Guest guest Posted September 14, 1999 Report Share Posted September 14, 1999 GSMC? whats that? boy this dr sounds way to weird, it doesn't sound normal,if anyone has ever heard of such a thing please let me know,lol kinda funny though,espically #'s 4 & 5 rheumatic Totally Confused > From: Joyce <hiattruc@...> > > Hi Group, > > well, the day finally arrived for my appointment with the Great Smoky > medical Center doctor. I knew to expect something different from > mainstream but I'm throughly confused about the tests and treatments > suggested by the doctor. > > 1. He said that there is a red stripe in my mouth that shows mercury > sensitivity.(I have 10 Amalgram fillings and one root canal.) He said the > root canal was the worst thing anyone could have and suggested it be removed. > > 2. He said my reflexes also showed Merxury problems. > > 3. While lying flat, he told me to hold up my right arm and to try to > resist his trying to push it down. during that test, I was aware that he > laid something on my stomach but he didn't tell me until later that it was > a small vial of Mercury and that my arm showed no resistance to his pushing > it down while the vial was on my stomach. I honestly can't remember if he > told me to resist while the vial was there. > > 4. He suggested auto hemo therapy (injections of my own blood in my > buttocks), saying it would make me feel great for 5 or 6 days. i told him > I wanted to hold off until I can study the procedure. > > 5. He wanted to give me shots of Lidocaine in two pressure points on my > shoulders, saying that the injections would stop my nagging cough. I > decided to also hold off on that. > > 6. I was given a hair analysis test kit and a stool tet kit to take home to > complete and mail to them. Those I will do! > > 7. he wants me to return on Sept.22 for chelation intrevenous therapy to > see how much metal is excreted in my urine. I haven't quite decided > whether I'll do this. I need your imput! > > 8. He wants me to get a panarex x-ray of my teeth and to let their > radiologists interpet them. > > > Has anyone in this group been to one of the GSMC doctors. > > Group, I would appreciate any thoughts or feelings you have on the above > info. I wonder if this is legitimate or just way out in left field. > > By the way, it is quite expensive! > > Joyce > > > --------------------------- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 1999 Report Share Posted September 14, 1999 Hi Joyce, I don't know how much my ideas are worth, but I will share the little experience I have with some of this. > > 1. He said that there is a red stripe in my mouth that shows mercury > sensitivity.(I have 10 Amalgram fillings and one root canal.) He said the > root canal was the worst thing anyone could have and suggested it be removed. PJ replies: I have heard this about root canals from Dr. Cheney. However, I just had to chose between a root canal or pulling the tooth. I went to an endodontist. He did a special xray of the root and it showed a dark shadow around the root - evidence of infection. He said that if he did the root canal carefully he felt it would not be a problem. I asked him to do another xray in a few months after doing the root canal, and he said he would. I really didn't want to get the tooth pulled. I hope I have made the correct decision. This is a tough call. As to the mercury fillings, this is what Cheney said, " They can be a problem for some people. It depends on whether you have the gene which will protect you. If you don't have the protective genes and you already have mercury fillings it is too late. Removing the fillings is exposing you to more mercury than leaving them in. Basically, removing them is not going to fix you if you have the bad genes anyway, it is too late. " Cheney is highly respected. I am inclined to think he knows best on this matter, but many will disagree with him. Of course, my dentist just insists that mercury fillings are no problem and that mercury does not leech out of the combination of metals, ie it is an amalgam or mixture of metals, not just mercury. Again, who knows? > > 2. He said my reflexes also showed Merxury problems. > > 3. While lying flat, he told me to hold up my right arm and to try to > resist his trying to push it down. during that test, I was aware that he > laid something on my stomach but he didn't tell me until later that it was > a small vial of Mercury and that my arm showed no resistance to his pushing > it down while the vial was on my stomach. I honestly can't remember if he > told me to resist while the vial was there. PJ replies: I have been to a chiropractor who did these types of tests. I sort of believed him until he asked me about when my arthritis started while pushing on my arm. I said, " When my first child was stillborn " and my arm dropped. He immediately decided that my arthritis was psychological in nature, not a physical disease. I believed him because my arm lost power. I no longer believe this at all. I think therer are many other possible explanations for both phenomenon. Besides who decides how much strength drops at any given moment of his exerting pressure? It's not like he has an accurate gage there? > > 4. He suggested auto hemo therapy (injections of my own blood in my > buttocks), saying it would make me feel great for 5 or 6 days. i told him > I wanted to hold off until I can study the procedure. > > 5. He wanted to give me shots of Lidocaine in two pressure points on my > shoulders, saying that the injections would stop my nagging cough. I > decided to also hold off on that. > > 6. I was given a hair analysis test kit and a stool tet kit to take home to > complete and mail to them. Those I will do! PJ replies: Maybe on these too. The doctor I saw in California does blood tests for vitamin and mineral deficiencies at SpectraCell Lab which I think is located in Dallas. They were covered by my insurance which was nice. > > 7. he wants me to return on Sept.22 for chelation intrevenous therapy to > see how much metal is excreted in my urine. I haven't quite decided > whether I'll do this. I need your imput! PJ replies: I am on a list with someone who became extremely ill from chletation therapy of a certain type. I will try to get more details on this one. I hear people who claim chelation helps them, but I also hear stories of people who get sick from certain types. It is really scary to me to have anything injected into blood vessels. > > 8. He wants me to get a panarex x-ray of my teeth and to let their > radiologists interpet them. PJ suggests: Maybe get the xrays done by a really good endontist, sort of a second opinion on this. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 1999 Report Share Posted September 14, 1999 Hi Joyce! Geoff Crenshaw here. Thought maybe a little chiming in would be apropos... > From: Joyce <hiattruc@...> > > Hi Group, > > well, the day finally arrived for my appointment with the Great Smoky > medical Center doctor. I knew to expect something different from > mainstream but I'm throughly confused about the tests and treatments > suggested by the doctor. > > 1. He said that there is a red stripe in my mouth that shows mercury > sensitivity.(I have 10 Amalgram fillings and one root canal.) He said the > root canal was the worst thing anyone could have and suggested it be removed. Right. The root canal procedure commonly traps bacterium in the blood rich area of the tooth & root, which now has a wonderful big hole in it where the nerve used to be. The holes in the teeth are filled with a nonporous substance, however, tooth structure is akin to a sponge except with much smaller openings. The openings are so small and the area so rich that it is not particularly rare for infections and chronic disorders to follow from these even years or decades later, growing in an area here many body cells cannot enter. > 2. He said my reflexes also showed Merxury problems. Interesting comment. I wonder just what sort of reflex is speficially altered, and in what way, by mercury toxicity. > 3. While lying flat, he told me to hold up my right arm and to try to > resist his trying to push it down. during that test, I was aware that he > laid something on my stomach but he didn't tell me until later that it was > a small vial of Mercury and that my arm showed no resistance to his pushing > it down while the vial was on my stomach. I honestly can't remember if he > told me to resist while the vial was there. The Great Smokies people are considered amongst the best in the nation. They are not nest featherers nor self-indulgent. The test you describe is one of several common ways to assess your body's energy field via introduction of a foreign material. Western medicine is just now being forced to admit this is valid, however they still do not understand why. For a full discussion on this issue you will need to spend some time (months - years) in the study of Chinese medicine and the body chi. Short answer - it does work, but like all things (e.g., the chiropractor mentioned n another post) can be misuesd and abused. An interesting note is that this is also an *extremely* reliable way to determine what food stuffs and supplements your body NEEDS, i.e., which ones impart energy to you vs. taking it from you. A common similarity to this test is one with which many people ar familiar... they eat ice cream (or some other food) and a half hour later are falling asleep. That's because the food is " taking " energy vs. " giving " energy. You should have no qualms about going along with this fellow so far. > 4. He suggested auto hemo therapy (injections of my own blood in my > buttocks), saying it would make me feel great for 5 or 6 days. i told him > I wanted to hold off until I can study the procedure. This sounds very much like what is used by the US (and other) Olympic Teams. Auto Hemo Therapy increases the quantity of red blood cells in free circulation, thereby giving you increased oxygen carrying capacity. It does work and indeed, takes about 4-6 days for the production to even out against the added capacity. As long as