Guest guest Posted December 29, 2008 Report Share Posted December 29, 2008 It saddens me to witness the continued infatuation with health information technology when so much basic and less expensive improvement is yet to be done. Commonwealth Fund studies show other developed countries outperforming the US on quality and cost of care because their health systems are founded on effective primary care. Effective primary care from the perspective of those receiving care: “I can get care when I need it,” “my personal doctor and nurse know me,” “my primary office provides for most of my needs,” and “they coordinate care when I need any outside their office.” “Computers on the team” fails to correct longstanding policies of rewarding procedures instead of caring. While computers on the team may in some cases help actual people, the real improvement from this push to fund electronic records is likely to be the bottom line of companies with well heeled lobbyists. Attached is a very nice short article that exposes this myth for what it is and does a good job identifying the source of the mistake (missing a key caveat in a 2005 RAND study that identified savings IF technology was adopted as part of other major changes to the health care delivery system). Gordon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.