Guest guest Posted June 6, 2010 Report Share Posted June 6, 2010 Rose was concerned you broke a copyright law in freely posting somone's work which is under their copyright. Which is EXACTLY what you did- to an open list- for free, without consideration for the author or his copyright. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> KEEP ME OUT OF THIS. I fully supported Ralph’s posting of the book. Can’t you read… “2 cents…THANKS” Means…THANK YOU RALPH This kind of finger pointing copywrite dribble leaves me speechless. Ralph posted something that might be of benefit to members. when folks are seeking answers and someone so kindly post a ‘this might help’ I would think, even if you disagree with the posting, to not come back with coy sarcasm or possible judgment scenarios like the one below. This is box thinking stuff and it has no place in my reality. I have better things to do with my life that be cop on the beat and run around with my nose in the air pointing a long accusing finger. Anyone here ever look into the connection between emotions and dis/ease? On my health forum I make sure the files are chocked full of useful ebooks. If it does seem ‘sensitive’ to do so then I post ‘anyone wanting a copy pls pm me” and I always have takers. Just for you finger pointers, it is not illegal to give someone a copy personally. So I am prob one of the sinners that is referenced below. Know what…I don’t give a rip. I do what I feel is right to help my members get the information they are seeking. Sometimes folks are so brainwashed it still boggles my comprehension. And no, I’m not going to debate the finer points of thievery…enjoy your sandbox, I’ll enjoy mine. rose >>>>>>>>>>>> It is also possible he is the kind of person who thinks downloading pirated music and/or movies is just fine and dandy, in which case he *is* a thief, regardless of what he may think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 With all the backwards & forwards here it would appear that no one has actually read the book or ascertained how the author wants the book used. She has generously given permission for it to be given to everyone that you care about...see the extract below! <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< A World Without Disease Give a copy of this book to everyone you care about.. There isn't a person on earth who cannot benefit from this information. I am optimistic that the information I've presented herein will inspire compassion for those who are sick—a compassion that I hope overshadows the lure of profit. The majority of health professionals are slowly but....see pages 104 & 105 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- In , " palulukon " <palulukon@...> wrote: > > > > Rose was concerned you broke a copyright law in freely posting somone's > work which is under their copyright. Which is EXACTLY what you did- to an > open list- for free, without consideration for the author or his copyright. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > KEEP ME OUT OF THIS. I fully supported Ralph's posting of the book. Can't > you read. > > " 2 cents.THANKS " > > Means.THANK YOU RALPH > > This kind of finger pointing copywrite dribble leaves me speechless. Ralph > posted something that might be of benefit to members. when folks are > seeking answers and someone so kindly post a 'this might help' I would > think, even if you disagree with the posting, to not come back with coy > sarcasm or possible judgment scenarios like the one below. This is box > thinking stuff and it has no place in my reality. I have better things to > do with my life that be cop on the beat and run around with my nose in the > air pointing a long accusing finger. Anyone here ever look into the > connection between emotions and dis/ease? > > On my health forum I make sure the files are chocked full of useful ebooks. > If it does seem 'sensitive' to do so then I post 'anyone wanting a copy pls > pm me " and I always have takers. Just for you finger pointers, it is not > illegal to give someone a copy personally. So I am prob one of the sinners > that is referenced below. Know what.I don't give a rip. I do what I feel > is right to help my members get the information they are seeking. Sometimes > folks are so brainwashed it still boggles my comprehension. And no, I'm not > going to debate the finer points of thievery.enjoy your sandbox, I'll enjoy > mine. > > rose > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > It is also possible he is the kind of person who thinks downloading > > pirated music and/or movies is just fine and dandy, in which case he > > *is* a thief, regardless of what he may think. