Guest guest Posted July 19, 2010 Report Share Posted July 19, 2010 Morning Dacian, Even tho you mention… I won't give up because of the few nasty answers. When you show up on a forum, don’t read the post and put this in your opening statement to the group It looks like " silverfox_science " and " Tom " are considered trolls here and many believe they are paid by BIG PHARMA; maybe... Then who the heck is Dr. Hesselink they keep mentioning? Is this guy actually doing extensive tests the two supposed trolls are accusing Jim Humble of not having done? Is there a link showing his conclusions? Then you need to take responsibility for the comments that follow. You did not get nasty answers…you got the answers that would be a vibrational match for the tone with which you entered the discussion. Probably a good idea to familiarize yourself with forum etiquette. Repeating mindless gossip before taking the time to read a bit more is just that, spreading mindless gossip. If you were really just scanning post I find it odd that you missed the post by Daddybob, list moderator, on June 26 subject “paid Trolls”. Btw, when he references …she is the list owner. What follows is the approval of a message from a new member, with moderator comments first... and I have discussed this. I am neither anti-MMS or pro-MMS. I have headed off in new directions. My experience with MMS goes back to the beginning of the phenomenon. I did Humble's first protocol and nearly killed myself with it. I came very close to ruining my heart. The silver lining was this- my heart was already bad and when it got worse I got dead serious about learning to bring it back to life and I succeeded. I admit to having a burr under my saddle about Humble. When he heard my story he was dismissive. He has changed his protocols very reluctantly. After having been very active on alternative medical groups for over 10 years, I am very familiar with the pharma trolls, whether paid or not. I can usually pick them out and I begin to ignore everything from them. I cut my own path. Not everyone does and plenty will be mislead in every way possible. Well, some of us who cut our own path also fall off a cliff that we couldn't see in the underbrush (I actually nearly did that one time). However, this message that follows really makes my nostrils flare. It is very obvious who it is directed towards. The authoritarian part of me is inclined to delete it but the libertarian part says let it out there and let people go their own way. feels pretty much the same way. I see this as a blatant attempt to cull off members to a new group and I have no doubt that the leader of such a group will squelch dissent and form his own dogma. I'll have no part of it. I believe that bright light never hurt a good idea or helped a bad one. The light has been intense here lately. With all that said, I assume you are all adults here whether you act like it or not. You can make your own decisions. You can do what you want to do and go where you want to go. What will not be allowed is personal attacks. - be forewarned- you will not further accuse any members here of being pharma whores. If they are, we'll figure it out. DaddyBob >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Somehow in all your quick scanning you picked up on only the parts that Tom was a troll, missed all the back and forth discussing the subject (like interesting how that just happened) and ‘just happened’ to use the word Tom with trolls twice in one paragraph. Maybe all just coincidence. If it is then accept that you got replies that would be a match for your ‘entrance’ and not further the animosity by saying ‘nasty answers’. In my world I am never a victim of circumstance…I get back what I give out rose Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.