Guest guest Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 Sometimes looking at what doesn't work helps to find better methods of what can work. Here is the post: " Hi. I live in Koh Samui, Thailand. For awhile a couple years ago I employed a housekeeper. She decided to move to her home of her youth about 2 years ago. She's over 50, and it seemed her returning to her home was a bad idea. Within 2 weeks of her arrival there she started coughing very badly. She went to several clinics that gave her some cheap pills, and sent her home. I also sent her a bottle of MMS and told her how to start, and progress in upping the dosage.. For nearly a year none on these poorly trained doctors, gave her a TB test. Finally someone with half a brain gave her a TB test, and the news was bad. She had it! The news was bad for MMS too! By the time she was diagnosed with TB she had been taking MMS faithfully at 30 drops daily for about a year. In the presence of MMS TB not only did not die off, but flourished. Too bad! I was expecting the best. Fortunately her TB was not drug resistant, and after a long time, she has been pronounced free of TB. So help me God, Buzzer " http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1655794 Can chlorine dioxide kill Tuberculosis? Yes. It is actually well studied, however, it is very difficult to kill. Most bacteria can be killed off with chlorine dioxide by using a CT of 100. However, TB has a CT of 5000. CT stands for the concentration of chlorine dioxide times the amount of contact time needed to kill the pathogen. 30 drops ends up with a concentration of about 948 PPM available chlorine dioxide (assuming 2, 15 drop doses) and about 95 PPM of that as free chlorine dioxide. This means that if chlorine dioxide could exist within the blood, it would have to be in contact with the TB bacteria for about 53 minutes to kill it off. Obviously, after a year of heavy use of MMS, this did not happen. The question is why didn't it work? My guess is that the chlorine dioxide did not contact the TB bacteria. Speculating further, it could be that oral use is not the best method to get the chlorine dioxide into contact with the bacteria. While inhaling chlorine dioxide gas is dangerous and it is a respiratory irritant, this may be a more effective way to get the chlorine dioxide in contact with the bacteria. However, because of the dangers involved, it could make things worse. That leaves a topical application. It could be possible to soak a blanket and wrap the rib cage area with a solution containing chlorine dioxide. I have no idea what concentration would be necessary, but chlorine dioxide is very capable of penetrating the skin. There are many viruses that also have CT values of 5000, and that is why viruses are so difficult to get rid of. How about some creative ideas on how to get chlorine dioxide to the lung area when oral use doesn't work. Tom Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 29, 2010 Report Share Posted August 29, 2010 Tom where did this post come from? Got a link? Would like to see a new health group to join. > > > > Sometimes looking at what doesn't work helps to find better methods of what can work. > > Here is the post: > > " Hi. > > I live in Koh Samui, Thailand. For awhile a couple years ago I employed a housekeeper. She decided to move to her home of her youth about 2 years ago. She's over 50, and it seemed her returning to her home was a bad idea. > Within 2 weeks of her arrival there she started coughing very badly. She went to several clinics that gave her some cheap pills, and sent her home. I also sent her a bottle of MMS and told her how to start, and progress in upping the dosage.. For nearly a year none on these poorly trained doctors, gave her a TB test. Finally someone with half a brain gave her a TB test, and the news was bad. She had it! The news was bad for MMS too! By the time she was diagnosed with TB she had been taking MMS faithfully at 30 drops daily for about a year. In the presence of MMS TB not only did not die off, but flourished. Too bad! I was expecting the best. Fortunately her TB was not drug resistant, and after a long time, she has been pronounced free of TB. > > So help me God, > > Buzzer " > > http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1655794 > > Can chlorine dioxide kill Tuberculosis? Yes. It is actually well studied, however, it is very difficult to kill. > > Most bacteria can be killed off with chlorine dioxide by using a CT of 100. However, TB has a CT of 5000. > > CT stands for the concentration of chlorine dioxide times the amount of contact time needed to kill the pathogen. > > 30 drops ends up with a concentration of about 948 PPM available chlorine dioxide (assuming 2, 15 drop doses) and about 95 PPM of that as free chlorine dioxide. This means that if chlorine dioxide could exist within the blood, it would