Guest guest Posted September 9, 2008 Report Share Posted September 9, 2008 I was speaking to the litigation office at Public Citizen in Washington DC earlier today the court agrees the FDA and industry claims are not justified ! In this case, defendant Chicken-of-the-Sea contends that Deborah Fellner's claims that she was not adequately warned about the dangers of mercury in tuna fish are impliedly preempted by the FDA's " approach " to mercury in seafood. In its brief on behalf of Ms. Fellner, Public Citizen explains that the FDA's few informal actions on mercury in seafood — a brochure and backgrounder giving advice to pregnant and nursing women and young children on how much seafood is safe to eat, and non-binding guidance to its enforcement division — do not preempt Ms. Fellner's state-law claims. Public Citizen is pleased that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has agreed that the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) brochures about the dangers of mercury in fish cannot justify shutting the courthouse doors to consumers who bring claims under state law. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.