Guest guest Posted September 30, 2002 Report Share Posted September 30, 2002 This what the National Academies Paper says in " general " . Many public schools cannot say they are even close to meeting these objectives as general as they are presented here. The National Academies Paper and No Child Left Behind 2001 Law, maybe a very good place to start in terms of going after a school system along with a good attorney. " Intensive educational programming for at least 25 hours a week, year round, in which the child moves toward identified objectives, " would be the place to start. The best way a lawyer can prove this isn't happening is to look at goals (like talking or mand aquistion)for the lack of progress with experts and gather documentation about the training that teachers do have. Done properly this could be a sure winner to get a child what they need. Been there and done that, lyn The ERIC/OSEP Special Project -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Development funded by the U.S. Office of Special Education Programs NEWS BRIEF The Earlier the Better: Interventions that Benefit Children with Autism Early intervention and a coordinated program of instructional strategies are key to progress for children with autism spectrum disorders according to a recent OSEP-funded study by the National Research Council, headed by Lord, professor of psychiatry at the University of Chicago. The study committee was charged with creating a framework for evaluating research results on the effects and features of educational interventions for young children with autism. The committee reports that there is a general consensus in treatment programs about what services are essential to a successful intervention, some of which are entry into an intervention program as soon as the child is suspected of having an autistic spectrum disorder, intensive educational programming for at least 25 hours a week, year round, in which the child moves toward identified objectives, functional spontaneous communication, social instruction delivered throughout the day in various settings, cognitive development and play skills, and proactive approaches to behavior problems. The committee also recommends that " young children with an autistic spectrum disorder should receive specialized instruction in a setting in which ongoing interactions occur with typically developing children. " The study also surveyed the research and reported on instructional strategies that have proven successful for children with autism, strategies that modify behavior, build new developmental skills, or increase the ability of the student to communicate. Other successful techniques include a mix of individual and group instruction and the use of typical students as peers to elicit social, play, and communicative responses from young children with autism. The full report of the committee is available online from the National Academy Press web site at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10017.html. A paper copy of the same report can be ordered via that same link. The study was funded by the Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs (Grant #H324F980001; Jim McGee, project director) and the Committee on Educational Interventions for Children with Autism was formed by the National Research Council. Lord directed the committee. Additional information about the report can be found at the National Academies Web site: http://www4.nationalacademies.org. ERIC/OSEP Special Project Page Back to ERIC EC Menu -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last updated: December 13, 2001 http://ericec.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.