Guest guest Posted January 7, 2008 Report Share Posted January 7, 2008 http://www.researchautism.net/interventionitem.ikml?ra=25 & infolevel=4 Chelation Introduction Chelation, also known as detoxification, is a highly controversial and potentially dangerous intervention which involves using one or more chemicals to correct the chemical balance in the bodies of individuals with autism. Opinion There is currently no scientifically valid and reliable evidence to show that chelation is effective in the treatment of people with autism. The National Institute for Mental Health in the USA is currently running a major clinical trial into chelation and people with autistic spectrum disorders but there is, as yet, no evidence from this trial. Some chelating agents can have significant and very harmful side effects. For these reasons, we do not believe that chelation is an appropriate intervention for the treatment of people with autism. Trials Bradstreet J. et al. (2003). A case-control study of mercury burden in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, 8(3), pp. 76-79. Read Full item National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (Commenced 2006). An Investigation of the Efficacy of Mercury Chelation as a Treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Ref. NCT00376194 Audience The proponents of chelation claim that it is suitable for most children with autism and other autistic spectrum disorders because `most children with autism suffer from mercury/metal toxicity.' (DAN!, 1999). However this claim is not accepted by the majority of academic researchers. Aims To reduce the causes and/or symptoms of autism by removing excess levels of toxic metals from the body and/or improving the sulphur amino acid balance in individuals with autism and/or increasing the anti-oxidant properties of people with autism Claims There have been various claims for chelation. For example, Defeat Autism Now (2001) stated that ` Many DAN! physicians have reported good improvements with DMSA, although the improvements are sometimes accompanied by gut problems. Reported benefits include rapid progression of language ability, improved social interaction, improved eye contact, and decreased self- stimulatory behaviors ( " stimming " ). Children with motor problems have experienced significant improvement in both strength and coordination.' Detail Chelating agents There is a wide range of different chelating agents, each of which has different properties – such as effectiveness and side effects. They include Alpha lipoic acid Cysteine, aka Cystin DMSA, aka succimer or Chemet DMPS, aka 2,3-Dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid EDTA, aka ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid NAC, aka N-Acetyl-L-Cysteine NDF, aka Nannocolloidal Detox Factors TTFD, aka Thiamine Tetrahydrofurfuryl Disulfide However not all chelating practitioners agree as to which of these chelating agents is appropriate to use. For example, Defeat Autism Now! states that cysteine/cystine should not be used because they may worsen mercury intoxication by spreading it to other tissues. They may also promote or worsen intestinal candidiasis. Process Different practitioners of chelation follow different processes. The following processes are those recommended by Defeat Autism Now! in its Mercury Detoxification Consensus Group position paper of 2001. First stage: Provocation Test The purpose of the provocation test is to find out if a toxic metal is present in the body, and if the given chelating agent can remove it. This is done by using a small dose of a given chemical, such as DMSA, followed by a collection of urine or stool depending on the mode of excretion. Second stage Pre-Detoxification Treatment All sources of the metal are removed from the immediate environment of the child e.g. mercury or lead based paint, flame retardant materials, water which contains uranium. Existing nutritional problems are corrected e.g. the practitioner checks that the child has sufficient vitamins, minerals and amino acids, especially zinc. Glutathione, an anti-oxidant peptide, levels are normalised – usually by giving the child glutathione supplements. Any existing gastro-intestinal problems, such as constipation, diarrohea, bacterial and yeast infections, are corrected. If this is not done, the adverse side effects of the therapy may be made worse e.g. explosive growth of abnormal or pathogenic bacteria or fungi. Liver, kidney and Complete Blood Count are monitored before and during detoxification. Some chelating agents can adversely affect liver/kidney function, platelet count, and lymphocytes. Third stage – Treatment The third and last stage of treatment is to give full doses of the chelating agent, along with supplements of minerals and vitamins. Depending on the chelating agent, it may be given orally, by intravenous infusion, or in the form of nasal sprays, suppositories or creams. The dosage is determined by the individual's reaction to the initial testing and to subsequent doses of the chelating agent. Time Different authorities suggest different amounts of time required to undertake chelation. The clinical trial currently being run by the National Institute for Mental Health in the USA is providing chelation 3 times daily for 12 weeks. Involvement Five or ten minutes a day. Costs We have not yet been able to identify the costs of chelation. Credentials Some chelating agents, such as DMSA, are only available from qualified medical practitioners. Other chelating agents, such as NDF, are available without a prescription in chemists and health food stores. Therefore some providers will have professional credentials and qualifications, while others will not. Many of the chemicals and nutritional supplements discussed in this section are not approved by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) or by the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA). The UK and the US governments do not strictly regulate herbs and supplements. Because of this there is no guarantee of strength, purity or safety of some chelating agents and their effects may vary. Availability Most of these chelating agents are widely available within Europe and the US. Hazards Different chelating agents have different adverse effects but some can -remove