Guest guest Posted November 30, 2008 Report Share Posted November 30, 2008 i'm glad gordon has come to the conclusion that health insurance, in it's current form, with all kinds of policies and procedures to be followed, failure of which results in financial flogging of doctors, and of patients by their doctor as the instrument of the insurance companies, is in fact the enemy; any administrative burden which prevents patients from receiving care is a barrier we must fight to bring down. megan lewis in colorado, and other similar models is the way to go for any small practice currently. it alleviates the administrative burden from the doctor and allows the chance for practice financial viability. nonetheless it is only a bridging formula, because the administrative burden continues to weigh on the patient, and only to be given up at some financial cost to them. in addition, it does not address the inherent conflict between prevention and cost savings, if the cost for that prevention comes directly out of the patient's pocket. there are too many other competing interests for that money, especially in today's economy. we can't forget that patients are our natural allies, and that any formula for effective care must rely on family and other primary care doctors, prevention, patient education and empowerment. do we get it? do obama and daschle understand this? does anybody? LL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.