thanks for all the depression responses!

[Guest guest]

For anyone who hasn't responded yet- please see my post titled

depression and respond, I think I've had not quite a dozen out of 700

members respond- in science, you need to have way more than that to

have more accurate results. So Please please respond!!

And thank you to those that have so far- very enlightening. Especially

to see the difference in old meds and new. I guess its fair tosay I

should only get responses from those of the new meds; since that is

what I will be taking and I should be comparing " apples to apples " .

So that everyone here can hear my doctor's from Cedar Sinai input- the

statistics most current are that 40% of all patients taking the current

meds get depression from the chemical inbalance. Those odds aren't too

bad.

Has anyone tried light therapy for low seratonin levels, by any chance?

[Guest guest]

I still say if it isn't broke, wait until it is before you insist on

fixing it. What is " light therapy " ? Any Links you care to share?

Sheena

>

> For anyone who hasn't responded yet- please see my post titled

> depression and respond, I think I've had not quite a dozen out of

700

> members respond- in science, you need to have way more than that

to

> have more accurate results. So Please please respond!!

>

> And thank you to those that have so far- very enlightening.

Especially

> to see the difference in old meds and new. I guess its fair tosay

I

> should only get responses from those of the new meds; since that

is

> what I will be taking and I should be comparing " apples to apples " .

>

> So that everyone here can hear my doctor's from Cedar Sinai input-

the

> statistics most current are that 40% of all patients taking the

current

> meds get depression from the chemical inbalance. Those odds aren't

too

> bad.

>

> Has anyone tried light therapy for low seratonin levels, by any

chance?

>