Guest guest Posted October 8, 2002 Report Share Posted October 8, 2002 I have a friend, Saul Shockett, who was a World Class lifetime drug free Powerlifter in the 80's, who is a vegetarian. He had an impressive build and attained a 677 deadlift in the 181's. He earned his size and strength sans meat. I guess it can be done. Robbie Stark St. N.Y. Re: Vegetarianism and Bill Pearl Whitney Richtmyer wrote: > My understanding is that Pearl 'earned' his size and strength as a > meat eater, and maintained as a vegetarian. I could be wrong. > Anbody got the lowdown on this?>> Rosemary Vernon: > This is exactly what I have heard and it was from a reliable > source that doesn't just tend to spout nonsense. At training > course, someone in the audience asked about being able to build a > lot of muscle on a vegetarian diet, citing Bill Pearl as an example. > The answer was that Bill Pearl was not a vegetarian in his youth and > that if the person was really serious about packing on a lot of > muscle (what Nature considers excess) they should " rethink your > priorities. " > > I no longer have Bill Pearl's " Keys to the Universe, " but I think he > mentioned something in there about *becoming* a vegetarian at some > point in time, but I didn't get the feeling that it was when he was a > young guy. Realizing that Bill is in his 70's, he could have easily > been a vegetarian for 40 years, long after he built his physique. > Like Whitney, however, I don't have any definite facts. Mel Siff: > [by this, are you implying that it is impossible to become a top > level bodybuilder if you don't eat meat? Furthermore, it is valid > to suggest that the affects of a meat-eating diet are still apparent > many decades after someone has become a vegetarian? ] In my regards, I'm not implying that. I am saying that *if* it is true that Pearl built his impressive musculature as a meat eater, and then turned to vegetarianism that this merely means that Pearl should not be used as an example of how one can build a world class physique on a vegi diet. That would be if he didn't in fact do this. It is easier to maintain musculature, than to build it. It takes less effort to maintain at a given level, than to improve. I certainly think it is possible to build impressive musculature on a vegi diet. I just don't think that people should use Pearl as an example of this, if in fact it was not the case. So, what I object to is Pearl being used as an invalid example of the possibility of building a world class physique while abstaining from meats, etc. IF it is the case that he did so, then fine. However, if he was a meat eater during his building years, then it would be disingenuous to ignore that. [Agreed! Mel Siff] Whitney Richtmyer Seattle, WA Modify or cancel your subscription here: http://groups.yahoo.com/mygroups Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2002 Report Share Posted October 8, 2002 Whitney Richtmyer wrote: > My understanding is that Pearl 'earned' his size and strength as a > meat eater, and maintained as a vegetarian. I could be wrong. > Anbody got the lowdown on this?>> Rosemary Vernon: > This is exactly what I have heard and it was from a reliable > source that doesn't just tend to spout nonsense. At training > course, someone in the audience asked about being able to build a > lot of muscle on a vegetarian diet, citing Bill Pearl as an example. > The answer was that Bill Pearl was not a vegetarian in his youth and > that if the person was really serious about packing on a lot of > muscle (what Nature considers excess) they should " rethink your > priorities. " > > I no longer have Bill Pearl's " Keys to the Universe, " but I think he > mentioned something in there about *becoming* a vegetarian at some > point in time, but I didn't get the feeling that it was when he was a > young guy. Realizing that Bill is in his 70's, he could have easily > been a vegetarian for 40 years, long after he built his physique. > Like Whitney, however, I don't have any definite facts. Mel Siff: > [by this, are you implying that it is impossible to become a top > level bodybuilder if you don't eat meat? Furthermore, it is valid > to suggest that the affects of a meat-eating diet are still apparent > many decades after someone has become a vegetarian? ] In my regards, I'm not implying that. I am saying that *if* it is true that Pearl built his impressive musculature as a meat eater, and then turned to vegetarianism that this merely means that Pearl should not be used as an example of how one can build a world class physique on a vegi diet. That would be if he didn't in fact do this. It is easier to maintain musculature, than to build it. It takes less effort to maintain at a given level, than to improve. I certainly think it is possible to build impressive musculature on a vegi diet. I just don't think that people should use Pearl as an example of this, if in fact it was not the case. So, what I object to is Pearl being used as an invalid example of the possibility of building a world class physique while abstaining from meats, etc. IF it is the case that he did so, then fine. However, if he was a meat eater during his building years, then it would be disingenuous to ignore that. [Agreed! Mel Siff] Whitney Richtmyer Seattle, WA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2002 Report Share Posted October 8, 2002 I thought, since I'm probably one of the only vegetarians on the list, that a vegetarian view point should be represented. I was a vegetarian for about 4 years before I ever pursued fitness. When I finally came around to hoisting some iron for the sake of aesthetic manipulation, known to many as bodybuilding, I was about 127 pounds, 23 years old and 5'10'' tall. Ten years later, I'm no monster, but I've peaked at about 190 (I compete at PL at about 180) and, although increasing size at this point is difficult, I can do it but it's not my goal (I'd rather compete in the 181 weight class). I do get the protein I need, albeit supplemented a bit. I do get the EFA's I need, plus I get a considerable amount of veggies and fiber. What exactly would a meat-enhanced diet bring me that I don't have? Maybe some extra B vitamins? Would I achieve a greater lifting prowess or substantial hypertrophic benefits if the past 10 years have been meatier? I don't know. Can anyone offer me a reason why things might have been different? 