it's done right (clean, etc.) there's no downside except the, well, the, ahem... " down " side. > 5. He wanted to give me shots of Lidocaine in two pressure points on my > shoulders, saying that the injections would stop my nagging cough. I > decided to also hold off on that. Another good move here. Lidocaine is used to break up lesions, scar tissues, etc. and restore the natural kinetic energy flow of the body (chi). Commonly used in Europe and by highly trained plastic surgeons here in the US, it is often injected in fresh scar tissue to prevent and/or break up the " roping " associated the cheloids. So far, this guy, though his procedures are foreign to your " allopathy trained " senses, is right on the money. That is one of the major drawbacks to our " western allopathic medicine " . We as consumers are so thoroughly indoctrinated in shots & surgery we cringe from the thought of other methods. > 6. I was given a hair analysis test kit and a stool tet kit to take home to > complete and mail to them. Those I will do! Good move - not too messy either. Be careful to note ALL things used in your hair including shampoos, conditioners, sprays, colors, detanglers, soaps, scents, etc. > 7. he wants me to return on Sept.22 for chelation intrevenous therapy to > see how much metal is excreted in my urine. I haven't quite decided > whether I'll do this. I need your imput! Chelation therapy is the first line of treatment outside the US for vein and artery blockages. Here the only people who use it commonly are the heart surgeons who do NOT tell their patients about it. However... and this is worth noting for you, chelation therapy IS the recognized method of removing heavy metals in the US and is specifically recommended for that. Most common US medical use: lead poisoning. Another good move. Beware, however, chelation therapy can be quite fatiguing and should be done slowly over a period of several months. Once every two weeks or so is about tops for most folks to handle comfortably. The more frequently you do it, the higher the risk you run of getting severly fatigued and from that fatigure all sorts of bad things can happen, including RA flares. Prior to chelation eat a healthy meal (as in a couple of hours prior - not " just " prior) and take some light high-carb type snacks with you. As always, drink plenty of WATER. It's best to have a driver as the therapy is normally fatiguing. The chelate, usally EDTA, should be administered IV in sterile water, not saline nor ringers, and can (and usually is by those most familiar with its administration) be punched up at the tail end with a vitamin boost added to the IV solution. > 8. He wants me to get a panarex x-ray of my teeth and to let their > radiologists interpet them. Panarex is the newest sort of x-ray. These machines, while new and obviously expensive, use about 1%, that is 1/100th, of the radiation used by traditional dental x-ray machines of only 5-6 years ago. You are placed in a brace and the unit circles you taking a 180 degree x-ray of your complete jaw, thus the name Pan-a-rex. This x-ray is then digitized into a computer where the resolution and output are far superior to any film x-rays ever done. The can be printed on plain paper by laser, output to film, blown up, manipulated, basically anything one would expect with image manipulation to a pixel level. They are also ready instantly - no waiting. Hot stuff and very, very good. > Group, I would appreciate any thoughts or feelings you have on the above > info. I wonder if this is legitimate or just way out in left field. Not only is it legitimate, it is anything but left field -- this is cutting edge, holistic medicine at it's western best. Fully aware of all body systems, the environment, body energy flows and interruptions, and making use of the best of new and old technologies. It only has one problem... > By the way, it is quite expensive! That's it! That's the one MAJOR drawback. And oftentimes it is NO covered by insurance. It's cheap to get a quack to pretend he knows what he's doing with these things. It's quite another thing altogether to get people who know their stuff, and the folks at Great Smokies do. If your purse can handle it, you should be on the road to far better health when you leave them. Regards, Geoff Crenshaw, ACC ----------------------- Captain Cook's Cruise Center ** Usual Disclaimers ** ----------------------- Religion: Man's attempt to discover God Christianity: God's offer to save humankind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 These are my suggestions: First, are your kids making good progress with your children. If yes, who cares what the method it. It's working. Second, if they aren't making progress, then look for a new therapist. Who cares if your current therapist is an " expert " . I'd call around and talk to other therapist. It won't hurt to make a few phone calls. I'd ask how they treat apraxia. You can always go one time to a therapist that you like on the phone. Good luck. Suzi > Hi everyone, > > After the Kaufman workshop, I was totally convinced Maddie has apraxia and > Luke 80% sure. > > I finally got in touch with the EI coordinator, and she says our SLP is THE > expert in the county on apraxia!!!! Our SLP is telling me they do NOT have > apraxia! I should also note that every single doctor the EI coordinator > has recommended to me has turned out to be a dud. > > Can I be this wrong? Should I just " wait and see " what happens, meanwhile > try the Kaufman cards and what I learned at the workshop on my own? How > can she be an expert if she doesn't even know the Kaufman method exists and > thinks Prompt is the only way to treat kids with apraxia? > > I'm so confused....I'm so sorry to be bothering you all with this again! > Wendi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 Hi Wendi, Very frustrating indeed. My son was diagnosed at 3 with apraxia. His private SLP said he had it and a neuroligist based on his symptons said he " probably " was apraxic. Then the school SLP did her evaluation and was and is still convinced he does not have it. At first I was very bothered by this thinking like you that he wasn't going to get the right therapy. To the contrary the school SLP has been wonderful with him. She chooses not to call it apraxia but she was successful with her combination of various techniques whether tactile visual or whatever. If she is PROMPT trained ( you can call PROMPT to see if she is certified which is a 3 part process where from what I understand Deborah Hayden the founder observes for the last phase) then she probably is well versed in apraxia. Why not have a frank discussion with her to see why she doesn't think your kids are. In my son's case he is not a classic apraxic where he gropes for words. However he exhibits so many other signs. The other issue may be which I found is that EI tends to not " offer " a diagnosis especially since apraxia is considered to be neurological. However the AM. Speech and Hearing recognizes that those SLP's experienced in apraxia can diagnose. The bottomline is that whether they have it or not they get the right therapy. Also, the Kaufman cards cannot hurt so why not use them. Maybe your SLP will see how they work. denise --- In , Wendi Sotis <wsotis@m...> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > After the Kaufman workshop, I was totally convinced Maddie has apraxia and > Luke 80% sure. > > I finally got in touch with the EI coordinator, and she says our SLP is THE > expert in the county on apraxia!!!! Our SLP is telling me they do NOT have > apraxia! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 Wendi and : I, too, have been down the " diagnosis " road also. When , then age 2 was diagnosed with verbal apraxia, we started a course of treatment specifically for apraxia. My EI service coordinator got me in touch with my current therapy group and away we went. However, several months later, the SLP told me that he didn't see apraxia with for the same reason mentioned below.....he did not grope for words. I asked if that " groping " was more consistent with oral apraxia....but he didn't know. Regardless, they (and I) agreed to call it an expressive language delay for now and to just work with him in developing his language/speech skills. He has done wonders with this group and we continue to see improvements. While I have finally decided not to get hung up on the diagnosis, I am still nervous about his 3 year evaluation next week, to see that they call his delay. Good luck! Kim Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 Hi Wendi! As Kaufman told me -the Kaufman cards are good for any late talker and " weed out the men from the boys " What she meant is that a child with a simple delay will progress quickly through the word hierarchy on the backs of the cards to say the words correctly - while the apraxic children will take longer and will require the word bridges the cards provide. I love the Kaufman technique - PROMPT -oral motor therapy -multi sensory therapies -OT -Fast For Word -the right Omega 3/6 EFAs -whatever works for my boys I love. Doesn't mean what works for one child will work for another -no matter what the diagnosis. The right diagnosis however will provide you will a better idea of appropriate therapies. Knowledge will both make you both less confused -and more unsure. The more your learn -the more questions you'll have -the more that you'll know that we need to find out the answers through clinical research -and the less stressing the hodge podge diagnosis's you'll get along the way will bother you. All that will matter is all that matters -find the most appropriate ways to help your child no matter why he's a late talker. Why do you think we named The Late Talker book The Late Talker? It's the only name that describes almost all of our children -and it's what almost all of us heard and thought that our children " just " were. A good therapist -no matter how good -PROMPT or Kaufman or otherwise -can't work with every child -children and impairments are unique -and in addition -at times even with the