Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 > > Why did his customers leave him? Because of the raid? Was he doing > something illegally? Selling unpasteurized milk is illegal here. I don't think at the time he had sold cow shares but had some sort of cow lease. He was convicted of selling unpasteurized milk in court. I did not go to the trial but I did go to the public hearing and spoke to him about Price and Pottenger but his lawyer never tried to use that information, as far as I know. Some time after I started getting the raw milk in 2000, I asked him if he remembered my speaking to him at the trial. He said he did and that he still had the letter on file that I sent to him after the hearing. In his words, the customers left him because of the " hassles " at the time. Following these events he wrote a letter to the government saying that he intended to keep providing raw milk and invited the government to do a study of the benefits and risks with regards to his milk. I don't think they ever answered that letter. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 > > So he is still selling it illegally or he does shares now? Hi : Several years ago he switched from a cow " lease " to a cow share program. Cow share programs are not legal or illegal in this province. What matters in this province is the law and the law states that no one can sell or give away unpasteurized milk, except, of course for sending to a milk processing plant. Dairy farmers, being owners of dairy cows often drink their own milk raw but none are ever charged with breaking the law because they own the cows that produce the milk and hence they are not giving the milk or selling the raw milk to anyone. So when the farmer I get milk from switched to the cow share program, I commented at the time that I thought that would greatly enhance our position with respect to the law as it is currently written as now the people drinking the milk raw are the cow owners. It is yet to be tested in court. (But I look forward to the day.) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 I am going to try and get the books also. We are always struggling to improve here and I am wondering if this cow happened to be a Jersey that loved to pretend to be a pig? I have a few Jerseys that do exactly what you are describing and it is awful to try and clean them and I do believe that is how one of them got mastitis. Forty below here we cannot exactly take her out of the barn and hose her off. So rags, warm water and soap and vinegar are used to scrub and scrub. We dry her off before milking and rewash our hands but she did land up sick one year. She is also easy milking though and I wonder about the tightness of her teat orifices? She has never leaked milk though except at freshening. We try and not have her fresh in the winter so if she is full of poop at least we don't have to try and milk her. Debbie Chikousky Manitoba, Canada " A successful man is one who can build a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him. " -- Brinkley-- Re:Healthy milk vs milk yield > , I am ordering the books as I have not read them. I do not > sell milk, but do feed my family and neighbors. I do say that I > have to agree with Debbie and Belinda. As a veterinarian and > working towards a biodynamic farm, I am doing everything I can to > keep my cows healthy. We try to keep our soil healthy, it was > pretty rough when we took over this farm, we keep them on pasture, > and we keep the milking area clean, as well as the area we process > our milk. However, I had a calf mangle a teat on one cow this year, > and we had a cow that was just dirty. She came to us as a 3 teater, > and was completely coated in manure (hubby rescued her on a farm > call), and we cleaned her up and babied her, and she gave us lots of > great milk, but she would find every fresh cow pie she could and lie > on it. We had 2 cows on a 20 acre pasture that had no mud holes > and she would come in with a caked udder nearly every night. We did > end up culling her and she never got mastitis here, but I can see > how easily it could have happened with her propensity for > dirt/manure. The other thing I think is important is to always > learn, and to always be willing to learn. I will gladly read the > reccommended books and I enjoy the dialog that goes on here, even > though we don't always agree. > Peace to all of you and yours, and happy healthy real milk drinking! > > > ------------------------------------ > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 Hmmm how's about a " touchless car wash " ? <G> Belinda > > I am going to try and get the books also. We are always struggling to > improve here and I am wondering if this cow happened to be a Jersey that > loved to pretend to be a pig? > I have a few Jerseys that do exactly what you are describing and it is awful > to try and clean them and I do believe that is how one of them got mastitis. > Forty below here we cannot exactly take her out of the barn and hose her > off. So rags, warm water and soap and vinegar are used to scrub and scrub. > We dry her off before milking and rewash our hands but she did land up sick > one year. She is also easy milking though and I wonder about the tightness > of her teat orifices? She has never leaked milk though except at > freshening. We try and not have her fresh in the winter so if she is full > of poop at least we don't have to try and milk her. > Debbie Chikousky > Manitoba, Canada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 17, 2008 Report Share Posted August 17, 2008 , Thanks for telling about this farmer. It's sad that we become so used to problems being normal, it is hard to imagine any other way. We have been sold a bill of goods by the parasites in industry that suck the lifeblood out of the small farms with their poisons, vaccines, hormones, etc. I've had farmers tell me you can't grow corn organically, all my animals will die if I don't vaccinate them, I must have dead animals everywhere because I don't have a vet out regularly, yield is all that matters, I don't care for my animals if I don't use vaccines, antibiotics, poison wormers, etc., etc. My goals are where this guy is at. I am not there yet as we still do have some of the problems listed. We struggle with very high iron in water and soil tying up nutrients and I haven't quite overcome that yet, but I believe it's possible. We have far better health than most farmers I know so I'm convinced I'm on the right path. It is very refreshing to see someone else understands that hybrid corn is garbage. I also don't understand how organic can allow hybrid seeds. I do not feed any grain on my dairy, but feel oats is by far the best. If P is really low I would consider adding some in test strips to see if the animals prefer it. ( I agree, the animal is the best judge) I remember being on a farm where rock phosphate was added to a pasture at 400 lbs/acre on one half and 1000lbs./acre on the other. The cows chewed the grass to the ground where the 1000lbs. was applied. It was amazing! I've always struggled with hauling in nutrients and