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 Being a reader I went to the website and READ what it said. Ralph, being a reader, READ it also. And guess what??? The people we CARE about are in a group just like this one. CARE ABOUT??? Not so sure about some of you anymore. Especially those that CAN'T READ and still cast disparaging remarks. But then, the average reading level in the US today is only at the 5th grade level. Bill roloaus wrote: With all the backwards & forwards here it would appear that no one has actually read the book or ascertained how the author wants the book used. She has generously given permission for it to be given to everyone that you care about...see the extract below! <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< A World Without Disease Give a copy of this book to everyone you care about.. There isn't a person on earth who cannot benefit from this information. I am optimistic that the information I've presented herein will inspire compassion for those who are sick—a compassion that I hope overshadows the lure of profit. The majority of health professionals are slowly but....see pages 104 & 105 Rose was concerned you broke a copyright law in freely posting somone's work which is under their copyright. Which is EXACTLY what you did- to an open list- for free, without consideration for the author or his copyright. KEEP ME OUT OF THIS. I fully supported Ralph's posting of the book. Can't you read. "2 cents.THANKS" Means.THANK YOU RALPH This kind of finger pointing copywrite dribble leaves me speechless. Ralph posted something that might be of benefit to members. when folks are seeking answers and someone so kindly post a 'this might help' I would think, even if you disagree with the posting, to not come back with coy sarcasm or possible judgment scenarios like the one below. This is box thinking stuff and it has no place in my reality. I have better things to do with my life that be cop on the beat and run around with my nose in the air pointing a long accusing finger. Anyone here ever look into the connection between emotions and dis/ease? On my health forum I make sure the files are chocked full of useful ebooks. If it does seem 'sensitive' to do so then I post 'anyone wanting a copy pls pm me" and I always have takers. Just for you finger pointers, it is not illegal to give someone a copy personally. So I am prob one of the sinners that is referenced below. Know what.I don't give a rip. I do what I feel is right to help my members get the information they are seeking. Sometimes folks are so brainwashed it still boggles my comprehension. And no, I'm not going to debate the finer points of thievery.enjoy your sandbox, I'll enjoy mine. rose It is also possible he is the kind of person who thinks downloading pirated music and/or movies is just fine and dandy, in which case he *is* a thief, regardless of what he may think. ------------------------------------ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 But then, the average reading level in the US today is only at the 5th grade level. Bill It’s that high???????????????? rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 On 2010-06-06 7:17 PM, roloaus wrote: > With all the backwards & forwards here it would appear that no one > has actually read the book or ascertained how the author wants the > book used. I didn't take the time to read the entire book, no, but I did check, and found this on the second page: " The One-Minute Cure: The Secret to Healing Virtually All Diseases Think-Outside-the-Book Publishing, Inc. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the written permission of the publisher. " Why would someone put a copyright like that on the second page, if their intention is otherwise? Doesn't make sense. > She has generously given permission for it to be given to everyone > that you care about...see the extract below! > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > A World Without Disease > Give a copy of this book to everyone you care about.. > There isn't a person on earth who cannot benefit from this > information. I am optimistic that the information I've presented > herein will inspire compassion for those who are > sick—a compassion that I hope overshadows the lure of > profit. The majority of health professionals are slowly but....see pages 104 & 105 Then she needs to REMOVE the copyright disclaimer on page 2. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 On 2010-06-06 8:50 PM, bjordan wrote: > Being a reader I went to the website and READ what it said. Ralph, > being a reader, READ it also. And guess what??? The people we CARE > about are in a group just like this one. CARE ABOUT??? Not so sure > about some of you anymore. Especially those that CAN'T READ and still > cast disparaging remarks. As I said, I *did* check it out... I can't help it if some authors put restrictive disclaimers on their copyright page of their work, then grant permission to violate said restrictions later on in the middle of the text. and no, it is *not* reasonable to suggest that I should have read the entire book with a fine-tooth comb to see if the author decided to contradict their severely limiting copyright notice at some random later point in the book itself. And if was aware of this paragraph granting permission, I'm sure he would have replied to this effect the second I asked about it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 7, 2010 Report Share Posted June 7, 2010 And if was aware of this paragraph granting permission, I'm sure he would have replied to this effect the second I asked about it. Well, that's your assumption. You came off so snooty I would have done exactly what he did. Just sayin rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.