research. Sorry Jerry, but your a little late on this one.(A joke there as I have read Mr Telle's work and find it to be a great read.) Mel, Jerry, or anyone else with comments? I personally will continue to relive the golden oldies with my dumbbells and barbells, no machines and throw in a few " Telle raises and a cycle of " DSP Training " . I have not seen a machine or training system that would make me want to rush out and join a gym yet! * Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 << That is what the website claims and I heard about this on a website that a high school football coach writes for who rushed out and purchased one of the machines. At least they will claim an Olympian. This was not enough to make me drop the money nor take a second look, but they claim to have cutting edge technology and research. Sorry Jerry, but your a little late on this one. Telle response-- I'm crushed !! Actually I built one of these things about 20 ?years ago(really) with a 36 lb " circle " from the metal scrap yard. I didnt computer interface it--because of resistance irregularities--that is the eccentric resistance is a funtion of concentric inertial wheel momentum(terminology)or in other words you only get a an eccentric resitive force equal to(99%?) of the concentric force. The problems/advantages lie in the distribution of user energy?/force--that is after a somewhat full resistance concentric rep the spool begins to winde the strap and provide eccentric resistance. If you resist the negative motion vigourously at this point--the inertial wheel dies--stops before the eccentric is completed. This is not a huge problem and the user soon learns to distribute the eccentirc force over the rep and can even target certain negative phases--there is a danger if user force is applied to late in the negative movement resulting in possible soft tissue damage. I rather wish I had saved the transmission device. On certain pulling movements where user force is much higher(3X's) at the onset of positive and end of negative movement( low pulley rows, upright rows, lat pulldowns) this device may work well for hypertrophy? Because the onset of positive is always very slow relatve to the end rapid acceerations are inhibited.. I talked (had a bit of a tiff with)with Tesch and his assistant at the New Orleans NSCA Yo yo is a good term for this stuff they tried to tell me that you could increase negative resistance and we went over to his computer and argued the point--I cant remember the exact topic, but was not impressed and thought I was being " ed. " His reselling his " Muscle Meets Magnets " under a different title indicates to me he will do anything to make a sale--big credibility issue!. Jerry Telle Lakewood CO USA jrtelle@... ---------------- >> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 9, 2002 Report Share Posted September 9, 2002 I am not defending Tesch patents or his explanation of it. I just found 53 of his publications in peer-reviewed journals in PubMed and I know there are a lot more,' Dr.Tesch has been working at the famous Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and for NASA. Mr. Telle probably never wrote a book, otherwise he would know that writing a book, even published under another title, certainly on a subject like this, is hardly a money-maker or even an attempt to a big sale. [Actually, Jerry has written a book, which he asked me to review and edit many years ago, so he is painfully aware of the difficulties in selling techincal books in strength science. Mel Siff] Articles, information, supplements and machines appear on this list from people with a lot less scientific credibility than Dr.Tesch. [True, but others with equal or greater credibility also appear here. We also need to distinguish between credibility in one field and credibility in another in which one may not necessarily be an expert. Unfortunately, far too many of the general public are cowed by the sight of a PhD and daunting list of publications and seem to accept the meanderings of some world famous minds into some territory where they are just as lost as the rest of us. Thus, one always has to look beyond the personality and rely solely on the evidence being presented. Mel Siff] More information about the Yo-Yo: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=7980338 & dopt=Abstract> Berg HE, Tesch A. A gravity-independent ergometer to be used for resistance training in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Aug; 65(8):752-6. [it is interesting to note that this publication appeared many years after similar articles appeared in Russian journals and even a few years after books written by Dr Zatsiorsky and myself had described inertial training in English. I will try to find out from my Russian colleagues more about the early history of these devices. Mel Siff] Henk Kraaijenhof Amstelveen Holland ------- henkra@... writes: << That is what the website claims and I heard about this on a website that a high school football coach writes for who rushed out and purchased one of the machines. At least they will claim an Olympian. This was not enough to make me drop the money nor take a second look, but they claim to have cutting edge technology and research. Sorry Jerry, but your a little late on this one. Jerry Telle response-- I'm crushed !! Actually I built one of these things about 20 ?years ago(really) with a 36 lb " circle " from the metal scrap yard. I didnt computer interface it--because of resistance irregularities--that is the eccentric resistance is a funtion of concentric inertial wheel momentum(terminology)or in other words you only get a an eccentric resitive force equal to(99%?) of the concentric force. The problems/advantages lie in the distribution of user energy?/force--that is after a somewhat full resistance concentric rep the spool begins to winde the strap and provide eccentric resistance. If you resist the negative motion vigourously at this point--the inertial wheel dies--stops before the eccentric is completed. This is not a huge problem and the user soon learns to distribute the eccentirc force over the rep and can even target certain negative phases--there is a danger if user force is applied to late in the negative movement resulting in possible soft tissue damage. I rather wish I had saved the transmission device. On certain pulling movements where user force is much higher(3X's) at the onset of positive and end of negative movement( low pulley rows, upright rows, lat pulldowns) this device may work well for hypertrophy? Because the onset of positive is always very slow relatve to the end rapid acceerations are inhibited.. I talked (had a bit of a tiff with)with Tesch and his assistant at the New Orleans NSCA Yo yo is a good term for this stuff they tried to tell me that you could increase negative resistance and we went over to his computer and argued the point--I cant remember the exact topic, but was not impressed and thought I was being " ed. " His reselling his " Muscle Meets Magnets " under a different title indicates to me he will do anything to make a sale--big credibility issue!. Jerry Telle *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 10, 2002 Report Share Posted September 10, 2002 I am not defending Tesch patents or his explanation of it. I just found 53 of his publications in peer-reviewed journals in PubMed and I know there are a lot more,' Dr.Tesch has been working at the famous Karolinska Institute in Stockholm and for NASA. Mr. Telle probably never wrote a book, otherwise he would know that writing a book, even published under another title, certainly on a subject like this, is hardly a money-maker or even an attempt to a big sale. Mel Siff: <Actually, Jerry has written a book, which he asked me to review and edit many years ago, so he is painfully aware of the difficulties in selling techincal books in strength science.