No Reason For That

[Guest guest]

What does a man do - what can a man do - what is it one man should do - when, everywhere he looks - there seems so much to be done?

Who am I to even consider I might be one who can or should do anything? Who, or what, is man anyway?

Given a mind to consider and ponder, to question - it can not go un-noticed that - surely - it must of been given him - abilities - powers - the means in which to act. Unless - unless perhaps - they are one and the same.

This would be that, perhaps - the act of thinking something, is also - the act of doing something.

At once - it seems - that "reasoning" is a factor. For man has "reasoned with his own thoughts".

A thought is but pure - it is true - regardless of it's make-up. For the "thinker" - it is "everything". Therefore, it can only be when a man reasons - or, questions the thought - does it become - "something else"...poluted - it's power, it's inherient power, becomes deluted and, without power. It has become, "dis-empowered". [power dismissed from the will].

By the "mind", the thinker "within"; a spiritual creation - a thought is "an act of creation". What is created, is manifested, and is the same as the thought itself. Nothing else.

By reason; reasoning - man questions the creation; the thought. The creating still takes place, yet now, by reason, it has become, distorted.

Man has "learned" to reason. He has not learned to think. Thinking is of the spirit, the soul. It reproduces itself. Reasoning takes apart the thought - breaks it down - delutes it - questions it - separates.

Thoughts do not exist as right and wrong, for there is no separation within a thought. A thought is true, direct, and pure. It comes with the power to create, simply by being a thought. A "thought" becomes a "thing "just because it "is".

"As it is said [thought], so shall it be done". "As above [thought], so below [thing]".

By thought, a thing is declared [created], declared so, declared decided, declared done.

By reason, it is declared - undecided, unso, undone, and it can not become so; there is a separation of the power "of it".

But, doesn't a "sane man" need to reason a thought, a series of thoughts, to determine, the best action to take? It would seem so to man, yet, it is man who has decided on this separation in doing so. He has "judged", where judgement was not needed. By judgement, power disolves, and then man must "act" to do what would have been done, without the need to act, or do.

Everything a man thinks about, he draws to himself. There is [no reason], to act, to do. It is done - "by my word [thought] - it is so"; "as it is written [thought], so let it be done [created]". "By the WORD [thought], it is". "And the WORD said let there be....and there was...."

A man can not have a thought that says "red", when he ventures to reason there could be "blue". He has ended up with niether the red or the blue, and what has come, is more reasoning as to why neither red or blue was made so. "Purple" has appeared...a distortion of the former thought.

All thoughts are true -all thoughts have power and do create after themselves, without further action...instantly, absolutely. By reason alone, we separate, what we have decided [judged and reasoned with], from ourselves.

The [whole thought] of man[kind] was to remain "as one". And no reason is needed for that.

c2007knightsintent(dc)

http://myspace.com/knightsintent

http://intentionalone.com/yabb/YaBB.pl