essential minerals and vitamins from the body e.g. zinc and magnesium. -may worsen mercury poisoning by spreading it to other tissues. -cause an explosion of bacteria and pathological fungal growth -cause nausea, diarrhoea, anorexia, flatulence, fatigue, irritability, sleep disturbances, macular-papular skin rash, allergic reactions -make autistic symptoms worse in some people e.g. leading to a regression in language and behaviour More seriously some chelating agents can also -cause bone-marrow suppression, which can lead to neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, which in turn can affect blood clotting and blood immune response to infections and other toxins. -cause liver and kidney damage -cause toxic epidermal necrolysis or erythema multiforme Some chelating agents, such as some commercially available brands of chlorella, may already have high levels of mercury in them when bought because of the way in which they are produced. One five year old child reportedly died from hypocalcaemia after receiving edetate disodium instead of edetate calcium disodium. Contraindications Chelation should not be used with people who have liver or kidney problems. History Synthetic chelating agents have been available for nearly a century. They were initially used by the military for treating acute exposure to heavy metals and other toxic substances. They have since been developed for use in other medical conditions, including cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease and cancer. At the end of the 20th century various researchers suggested that chelating agents could be used to remove heavy metals, especially mercury, from people with autistic spectrum disorders. Accounts `Chelation with DMSA/ALA -went from not being able to use language functionally, only having 6 words that he kept losing to 15 words in two weeks, 50 words in a month, to limitless vocabulary in a year. He never lost any words after starting chleation [sic]. He continued to progress in a `fast forward' pace. Unfortunately he was still really literal. He could answer what, who and where questions but the how, why and when were still too hard for him to comprehend. Basically improved his language, social skills (went from NONE to some ) digestion, bowel movements, and cognitive skills.' (TamiW, posted on the AutismWeb.com forum 2007.) `Chelation with NDF Plus- increases his focus, decreases negative behaviors, increases abstract thought as well as enabled him to ask, answer the why, how and when questions, improved expressive language.' (TamiW, posted on the AutismWeb.com forum, 2007.) Research We have identified two scientific trials of chelation for people with autistic spectrum disorders. One of them has been published in a peer- reviewed journal, the other is currently underway. The study by Bradstreet et al. (2003) included a total of 221 individuals aged 3-15. It stated that DMSA treatment appears to be a useful way of determining mercury levels in individuals with autism. However It did not claim that chelation could actually be used to alleviate any of the problems faced by people with autism. Status There are some issues with the single study identified. For example it was a retrospective study, the control group was very small and clearly unusual in some way – for example, there were religious objections to immunisation in half the group. Trials Bradstreet J. et al. (2003). A case-control study of mercury burden in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons, 8(3), pp. 76-79. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). (Commenced 2006). An Investigation of the Efficacy of Mercury Chelation as a Treatment for Autism Spectrum Disorder. Ref. NCT00376194 Summary There is no generally accepted, scientifically valid evidence to show that chelation alters the outcome for children with autistic spectrum disorders. However this lack of evidence does not prove or disprove the effectiveness of chelation for people with autistic spectrum disorders. It simply shows how little research has been conducted to date. Reading JB et al. (2006). Analyses of toxic metals and essential minerals in the hair of Arizona children with autism and associated conditions, and their mothers. Biol Trace Elem Res, 110(3), pp. 193- 209. JB et al. (2007). Mercury, lead, and zinc in baby teeth of children with autism versus controls. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70 (12), pp. 1046-1051. Brown MJ et al. (2006). Deaths resulting from hypocalcemia after administration of edetate disodium: 2003-2005. Pediatrics.118(2):e534- 6. son P. W. Myers G. J. Weiss B. (2004). Mercury exposure and child development outcomes. Pediatrics, 113(4 Suppl.), pp. 1023-1029. Defeat Autism Now! (2001). Mercury Detoxification Consensus Group Position Paper. ARI. Read Full item (PDF document.) Fido A. and Al-Saad S. (2005). Toxic trace elements in the hair of children with autism. Autism, 9(3), pp. 290-298. Holmes A. S. Blaxhill M. F. Haley B. E. (2003). Reduced levels of mercury in first baby haircuts of autistic children. International Journal of Toxicology, 22(4), pp. 277-278. Ip P. et al. (2004). Mercury exposure in children with autistic spectrum disorder: case-control study. Journal of Child Neurology, 19 (6), pp. 431-434. Kern JK et al. (2007). Sulfhydryl-reactive metals in autism. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 70(8), pp. 715-721. National Autistic Society. (2006). Briefing on mercury and autism. London: NAS. Simpson R.L. et al In: Simpson R.L. et al (2005). Other interventions, treatments, and related agents Autism spectrum disorders: interventions and treatments for children and youth. California, Corwin Press, pp. 207-229. Sinha Y, Silove N, K. (2006). Chelation therapy and autism BMJ, 333(7571), p. 756. Soden SE et al. (2007). 24-hour provoked urine excretion test for heavy metals in children with autism and typically developing controls, a pilot study. Clin Toxicol (Phila), 45(5), pp. 476-481. U.S. National Library of Medicine. (1999 ). Succimer. Bethseda, MD: US NLM. Problems: Problems Some of the problems which some people claim this intervention will help to resolve. Communication Impaired immunity Restricted and repetitive behaviours Social difficulties Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.