> Articles, information, supplements and machines appear on this list from people with a lot less scientific credibility than Dr.Tesch. Mel Siff: <True, but others with equal or greater credibility also appear here. We also need to distinguish between credibility in one field and credibility in another in which one may not necessarily be an expert. Unfortunately, far too many of the general public are cowed by the sight of a PhD and daunting list of publications and seem to accept the meanderings of some world famous minds into some territory where they are just as lost as the rest of us.> Thus, one always has to look beyond the personality and rely solely on the evidence being presented.> This might not be the case of Dr.Tesch here being an expert on muscle physiology and training effects. Don't forget it was Mr.Telle turning the release of Tesch' book into a credibility issue. More information about the Yo-Yo: <http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve & db=PubMed & list_uids=7980338 & dopt=Abstract> Berg HE, Tesch A. A gravity-independent ergometer to be used for resistance training in space. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1994 Aug; 65(8):752-6. Mel Siff: <It is interesting to note that this publication appeared many years after similar articles appeared in Russian journals and even a few years after books written by Dr Zatsiorsky and myself had described inertial training in English. I will try to find out from my Russian colleagues more about the early history of these devices. > Please don't be mistaken by the similarity in equipment, the difference is often in the details. Superficially many kinds of equipment look alike or are promoted to do the same job as the original idea. Look at vibration platforms as a perfect example. But it is like a friend of mine Marco Cardinale stated in his lectures: In God we trust, all others show data. [sorry, but the Scriptures clearly state that we should " prove all things " , and since other scriptures state that even God should be held to the same standards as the laws which " He " installed, then God should also be expected to offer some data or at least the way to find the data. Mel Siff] If a machine was described long time ago, why didn't it sustain until now: probably because it did not work as well as one expected and was discarded for that reason. [ Casler's earlier letters offer a very good explanation for this - MONEY. Had , Jerry and many others been able to attract the necessary funding, no doubt we would be seeing Telle and Casler devices in many gyms. Commercial success proves only one major thing - successful marketing and good business practice. Mel Siff] Why would it work now, simply because somebody picked up the basic idea and improved on it, maybe because of improvements in technology, electronics, software, that was not available at the time of the first seminal idea. [How many Russian mass marketed machines exist? This sort of enterprise was not one of the characteristics of the communist regime, so that we come across many Russian devices which are copied and produced in the West. For example, elastic bands and physio balls have been around for years, used largely by physical therapists, but it was only when some astute business folk saw the potential in the gullible and bored fitness world that such devices became best sellers. Mel Siff] When I read the recent descriptions about the resistance machines I continuously thing: how much would this be better than the free barbell, or could this all be an attempt for a big sale? [Without any reliance on exercise science, speak to elite athletes, especially those in the strength and power sports and see what their answers are. If we apply something like the legendary Milo approach, start a youngster's strength training by having him wrestle against progressively stronger and stronger opponents as he grows and see if any machines will ever increase his " functional " strength and stability to a comparable or greater extent. That unsophisticated non-technological approach will also help to answer that question. So will a comparison of inertial training with the tradtional training of weightlifting and powerlifting. At most any machine will offer only a certain modicum of supplementary strength conditioning, but will never replace the mainstream free weights methods. Mel Siff] Henk Kraaijenhof Amstelveen Holland ------- henkra@... writes: << That is what the website claims and I heard about this on a website that a high school football coach writes for who rushed out and purchased one of the machines. At least they will claim an Olympian. This was not enough to make me drop the money nor take a second look, but they claim to have cutting edge technology and research. Sorry Jerry, but your a little late on this one. Jerry Telle response-- I'm crushed !! Actually I built one of these things about 20 ?years ago(really) with a 36 lb " circle " from the metal scrap yard. I didnt computer interface it--because of resistance irregularities--that is the eccentric resistance is a funtion of concentric inertial wheel momentum(terminology)or in other words you only get a an eccentric resitive force equal to(99%?) of the concentric force. The problems/advantages lie in the distribution of user energy?/force--that is after a somewhat full resistance concentric rep the spool begins to winde the strap and provide eccentric resistance. If you resist the negative motion vigourously at this point--the inertial wheel dies--stops before the eccentric is completed. This is not a huge problem and the user soon learns to distribute the eccentirc force over the rep and can even target certain negative phases--there is a danger if user force is applied to late in the negative movement resulting in possible soft tissue damage. I rather wish I had saved the transmission device. On certain pulling movements where user force is much higher(3X's) at the onset of positive and end of negative movement( low pulley rows, upright rows, lat pulldowns) this device may work well for hypertrophy? Because the onset of positive is always very slow relatve to the end rapid acceerations are inhibited.. I talked (had a bit of a tiff with)with Tesch and his assistant at the New Orleans NSCA Yo yo is a good term for this stuff they tried to tell me that you could increase negative resistance and we went over to his computer and argued the point--I cant remember the exact topic, but was not impressed and thought I was being " ed. " His reselling his " Muscle Meets Magnets " under a different title indicates to me he will do anything to make a sale--big credibility issue!. Jerry Telle *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.