haven't done much, but my farm was so depleted we had to do something to get things rolling and to pay the bills. My winter bedding pack is really helping to bring poor land back to life. Has this guy used any inputs like lime, P, K, or traces? Can you ask him what the fertility levels were on his farm to start with? So much land is so terribly depleted I don't know how else to get it going. A big problem is over stocking. It takes too many animals for what the land can support just to pay the bills/debt. I'm very interested in your comments about the base saturation of Mg. and the availability from higher OM. My soil tests show good base saturations, but lack availability, especially Ca. My OM has gone from 1.7% to 3.4% and that did make a big difference. I see signs of Cu deficiency in the cows because of the iron. It's also supposed to tie up Zn and P which are critical for immune function and breeding. Is he doing any tillage, green manures, etc.? Does he use straw for bedding, if so, does he grow his own? What does the soil test show for S, B, Zn, and Cu? I'm still low, but have had great improvement with little or no added input, yet I'd like to see more. Does he have any alfalfa on his farm? Does he only feed dry hay? Cheyenne > > What is interesting to me is that this farmer came to Canada from > Europe in 1983 and bought a dairy farm with a milk quota and a typical > Holstein herd. Having had low production Brown Swiss in Europe, he was > quite surprised by what he quickly saw with the health of this herd. > The Holstein herd average per lactation was 6900 litres with the top > producing cow producing 9000 litres. His Brown Swiss herd in Europe > averaged 3200 litres per lactation. Within two weeks of purchasing the > farm, the top producing cow dropped dead from toxic mastitis in about > 24 hours. He learned from that that when a cow gets toxic mastitis you > must take immediate action or lose the cow. He told me some of the > problems the herd suffered from were mastitis, pink eye and warble > fly. Being pragmatic, he realized if he did not treat these problems, > he would likely lose half the herd. > In Europe he had practiced biodynamic organic Demeter farming. After a > time, he came to realize that it would take forever with this Holstein > herd to get where he wanted to be. As a result, he purchased a > Tarentaise bull so the herd genetics started to move away from the > Holstein genetics. After a group of farmers from Quebec had a tour of > the farm, one of the farmers took him aside and told him that with > what he was trying to accomplish, he would be better off using the > Canadienne breed of cow. As a result, he went to the Gaspe Peninsula > in Quebec and purchased 12 pregnant female Canadienne cows from > several farms. One farmer that he bought several cows from indicated > that if one particular cow had a bull calf, that should be the future > bull for the farm. The farmer believes your bull should be born on > your farm. Seven females and five males were born and one male was > from the desired female. This male later became the bull for the farm, > as intended. > The next year these females were bred by the Tarentaise bull. The > genetics were now a mixture of three breeds, but after that first > Canadienne bull became the bull for the farm, the genetics moved more > and more towards the Canadienne. Also, at the same time, the average > lactation for the herd was moving down and the health of the herd was > moving up. The current lactation herd average is about 4100 litres > with a 4600 litre top producer. > His pasture management was taken from Voisin's book, " Grass > Productivity " . The previous owner of the farm had reseeded the > pastures every 6 years. He allowed whatever was growing in the > pastures to grow, with no reseeding ever. As a biodynamic farmer, his > fertilizer program was to spray BD500 and BD501 along with using the > compost preps. In addition, of course, manure from the barn in winter > was composted and returned to the fields. > In 1994, two days after a TV documentary on his farm, health > authorities and the police raided his farm. As a result of legal > charges and mainly because most of his customers left him, he was > forced to sell half the farm and most of the herd to stay afloat > financially. From a herd of 50 producing cows, he was down to one bull > and four cows. He was determined to continue in spite of the ordeal he > went through. He said his greatest enemies in this ordeal were other > Ontario dairy farmers. Other farmers and the dairy industry probably > don't like someone exposing the truth about what they are really > doing, I guess. > The current herd is over 30 producing cows. Some producing cows have > been culled and are sold as meat. All the genetics in the herd are > from that one bull and those four cows. There are no genetics in the > herd from outside those five animals. The farmer, of course, based > this breeding program on his nutrition program. Heifers have their > first calf at three years of age. Calves are born, licked by the > mother and are up and nursing without assistance within 15 minutes > from birth. They nurse on their mother for the first three or four > days, then for the next three weeks they are fed their mother's milk > by humans to get them accustomed to humans. Then for six months they > are fed milk from the herd. Hay or grass is eaten after three weeks. > The diet is almost entirely grass. In season the animals are on grass > 24/7, only coming to the barn to be milked. No water is provided in > the pastures. They have access to water when they come to the barn to > be milked. In winter they are fed hay grown on the farm any they spend > a few hours outside the barn every day regardless of the weather. He > plants 7 or 8 varieties in his hay fields but he has not got back to > me yet with the list of varieties. In winter the animals receive a > handful of grain once a day. If I remember right, the grain is oats. > No other type of grain is ever fed, especially not corn or corn > silage. No hybrids are grown on this farm. This farmer knows that > hybrids are guaranteed malnutrition and doesn't fall for the yield at > the expense of nutrition scam that other farmers fall for. If organic > farmers are interested in nutrition, they don't grow hybrids. If > organic farm organizations ever get interested in nutrition, they will > prohibit the growing of hybrids on organic farms. > The rational pasture rotation based on Voisin's work is done in 21 > paddocks, using movable electric wire fencing. Animals are usually > left on the pasture for two days and occasionally three at most. He > has horses that follow the cows on the pastures and they stay for two > days to " clean up " the pasture. > Interestingly one area in what is now pasture had severed as a market > garden. As it came to be used as pasture, milk thistle showed up in > the field but after a period of time it disappeared from the field. As > Albrecht states and backs up with repeatable scientific > experimental evidence, the weeds the cows refuse to eat move in