WAS: Re: More proof autism is genetic IS - WARNING!

[Guest guest]

On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 06:33:28 -0000, environmental1st2003

<no_reply > wrote:

>

>

> " Bull. The amount in the initial vaccinations was the dosage for a

> 250 lb male. Look it up. That's far beyond the dosage level for a

> small child and could certainly cause these problems. Especially if

> you add in a genetic allergic reaction. "

>

> By the way, please try and watch how you respond to people. Randy's

> opinion is as valid as yours. Because his opinion differs from yours

> does not mean you can be terse with him. At least not here.

So people, among other people your co-administrator, can tell me that I

don't know what I'm talking about when I have first-hand experiences and

I'm supposed to just take that lying down? I can't even use a mild word to

denote my disagreement?

I get this sort of stuff from others I don't need it here. Here of all

places I would think the value of unimpeded speech would be worth more.

I'm " plain spoken " and prefer to remain that way. I guess there's no place

I can speak freely any more except in the privacy of my own mind. I'll

have to remember that the next time I post. :-|

Thank you for the warning. I'll say no more about the subject from this

point on.

----

Mike

[Guest guest]

" So people, among other people your co-administrator, can tell me

that I don't know what I'm talking about when I have first-hand

experiences and I'm supposed to just take that lying down? I can't

even use a mild word to denote my disagreement? "

Possibly your first hand experience is different from the months I

put into the whole vaccine thing, but I and Raven have been following

the whole debate for about eight years now at least.

You can have any opinion you want, but please try not to attack

members who disagree with you. I will admit, it is difficult, because

I have been guilty of doing that myself. All of us have at one time

or another I'm sure.

Just trying to keep the peace.

" I get this sort of stuff from others I don't need it here. Here of

all places I would think the value of unimpeded speech would be worth

more. "

You may want to ask yourself why you get it from others. Unimpeded

speech is like unimpeeded sex: Too much of it can come back to haunt

you in my opinion.

" I'm " plain spoken " and prefer to remain that way. I guess there's

no place I can speak freely any more except in the privacy of my own

mind. "

That's true with everyone. I have opinions on just about everything,

but most I keep to myself, and I try to keep my language controlled

when I do express myself, although I do not always succeed.

" Thank you for the warning. I'll say no more about the subject from

this point on. "

Just watch the language. That's all. Opinions are welcome, although I

think ones that go against proven science can be harmful.

Administrator

[Guest guest]

Terse with me? Somehow I missed that! ;-)

Thanks.

One reason I listen to opposing opinions is there is still something to be

learned from what is said. Sometimes it's vastly unrelated information that

is worth checking into and sometimes very close to the subject.

In this case there is indication but is not reported (much) in the news

(probably it's considered " old news " and uninteresting to the news editor).

There may be mercury based Thimerasol in medications despite the supposed

ban. OR much of medications are screwed up and needs to be examined for

serious errors. OR miss-labeling by various medical suppliers causing risks

from warnings for something that is not there OR a label being miss-labeled

as another medication.

I wish I worked in quality assurance for the medical industry (medical

knowledge not needed for label verification for example) but I'm sure none

of them will hire me for it. " We have too many government oversight stuff

to deal with " would be a common (I've heard it too!) complaint.

Randy Garrett

Antioch, CA USA

-----<---{(@

WAS: Re: More proof autism is genetic IS -

WARNING!

" Bull. The amount in the initial vaccinations was the dosage for a 250 lb

male. Look it up. That's far beyond the dosage level for a small child and

could certainly cause these problems. Especially if you add in a genetic

allergic reaction. "

By the way, please try and watch how you respond to people. Randy's

opinion is as valid as yours. Because his opinion differs from yours

does not mean you can be terse with him. At least not here.

Thanks.

Administrator

No virus found in this outgoing message.

Checked by AVG.

Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.22.13/1378 - Release Date: 4/15/2008

9:12 AM