Guest guest Posted December 18, 2008 Report Share Posted December 18, 2008 The concept of an international system to codify medical diagnoses may have some merit, but come on, give me a break. That money spent on those silly code books is so insulting ... on a good day, I try to remember laughing at Chico Marx, in A Day at the Races --- " getcher code book ! ... " , then selling Groucho a second set of code books, to de-cipher the first set ... I don't know if this is the worst invention to ever get excreted into the practice of medicine, but it is certainly an enormous burden. After about 10-15 minutes of fumbling through my code books, and my on-line references, I am ready to just give up, or settle on anything close. An example: Raynaud's Phenomenon (much more common than Raynaud's Syndrome) has no code number, that I can find ... so, either label the patient with something much worse than she actually has, or back it off to something vague and meaningless, like " pain in extremity " ... Has anybody found an I.C.D.-9 code for isolated Raynaud's Phenomenon ? ... If it is the insurance industry which wants every bean counted, every variant of U.R.I. tallied, every polygonal peg rounded-off and jammed-into one of these round holes, then why do we have to do their work ? ... It drives me crazy. In 4 years of medical school, and 3 years of residency, I learned enough diagnoses (and treatments) to start practicing medicine (in 1980), but nobody told me I might need to spend hours-upon-hours, in endless search for a code number, to match every diagnosis ... Makes you wanta holler, the way the do my mind. Rian Mintek, M.D. ... deconstructing, at the end of a long day ... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.