right therapy -it may not be the right therapist -chemistry could be off -or your child may be that day. Your child just may not " click " with the expert most other children do click with. Of course some therapists are pretty darn close to being perfect! Unless you want to fly to see one of the more well known therapists -a therapist that has a good reputation through your local support group -or from other parents in your area in this group is a good place to start for a second opinion. Not all SLP's agree on the exact definition of what apraxia is -or what PDD is -or what autism is -which is why so many of our children are given the flavor of the month diagnosis depending upon what country/state we live in and what type of professional we take our child to see. All will agree on " severe expressive language delay " which I'm sure all of us heard at some point. It's the easy way out diagnosis. Well maybe not all will agree on that either -because some will argue " It's not a severe expressive language delay this child has -it's a severe expressive verbal delay " but you get the point...there is no one answer -only different days and different therapists and mostly different opinions. Listen and keep track of them all -buy a file cabinet and mark your child's name on it and expect to buy another one in a year or two. Don't stress over it - just file them to have them handy if needed -at least that you have control over! As and Suzi pointed out -it is frustrating for many of us if we have to know the exact names of each diagnosis (because most of our children have more than one even though we all at first thought it was " just " late talker...like mild low tone -or mild DSI -or maybe dysarthria with the apraxia -or dysfluency with the apraxia - or SLI with the apraxia...and does the child have a " receptive " (cognitive) delay -or was the professional not skilled at providing the nonverbal child with the appropriate testing or was the child not in the mood that day? And then the next exam could have the professional saying " your child has above average receptive skills and severe communication delays...we suspect apraxia " ) but I digress. I highly recommend continuing to try to find a neurodevelopmental MD like Dr. Agin in NYC -or Dr. Chez in Chicago -or Dr. Ming in NJ -or Dr. Herbert in MA -etc. etc. and put those evals together with the other experts to see if all the experts agree. You want to find medical, speech, and educational professionals that are knowledgeable about various communication impairments -not just one. This way you have a better chance of getting not only a diagnosis -but the reason " why " the professional believes your child does have ABC and does not have XYZ. My experience is that the best professionals stay the most open minded -and want to hear from you the parent. You are your child's expert -and until more (ha ha -let's say " any large clinical " instead) research is done on apraxia as to causes, treatments, preventions, etc. the insight you provide to the professional is critical in my opinion for providing the full picture of your child. A nonverbal child may not act " normal " in public due to low self esteem or frustration -but may act perfectly fine with those that understand his nonverbal cues at home. It's fine the EI SLP doesn't agree and believe your child (children) not to be apraxic -however how can he/she be so 100% sure since apraxia like autism presents so many ways - you could have a child with verbal apraxia alone -or oral apraxia and verbal apraxia alone - or verbal apraxia with some mild global apraxia of the body -or oral and verbal apraxia with dysarthria. Also as you have noticed from our grouplist we have parents with children with autism and apraxia - CP and apraxia -Kabuki syndrome and apraxia -myelin disorders and apraxia etc. etc. Here is another " expert " story about an well known OT that specializes in DSI. I just spoke to the parent who told me this OT said that all of her child's " apraxia " signs -and " expressive language delays " were not from apraxia but from sensory dysfunction -and even though the child probably has DSI too -too being the key word here -this child with only OT and behavior therapy alone without speech TX has regressed. Bottom line is make sure your child's therapy is appropriate by expecting progress. Try to find therapists and medical doctors privately who you trust and respect who can oversee your child's therapy provided through the State or school -with an outside eye. And someone who can provide acceptable goals for your child's progression. You can fly your child all over until you get the right diagnosis - but the only thing that matters is that your child's needs are being met by a therapist or therapists and MD's who are open minded and typically use multi-sensory approaches. The good thing about paying for therapy yourself is that it's way easier to switch when your child is not progressing. And one last thought -as many of us have found -even with not the most experienced therapist -with the right Omega 3/6 EFAs almost all of our children have surges. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 Hey Kim! As Dr. Agin tells me -even children diagnosed with syndromes once on the right EFAs appear to " rewire " and lose the " signs " of the syndrome. Your child -my child -and many of our children were fitting the classic " signs " of apraxia before the EFAs. Look up the word paradigm shift -and that's what we have going on now. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 22, 2003 Report Share Posted January 22, 2003 ! You are so right! That's a great explanation! Thanks. Kim Hey Kim! As Dr. Agin tells me -even children diagnosed with syndromes once on the right EFAs appear to " rewire " and lose the " signs " of the syndrome. Your child -my child -and many of our children were fitting the classic " signs " of apraxia before the EFAs. Look up the word paradigm shift -and that's what we have going on now. ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 Wendi - I was also at the workshop (I came in late to lunch!). I have a 4 1/2 year old son with apraxia. His therapists were there with me (they are prompt certified, have been using Kaufman cards, do myofascial release, tons of oral motor, etc). I also think my third son who is 2 1/2 has apraxia. His current EI therapist is great and she thinks he doesn't but I only trust one person to make the diagnosis...Dr. Marilyn Agin. I am bringing my older son for a reevaluation and my 2 1/2 year old to be evaluated in March. I love her and think you can trust her 100% as to whether or not your children are apraxic. Email me directly if you want to " talk " . Lynaugh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 I've heard of some of the specialists mentioned below several times ... are there any tips on how to find/contact/get in to see them? Specifically Dr. Ming or Dr. Agin. My daughter is 2 1/2 and we are already on a couple of 6-month waiting lists for the 'good' developmental peds in town, but I'd prefer to have her see a apraxia specialist if I can arrange it. Thanks in advance Mom to Ellie, age 2 1/2 (apraxic, dysarthic, hypotonic) [ ] Re: totally confused > Hi Wendi! > > As Kaufman told me -the Kaufman cards are good for any late > talker and " weed out the men from the boys " What she meant is that > a child with a simple delay will progress quickly through the word > hierarchy on the backs of the cards to say the words correctly - > while the apraxic children will take longer and will require the > word bridges the cards provide. I love the Kaufman technique - > PROMPT -oral motor therapy -multi sensory therapies -OT -Fast For > Word -the right Omega 3/6 EFAs -whatever works for my boys I love. > Doesn't mean what works for one child will work for another -no > matter what the diagnosis. The right diagnosis however will provide > you will a better idea of appropriate therapies. > > Knowledge will both make you both less confused -and more unsure. > The more your learn -the more questions you'll have -the more that > you'll know that we need to find out the answers through clinical > research -and the less stressing the hodge podge diagnosis's you'll > get along the way will bother you. All that will matter is all that > matters -find the most appropriate ways to help your child no matter > why he's a late talker. Why do you think we named The Late Talker > book The Late Talker? It's the only name that describes almost all > of our children -and it's what almost all of us heard and thought > that our children " just " were. > > A good therapist -no matter how good -PROMPT or Kaufman or > otherwise -can't work with every child -children and impairments are > unique -and in addition -at times even with the right therapy -it > may not be the right therapist -chemistry could be off -or your > child may be that day. Your child just may not " click " with the expert > most other children do click with. Of course some therapists are > pretty darn close to being perfect! Unless you want to fly to see > one of the more well known therapists -a therapist that has a good > reputation through your local support group -or from other parents > in your area in this group is a good place to start for a second > opinion. > > Not all SLP's agree on the exact definition of what apraxia is -or > what PDD is -or what autism is -which is why so many of our children > are given the flavor of the month diagnosis depending upon what > country/state we live in and what type of professional we take our > child to see. All will agree on " severe expressive language delay " > which I'm sure all of us heard at some point. It's the easy way out > diagnosis. Well maybe not all will agree on that either -because > some will argue " It's not a severe expressive language delay this > child has -it's a severe expressive verbal delay " but you get the > point...there is no one answer -only different days and different > therapists and mostly different opinions. Listen and keep track of > them all -buy a file cabinet and mark