when > the soil fertility moves out, so if you want the weeds to move out, > you need to move the soil fertility back in. If you have plants in > your pasture that cows refuse to eat because they know the nutritional > value of the plant is not work the eating of the plant, then even the > plants they do eat are of lowered nutritional value and you have a > soil fertility problem, not a weed problem. > One of the things the farmer was going to get back to me on, but > hasn't yet, was when was the last occurrence of any of the diseases > that he used to see on the farm. I do know that it has been about 18 > years since he had hooves trimmed. Also, the consumption of hay in > winter is down by about one third, indicating, of course, that the > soil fertility has also been improving in the hay fields. > I don't have with me right now soil tests done eleven years apart on > the farm, with the latter being done two summers ago. What I do > remember was the high percentage base saturation of magnesium in the > first tests, generally around 24%. When the farmer had the second > series of tests done, I expected that since the health of the herd was > continuing to improve during this time as soil fertility improved, I > would see a drop in the base saturation percentage. I was surprised to > see, however, almost no change in the magnesium base saturation > percentage. Organic matter, however, increased by about 25% from 4 and > change % to 5 and change %, if I remember correctly. As Albrecht > explains with an experimental demonstration, minerals are more > available to plants from organic matter than they are from soil > mineral treatments. The company that did the second set of soil tests > reported that the phosphorus was so low that a soil phosphorus > application was needed. The farmer spoke to me about this and asked me > what I thought. I reminded of him what Voisin said in " Soil Grass and > Cancer " , that animals and man are the judge of nutrition, not the > chemist. I reminded the farmer that during the eleven years between > the soil tests his animals had been getting healthier. I suggested > that when the health of his animals starts to decline he might start > worrying about what mineral treatments might be appropriate for his > fields. He though about it for a time and later reported to me that he > wasn't going to do anything about the phosphorus level in the soil > tests. I would suggest the chemical readings in the soil tests for > both magnesium and phosphorus have less impact because of the high > level of organic matter in the soil. Just, as Albrecht explains, a > high CEC means you do not need to pay such close attention to the > relative balance in the base saturation mineral percentages. > Oh, I almost forgot, the farmer has done one soil treatment that is > not biodynamic. Some time ago he added about 80 tons of paramagnetic > rock to the fields. This was done mainly by mixing the rock with the > manure from the barn in the winter and then later spreading the manure > on the fields. The following spring after the first application of > rock to the fields, the farmer noted the condition of the animals > coming out the the winter had taken a jump that visitors to the farm > commented on. After losing their winter coat they looked like they > were brushed for a show but no brush had touched them. The farmer > wondered if the rock had anything to do with this. There was no direct > evidence in the fields from the biology that anything had changed. > With my head planted firmly in the sand up to my waist, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 Hi, We have goats and cows. We dehorn our cows but leave the horns on our meat goats. You can blunt the tips. We just use a hoof trimmer (hubby is a farrier). You could also use a horn saw. About three years ago I decided to leave the horns on my heifer calves.Now I am milking 5 heifers with their horns on.Some dairy farmers warned us that we would have some nasty injuries if we left those horns on.We have had a few scratches and one small wound from the heifers fighting with each other.These are Guernseys and the horns are rather sharp at the point.We are wondering if we should blunt the tips somehow .When the weather turns cool in the fall the older cows(still without horns) like to push each other around and fight sometimes.I'm a little concerned when I imagine what those tussles would be like if both of the cows had horns.I hope leaving the horns on will result in a noticeable improvment in health for these heifers.I'm not convinced that any improvement in health could outweigh the added risk of leaving horns on the bulls. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 About three years ago I decided to leave the horns on my heifer calves.Now I am milking 5 heifers with their horns on.Some dairy farmers warned us that we would have some nasty injuries if we left those horns on.We have had a few scratches and one small wound from the heifers fighting with each other.These are Guernseys and the horns are rather sharp at the point.We are wondering if we should blunt the tips somehow .When the weather turns cool in the fall the older cows(still without horns) like to push each other around and fight sometimes.I'm a little concerned when I imagine what those tussles would be like if both of the cows had horns.I hope leaving the horns on will result in a noticeable improvment in health for these heifers.I'm not convinced that any improvement in health could outweigh the added risk of leaving horns on the bulls. michaelSubject: Re:Healthy milk vs milk yieldTo: RawDairy Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008, 11:10 PM , Thanks for telling about this farmer. It's sad that we become so used to problems being normal, it is hard to imagine any other way. We have been sold a bill of goods by the parasites in industry that suck the lifeblood out of the small farms with their poisons, vaccines, hormones, etc. I've had farmers tell me you can't grow corn organically, all my animals will die if I don't vaccinate them, I must have dead animals everywhere because I don't have a vet out regularly, yield is all that matters, I don't care for my animals if I don't use vaccines, antibiotics, poison wormers, etc., etc. My goals are where this guy is at. I am not there yet as we still do have some of the problems listed. We struggle with very high iron in water and soil tying up nutrients and I haven't quite overcome that yet, but I believe it's possible. We have far better health than most farmers I know so I'm convinced I'm on the right path. It is very refreshing to see someone else understands that hybrid corn is garbage. I also don't understand how organic can allow hybrid seeds. I do not feed any grain on my dairy, but feel oats is by far the best. If P is really low I would consider adding some in test strips to see if the animals prefer it. ( I agree, the animal is the best judge) I remember being on a farm where rock phosphate was added to a pasture at 400 lbs/acre on one half and 1000lbs./acre on the other. The cows chewed the grass to