/was: Re:Chelation - suppositories

[Guest guest]

,

I should be interested to hear what the effects (behaviours?)are, and

how you know to attribute these effects to the suppositories/enemas

and not to some other cause? Obviously no-one in their right mind

wants to damage their child and this is presumably why enemas aren't

used because of the dire warnings, but Natasha Cambell-McBride in her

book says enemas may be necessary.We are in the situation now where

laxatives aren't working with Henry: yes one large poo in the toilet

in the morning yesterday but this was follwed by 7 soiled pairs of

pants during the day and soiled pyjamas. It is very obvious he is

backed up and needs more than laxatives.In practical terms it wpould

be impossible to give H an enema without sedating him, but I do

wonder whether we would now have this serious problem if enemas had

been started when he was much younger.

Until this problem is sorted there will be no progress at all with

biomed. I have been reading the posts about regression in males at

puberty with considerable alarm. Is there any real evidence to show

that enemas are harmful?

Margaret

>

> Hi Sally,

>

> I'm never offended when others' give their opinion. I don't get

personally involved with an idea :-) unless it gets personal, which

you did not.

>

> But I still disagree with you. Actually, the most damage from

the " regular " giving of suppositories would occur between the ages of

2 and 8 years, because that is the most critical time of psychosexual

development.

>

> Sexual orientation appears at around 12 to 15 and is the sum result

of a persons' experience from birth on, again the most critical time,

2-8 years.

>

> And, I don't think this is a cultural difference. There is some

difference between the occasional adminstration of pain killers given

as a suppository while a child is clearly ill with a fever and the

regular administration of a chelator that may have to be given every

3-4 hours every week or every other week for 2-3 years.

>

> Besides the psychological aspect given the choice what would any of

us rather have, oral or suppository? And it's just that, there is no

advantage to the suppositories, still creates yeast and no

appreciable difference in the ability of oral or suppositories in the

method of recovery.

>

> I can be wrong. Despite my 3 degrees in human development and 18

years of practice as a clinical psychologist, I still learn things

everyday. But I feel so strongly about this one that the only way I

would use suppositories on our little one would be if she had no

mouth for the oral, no arms or legs for the transdermal.

>

> I have seen the result of parents who " regularly " administered

enemas for sometimes real conditions and the very unsavory results

that this practice has.

>

>

>

> Re:Chelation - suppositories

>

>

>

> Originally doctor planned on oral DMSA, so I did all my

research on that. Now she suggested alternating suppositories of

DMSA/DMPS instead.

>

> Would love people's feedback on their experiences of

suppositories. We have high lead as well as other metals/ I'm

terrified of regression.

>

> Thanks

>

>

>