Guest guest Posted March 10, 2002 Report Share Posted March 10, 2002 I don't really know. I guess it is " fluent responses " which means correct and fast. I do TIMED fluency drills with my son using standard celeration charts and fluency aims on all targeted skills. It is a long story, but worth looking into. I can only say that it is the surest way to go if you really want to be sure. Accuracy is NOT enough, because rate of response tells you if the skill is being learned to be really used functionally, such as applied (generalized) and is the skill going to be retained and will there be endurance in doing the skill as well as stability ( the ability to perform under distractions). For example, if a child learn to say " hi " but it takes too long to come up with the word " hi " in a real conversation, it is not functional as no one is going to wait around for more than a few seconds for such a response. If it takes 30 minutes to get dressed, that could be a problem because it is to long a time to be functional to get to work on time. Accuracy is NOT enough; in the real world things happen in real time and the world does not wait unfortunately. So at the minimum, make sure the child is responding at a reasonable rate before you decide that practice in that skill is no longer necessary. Rose At 04:34 AM 3/10/2002 +0000, you wrote: >Hi everybody, >Could some one tell me what is the criteria for mastering any task under >Carbone theory. >Nina > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.