the ground where the 1000lbs. was applied. It was amazing! I've always struggled with hauling in nutrients and haven't done much, but my farm was so depleted we had to do something to get things rolling and to pay the bills. My winter bedding pack is really helping to bring poor land back to life. Has this guy used any inputs like lime, P, K, or traces? Can you ask him what the fertility levels were on his farm to start with? So much land is so terribly depleted I don't know how else to get it going. A big problem is over stocking. It takes too many animals for what the land can support just to pay the bills/debt. I'm very interested in your comments about the base saturation of Mg. and the availability from higher OM. My soil tests show good base saturations, but lack availability, especially Ca. My OM has gone from 1.7% to 3.4% and that did make a big difference. I see signs of Cu deficiency in the cows because of the iron. It's also supposed to tie up Zn and P which are critical for immune function and breeding. Is he doing any tillage, green manures, etc.? Does he use straw for bedding, if so, does he grow his own? What does the soil test show for S, B, Zn, and Cu? I'm still low, but have had great improvement with little or no added input, yet I'd like to see more. Does he have any alfalfa on his farm? Does he only feed dry hay? Cheyenne > > What is interesting to me is that this farmer came to Canada from > Europe in 1983 and bought a dairy farm with a milk quota and a typical > Holstein herd. Having had low production Brown Swiss in Europe, he was > quite surprised by what he quickly saw with the health of this herd. > The Holstein herd average per lactation was 6900 litres with the top > producing cow producing 9000 litres. His Brown Swiss herd in Europe > averaged 3200 litres per lactation. Within two weeks of purchasing the > farm, the top producing cow dropped dead from toxic mastitis in about > 24 hours. He learned from that that when a cow gets toxic mastitis you > must take immediate action or lose the cow. He told me some of the > problems the herd suffered from were mastitis, pink eye and warble > fly. Being pragmatic, he realized if he did not treat these problems, > he would likely lose half the herd. > In Europe he had practiced biodynamic organic Demeter farming. After a > time, he came to realize that it would take forever with this Holstein > herd to get where he wanted to be. As a result, he purchased a > Tarentaise bull so the herd genetics started to move away from the > Holstein genetics. After a group of farmers from Quebec had a tour of > the farm, one of the farmers took him aside and told him that with > what he was trying to accomplish, he would be better off using the > Canadienne breed of cow. As a result, he went to the Gaspe Peninsula > in Quebec and purchased 12 pregnant female Canadienne cows from > several farms. One farmer that he bought several cows from indicated > that if one particular cow had a bull calf, that should be the future > bull for the farm. The farmer believes your bull should be born on > your farm. Seven females and five males were born and one male was > from the desired female. This male later became the bull for the farm, > as intended. > The next year these females were bred by the Tarentaise bull. The > genetics were now a mixture of three breeds, but after that first > Canadienne bull became the bull for the farm, the genetics moved more > and more towards the Canadienne. Also, at the same time, the average > lactation for the herd was moving down and the health of the herd was > moving up. The current lactation herd average is about 4100 litres > with a 4600 litre top producer. > His pasture management was taken from Voisin's book, "Grass > Productivity" . The previous owner of the farm had reseeded the > pastures every 6 years. He allowed whatever was growing in the > pastures to grow, with no reseeding ever. As a biodynamic farmer, his > fertilizer program was to spray BD500 and BD501 along with using the > compost preps. In addition, of course, manure from the barn in winter > was composted and returned to the fields. > In 1994, two days after a TV documentary on his farm, health > authorities and the police raided his farm. As a result of legal > charges and mainly because most of his customers left him, he was > forced to sell half the farm and most of the herd to stay afloat > financially. From a herd of 50 producing cows, he was down to one bull > and four cows. He was determined to continue in spite of the ordeal he > went through. He said his greatest enemies in this ordeal were other > Ontario dairy farmers. Other farmers and the dairy industry probably > don't like someone exposing the truth about what they are really > doing, I guess. > The current herd is over 30 producing cows. Some producing cows have > been culled and are sold as meat. All the genetics in the herd are > from that one bull and those four cows. There are no genetics in the > herd from outside those five animals. The farmer, of course, based > this breeding program on his nutrition program. Heifers have their > first calf at three years of age. Calves are born, licked by the > mother and are up and nursing without assistance within 15 minutes > from birth. They nurse on their mother for the first three or four > days, then for the next three weeks they are fed their mother's milk > by humans to get them accustomed to humans. Then for six months they > are fed milk from the herd. Hay or grass is eaten after three weeks. > The diet is almost entirely grass. In season the animals are on grass > 24/7, only coming to the barn to be milked. No water is provided in > the pastures. They have access to water when they come to the barn to > be milked. In winter they are fed hay grown on the farm any they spend > a few hours outside the barn every day regardless of the weather. He > plants 7 or 8 varieties in his hay fields but he has not got back to > me yet with the list of varieties. In winter the animals receive a > handful of grain once a day. If I remember right, the grain is oats. > No other type of grain is ever fed, especially not corn or corn > silage. No hybrids are grown on this farm. This farmer knows that > hybrids are guaranteed malnutrition and doesn't fall for the yield at > the expense of nutrition scam that other farmers fall for. If organic > farmers are interested in nutrition, they don't grow hybrids. If > organic farm organizations ever get interested in nutrition, they will > prohibit the growing of hybrids on organic farms. > The rational pasture rotation based on Voisin's work is done in 21 > paddocks, using movable electric wire fencing. Animals are usually > left on the pasture for two days and occasionally three at most. He > has horses that follow the cows on the pastures and they stay for two > days to "clean up" the pasture. > Interestingly one area in what is now pasture had severed as a market > garden. As it came to be used as pasture, milk thistle showed up in > the field but after a period of time it disappeared from the field. As > Albrecht states