your child's name on it and > expect to buy another one in a year or two. Don't stress over it - > just file them to have them handy if needed -at least that you have > control over! > > As and Suzi pointed out -it is frustrating for many of us if > we have to know the exact names of each diagnosis (because most of > our children have more than one even though we all at first thought > it was " just " late talker...like mild low tone -or mild DSI -or > maybe dysarthria with the apraxia -or dysfluency with the apraxia - > or SLI with the apraxia...and does the child have a " receptive " > (cognitive) delay -or was the professional not skilled at providing > the nonverbal child with the appropriate testing or was the child > not in the mood that day? And then the next exam could have the > professional saying " your child has above average receptive skills > and severe communication delays...we suspect apraxia " ) but I > digress. > > I highly recommend continuing to try to find a neurodevelopmental MD > like Dr. Agin in NYC -or Dr. Chez in Chicago -or Dr. Ming in NJ -or > Dr. Herbert in MA -etc. etc. and put those evals together with the > other experts to see if all the experts agree. You want to find > medical, speech, and educational professionals that are > knowledgeable about various communication impairments -not just > one. This way you have a better chance of getting not only a > diagnosis -but the reason " why " the professional believes your child > does have ABC and does not have XYZ. > > My experience is that the best professionals stay the most open > minded -and want to hear from you the parent. You are your child's > expert -and until more (ha ha -let's say " any large clinical " > instead) research is done on apraxia as to causes, treatments, > preventions, etc. the insight you provide to the professional is > critical in my opinion for providing the full picture of your > child. A nonverbal child may not act " normal " in public due to low > self esteem or frustration -but may act perfectly fine with those > that understand his nonverbal cues at home. > > It's fine the EI SLP doesn't agree and believe your child (children) > not to be apraxic -however how can he/she be so 100% sure since > apraxia like autism presents so many ways - you could have a child > with verbal apraxia alone -or oral apraxia and verbal apraxia alone - > or verbal apraxia with some mild global apraxia of the body -or oral > and verbal apraxia with dysarthria. Also as you have noticed from > our grouplist we have parents with children with autism and apraxia - > CP and apraxia -Kabuki syndrome and apraxia -myelin disorders and > apraxia etc. etc. > > Here is another " expert " story about an well known OT that specializes > in DSI. I just spoke to the parent who told me this OT said that all > of her child's " apraxia " signs -and " expressive language delays " > were not from apraxia but from sensory dysfunction -and even though > the child probably has DSI too -too being the key word here -this > child with only OT and behavior therapy alone without speech TX has regressed. > > Bottom line is make sure your child's therapy is appropriate by > expecting progress. Try to find therapists and medical doctors > privately who you trust and respect who can oversee your child's > therapy provided through the State or school -with an outside eye. And > someone who can provide acceptable goals for your child's > progression. > > > You can fly your child all over until you get the right diagnosis - > but the only thing that matters is that your child's needs are being > met by a therapist or therapists and MD's who are open minded and > typically use multi-sensory approaches. The good thing about paying > for therapy yourself is that it's way easier to switch when your > child is not progressing. And one last thought -as many of us have > found -even with not the most experienced therapist -with the right > Omega 3/6 EFAs almost all of our children have surges. > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 Hi (great name!) Dr. Marilyn Agin -was my life-line for both of by boys as their neuro -developmental pediatrician -I don't know what we would have done without her. She helped us understand -help -and advocate for our children -and she also helped oversee the CHERAB Foundation as the Medical Director in the early stages and used to spend hours upon hours staying up to the wee hours of the morning giving up sleep answering emails after emails from the many parents before we stopped sharing her email. She has such a huge heart and wants so much to help -just like all good doctors. She is also my co-author of The Late Talker book and I can't say enough good things about her. Out of all the doctors I recommend -she is one of the few professionals out there that just about 100% that see her love/rave about her - just ask those that have. Due to the fact that Dr. Agin was a speech pathologist for seven years before medical school -she has a unique understanding of neurologically based multi faceted communication disorders such as autism and apraxia -however as the Medical Director for NYC's Early Intervention Department (the largest in the country) -she is an authority that lectures on all types of impairments and disorders in children and is very open minded and respects and listens to the concern of the parents. She is also knowledgeable about EFAs. Dr. Agin's private practice number 212- 274- 9180 her Early Intervention number if you are in NYC is 212- -219 - 5171 I don't have Dr. Ming's number handy since my move -but you could just call University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey / New Jersey Medical School (UMDNJ) at 973-972-5208 and I'm sure they will connect you. This is Dr. Ming's email : Pediatric Neurology/Autism Xue Ming,MD,PhD Mingxu@... Dr. Ming specializes in autism - however is very interested in the apraxic population and quite knowledgeable about the benefits of EFAs -she studied under Dr. Hugo Moser (our dinner speaker at The First Apraxia Conference hosted by CHERAB -he was the doctor portrayed in Lorenzo's Oil and he led the recent trials on the oil!) When I was called into UMDNJ to present about what my views are on apraxic children/ and the remyelinating qualities of EFAs, and why this may be helping our children (almost 100%) -Dr. Ming was one of the doctors I spoke with -with great interest. She is also quite impressed with one of our member's children who had myelin problems that are now resolved since on ProEFA. That parent is Caroline IlGrande -who " used " to be a skeptical attorney when it came to EFAs too -and it was amazing MRI changes which I'd rather Caroline explains since I may not get it all right. I'm not sure if she has shared all here yet. Caroline posts her first and last name so you can search (if I spelled it right!) Caroline - who I just spoke to the other night LOVES Dr. Ming for her apraxic daughter (who is not autistic) and if you search the archives you can probably find Dr. Ming's number since I believe Caroline posted it once -or maybe Caroline will see this and post it again! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 Hi Everyone, I am wondering how I can go about finding a reputable Neurodevelopmental Pediatrician in my neck of the woods. I am nowhere near NY or NJ, or any major city for that matter. We are not in a great financial position, so traveling too far is out of the question. Is there any way to search by region? We have had an SLP dx my son as Verbally Dyspraxic, but I would like to follow up with an MD, and I don't have much faith in our Dr. Also, is the majority of the population here using ProEFA, or is there another formulation that works equally well? TIA, Kathleen & Owen ----- Original Message ----- Hi (great name!) Dr. Marilyn Agin -was my life-line for both of by boys as their neuro -developmental pediatrician -I don't know what we would have done without her. She helped us understand -help -and advocate for our children -and she also helped oversee the CHERAB Foundation as the Medical Director in the early stages and used to spend hours upon hours staying up to the wee hours of the morning giving up sleep answering emails after emails from the many parents before we stopped sharing her email. She has such a huge heart and wants so much to help -just like all good doctors. She is also my co-author of The Late Talker book and I can't say enough good things about her. Out of all the doctors I recommend -she is one of the few professionals out there that just about 100% that see her love/rave about her - just ask those that have. Due to the fact that Dr. Agin was a speech pathologist for seven years before medical school -she has a unique understanding of neurologically based multi faceted communication disorders such as autism and apraxia -however as the Medical Director for NYC's Early Intervention Department (the largest in the country) -she is an authority that lectures on all types of impairments and disorders in children and is very open minded and respects and listens to the concern of the parents. She is also knowledgeable about EFAs. Dr. Agin's private practice number 212- 274- 9180 her Early Intervention number if you are in NYC is 212- -219 - 5171 I don't have Dr. Ming's number handy since my move -but you could just call University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey / New Jersey Medical School (UMDNJ) at 973-972-5208 and I'm sure they will connect you. This is Dr. Ming's email : Pediatric Neurology/Autism Xue Ming,MD,PhD Mingxu@... Dr. Ming specializes in autism - however is very interested in the apraxic population and quite knowledgeable about the benefits of EFAs -she studied under Dr. Hugo Moser (our dinner speaker at The First Apraxia Conference hosted by CHERAB -he was the doctor portrayed in Lorenzo's Oil and he led the recent trials on the oil!) When I was called into UMDNJ to present about what my views are on apraxic children/ and the remyelinating qualities of EFAs, and why this may be helping our children (almost 100%) -Dr. Ming was