Re: AstroPulse Model D

[Guest guest]

Jeff

I will agree with you only on one issue the frequency range that you

specified is correct. The frequency was " designed in " to my knowledge there

was no switch to change it. To change the carrier frequency the device had

to be taken apart and completely retuned changing the coil taps and

adjusting the plate current etc. To my knowledge there was no crystal.

I went to your website and could you please tell me where " The Ultimate "

has a plasma tube I think I must have not clicked on the right link or

something because I could not find it. The only plasma tubes were the ones

of Rifes original machines.!!

dave

Hello ,

In my last post I didn't say he used only 2.4, 3.5 and 4.68 MHz. You will

not find the word only any place in what I said. I said that from 1937

through the 1950's he used these carrier frequencies in his instruments. In

some of Cranes papers he said that Rife also used 3.15 MHz. We know he

used other carrier frequencies before the Beam Ray instruments. The Rife Ray

#4 built in 1935 (These Papers about the Rife Ray #4 I supplied to Stan

Truman and he has them up on his site. If you want to look at them go to

http://www.rife.org/) and the earlier instruments used 2 different megahertz

frequencies at the same time. One frequency was a carrier for the other one.

From 1937 on he used audio frequencies modulate on a single carrier

frequency that could be chosen by the operator. In Rifes deposition he said

" Initially I worked with loose couplers to get an audio oscillation and then

with the use of transmitters, I tried to balance the audio and modulate the

audio on a carrier wave to transmit the audio energy but I found that both

the audio and the audio transmitted through a tube as an antenna worked

equally as well in a painless and harmless method to human tissue " . The AZ

58 Built by Life labs in the 1950's of which Dr. Rife was the director of

research used audio frequencies modulated on one of the three carrier

frequencies mentioned above. I hope this helps clear up any

misunderstandings.

Jeff Garff

Jeff

In your last post you say that Rife used only (2.4, 3.5 and 4.68 MHz). As

a EE I have always wondered how people say that he used the 10 meter band.

What I would like to know is just how do you get off by saying that Rife

only used the three frequencies for the carrier? Do you have some notes

or

drawings that support your claim? I have not found anywhere that Rife

switched between only the three frequencies that you talk about.

Jeffers

dave@...

Dear Patti,

I would like to clear up a few misunderstanding. The Ultimate has

always

used square waves in the instrument. What we have done now is to make it

so

that it modulates all frequencies on a 2.4 MHz sine wave. The instrument

can

now work in 2 modes Audio or RF. We chose the 2.4 MHz because Rife's

instruments from 1937 through the 1950's used three carrier frequencies

(2.4, 3.5 and 4.68 MHz). Dr. Stafford said that it didn't matter which one

he used.

The model D was made by (who is now going on trial for

murder charges in California). She also made the model E bio-solutions,

Naturetronics, Electromagic and Astropulse. Energy Wellness is a copy of

the

modle E. The people who make Energy Wellness (after was arrested

and put in jail) copied the model E and put it in a different case and now

sell it with the name Energy Wellness. They didn't change anything but the

name and the price and then claim it is better than the model E so don't

be

misled. The Royal Rife Reach Society was a part of 's group and

that

is why they are shut down.

I hope this helps

Jeff

[Guest guest]

Jeff and List

Jeff as to your last post you are WRONG here is the switch you are talking

about:

http://www.rife.org/images/vt27.jpg

#1 It is not a three position switch (it is using 4 or 5 positions of a

multiposition wafer switch.

#2 It does NOT control the frequency (it controls the power)

#3 When was the last time you saw a mulit-tap power wirewound resistor

control the frequency??

#4 Even if you had a switch to control the carrier frequency you would have

to retune the coil to match the output. (Remember it is very similar to a

MOPA)

Please STOP putting wrong information on the list. While you are at it

would be nice to not have the name of Rife connected to your machine. And

please STOP advertising over the media about your machine I think you are

next in line for a FDA bust.

Editorial Comment:

I personally feel that the pad device, does have merit in solving some

health conditions, some conditions respond to pad devices extremely well.

BUT it is not what Rife was working on, call it a Crane device or whatever

else you want BUT KEEP RIFES NAME OUT OF IT. Jeff's using the media to

promote his device will bring the wrath of the FDA and only drag Rifes work

through the mud.

One of my many hobbies is detective work. I have found many of the people

that knew Rife, many have very interesting stories and paperwork. 2002 will

see some rediscoveries of the Rife technologies provided that it doesn't get

destroyed because of loud mouth greedy persons promoting there machines and

putting Rifes name on it.

Jeffers

dave@...

Jeffers

Here is the proof that you want that the carrier frequency could be changed.

If you go to Stan Truman's Web site and take a look at the photos of the

1947 Rife instrument you will see to the right of the large brass knob at

the top of the instrument a black slender knob.

http://www.rife.org/images/vt34.jpg This knob turned a switch that changed

between the three carrier frequencies (2.4, 3.5, and 4.68 MHz). Crane

in 1988 was explaining to Rick Sheppard of Precision Audio, Inc

http://www.rife.org/images/crane101.jpg how the old instruments worked

(AZ58). The AZ58 was built the same as the 1947 instrument but with one

change made to it. The switch that changed the carrier frequencies was

replaced with a tuning capacitor http://www.rife.org/images/crane102.jpg (on

the AZ58 schematic it is called a variable condenser. Part number S107

http://www.rife.org/images/az58/az58jrc8.jpg ). The Beam Ray instruments

and all other instruments up to and including the AZ58 were not crystal

controlled and I never said that these instruments were crystal controlled.

I built an AZ58 and with the variable condenser I can pick any carrier

frequency between 2.2 to 5 MHz. With the old switch you could only pick the

three original carrier frequency settings. These instruments had a switch to

change the carrier frequency and they didn't have to be taken apart.

Now as for " The Ultimate " I never said that it used a ray tube. I have

always said that it was a pad instrument and when you go to our web site

that's exactly what you will find. After having built the AZ58 we had our

engineers build " The Ultimate " to work like the AZ58. But instead of it

being a ray tube instrument it is a pad type. An instrument built like the

AZ58 which used a ray tube will never pass FCC regulations. Next time why

don't you ask your questions in a nicer way instead of saying " how do you

get off " .

Have a nice day,

Jeff