and backs up with repeatable scientific > experimental evidence, the weeds the cows refuse to eat move in when > the soil fertility moves out, so if you want the weeds to move out, > you need to move the soil fertility back in. If you have plants in > your pasture that cows refuse to eat because they know the nutritional > value of the plant is not work the eating of the plant, then even the > plants they do eat are of lowered nutritional value and you have a > soil fertility problem, not a weed problem. > One of the things the farmer was going to get back to me on, but > hasn't yet, was when was the last occurrence of any of the diseases > that he used to see on the farm. I do know that it has been about 18 > years since he had hooves trimmed. Also, the consumption of hay in > winter is down by about one third, indicating, of course, that the > soil fertility has also been improving in the hay fields. > I don't have with me right now soil tests done eleven years apart on > the farm, with the latter being done two summers ago. What I do > remember was the high percentage base saturation of magnesium in the > first tests, generally around 24%. When the farmer had the second > series of tests done, I expected that since the health of the herd was > continuing to improve during this time as soil fertility improved, I > would see a drop in the base saturation percentage. I was surprised to > see, however, almost no change in the magnesium base saturation > percentage. Organic matter, however, increased by about 25% from 4 and > change % to 5 and change %, if I remember correctly. As Albrecht > explains with an experimental demonstration, minerals are more > available to plants from organic matter than they are from soil > mineral treatments. The company that did the second set of soil tests > reported that the phosphorus was so low that a soil phosphorus > application was needed. The farmer spoke to me about this and asked me > what I thought. I reminded of him what Voisin said in "Soil Grass and > Cancer", that animals and man are the judge of nutrition, not the > chemist. I reminded the farmer that during the eleven years between > the soil tests his animals had been getting healthier. I suggested > that when the health of his animals starts to decline he might start > worrying about what mineral treatments might be appropriate for his > fields. He though about it for a time and later reported to me that he > wasn't going to do anything about the phosphorus level in the soil > tests. I would suggest the chemical readings in the soil tests for > both magnesium and phosphorus have less impact because of the high > level of organic matter in the soil. Just, as Albrecht explains, a > high CEC means you do not need to pay such close attention to the > relative balance in the base saturation mineral percentages. > Oh, I almost forgot, the farmer has done one soil treatment that is > not biodynamic. Some time ago he added about 80 tons of paramagnetic > rock to the fields. This was done mainly by mixing the rock with the > manure from the barn in the winter and then later spreading the manure > on the fields. The following spring after the first application of > rock to the fields, the farmer noted the condition of the animals > coming out the the winter had taken a jump that visitors to the farm > commented on. After losing their winter coat they looked like they > were brushed for a show but no brush had touched them. The farmer > wondered if the rock had anything to do with this. There was no direct > evidence in the fields from the biology that anything had changed. > With my head planted firmly in the sand up to my waist, > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he change out cows on a regular basis? Belinda After a group of farmers from Quebec had a tour of > the farm, one of the farmers took him aside and told him that with > what he was trying to accomplish, he would be better off using the > Canadienne breed of cow. As a result, he went to the Gaspe Peninsula > in Quebec and purchased 12 pregnant female Canadienne cows from > several farms. One farmer that he bought several cows from indicated > that if one particular cow had a bull calf, that should be the future > bull for the farm. The farmer believes your bull should be born on > your farm. Seven females and five males were born and one male was > from the desired female. This male later became the bull for the farm, > as intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I've heard of cutting off the ends of the horn to make them more blunt. I may try that on some this fall. I've left horns on the last 6 or 7 years and there are a few mean cows that like to use them. The older cows are still the boss cows even though they don't have horns. It also appears only certain animals are picked on. Cheyenne > > About three years ago I decided to leave the horns on my heifer calves.Now I am milking 5 heifers with their horns on.Some dairy farmers warned us that we would have some nasty injuries if we left those horns on.We have had a few scratches and one small wound from the heifers fighting with each other.These are Guernseys and the horns are rather sharp at the point.We are wondering if we should blunt the tips somehow .When the weather turns cool in the fall the older cows(still without horns) like to push each other around and fight sometimes.I'm a little concerned when I imagine what those tussles would be like if both of the cows had horns.I hope leaving the horns on will result in a noticeable improvment in health for these heifers.I'm not convinced that any improvement in health could outweigh the added risk of leaving horns on the bulls. > michael > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 The whole US cattle herd is terribly inbred as the same farms/cows have supplied bulls to the AI companies for years. Unfortunately they had no rhyme or reason for what they were doing, other than more production, so we ended up with the frail cows of today. I think the whole inbreeding thing was used to scare farmers away from using their own bulls, which would have allowed them to develop superior animals for their farm. Who's out making sure the big buck doesn't breed his daughters year after year. It works rather well in nature. I've been using my own bulls for about 10 years and sure am getting some beautiful heifers. There's a herd of Herfords in OK, if I remember correctly, that have been a closed herd for 130+ years with excellent results. Cheyenne > > He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he > change out cows on a regular basis? > > Belinda > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 Belinda, Is inbreeding a cause for concern?I would rather use a bull from my own herd that had the characteristics I want rather than a less desireable animal that wasn't related to my cows.Breeding with an unrelated bull is a good idea if by doing so you are improving the herd. It is believed that saving your own seed will give you, over time ,plants that are better adapted to the local conditions.The same holds true for