Guest guest Posted January 21, 2008 Report Share Posted January 21, 2008 So, following 's advice: TA would write to the mem bers of the Parliamentary Cttee and remind them of their existence (TAs that is) Sara would locate her MP and write to him explaining her situation and saying that the NAS didn't represent her anyone else who felt inspired and had a personal anecdote/gripe would do the same to their local MP And Thinking over Benet's statement of the NAS scientific position I was struck by the genetic pre-disposition/environmental trigger stuff and I wondered if that was a result of the Indie letter because the phraseology is very reminiscent of that letter. I spoke to Mills the NAS scientific officer about a year ago and he seemed very frustrated to me and finding himself in the middle of NAS rows about the science. It might be that the Indie row strengthened the science hand inside the NAS. Maybe we should consider attempting to influence Research Autism again. We know that Benet Middleton is on the way out (he/she is retiring/resigning I'm not sure which) perhaps we could influence the choice of successor towards someone more " severe friendly " xx sally Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.