Puhleeeze, pretty please

[Guest guest]

Kids....healing, tanstaafl...

your points have been lost....your trains, derailed....your conversation is becoming a petty argument with all of us stuck bearing witness....

i am now bulk erasing my inbox to avoid the fallout...and i hate doing that, there is oftentimes real information to be had and i'd hate to miss it. let it be...agree to disagree....it's almost new year...start fresh.

thank you.

From: Tanstaafl <tanstaafl@...> Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 2:57:58 PMSubject: Re: [ ] Re: MMS2 - Who is taking it?

On 2009-12-31 12:40 PM, healinghope wrote:>> I already agreed with you that if you only consider the unactivated form>> of MMS1, then yes, it is essentially a 'mineral salt'.>>>> You are refusing to acknowledge that people don't *ingest* sodium>> chlorite when taking MMS1, they ingest *chlorous acid*.> Tans THIS IS FROM MMS MEDICAL RESEARCH!!!!*What* is from 'MMS MEDICAL RESEARCH!!!! '?> MMS is generally used experimentally similar to other common tissue> salts in solution such as Nat.Phos., Nat.Mur., and Nat.Sulph.By who? Most people on this list are using (activated) MMS1 for healingpurposes - fighting disease, or cleansing/detox (or both). They aren'tconsidering "Nat.Phos., Nat.Mur., and Nat.Sulph" at all.> Of the four oxidative therapies, ClO2 is the weakest oxydizing agent> and as such is unable to harm normal body

cells.> http://mmsmedicalresearch.com/What does any of that have to do with the fact that you mis-stated whatactivated MMS1 was (you called it a 'mineral salt'), then when I pointedout that this was not true, you claimed you didn't say it, then ignoredmy quotes of yours where you did and instead posted this?I'm not challenging any of these last comments of yours, but they havenothing to do with the (my) post you are replying to.