livestock.Voisins' idea that animals give us a picture of the health of the soil they live on is true.The bacteria that live in the soil and in the cows is passed on from mother to offspring ,so they are born already adapted to your farm. I have learned by experience that you can take the ideas that the conventional dairy farms follow and turn them on their heads to find how to raise healthy cows. Interesting research indicates that nutrition and emotions (fear vs love) have an effect on the way that genes are expressed. michaelSubject: Re:Healthy milk vs milk yieldTo: RawDairy Date: Monday, August 18, 2008, 1:36 PM He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he change out cows on a regular basis? Belinda After a group of farmers from Quebec had a tour of > the farm, one of the farmers took him aside and told him that with > what he was trying to accomplish, he would be better off using the > Canadienne breed of cow. As a result, he went to the Gaspe Peninsula > in Quebec and purchased 12 pregnant female Canadienne cows from > several farms. One farmer that he bought several cows from indicated > that if one particular cow had a bull calf, that should be the future > bull for the farm. The farmer believes your bull should be born on > your farm. Seven females and five males were born and one male was > from the desired female. This male later became the bull for the farm, > as intended. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 It is currently being challenged in ON with the court case against his farm. Debbie Chikousky Manitoba, Canada " A successful man is one who can build a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him. " -- Brinkley-- Re:Healthy milk vs milk yield > >> >> So he is still selling it illegally or he does shares now? > > Hi : > Several years ago he switched from a cow " lease " to a cow share > program. Cow share programs are not legal or illegal in this province. > What matters in this province is the law and the law states that no > one can sell or give away unpasteurized milk, except, of course for > sending to a milk processing plant. Dairy farmers, being owners of > dairy cows often drink their own milk raw but none are ever charged > with breaking the law because they own the cows that produce the milk > and hence they are not giving the milk or selling the raw milk to > anyone. So when the farmer I get milk from switched to the cow share > program, I commented at the time that I thought that would greatly > enhance our position with respect to the law as it is currently > written as now the people drinking the milk raw are the cow owners. It > is yet to be tested in court. (But I look forward to the day.) > > > > ------------------------------------ > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 I've always thought it wasn't such a great thing to have fathers breeding their daughters and grand daughters. So we're OK with this only in livestock or in humans as well? Just curious. Belinda > > Subject: Re:Healthy milk vs milk yield > To: RawDairy > Date: Monday, August 18, 2008, 1:36 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he > > change out cows on a regular basis? > > > > Belinda > > > > After a group of farmers from Quebec had a tour of > > > the farm, one of the farmers took him aside and told him that with > > > what he was trying to accomplish, he would be better off using the > > > Canadienne breed of cow. As a result, he went to the Gaspe Peninsula > > > in Quebec and purchased 12 pregnant female Canadienne cows from > > > several farms. One farmer that he bought several cows from indicated > > > that if one particular cow had a bull calf, that should be the future > > > bull for the farm. The farmer believes your bull should be born on > > > your farm. Seven females and five males were born and one male was > > > from the desired female. This male later became the bull for the farm, > > > as intended. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 > , > > Thanks for telling about this farmer. It's sad that we become so > used to problems being normal, it is hard to imagine any other way. Hi Cheyenne: In order to answer your questions, I have printed a copy of your e-mail to give to the farmer. I pick up milk on Wednesday this week but the farmer won't be there. I will give the copy to the people there but I can not be sure when I will get all the answers. I know that the farmer and I share the same attitude in that we are willing to share with others whatever we have learned and we don't charge for it. On the matter of mineral availability, I have come to the opinion from evidence that the mineral availability in soil is controlled by the microbes in the soil and the microbes in the soil are controlled by the energy of the soil. Both biodynamic farming and paramagnetic rock are energy approaches to soil fertility. So far at least, I think this approach to balancing minerals is better than trying to balance minerals by adding minerals, particularly if the mineral application is a fine dust. Minerals are often antagonistic to other minerals. Adding for what appears to be a shortage of one may result in another now showing up as a shortage because of that antagonistic relationship. As far as using compost teas to put the " right " microbes in the soil, I see that as treating the symptom, rather than treating the cause. If you put microbes into soil of a terrain that won't support them, you can put them in again next year. It's far better, imo, to create the terrain that causes the " right " microbes to show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 > > He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he > change out cows on a regular basis? > > Belinda Hi Belinda: Yes, one bull at a time does the entire herd. I guess there are two when he is transitioning from one bull to the next. The bulls have horns and, I think, no nose ring. He is inbreeding as that is his intention to breed his animals " backwards " . He knows and I know that inbreeding in plants, animals or humans is only a problem in conditions of malnutrition. For instance, when I was young I learned that when farmers planted crops they would save seeds for the following year's crop. However, after a number of years, the germination rate would become so low that he would need to go buy new seeds from the store and start over. I was told that the seeds ran out because of the inbreeding that was happening between the plants on a single farmer's farm. I now think that is nonsense. The reason for the declining germination rate is the low soil fertility. If the soil fertility were addressed instead of buying new seeds, there would not be a falling germination rate. I have done some experiments with paramagnetic rock and with seeds with a poor germination rate and not only do I get a higher germination rate with 100% rock than with soil, when the weak seeds are grown in soil with paramagnetic rock, the next generation of seeds has a much improved germination rate. I am not aware of others restoring low germination rate seeds to good germination rate seeds in one