one of the doctors I spoke with -with great interest. She is also quite impressed with one of our member's children who had myelin problems that are now resolved since on ProEFA. That parent is Caroline IlGrande -who " used " to be a skeptical attorney when it came to EFAs too -and it was amazing MRI changes which I'd rather Caroline explains since I may not get it all right. I'm not sure if she has shared all here yet. Caroline posts her first and last name so you can search (if I spelled it right!) Caroline - who I just spoke to the other night LOVES Dr. Ming for her apraxic daughter (who is not autistic) and if you search the archives you can probably find Dr. Ming's number since I believe Caroline posted it once -or maybe Caroline will see this and post it again! ===== Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 Kathleen My daughter has been taking a very similar supplement (sorry I don't have the stats right handy but I did check at some time) made by Nordic Naturals. It also comes in a softgel capsule that has a lemon scent. You can get it online direct from NN, but I found it at my local vitamin shop much cheaper. There also is some sort of new paste out there (think of like a ketchup packet) but I found the smell and texture a turn off. The claim with this stuff was that you could eat it straight, but I certainly couldn't! Re: [ ] Re: totally confused > Hi Everyone, > > I am wondering how I can go about finding a reputable Neurodevelopmental Pediatrician in my neck of the woods. I am nowhere near NY or NJ, or any major city for that matter. We are not in a great financial position, so traveling too far is out of the question. Is there any way to search by region? > > We have had an SLP dx my son as Verbally Dyspraxic, but I would like to follow up with an MD, and I don't have much faith in our Dr. > > Also, is the majority of the population here using ProEFA, or is there another formulation that works equally well? > > TIA, > Kathleen & Owen > ----- Original Message ----- > > Hi (great name!) > > Dr. Marilyn Agin -was my life-line for both of by boys as their > neuro -developmental pediatrician -I don't know what we would have > done without her. She helped us understand -help -and advocate for > our children -and she also helped oversee the CHERAB Foundation as > the Medical Director in the early stages and used to spend hours > upon hours staying up to the wee hours of the morning giving up > sleep answering emails after emails from the many parents before we > stopped sharing her email. She has such a huge heart and wants so > much to help -just like all good doctors. She is also my co-author > of The Late Talker book and I can't say enough good things about > her. Out of all the doctors I recommend -she is one of the few > professionals out there that just about 100% that see her love/rave about her - > just ask those that have. Due to the fact that Dr. Agin was a > speech pathologist for seven years before medical school -she has a > unique understanding of neurologically based multi faceted > communication disorders such as autism and apraxia -however as the > Medical Director for NYC's Early Intervention Department (the > largest in the country) -she is an authority that lectures on all > types of impairments and disorders in children and is very open > minded and respects and listens to the concern of the parents. She > is also knowledgeable about EFAs. > > Dr. Agin's private practice number 212- 274- 9180 > her Early Intervention number if you are in NYC is 212- -219 - 5171 > > I don't have Dr. Ming's number handy since my move -but you could > just call University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey / New > Jersey Medical School (UMDNJ) at 973-972-5208 and I'm sure they will > connect you. > This is Dr. Ming's email : Pediatric Neurology/Autism Xue > Ming,MD,PhD Mingxu@... Dr. Ming specializes in autism - > however is very interested in the apraxic population and quite > knowledgeable about the benefits of EFAs -she studied under Dr. Hugo > Moser (our dinner speaker at The First Apraxia Conference hosted by > CHERAB -he was the doctor portrayed in Lorenzo's Oil and he led the > recent trials on the oil!) When I was called into UMDNJ to present > about what my views are on apraxic children/ and the remyelinating > qualities of EFAs, and why this may be helping our children (almost > 100%) -Dr. Ming was one of the doctors I spoke with -with great > interest. She is also quite impressed with one of our member's > children who had myelin problems that are now resolved since on > ProEFA. That parent is Caroline IlGrande -who " used " to be a > skeptical attorney when it came to EFAs too -and it was amazing MRI > changes which I'd rather Caroline explains since I may not get it > all right. I'm not sure if she has shared all here yet. Caroline > posts her first and last name so you can search (if I spelled it > right!) > > Caroline - who I just spoke to the other night LOVES Dr. Ming for > her apraxic daughter (who is not autistic) and if you search the > archives you can probably find Dr. Ming's number since I believe > Caroline posted it once -or maybe Caroline will see this and post it > again! > > ===== > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 23, 2003 Report Share Posted January 23, 2003 Thanks so much to everyone for helping me (once again) get past my confusion! I had a " discussion " with the ST today and gave her the handout and my notes from the Kaufman workshop to study. It's so strange how our 2 occupational therapists understand apraxia so much better then the ST! I've talked to them several times in the past couple of weeks and they understand it completely. Both of them are so anxious to see the handout. I guess because of the motor planning aspect... The ST says she's knows Prompt, and I asked if she was certified and she said yes. Yet didn't know who Kaufman was, said she wasn't familiar with the Kaufman Praxis test (are there other tests for apraxia?), and looked shocked when I said that apraxia is a motor planning problem. Is this possible? I just would like to know because the county thinks she's an expert. She said if a child can approximate a word that's modeled, s/he is not apraxic. If that's the case, then how does an apraxic child ever learn to say anything at all? She had no answer to this. Meanwhile I've talked to EI and they say since she's the expert on apraxia, she would be the one they'd recommend to treat the kids if they were diagnosed elsewhere. Wendi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2003 Report Share Posted September 14, 2003 And there I was just about to write congratulating you on yesterdays post - sounds like you're doing sooo well ! I wonder if this is what I sometimes get after a big 'high' - an equally big 'low' ? It's hard for all of us, warren, everyone has problems - yours may be a disorder, someone else's might be that they are plain-looking, had an abusive childhood with aftermath and mental scars etc etc Just because people don't go around telling or showing you their problems doesn't mean they don't have them. take care and I hope you feel a bit happier soon. Even if you do feel your mum is interfering just remember it's only cos she loves you and wants good for you - she could have a lot easier life herself and not bother if she didn't care but when you love your kids sometimes it's hard to not help them cos you want THE best for them. You have many good things about you and if you look around there is always someone else worse off. cheer up Julea --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free by AVG so it wasn't me ! Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.516 / Virus Database: 313 - Release Date: 01/09/2003 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2003 Report Share Posted September 14, 2003 > > I'm feeling so depressed:( I should be happy > with everything going on right now, getting my house, > going to school. But it's so hard. All my peers reject > me, laugh at me, and all the girls act like I carry > the plague. If you want, you can send me a private email and I can give you some sites that are restricted to AS only. You might get some good ideas if you post your thoughts there. >>Now I don't even know > who I can trust anymore. My mom and my counselors are > more concerned about themselves. Always trying to make > decisions for me that I never have any say in, and > % & ^$ going over my head. I don't trust anyone, it is safer that way. Maybe not the preferred method, but it works for me. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2003 Report Share Posted September 14, 2003 > > Any local sites? I live in NC. I have no idea if they are local to NC, altho I believe most of them are US based. A few are Europe based. Dana Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 JD, I have talked to my board and they are clueless. What is the practice act and where can I find it for Ohio LPC’s? However, there was a question on my licensing exam about biofeedback (I think). Brainmaster is located in Ohio and they may actually be able to point me there if no one here knows. I think you can get BCIA certification now with your PT license. (not that you want to ) They have opened up certification. Connie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of JD Elder Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:46 AM Subject: Totally Confused When I first started doing biofeedback and neurofeedback, this was before neurofeedback certification was offered by BCIA. I had applied for Biofeedback Certification with BCIA, but as a licensed physical therapist I was unable to meet one requirement of training, at the time, in counseling. I tried unsuccessfully for years to get into a training program. Each time I was informed that since I was not a mental health professional or pursuing a mental health degree, I could not be accepted into the counseling course. I asked for help from BCIA and they could not help me. So I got certified with the certifying organization which was the precursor to NTCB. For