Re: US Vaccine protocol

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 2/18/01 9:57:47 PM Eastern Standard Time,

laidlerj@... writes:

<< No, vaccination is a classic example of " if one is good, three are

better " writ large. There's a lot of that sort of thinking going on.

The really scary part is that the people who are promoting this (and

the chicken-pox vaccine, ye Gods!) are truly convinced that they are

doing the right thing. I would be happier if they were doing it to

make money, because nothing is more dangerous than someone who is

convinced that they are doing something for your good.

Jim Laidler

>>

Jim:

Sadly, with revelation of the number of FDA vaccine officials who are big

pharmaceutical stock holders and/or pharmaceutical board members or have

other similar ties (as revealed in Congressional hearings led by Rep. Dan

Burton last year), I think the real incentive behind our vaccine protocol IS

to make money. The way I see it, our children are simply the " road kill "

along the superhighway to bigger and bigger profits from more and more

vaccines. The average American parent has been brainwashed that vaccines are

" good, " and that the pediatrician always knows best, and that they should

strictly follow that vaccine schedule for their babies. (Notice all those

" soft focus " warm-and-fuzzy vaccine ads we're seeing in magazines and on TV

in recent years?) This is one of the largest examples of a corporate " cash

cow " that exists in the business world today.

Nothing about the current infant/todder vaccine protocol in the US makes

any medical sense, and yet the pharmaceutical co's are still getting the

" green light " from the FDA to add more vaccines and create bigger concoctions

of them. Hang onto your hats when the adverse reaction stats start coming in

that from that 7-valent Prevnar thing!... Heaven help us.