Guest guest Posted May 22, 2002 Report Share Posted May 22, 2002 Our son, Dylan, is 3-1/2 and has been in an intensive Lovaas-style home ABA program (35 hrs/week). (We are currently starting a supplemental VB program to see how he responds to NET.) His program includes 5 hours per week in a preschool disabled program and 2 2hr play dates during his home program per week. He is verbal, although not converssational, and age appropriate on many academic skills (alphabet, counting, colors, shapes, puzzles, etc). His primary weeknesses are expressive language delay, recipricol language, peer socialization. He still has a lot of problems with non-response and scripting videos. The school district wants to switch him to a full-day program at school that will incorporate ABA (not Lovaas-style but couldn't tell me what model) and some Greenspan with typical kids. I don't feel he is ready...but how do you know when your child IS ready, and when the appropriate time to make that kind of move is? Marcy mkelly@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 22, 2002 Report Share Posted May 22, 2002 In a message dated 5/22/02 3:30:05 PM Central Daylight Time, mak4232001de@... writes: > The school district wants to switch him to a full-day program at > school that will incorporate ABA (not Lovaas-style but couldn't tell > me what model) and some Greenspan with typical kids. I don't feel he > is ready...but how do you know when your child IS ready, and when the > appropriate time to make that kind of move is? > Marcy and list, I think that when a child has enough receptive language to understand basic directions, even if he still needs visual cueing, and can behave even marginally acceptably in a group setting and seems to show even a slight interest in at least being in the company of peers, it's time to start pairing all the good things the child likes with being in school/peer settings. Life is alas not a 1:1 proposition. Negotiating to get the services and supports to make the school setting truly reinforcing is the parent's job. Teaching the child then becomes the school's job. in WI. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 23, 2002 Report Share Posted May 23, 2002 Marcy, There is no easy answer to your question, but what needs to guide the decision is what is the most effective use of the hours for your child. In other words, if Dylan will gain more from 35 hours of intensive teaching than he will in a classroom, than intensive teaching needs to be what he is doing. As an intermediate step, I can tell you that many of us on this list would argue that the optimal allocation of resources (since time is a resource) for most kids would be fifty percent intensive, fifty percent NET. School counts as NET. . If Dylan will follow group instructions and doesn't act out, I think perhaps a typical classroom with a shadow might be the best placement option for the NET time. Errorless teaching transfers quite readily to the classroom and in our brief experience we've found teachers (and even kindergarden classmates) can learn the prompting techniques fairly quickly. Why a typical classroom? More positive modeling and many, many more teaching opportunities. If you want to teach a child to respond to peers, putting him in a room with other language delayed students who are unlikely to initiate a social interaction isn't very smart, is it? One caveat, the shadow needs to be a therapist with prior experience with Dylan who has been paired with tons of reinforcement and has instructional control over him. Assigning a stranger is a recipe for disaster. I'd be leery of the ABA at school, though it's not impossible to do it. Tell them you want to observe it first before signing on. Poorly conducted ABA can be worse than no ABA at all. Moreover, pose questions about how they intend to make his strongest reinforcers available (probably videos...right?) and how they intend to minimize or remove outside distractions. If they can't replicate the control of the environment you have at home...veto it. If they can come up with a reasonable fascimile, okay since doing both at school should facilitate the generalization of the skills he's learning at the table to the classroom. Just my thoughts, Mark Cyr Grant's Dad " Children with autism are not learning disabled, they are teaching challenges. " Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.