me, at the time, they were a godsend. Though BCIA is a fine certification board they are exclusive and if you are not a licensed professional you cannot become certified with them. For that reason, I think that NTCB is a fine alternative. I am not aware of being associated with NTCB. If is associated with NTCB then I would reconsider my position. You can become BCIA certified, but that does not guarantee that you can practice neurofeedback in the state that you practice. If your practice act does not specifically indicate that you can use " biofeedback " you may not be able to legally practice neurofeedback, but this may vary from state to state. For the licensed professional, I believe that BCIA is the gold standard and that state laws and professional practice acts need to be changed to reflect the standards set forth by BCIA, but I do not see this happening anytime soon considering the amount of time, money and effort that it takes to changes practice acts many of which most of us have no interest in. Yet licensed psychologist without sufficient training or certification can practice legally. Also, if it is not clear in your practice act that you can practice biofeedback (neurofeedback) then your malpractice will not cover you in case of a complaint against you with state department of professional licensing or otherwise. It is my understanding that you will need to get a second malpractice insurance which covers neurofeedback. There are other tact's that can be taken to practice legally, but it is best to contact your state professional licensing board first and find out about their position. Always try and get there response in an e-mail or record your telephone conservation, and then call back and get verification from a second party. Keep this information in case an issue does arise. Even after certification, I was denied the ability to practice neurofeedback despite the fact that biofeedback was explicitly mentioned in my practice act. That's when I went ahead and did it anyway and to hell with the consequences. None occurred thank goodness. The following is from an e-mail by Gilbert in October of 2007. It has some interesting facts that may be worth knowing. Best Regards, JD Elder " Gentlepeople, Joe raises a very critical issue. A small group of biofeedback-trained psychologists are indeed trying to take complete control of biofeedback. This group is implicated in filing anonymous charges of practicing psychology without a license against well over 200 biofeedback professionals over the past three years. To date, they have won none of these cases, but they are painting the picture that psychology is under attack by non-psychologists practicing psychology without a license. Please do contact the APA regarding their proposed " hostile takeover " of biofeedback and arm yourself with the following facts: 1. In the USA there are less than 1200 licensed psychologists practicing biofeedback. 2. In the USA there are more than 12,000 trained biofeedback professionals who are not licensed psychologists and who legally practice biofeedback for relaxation and muscle re-education to assist their clients in managing pain and/or stress. 3. Over the period of January 2003 through December 2006 a very small group of licensed psychologists anonymously filed charges with psychology licensing boards against over 200 non-licensed biofeedback professionals for practicing psychology without a license; and in every one of these cases the defendants were found to be legally practicing biofeedback and not practicing psychotherapy 4. Biofeedback devices under the jurisdiction of the FDA are registered for use by acupuncturists, chiropractors, clinical social workers, counselors, dentists, hypnotists, massage therapists, medical doctors, naturopaths, registered nurses, occupational therapists, oriental medical doctors, osteopaths, physician assistants, physical therapists, special education teachers, speech pathologists, veterinarians, other licensed health care professionals and certified biofeedback professionals. 5. It is estimated by the Natural Therapies Research Board that eighty percent of all biofeedback devices in the USA are used for stress and/or pain management. This board also estimates that less than one percent of all biofeedback devices are used by licensed psychologists to treat psychological conditions. 6. Both the Natural Therapies Research Board and the Natural Therapies Certification Board indicate that more than 60,000 biofeedback devices are owned and operated by private individuals for their own use. This represents about seventy-five percent of an estimated 80,000 biofeedback devices currently in use in the USA. 7. A few hundred licensed psychologists have neither the authority nor the expertise to take control of the biofeedback industry. On the other hand, the cost of attempting to enforce such a hostile takeover may bankrupt the APA. It will certainly put psychologists in a very bad light with other professionals who use biofeedback in their practice. That may be a good thing. Peace, " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Connie, I am pretty sure that Ohio has a practice act with the licensing division/department for Professional Counselors. Here in Utah you can access the Professional Counselor's practice act online. My son is a LPC and works in an addiction's setting. On the phone, they have told him that he cannot use biofeedback (neurofeedback) equipment in his practice, so he doesn't. Yet there are many other LPC's in the state that indicate that they can use biofeedback equipment to get "stress reduction and relaxation" which is expressly stated and permitted in their practice act and they do use biofeedback equipment in their practices. Some have confronted the professional licensing department, but most have not. In time these issues will be resolved, but not as long as we have people like Cory Hammond who consistently reports licensed professionals, even those who have BCIA certification, and others because they do not expressly have "biofeedback" spelled out in their practice act. If this is the case, then more time and effort needs to be taken to insure that our "informed consent forms" and the way we "advertise" are such that we are not saying that we are practicing medicine or diagnosing or treating mental health conditions. Most licensing boards are kind and will give their licensed professions the benefit of the doubt, and will work with them to help them come into compliance if there is an issue. Cory's influence has been felt in Utah, where he lives, but most licensed professionals (even non-BCIA certified) have simply had to change the way they advertise and adjust their informed consent. Others have been restricted from practicing neurofeedback, as it should be in some non-professional cases. I hope that we can use some common sense and support the standards as spelled out by BCIA for all of our licensed professionals. I also hope to someday see a professional discipline for biofeedback and neurofeedback. It has always been my contention that since we are training the brain we are working with the control center for the entire body. Training affects vision, hearing, muscle tension, IQ, reading, math, cognition, organ function, speech and hearing, etc., etc.. With the way Cory and others interrupt the law, since let's say speech is effected they are breaking the law because they affect speech function even though they may have been addressing another issue. I am perfectly comfortable in indicating that we are working to bring about homeostasis (balance) of the autonomic control system, by reducing stress and improving relaxation which happens to effect all these functions and many disorders as well. Thank you Connie. I am BCIA certified and have been for a number of years. I regret that Gilbert changed the name of his certification board to be more inclusive of more disciplines so he and others could earn more money. At least that is the way it appears to me. I suspect that since he has been in less of a management position that things have degenerated. Maybe we do need another certification board to replace NTCB with fewer adverse connections and more openness so that people that are unable to meet the rigid standards of BCIA have another option for certification and reputable insurance coverage. The world is much broader and more diverse than BCIA gives credit. But we have to remember the strong psychology influence held by many board members of BCIA. I believe in opposition, it keeps all parties on their toes and I would welcome another certification organization. Any ideas? Best Regards, JD Elder JD, I have talked to my board and they are clueless. What is the practice act and where can I find it for Ohio LPC’s? However, there was a question on my licensing exam about biofeedback (I think). Brainmaster is located in Ohio and they may actually be able to point me there if no one here knows. I think you can get BCIA certification now with your PT license. (not that you want to ) They have opened up certification. Connie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of JD ElderSent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:46 AM Subject: Totally Confused When I first started doing biofeedback and neurofeedback, this was before neurofeedback certification was offered by BCIA. I had applied for Biofeedback Certification with BCIA, but as a licensed physical therapist I was unable to meet one requirement of training, at the time, in counseling. I tried unsuccessfully for years to get into a training program. Each time I was informed that since I was not a mental health professional or pursuing a mental health degree, I could not be accepted into the counseling course. I asked for help from BCIA and they could not help me. So I got certified with the certifying organization which was the precursor to NTCB. For me, at the time, they were a godsend. Though BCIA is a fine certification board they are exclusive and if you are not a licensed professional you cannot become certified with them. For that