have to be in contact with the TB bacteria for about 53 minutes to kill it off. > > Obviously, after a year of heavy use of MMS, this did not happen. > > The question is why didn't it work? > > My guess is that the chlorine dioxide did not contact the TB bacteria. Speculating further, it could be that oral use is not the best method to get the chlorine dioxide into contact with the bacteria. While inhaling chlorine dioxide gas is dangerous and it is a respiratory irritant, this may be a more effective way to get the chlorine dioxide in contact with the bacteria. However, because of the dangers involved, it could make things worse. That leaves a topical application. It could be possible to soak a blanket and wrap the rib cage area with a solution containing chlorine dioxide. I have no idea what concentration would be necessary, but chlorine dioxide is very capable of penetrating the skin. > > There are many viruses that also have CT values of 5000, and that is why viruses are so difficult to get rid of. > > How about some creative ideas on how to get chlorine dioxide to the lung area when oral use doesn't work. > > Tom > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 Hello Healinghope, Did you read the post? The link was included in the post. Tom --- In , " healinghope " <mfrreman@...> wrote: > > Tom where did this post come from? Got a link? Would like to see a new health group to join. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 30, 2010 Report Share Posted August 30, 2010 JIM HUMBLE SAID: even yeast not killed by MMS1 need MMS2 also I gess for TB needs MMS2. gb the protocol for yeast 1 hour mms1 other hour mms2 REASON maybe needed for 1/2 hours reason yeast divides very very fast do not forget cancer is :mold yeat and fungus if not all cells or body involved is not that bad if all body parts is involved.that is the saying every body has cancer and the body cleaning outh the cancer cells.gb > > > > Sometimes looking at what doesn't work helps to find better methods of what can work. > > Here is the post: > > " Hi. > > I live in Koh Samui, Thailand. For awhile a couple years ago I employed a housekeeper. She decided to move to her home of her youth about 2 years ago. She's over 50, and it seemed her returning to her home was a bad idea. > Within 2 weeks of her arrival there she started coughing very badly. She went to several clinics that gave her some cheap pills, and sent her home. I also sent her a bottle of MMS and told her how to start, and progress in upping the dosage.. For nearly a year none on these poorly trained doctors, gave her a TB test. Finally someone with half a brain gave her a TB test, and the news was bad. She had it! The news was bad for MMS too! By the time she was diagnosed with TB she had been taking MMS faithfully at 30 drops daily for about a year. In the presence of MMS TB not only did not die off, but flourished. Too bad! I was expecting the best. Fortunately her TB was not drug resistant, and after a long time, she has been pronounced free of TB. > > So help me God, > > Buzzer " > > http://curezone.com/forums/am.asp?i=1655794 > > Can chlorine dioxide kill Tuberculosis? Yes. It is actually well studied, however, it is very difficult to kill. > > Most bacteria can be killed off with chlorine dioxide by using a CT of 100. However, TB has a CT of 5000. > > CT stands for the concentration of chlorine dioxide times the amount of contact time needed to kill the pathogen. > > 30 drops ends up with a concentration of about 948 PPM available chlorine dioxide (assuming 2, 15 drop doses) and about 95 PPM of that as free chlorine dioxide. This means that if chlorine dioxide could exist within the blood, it would have to be in contact with the TB bacteria for about 53 minutes to kill it off. > > Obviously, after a year of heavy use of MMS, this did not happen. > > The question is why didn't it work? > > My guess is that the chlorine dioxide did not contact the TB bacteria. Speculating further, it could be that oral use is not the best method to get the chlorine dioxide into contact with the bacteria. While inhaling chlorine dioxide gas is dangerous and it is a respiratory irritant, this may be a more effective way to get the chlorine dioxide in contact with the bacteria. However, because of the dangers involved, it could make things worse. That leaves a topical application. It could be possible to soak a blanket and wrap the rib cage area with a solution containing chlorine dioxide. I have no idea what concentration would be necessary, but chlorine dioxide is very capable of penetrating the skin. > > There are many viruses that also have CT values of 5000, and that is why viruses are so difficult to get rid of. > > How about some creative ideas on how to get chlorine dioxide to the lung area when oral use doesn't work. > > Tom > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.