'Twould be interesting to speculate, though I'm pretty happy where I am. I do agree that Bill Pearl, although one of the nicest representatives of iron sports, may not be a suitable candidate for vegetarinism and bodybuilding. Chip Conrad Sacramento, CA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 8, 2002 Report Share Posted October 8, 2002 Pearl was an omnivore for some decades. As I recall, he wrote about the shift in his Inner Universe although the word was out in print prior to that. Without the text in front of me, as I recall after one of his big contest wins - either in the late 60s or early 70s - a routine physical examination revealed very high cholestorl levels, etc. He realized his outward appearance of fitness was not in alignment with his actual inner condition. Seem to remember he pretty much went on a fast for a short time, as I recall living on potatoes! His conversion to vegetarianism occured then. For health reasons. He has since stated he feels a definite shift in emotion as a result, becoming less aggressive, more tolerant and compassionately understanding of others. I think it important to realize Pearl maintained an exceptional physique, strength levels, and level of conditioning for decades following that - and a bodyweight around 225, a scant 17 pounds less than contest shape, well into his sixties as a vegetarian. Those photos of him in his very late 50s set a standard in and of themself!!! Another strength athlete long a vegetarian is former Mr America and outstanding Olympic lifter Roy Hillegan. Read recently that Hillegan, now back in South Africa (due to problems with the law in the USA?) did a reported 30+ reps in the deadlift with 400 lbs, winning competition with far younger guys, at 76 years of age. Hillegan's been a vegetarian for 40 or more years. In principle, vegetarian eating habits should have no adverse effects on gaining mass or strength - especially with the protein supplements available today, our growing knowledge of sports nutrition, and sensible approaches to vegetarian eating including combining food methods. regards, Ken O'Neill Tucson, Arizona Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2002 Report Share Posted October 9, 2002 Mel Siff wrote: <<Are you implying that it is impossible to become a top level bodybuilder if you don't eat meat?>> **** No, but there are all sorts of vegetarians and this has not been qualified in this case. I think we have to take it farther and ask what kind of vegetarian? A person who eats eggs and dairy products and uses whey protein powder can get a lot of very high quality protein without eating meat. An egg is, after all, simply an undeveloped bird or reptile. That would make a big difference than someone who only ate vegetable matter, whether they ate combinations of foods that were supposedly complete proteins or not.>> <<Furthermore, is it valid to suggest that the affects of a meat-eating diet are still apparent many decades after someone has become a vegetarian?>> **** Again, it probably has to do with what kind of vegetarian the person is and their genetics. Remember Bill Pearl has tremendous genetics. I do agree with Whit that it takes less in the way of calories and protein to maintain a physique than to build it in the first place and especially a competition level physique. Rosemary Vernon Editor, Dolfzine On-Line Fitness, Inc. A Not-For-Profit Corporation www.dolfzine.com Marina del Rey, CA IronRoses@... http://www.chuckietechie.com *Don't forget to sign all letters with full name and city of residence if you wish them to be published! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 9, 2002 Report Share Posted October 9, 2002 Rosemary wrote, > >**** No, but there are all sorts of vegetarians and this has not >been qualified in this case. I think we have to take it farther and >ask what kind of vegetarian? A person who eats eggs and dairy >products and uses whey protein powder can get a lot of very high >quality protein without eating meat. An egg is, after all, simply >an undeveloped bird or reptile. That would make a big difference >than someone who only ate vegetable matter, whether they ate >combinations of foods that were supposedly complete proteins or >not.>> Not to dispute Rosemary's point that vegetarians who eat eggs and dairy products can get a lot of high quality protein, but... An egg is not a underdeveloped bird or reptile unless it has been fertilized. In which case it is a diploid cell and the correct term is no longer egg. Eggs that are sold are normally haploid cells. They cannot possibly grow or develop into a bird or reptile (or mammal as some mammals also have shelled eggs - eg turtles) unless they are first fertilized by another haploid cell - the sperm cell. Just making this clear less someone whose has ethical concerns about eating animals suddenly quits on eggs as well because of Rosemary's remark. Personally I enjoy my protein the most in the form of beef. :^) Hobman Saskatoon, CANADA Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.