reason, I think that NTCB is a fine alternative. I am not aware of being associated with NTCB. If is associated with NTCB then I would reconsider my position. You can become BCIA certified, but that does not guarantee that you can practice neurofeedback in the state that you practice. If your practice act does not specifically indicate that you can use "biofeedback" you may not be able to legally practice neurofeedback, but this may vary from state to state. For the licensed professional, I believe that BCIA is the gold standard and that state laws and professional practice acts need to be changed to reflect the standards set forth by BCIA, but I do not see this happening anytime soon considering the amount of time, money and effort that it takes to changes practice acts many of which most of us have no interest in. Yet licensed psychologist without sufficient training or certification can practice legally. Also, if it is not clear in your practice act that you can practice biofeedback (neurofeedback) then your malpractice will not cover you in case of a complaint against you with state department of professional licensing or otherwise. It is my understanding that you will need to get a second malpractice insurance which covers neurofeedback. There are other tact's that can be taken to practice legally, but it is best to contact your state professional licensing board first and find out about their position. Always try and get there response in an e-mail or record your telephone conservation, and then call back and get verification from a second party. Keep this information in case an issue does arise. Even after certification, I was denied the ability to practice neurofeedback despite the fact that biofeedback was explicitly mentioned in my practice act. That's when I went ahead and did it anyway and to hell with the consequences. None occurred thank goodness. The following is from an e-mail by Gilbert in October of 2007. It has some interesting facts that may be worth knowing. Best Regards, JD Elder "Gentlepeople,Joe raises a very critical issue. A small group of biofeedback-trained psychologists are indeed trying to take complete control of biofeedback. This group is implicated in filing anonymous charges of practicing psychology without a license against well over 200 biofeedback professionals over the past three years. To date, they have won none of these cases, but they are painting the picture that psychology is under attack by non-psychologists practicing psychology without a license.Please do contact the APA regarding their proposed "hostile takeover" of biofeedback and arm yourself with the following facts:1. In the USA there are less than 1200 licensed psychologists practicing biofeedback.2. In the USA there are more than 12,000 trained biofeedback professionals who are not licensed psychologists and who legally practice biofeedback for relaxation and muscle re-education to assist their clients in managing pain and/or stress.3. Over the period of January 2003 through December 2006 a very small group of licensed psychologists anonymously filed charges with psychology licensing boards against over 200 non-licensed biofeedback professionals for practicing psychology without a license; and in every one of these cases the defendants were found to be legally practicing biofeedback and not practicing psychotherapy4. Biofeedback devices under the jurisdiction of the FDA are registered for use by acupuncturists, chiropractors, clinical social workers, counselors, dentists, hypnotists, massage therapists, medical doctors, naturopaths, registered nurses, occupational therapists, oriental medical doctors, osteopaths, physician assistants, physical therapists, special education teachers, speech pathologists, veterinarians, other licensed health care professionals and certified biofeedback professionals.5. It is estimated by the Natural Therapies Research Board that eighty percent of all biofeedback devices in the USA are used for stress and/or pain management. This board also estimates that less than one percent of all biofeedback devices are used by licensed psychologists to treat psychological conditions.6. Both the Natural Therapies Research Board and the Natural Therapies Certification Board indicate that more than 60,000 biofeedback devices are owned and operated by private individuals for their own use. This represents about seventy-five percent of an estimated 80,000 biofeedback devices currently in use in the USA.7. A few hundred licensed psychologists have neither the authority nor the expertise to take control of the biofeedback industry. On the other hand, the cost of attempting to enforce such a hostile takeover may bankrupt the APA. It will certainly put psychologists in a very bad light with other professionals who use biofeedback in their practice. That may be a good thing. Peace," Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Connie, I am pretty sure that Ohio has a practice act with the licensing division/department for Professional Counselors. Here in Utah you can access the Professional Counselor's practice act online. My son is a LPC and works in an addiction's setting. On the phone, they have told him that he cannot use biofeedback (neurofeedback) equipment in his practice, so he doesn't. Yet there are many other LPC's in the state that indicate that they can use biofeedback equipment to get "stress reduction and relaxation" which is expressly stated and permitted in their practice act and they do use biofeedback equipment in their practices. Some have confronted the professional licensing department, but most have not. In time these issues will be resolved, but not as long as we have people like Cory Hammond who consistently reports licensed professionals, even those who have BCIA certification, and others because they do not expressly have "biofeedback" spelled out in their practice act. If this is the case, then more time and effort needs to be taken to insure that our "informed consent forms" and the way we "advertise" are such that we are not saying that we are practicing medicine or diagnosing or treating mental health conditions. Most licensing boards are kind and will give their licensed professions the benefit of the doubt, and will work with them to help them come into compliance if there is an issue. Cory's influence has been felt in Utah, where he lives, but most licensed professionals (even non-BCIA certified) have simply had to change the way they advertise and adjust their informed consent. Others have been restricted from practicing neurofeedback, as it should be in some non-professional cases. I hope that we can use some common sense and support the standards as spelled out by BCIA for all of our licensed professionals. I also hope to someday see a professional discipline for biofeedback and neurofeedback. It has always been my contention that since we are training the brain we are working with the control center for the entire body. Training affects vision, hearing, muscle tension, IQ, reading, math, cognition, organ function, speech and hearing, etc., etc.. With the way Cory and others interrupt the law, since let's say speech is effected they are breaking the law because they affect speech function even though they may have been addressing another issue. I am perfectly comfortable in indicating that we are working to bring about homeostasis (balance) of the autonomic control system, by reducing stress and improving relaxation which happens to effect all these functions and many disorders as well. Thank you Connie. I am BCIA certified and have been for a number of years. I regret that Gilbert changed the name of his certification board to be more inclusive of more disciplines so he and others could earn more money. At least that is the way it appears to me. I suspect that since he has been in less of a management position that things have degenerated. Maybe we do need another certification board to replace NTCB with fewer adverse connections and more openness so that people that are unable to meet the rigid standards of BCIA have another option for certification and reputable insurance coverage. The world is much broader and more diverse than BCIA gives credit. But we have to remember the strong psychology influence held by many board members of BCIA. I believe in opposition, it keeps all parties on their toes and I would welcome another certification organization. Any ideas? Best Regards, JD Elder JD, I have talked to my board and they are clueless. What is the practice act and where can I find it for Ohio LPC’s? However, there was a question on my licensing exam about biofeedback (I think). Brainmaster is located in Ohio and they may actually be able to point me there if no one here knows. I think you can get BCIA certification now with your PT license. (not that you want to ) They have opened up certification. Connie From: [mailto: ] On Behalf Of JD ElderSent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 7:46 AM Subject: Totally Confused When I first started doing biofeedback and neurofeedback, this was before neurofeedback certification was offered by BCIA. I had applied for Biofeedback Certification with BCIA, but as a licensed physical therapist I was unable to meet one requirement of training, at the time, in counseling. I tried unsuccessfully for years to get into a training program. Each time I was informed that since I was not a mental health professional or pursuing a mental health degree, I could not be accepted into the counseling course. I asked for help from BCIA and they could not help me. So I got certified with the certifying organization which was the precursor to NTCB. For me, at the time, they were a godsend. Though BCIA is a fine certification board they are exclusive and if you are not a licensed professional you cannot become certified with them. For that reason, I think that NTCB is a fine alternative. I am not aware of being associated with NTCB. If is associated with NTCB then I would reconsider my position. You can become BCIA certified, but that does not guarantee that you can practice