generation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 On your take on this I agree whole heartedly. In reality isn't that the underlying problem with society in general and the medical establishment in particular? Treat the symptom rather than the cause.As far as food = healthy and disease free cows, I have to agree for 99.99% of them. Personally I feel there is always going to be the odd genetic anomaly or weakness that will cause a failure to thrive issue, and thus a cow that is prone to illness.Kurtis> ,>Â > Thanks for telling about this farmer. It's sad that we become so> used to problems being normal, it is hard to imagine any other way.Hi Cheyenne:In order to answer your questions, I have printed a copy of youre-mail to give to the farmer. I pick up milk on Wednesday this weekbut the farmer won't be there. I will give the copy to the peoplethere but I can not be sure when I will get all the answers.I know that the farmer and I share the same attitude in that we arewilling to share with others whatever we have learned and we don'tcharge for it.On the matter of mineral availability, I have come to the opinion fromevidence that the mineral availability in soil is controlled by themicrobes in the soil and the microbes in the soil are controlled bythe energy of the soil. Both biodynamic farming and paramagnetic rockare energy approaches to soil fertility. So far at least, I think thisapproach to balancing minerals is better than trying to balanceminerals by adding minerals, particularly if the mineral applicationis a fine dust. Minerals are often antagonistic to other minerals.Adding for what appears to be a shortage of one may result in anothernow showing up as a shortage because of that antagonistic relationship.As far as using compost teas to put the "right" microbes in the soil,I see that as treating the symptom, rather than treating the cause. Ifyou put microbes into soil of a terrain that won't support them, youcan put them in again next year. It's far better, imo, to create theterrain that causes the "right" microbes to show up. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 18, 2008 Report Share Posted August 18, 2008 , We have been leaving the horns on as well, and now have 2 Jersey heifers, one bred for next spring, with horns. They don't seem to be using them on the other cows. My neighbor has a Jersey/Shorthorn cross who is nasty to the other cows, so they cut open tennis balls and duct tape them on the horns. It works really well. Leaving them on the bull is an especially good idea if you want him to be horny. (sorry I couldn't resist) > > Â About three years ago I decided to leave the horns on my heifer calves.Now I am milking 5 heifers with their horns on.Some dairy farmers warned us that we would have some nasty injuries if we left those horns on.We have had a few scratches and one small wound from the heifers fighting with each other.These are Guernseys and the horns are rather sharp at the point.We are wondering if we should blunt the tips somehow .When the weather turns cool in the fall the older cows(still without horns) like to push each other around and fight sometimes.I'm a little concerned when I imagine what those tussles would be like if both of the cows had horns.I hope leaving the horns on will result in a noticeable improvment in health for these heifers.I'm not convinced that any improvement in health could outweigh the added risk of leaving horns on the bulls. > Â Â Â Â Â michael > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 My FIL is a rancher (Angus X cattle) and he always dehorns and his cows are very healthy. My dairy goats are dehorned and they are also very healthy. I don't see any correlation between the health of an animal and being horned or dehorned. We kept the horns on our dairy cows until we began to get more and more people coming to the farm. The past 3 years we've made sure that dairy boys and girls do not grow horns. Haven't noticed any difference in the health of the animals. At times during the year they are in with the beef girls and get along fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Well, my dad raises angus cross cows and they have always had horns and they are not any healthier than the dehorned cows. They are more destructive and cause more injury though so if he's not out fixing fence then he's out doctoring from horn inflicted injuries. I have both horned and dehorned goats and neither is healthier than the other but the horned goats do the same as the horned cattle... If you have an interest in biodynamic farming and think that a lot of Steiner's ideas were correct and you are raising livestock that would naturally have horns its hard to resist the temptation to give the idea a try.If you haven't compared the health of horned vs dehorned cattle how would you be able to tell if there is a difference. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 We kept the horns on our dairy cows until we began to get more and more people coming to the farm. The past 3 years we've made sure that dairy boys and girls do not grow horns. Haven't noticed any difference in the health of the animals. At times during the year they are in with the beef girls and get along fine. Belinda > > > > About three years ago I decided to leave the horns on my heifer > calves.Now I am milking 5 heifers with their horns on.Some dairy > farmers warned us that we would have some nasty injuries if we left > those horns on.We have had a few scratches and one small wound from the > heifers fighting with each other.These are Guernseys and the horns are > rather sharp at the point.We are wondering if we should blunt the tips > somehow .When the weather turns cool in the fall the older cows(still > without horns) like to push each other around and fight sometimes.I'm a > little concerned when I imagine what those tussles would be like if > both of the cows had horns.I hope leaving the horns on will result in a > noticeable improvment in health for these heifers.I'm not convinced > that any improvement in health could outweigh the added risk of leaving > horns on the bulls. > > michael > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 , I have been reading with interest your emails regarding your farming practices. Very enlightening! I don't know what paramagnetic rock it though. Can you explain in more detail? I picture a field full of number 4's but I'm sure that is not what you mean! LOL!!! Thanks, Jen Re:Healthy milk vs milk yield >> He keeps the one bull? How does he keep from inbreeding? Does he> change out cows on a regular basis?