letter fom Tom to Dee

[Guest guest]

I sent a copy of Toms Letter to Dee on the list yesterday..So that

JIM Humble could defend himself.. This is Tom's text to Dee..

Jim Humbles reply to Dee will be in my next email

Hello Dee,The flaws have to do with the claims Jim Humbles built the MMS protocol on...He thinks he is using a solution that only has 1 - 5 PPM chlorine dioxide in it. Actually the concentrations are much higher than that. Drinking high concentrations of chemicals can result in poisoning effects like diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting.He thinks that chlorine dioxide can exist inside the body. Actual testing has shown that it only lasts for seconds to a few minutes.He thinks the proper activation using citric acid is 5:1 using 10% and 1:1 using 50% and allowing the activation to continue for 3 minutes. The people using this product in industry have run extensive testing on this and they use 1:1 activating with 10% citric acid and 1:5 using 50% citric acid (that is 1 part 50% citric acid to 5 parts sodium chlorite). The most effective activation time is 10 minutes. I ran some rough tests on this and came up with the industrial activation having about 30% more oxidation potential than the MMS activation.He thinks that chlorine dioxide quickly breaks down to chloride in the body, and is quickly passed. Researchers studying chlorine dioxide for water purification have found that chlorine dioxide almost immediately breaks down to chlorite and chlorite has a half life of over 40 hours (in animals).He claims that the amount of water added has no effect on the solution. You use the same dose in the bath tub that you use to drink. Actually the concentration of the chemical in the water is what counts. That is measured in parts per million. To have an effective concentration in a large amount of water, you have to add more chemicals.He claims that MMS = chlorine dioxide. Actually MMS = acidified sodium chlorite, something much different.He claims that MMS is safe because chlorine dioxide is used to treat water. These are two very different technologies. Chlorine dioxide has been well studied and tested, including testing on humans. Acidified sodium chlorite has not been well tested nor has it been tested on humans. ASC is used in food processing and keeps dead carcasses from rotting. Chlorine dioxide is used to disinfect water for consumption.The list goes on and on, but the point is that developing a protocol based upon flawed assumptions and no testing results in a flawed protocol.Keep in mind that in spite of the flaws, some people are reporting success with the MMS protocol. Although, almost all of those successes have involved a modification of the protocol, and the number of successes (outside of Africa) are much lower than Jim Humbles claim of around 95% on every illness. I think that in order to explore a protocol you need to understand the chemistry behind it. Once that is understood, testing can be done to explore the best way to use the chemicals. Jim Humble claims that testing involves millions of dollars and too much of his time. Others are simply doing the testing, not spending exorbitant amounts of time or money, and discovering the flaws in the MMS protocol and Jim Humbles claims.Tom