Guest guest Posted May 1, 2002 Report Share Posted May 1, 2002 Lynda, Its good to hear from you. I want to second your opinion that using a text word to object or picture match helps a student learn. I have found it important to use the text word and now text phrases in our teaching. My son is not hyperlexic, and he does not know how to read words automatically. But I have found that using a verbal and text prompt together help him remember what to say. So we use the text as a prompt and the nice byproduct is that he learns to read the word and tact the object or use a phrase to comment. I remember thinking, surely I shouldn't teach reading before he can talk normally. Wrong. The reading is his bridge to spoken language. I guess he thinks in words. And just lately because we are working on writing, we started teaching spelling. Now I am starting to suspect the possibility that if we teach him how to spell the word before he can read it he'll learn both to spell and to read it. I think you have hit on another important point about how many things to teach at the same time. I know we learned that lesson the hard way with prepositions. Instead of teaching pairs of opposites we ended up teaching preposition + location for example " on the table " " on the box " " on the bus " " on the house " . Instead of " on bus " and " under bus " that was too hard of a discrimination. Thanks for your post. It is nice when people share their success. diana@... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted May 2, 2002 Report Share Posted May 2, 2002 In a message dated 5/1/02 2:19:04 PM Central Daylight Time, diana@... writes: > The reading is his bridge to spoken language. I guess > he thinks in words. And just lately because we are working on writing, we > started teaching spelling. Now I am starting to suspect the possibility > that if we teach him how to spell the word before he can read it he'll > learn both to spell and to read it. > , Lynda and others, I guess this does seem counterintuitive but I have taught Colin language visually--using word cards--since he was 3YO. He is 11YO now. I think he has a very small vocabulary compared with NT peers but he can read, type and use a voice a speech synthesis device to speak every word in his repetoire. Last fall the communication specialist gave him the Peabody which is a test of receptive language and his scores were age 4, which we thought was pretty good considering that he can spell and type all these words as well as recognize them from line drawing s that look as if they date from about the 1940s. in Wi. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.