neurofeedback in the state that you practice. If your practice act does not specifically indicate that you can use "biofeedback" you may not be able to legally practice neurofeedback, but this may vary from state to state. For the licensed professional, I believe that BCIA is the gold standard and that state laws and professional practice acts need to be changed to reflect the standards set forth by BCIA, but I do not see this happening anytime soon considering the amount of time, money and effort that it takes to changes practice acts many of which most of us have no interest in. Yet licensed psychologist without sufficient training or certification can practice legally. Also, if it is not clear in your practice act that you can practice biofeedback (neurofeedback) then your malpractice will not cover you in case of a complaint against you with state department of professional licensing or otherwise. It is my understanding that you will need to get a second malpractice insurance which covers neurofeedback. There are other tact's that can be taken to practice legally, but it is best to contact your state professional licensing board first and find out about their position. Always try and get there response in an e-mail or record your telephone conservation, and then call back and get verification from a second party. Keep this information in case an issue does arise. Even after certification, I was denied the ability to practice neurofeedback despite the fact that biofeedback was explicitly mentioned in my practice act. That's when I went ahead and did it anyway and to hell with the consequences. None occurred thank goodness. The following is from an e-mail by Gilbert in October of 2007. It has some interesting facts that may be worth knowing. Best Regards, JD Elder "Gentlepeople,Joe raises a very critical issue. A small group of biofeedback-trained psychologists are indeed trying to take complete control of biofeedback. This group is implicated in filing anonymous charges of practicing psychology without a license against well over 200 biofeedback professionals over the past three years. To date, they have won none of these cases, but they are painting the picture that psychology is under attack by non-psychologists practicing psychology without a license.Please do contact the APA regarding their proposed "hostile takeover" of biofeedback and arm yourself with the following facts:1. In the USA there are less than 1200 licensed psychologists practicing biofeedback.2. In the USA there are more than 12,000 trained biofeedback professionals who are not licensed psychologists and who legally practice biofeedback for relaxation and muscle re-education to assist their clients in managing pain and/or stress.3. Over the period of January 2003 through December 2006 a very small group of licensed psychologists anonymously filed charges with psychology licensing boards against over 200 non-licensed biofeedback professionals for practicing psychology without a license; and in every one of these cases the defendants were found to be legally practicing biofeedback and not practicing psychotherapy4. Biofeedback devices under the jurisdiction of the FDA are registered for use by acupuncturists, chiropractors, clinical social workers, counselors, dentists, hypnotists, massage therapists, medical doctors, naturopaths, registered nurses, occupational therapists, oriental medical doctors, osteopaths, physician assistants, physical therapists, special education teachers, speech pathologists, veterinarians, other licensed health care professionals and certified biofeedback professionals.5. It is estimated by the Natural Therapies Research Board that eighty percent of all biofeedback devices in the USA are used for stress and/or pain management. This board also estimates that less than one percent of all biofeedback devices are used by licensed psychologists to treat psychological conditions.6. Both the Natural Therapies Research Board and the Natural Therapies Certification Board indicate that more than 60,000 biofeedback devices are owned and operated by private individuals for their own use. This represents about seventy-five percent of an estimated 80,000 biofeedback devices currently in use in the USA.7. A few hundred licensed psychologists have neither the authority nor the expertise to take control of the biofeedback industry. On the other hand, the cost of attempting to enforce such a hostile takeover may bankrupt the APA. It will certainly put psychologists in a very bad light with other professionals who use biofeedback in their practice. That may be a good thing. Peace," Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Hi All, JD makes excellent points. BCIA has a limited scope and due to its administration being mostly psychologists, the broader view is neglected. Biofeedback and neurofeedback are classically in the experience of each of us in our day to day living. In clinical settings we treat people who are overdosing on biofeedback, i.e., computer games, golf, internet, pornography, etc. Including the more positive forms of biofeedback would be teaching/learning in the classroom or gym or playground or TV or movies. The field of biofeedback is huge. So huge that every breathing moment of our lives we are involved in some kind of biofeedback/neurofeedback process. Some of us do it well and some of us get into trouble. An example is breathing. When we get into trouble we end up on a device called a C-Pap.. On and on I could go with examples of feedback and the impossibility of regulating the practice of such. I would call it an illusion.What the BCIA is not considering is the application of such feedback devices as Scenar or NeuroScenar or Cosmodic or soft laser or Alpha Stim or binaural music, etc, etc, etc...Where do we go from here? I think we go back to common sense and common sense practices. Insurance companies often do dictate how much treatment one afford. The sad part is that some conditions really do require the added treatment of biofeedback/neurofeedback and without there is less than optimal outcome. It reminds me of the drugging of clients as well. Sometimes a set of nutrients and change in the quality of nutrition would put the client on a path to robust health but due to the lack of funding for nutrient supplements and the provision of coverage for drugs the client gets the drugging instead.What is wrong with this picture? Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 18, 2010 Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 Hi All, JD makes excellent points. BCIA has a limited scope and due to its administration being mostly psychologists, the broader view is neglected. Biofeedback and neurofeedback are classically in the experience of each of us in our day to day living. In clinical settings we treat people who are overdosing on biofeedback, i.e., computer games, golf, internet, pornography, etc. Including the more positive forms of biofeedback would be teaching/learning in the classroom or gym or playground or TV or movies. The field of biofeedback is huge. So huge that every breathing moment of our lives we are involved in some kind of biofeedback/neurofeedback process. Some of us do it well and some of us get into trouble. An example is breathing. When we get into trouble we end up on a device called a C-Pap.. On and on I could go with examples of feedback and the impossibility of regulating the practice of such. I would call it an illusion.What the BCIA is not considering is the application of such feedback devices as Scenar or NeuroScenar or Cosmodic or soft laser or Alpha Stim or binaural music, etc, etc, etc...Where do we go from here? I think we go back to common sense and common sense practices. Insurance companies often do dictate how much treatment one afford. The sad part is that some conditions really do require the added treatment of biofeedback/neurofeedback and without there is less than optimal outcome. It reminds me of the drugging of clients as well. Sometimes a set of nutrients and change in the quality of nutrition would put the client on a path to robust health but due to the lack of funding for nutrient supplements and the provision of coverage for drugs the client gets the drugging instead.What is wrong with this picture? Marie Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 21, 2010 Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 Hello Carole, 1 ml of 22.4% sodium chlorite in 1 liter of water will give you 134.4 PPM available chlorine dioxide. Activating with 10% citric acid will give you about 13 PPM of the available chlorine dioxide as free chlorine dioxide. Activating with 50% citric acid will give you about 26 PPM of the available chlorine dioxide as free chlorine dioxide. 3 drops of the 22.4% sodium chlorite, the way that I form drops, is about 0.176 ml. With a specific gravity of 1.2 the 22.4% sodium chlorite should form 17 drops per ml. In 1 liter of water 0.176 ml of 22.4% sodium chlorite will give you about 24 PPM available chlorine dioxide. If you activate it with 10% citric acid you should end up with about 2 PPM of the available chlorine dioxide as free chlorine dioxide. 1/8 teaspoon = 0.625 ml. 1 gallon = 3.8 liters. 0.625 ml of 22.4% sodium chlorite in 3.8 liters of water will give you about 22 PPM available chlorine dioxide. Tom --- In , " Carole " <carole@...> wrote: > > I'm now totally confused re dilution rates of MMS and trying to convert them to Australian units of measure (millitres & litres). I also use an eyedropper that delivers 20 drops per mL. > > Can someone fill in the blanks in the following calculation: > > 3 drops 22.4% MMS per litre water = * % solution = * ppm > > (this is equivalent to 1/8 teaspoon per gallon water so what is the % solution and ppm for this dilution)? > > > > Carole in Oz > Eideann & Fionn (Tristania GSDs) > carole@... > www.berigorafarm.com.au > > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4580 (20091106) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. > > http://www.eset.com > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.