> > BelindaHi Belinda:Yes, one bull at a time does the entire herd. I guess there are twowhen he is transitioning from one bull to the next. The bulls havehorns and, I think, no nose ring.He is inbreeding as that is his intention to breed his animals"backwards". He knows and I know that inbreeding in plants, animals orhumans is only a problem in conditions of malnutrition.For instance, when I was young I learned that when farmers plantedcrops they would save seeds for the following year's crop. However,after a number of years, the germination rate would become so low thathe would need to go buy new seeds from the store and start over. I wastold that the seeds ran out because of the inbreeding that washappening between the plants on a single farmer's farm.I now think that is nonsense. The reason for the declining germinationrate is the low soil fertility. If the soil fertility were addressedinstead of buying new seeds, there would not be a falling germinationrate.I have done some experiments with paramagnetic rock and with seedswith a poor germination rate and not only do I get a highergermination rate with 100% rock than with soil, when the weak seedsare grown in soil with paramagnetic rock, the next generation of seedshas a much improved germination rate. I am not aware of othersrestoring low germination rate seeds to good germination rate seeds inone generation. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 "The cow has horns in order to reflect inwards the astral and etheric formative forces, which then penetrate right into the metabolic system so that increased activity in the digestive organism arises by reason of this radiation from horns and hoofs." Rudolf Steiner If you have an interest in biodynamic farming and think that a lot of Steiner's ideas were correct and you are raising livestock that would naturally have horns its hard to resist the temptation to give the idea a try.If you haven't compared the health of horned vs dehorned cattle how would you be able to tell if there is a difference. michaelSubject: Re: Re:Healthy milk vs milk yieldTo: RawDairy Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 9:37 AM My FIL is a rancher (Angus X cattle) and he always dehorns and his cows are very healthy. My dairy goats are dehorned and they are also very healthy. I don't see any correlation between the health of an animal and being horned or dehorned. We kept the horns on our dairy cows until we began to get more and more people coming to the farm. The past 3 years we've made sure that dairy boys and girls do not grow horns. Haven't noticed any difference in the health of the animals. At times during the year they are in with the beef girls and get along fine. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 Thanks , I agree with your thoughts on biology and the nutrient process. I've seen amazing things on my farm over the last 14 years. Grazing has definitely helped build organic matter and plant density, but we have applied some high calcium lime, P, trace minerals, foliar kelp and minerals which I feel also helped. I have applied paramagnetic basalt from a local quarry at 1 ton/acre. I still see room for improvement on my farm. When we bought this farm soil fertility was non existent. We've also had very dry and/or drought for 5 of the last 6 years so it's hard to tell where we are at. That has made it hard/impossible to grow green manure crops which also helped in the past. Producing milk without grain requires good fertility and nutrient dense plants, especially with Holsteins in WI. I have goals of perfection so am always looking for new ideas. I'm only interested in producing the highest quality milk possible for my family, friends, and neighbors. Also, I talk to farmers all over the US, about low/no grain, that are struggling with low fertility and poor yields. For some, staying on the farm requires improvement sooner than later so I'm looking for additional input that may help speed the process for many. Cheyenne > > Hi Cheyenne: > On the matter of mineral availability, I have come to the opinion from > evidence that the mineral availability in soil is controlled by the > microbes in the soil and the microbes in the soil are controlled by > the energy of the soil. Both biodynamic farming and paramagnetic rock > are energy approaches to soil fertility. So far at least, I think this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 I wonder if part of the problem would be that every time the same two breed there is the possibility of bad results, recessive genes popping up, and eventually you aren't always going to get good results? Most people I know that plant here are constantly trying to improve soil health. Debbie Chikousky Manitoba, Canada " A successful man is one who can build a firm foundation with the bricks that others throw at him. " -- Brinkley-- > > Hi Belinda: > Yes, one bull at a time does the entire herd. I guess there are two > when he is transitioning from one bull to the next. The bulls have > horns and, I think, no nose ring. > He is inbreeding as that is his intention to breed his animals > " backwards " . He knows and I know that inbreeding in plants, animals or > humans is only a problem in conditions of malnutrition. > For instance, when I was young I learned that when farmers planted > crops they would save seeds for the following year's crop. However, > after a number of years, the germination rate would become so low that > he would need to go buy new seeds from the store and start over. I was > told that the seeds ran out because of the inbreeding that was > happening between the plants on a single farmer's farm. > I now think that is nonsense. The reason for the declining germination > rate is the low soil fertility. If the soil fertility were addressed > instead of buying new seeds, there would not be a falling germination > rate. > I have done some experiments with paramagnetic rock and with seeds > with a poor germination rate and not only do I get a higher > germination rate with 100% rock than with soil, when the weak seeds > are grown in soil with paramagnetic rock, the next generation of seeds > has a much improved germination rate. I am not aware of others > restoring low germination rate seeds to good germination rate seeds in > one generation. > > > > ------------------------------------ > > PLEASE BE KIND AND TRIM YOUR POSTS WHEN REPLYING! > Visit our Raw Dairy Files for a wealth of information! > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/RawDairy/files/ > > Archive search: http://onibasu.com > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 19, 2008 Report Share Posted August 19, 2008 > > On your take on this I agree whole heartedly. In reality isn't that > the underlying problem with society in general and the medical > establishment in particular? Treat the symptom rather than the cause. > > As far as food = healthy and disease free cows, I have to agree for > 99.99% of them. Personally I feel there is always going to be the odd > genetic anomaly or weakness that will cause a failure to thrive > issue, and thus a cow that is prone to illness. > Hi Kurtis: Yes, I agree that treat the symptom rather than the cause is the problem in both the medical and agricultural establishments. The reason for this being the case is obvious to me, there is no money in prevention but there is an infinite amount in treating symptoms. Albrecht put it something like this, " We conduct postmortems, we tabulate symptoms and we offer explanations (often only consolation) but we fail to comprehend causes. " So true. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.