Guest guest Posted October 5, 2006 Report Share Posted October 5, 2006 In a message dated 10/5/2006 10:36:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, fijiwigged@... writes: That is 90,909 - get that? Ninety thousand, nine hundred and nine people have CMT in the USA! My Mom was told CMT was so rare. Not so rare if you ask me. jenny Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2006 Report Share Posted October 6, 2006 No kidding , I heard that 'rare' word too. But in 1962, even though CMT was in fact 'known', it was unfortunately lumped into a category of MD. Remember too, our USA population at that time was alot less - but now more people, more generations procreating, equals more CMT. The mere fact that I was 'supposedly' 1 of only 10 people diagnosed with CMT in the USA is BS. I mean, there you were, and so were the other 8 + hundreds/thousands too, lol With 90,909 people in the US with CMT, don't you think we'd get more research and treatment in the works? That is a large number of people who would benefit. And as our population grows and generations procreate, there will be more people with CMT. I also meant to say that that 90,909 figure does NOT include children, so if I can work out a child number, the total number will obviously increase. ~ Gretchen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 10, 2006 Report Share Posted October 10, 2006 Hello Gretchen, Several years ago, I went to a lady doctor in Portland, ME who was listed on the CMTA Board of Advisors. She has since moved to the White Plains, NY area and I can not get her name from my memory. She told me that she had been studying the French related population in the Northeast US and found an incidence rate of 1 per 800. She said that this was traced back to a couple who emigrated from France in the 1700's. Those comments could raise a lot of questions, but I thought I would pass it on anyway. EdM from NH > > Dear ers, > > Later this week, the U.S. Census Data Bank will release their new > figure stating that 330 million people now live in the USA. I have > been wondering for so long how many people in the US have CMT. > > Dr. Greg , CMT expert, provided me with an academic research > paper from 1991 that gave a figure whereas 1 out of 3,300 people are > affected with CMT. This is the same figure Mayo clinic uses. > > I contacted two other organizations and both reported it is 1 in 2500 > who are affected. One organization gave me no research data to back > that up. The response was simply " this is the number we use given by > our Medical Advisors " . The second organization replied with that same > number, but didn't even say where they derive that number - they just > sent the number. > > With the trust that I have for Dr. and the CMT experts and > academics at Mayo, I decided to use the 1991 academic report on CMT > populations and then with this new USA Census figure, see how many > people have CMT in the USA. (Obviously there is no way to > actually 'count heads' - many with CMT do not know they have it. > Also, as we know, people are often misdiagnosed with a 'form of MD or > MS', ad infinitium) > > OK, now we have a good figure for the CMT population in the USA. > Ready for this? > > That is 90,909 - get that? Ninety thousand, nine hundred and nine > people have CMT in the USA! > > My next plan is to break down the new Census information by State, > Counties and major cities. Remember, you heard it first at . > > I have been asked to write an in-depth article about CMT and will be > including this information. Soon as I find my link to the 1991 > report, I'll post that for your information. If you use any of the above information in your support groups, individual newspaper articles, posts on forums, info for your doctors, wherever, please respect my project and credit . Thank you. > > ~ Gretchen > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Hi Ed in NH, Thanks for your input. French ancestry population in general in the Northern U.S. has shown a *greater incidence* of CMT due to interbreeding and then also the French Acadian CMT in the South, due to mixed marriages and interbreeding. However, for my article, I need to back all stats up with footnotes and have consulted with advisors who encourage me to use the stats of 1 in 3,300 Greg and Mayo use. A few years back Wheeler and CMT World Magazine did a 'world report' statistics on CMT, which was enlightening, it included Oceania, Australia, Asia, etc., all major continents and areas. At that time I discovered there was more Autosomal Recessive CMT in Africa as well as the Middle East, also due to mixed marriages and inbreeding. At this time Dr. Vinci in Rome presented me with an altogether different number for CMT affected persons in Italy. Anyway, at that time it was estimated that about 6 million people globally are affected. But then, think about 3rd world countries - getting a CMT diagnosis is not a priority like finding food to eat or fresh water to drink. Since so much CMT research comes out of parts of Asia, I *suppose* they have higher figures, but seriously, what are we going to do, stand all people with known CMT up and count them? LOL Even if we do that, LOL, what about all those who are carriers, but asymptomatic? Questions, questions, and more questions. Why don't ya make me work hard? LOL ~ Gretchen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2006 Report Share Posted October 11, 2006 Ed That was interesting to hear. Around 10 years ago when my CMT started getting worse I saw a consultant in the Southern General which is home to Scotland's main neurology department . She told me that the incidents of CMT in Northern Ireland and the west coast of Scotland were higher than the rest of the UK. Since at its narrowest point the two countries are only 12 miles apart and also its history I can understand that. I'm northern Irish by birth and have been brought up in both countries though, and have been dragged round hospitals on and off throughout my life = with my mother at one point being derided as hysterical (the 60's, didn't you love 'em!) so it makes you wonder how in the past the condition was ever dealt with! The sad thing is even now all the knowledge we have is still so patchy. I'm off before I get really depressed! Fiona from Glasgow, Scotland Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 15, 2006 Report Share Posted October 15, 2006 Hello Gretchen, You ought to see what the FAA and the Congress are doing for the estimated 10,000 blind people with guide dogs! The airlines and the other public transportation modes will have to jump through the hoops for them as decreed by the regulations. EdM from NH > > No kidding , I heard that 'rare' word too. But in 1962, even > though CMT was in fact 'known', it was unfortunately lumped into a > category of MD. Remember too, our USA population at that time was > alot less - but now more people, more generations procreating, equals > more CMT. > > The mere fact that I was 'supposedly' 1 of only 10 people diagnosed > with CMT in the USA is BS. I mean, there you were, and so were the > other 8 + hundreds/thousands too, lol > > With 90,909 people in the US with CMT, don't you think we'd get more > research and treatment in the works? That is a large number of people > who would benefit. And as our population grows and generations > procreate, there will be more people with CMT. > > I also meant to say that that 90,909 figure does NOT include > children, so if I can work out a child number, the total number will > obviously increase. > > ~ Gretchen > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.