Re: low functioning

July 9, 2004

Hi Regina,

I don't disagree with you, but I have used the term " low functioning " myself to

describe my son. Generally I use it when I am asking a question on these lists,

and want to give an idea of where he's at developmentally (i.e., some answers or

suggestions people might give, would not necessarily be appropriate for him).

But I agree, I'm not crazy about the terminology. Although, I do feel,

especially on these lists, where we're asking questions and seeking input,

*some* sort of description is necessary, again, if only to get appropriate

suggestions and responses.

Take care,

Eileen, Florida

Message: 2

Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 13:00:20 -0700 (PDT)

From: Regina Frey <rgcf541@...>

Subject: OT: Is anyone else annoyed by references to " functioning-level? "

I'm raising this question in the hope of generating a little thought and

discussion around this issue...

Is anyone else out there annoyed with references to " functioning-level " ?

Whether a kid is " high-functioning " or " low-functioning " , it seems like such a

pigeon-hole statement, defining an individual with a blanket conclusion

regardless of his/her particular strengths and weaknesses. This is particularly

true of those deemed " low functioning " , and I've gotten at least half a dozen

explanations, all different, about what the heck that means.

I've heard these terms thrown around by professionals, therapists, parents, on

lists, in public, in print and it never ceases to infuriate me. I am not

thinking of any particular individual on this list, but it is food for thought.

IMO, here in Lake Wobegon, all the men are strong, all the women are

good-looking, and all the children are individuals.

Regina

________________________________________

PeoplePC Online

A better way to Internet

Recommended Posts