Re: Cutler chelation protocol - Poll!

[Guest guest]

Hi,

We ran a series of tests, including blood, hair and provoked urine

toxic metals. There is some disagreement across the boards on the

best method of calculating total metals in the body, so I will

concede that point up front.

Our very first provoked urine toxic metals test we ran with GPL when

we were doing NO biomed at all. His lead levels were a 70, on a

reference range of 0-5. His DAN said that was the highest she had

ever personally seen on this particular test. His blood tests came

back above normal ranges as well, although the blood tests for metals

is pointless unless you are looking for current exposure. Funny it

was actually high enough though that our health department agreed to

come out and check our house for lead. We discovered it was coming

from our garden hose, of all things.

We only ran one hair test as our DAN does not think this is a

reliable way to measure heavy metals, specifically lead and mercury.

That's just her opinion, and for now I am satisfied with it. We

actually only ran a hair essential elements test in the first place

to look at lithium levels.

We did four rounds of DMSA and retested the UTM and his lead levels

read a 34. His other metals came back raised from his first one, like

you mentioned, as the lead comes out other metals show up behind it.

Every UTM we have run since then the lead keeps decreasing, although

not as dramatically as the first time we re-ran it.

We have had nothing but positive experiences with this protocol so

far and plan to continue it until it stops working for us, or all the

metals are gone (oh, wouldn't that be a happy day)....

The next toxic metals test we ran

> > > >

> > > > From: Farley <chris_farley@>

> > > > Subject: RE: Cutler chelation protocol -

Poll!

> > > > To: mb12 valtrex

> > > > Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 8:07 AM

> > > >

> > > > I have never done the protocol but I have heard that most

> > begin

> > > > the " round " on Friday when they pick child up from school

> and

> > end

> > > > on Sunday (early Monday morning). Every 3 hrs. The only

> > reason I

> > > > have never used it is because I am afraid of the DMSA.

If I

> > > > decide to do it I will use ALA

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > Chris

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > ----------------------------------------------------------

--

> --

> > ----------

> > > >

> > > > *From:* mb12 valtrex@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:mb12 valtrex

> > > > @yahoogroups. com] *On Behalf Of *tommysmommy67

> > > > *Sent:* Monday, September 08, 2008 7:59 AM

> > > > *To:* mb12 valtrex@ yahoogroups. com

> > > > *Subject:* Cutler chelation protocol - Poll!

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > > I'm curious...I' ve read a lot of posts wherein people

say

> > the Cutler

> > > > chelation protocol made a big difference for themselves

or

> > their

> > > > child. Has anyone here used this protocol? Good, bad or

no

> > results?

> > > > Did those who use it follow it to the letter? I think I

> recall

> > > > that he

> > > > recommends dosing every three hours, which would be tough

> for

> > > > those of

> > > > us who have children in school.

> > > >

> > > > Anyone care to comment? I've never chelated my son with

> > anything

> > > > other

> > > > than NCD and NDF Plus and got no results from these.

Thanks.

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > > >

> > >

> >

>