RE: @ Dacian

[Guest guest]

HelloActually I read that message of Daddy (I don't know who is he, I didn't know who is, or Tom or silver_whatever) as I remember the heart problems (almost killed him he said - the MMS, that's why I remember the post).Now regarding me, if my first post was that brutal or not ethic, I sorry for that and never intended to offend one or another; I specified it SEEMS, it was not me who labeled those persons trolls. When you go out and read something, you make yourself on opinion: a SUBJECTIVE one, and this is very important (there is no absolute reference out there to relate you opinion against). No my opinion was most people here consider them trolls. That is to say, I read some of Tom's posts enterly as I'm keep having doubts about MMS and Jim Humble as well (not knowing his story very well and not knowing the product). Though, that will

change for sure, for better or worse. What exactly am I supposed to do when by my own judgment (poor or rich) I feel there a person is a troll on a forum? What about if after reading every single message out there, still by my judgment, I make a completely wrong opinion on someone not being a troll when he actually is?Look, I understand you comments towards my post; I agree on some, I was accused already being a troll (I would say I was quick making an opinion - and it is my fault, but because I was labeled troll after a single post is very fast!). On top of that, there is a moderator here; I remember you my post was not banned, so until then I think I'm allowed to ask questions, right?Now, can I get some help with my questions? I'm not having all the time in the world, I'm interested in getting help with my father's in law pancreatic cancer and MMS.thanks in advance!From: palulukon <palulukon@...>Subject: [ ] @ Dacian Date: Monday, July 19, 2010, 6:21 PM

Morning

Dacian, Even

tho you mention… I won't give up because of the few nasty answers. When

you show up on a forum, don’t read the post and put this in your opening

statement to the group It looks like "silverfox_science" and "Tom"

are considered trolls here and many believe they are paid by BIG PHARMA; maybe... Then who the heck

is Dr. Hesselink they keep mentioning? Is this guy actually doing extensive tests

the two supposed trolls are accusing Jim Humble of not having done? Is

there a link showing his conclusions? Then

you need to take responsibility for the comments that follow. You did not

get nasty answers…you got the answers that would be a vibrational match

for the tone with which you entered the discussion. Probably a good idea

to familiarize yourself with forum etiquette. Repeating mindless gossip

before taking the time to read a bit more is just that, spreading mindless

gossip. If you were really just scanning post I find it odd that you

missed the post by Daddybob, list moderator, on June 26 subject “paid

Trollsâ€. Btw, when he references …she is the list

owner. What follows is the approval of a message from a new member,

with moderator comments first...

and I have discussed this. I am neither anti-MMS or pro-MMS. I have headed off

in new directions. My experience with MMS goes back to the beginning of the phenomenon.

I did Humble's first protocol and nearly killed myself with it. I came

very close to ruining my heart. The silver lining was this- my heart was already

bad and when it got worse I got dead serious about learning to bring it back

to life and I succeeded. I

admit to having a burr under my saddle about Humble. When he heard my story he was

dismissive. He has changed his protocols very reluctantly. After

having been very active on alternative medical groups for over 10 years, I am

very familiar with the pharma trolls, whether paid or not. I can usually pick them

out and I begin to ignore everything from them. I cut my own path. Not everyone

does and plenty will be mislead in every way possible. Well, some of us who

cut our own path also fall off a cliff that we couldn't see in the underbrush

(I actually nearly did that one time). However,

this message that follows really makes my nostrils flare. It is very obvious

who it is directed towards. The authoritarian part of me is inclined to delete

it but the libertarian part says let it out there and let people go their own

way. feels pretty much the same way. I

see this as a blatant attempt to cull off members to a new group and I have no doubt

that the leader of such a group will squelch dissent and form his own dogma.

I'll have no part of it. I believe that bright light never hurt a good idea

or helped a bad one. The light has been intense here lately. With

all that said, I assume you are all adults here whether you act like it or not.

You can make your own decisions. You can do what you want to do and go where

you want to go. What

will not be allowed is personal attacks. - be forewarned- you will not

further accuse any members here of being pharma whores. If they are, we'll figure

it out. DaddyBob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Somehow

in all your quick scanning you picked up on only the parts that Tom was a

troll, missed all the back and forth discussing the subject (like interesting

how that just happened) and ‘just happened’ to use the word Tom

with trolls twice in one paragraph. Maybe

all just coincidence. If it is then accept that you got replies that

would be a match for your ‘entrance’ and not further the animosity

by saying ‘nasty answers’. In

my world I am never a victim of circumstance…I get back what I give out rose

[Guest guest]

Afternoon

Dacian,

Not

to get too far OT (off topic) but this site

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/index.html

has

a whole host of alternative protocols…ones you could include with mms for

your father in law.

I

found this article particularly interesting when I read I some time ago

http://www.healingcancernaturally.com/hamer.html

wishing

you all the best of the very best…

xxx

rose