Re: Re: confused about frequency effects

[Guest guest]

Darrell I would like to read it too

joss@...

>

> >

> > Darrell Bross wrote:

> >

> > > This is to ascoon@... who wrote a very thoughtful post

> > about

> > > radionics and scalar waves and obviously is knowledgeable on the

> > subject.  I

> > > also am familiar with the work of Bearden and, of course

> > Maxwell's

> > > quadratic equations, not just the surface ones but the full four

> > deep level.  My

> > > background is not technical but my very first exposure to the

> > " alternative

> > > universe " was with an anecdotal story about Radionics.  I have yet

> > to emerge

> > > from that rabbit hole.

> > >

> > > To cut to some sort of bottom line I would go way out on a limb and

> > state that

> > > " quantum " anything is a crock of bullshit designed soley to seque

> > from a

> > > misguided perpetration on the public of a misdirection designed to

> > explain why

> > > " relativity physics " has led us nowhere and aether physics (which is

> > ABSOLUTELY

> > > supported by hard evidence) has been suppressed for decades (ever

> > since Einstein

> > > made a big splash - with a " special case of relativity " ).  I have

> > permission to

> > > post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY

> > plain English

> > > if anybody wants to see.  Enquiries invited.

[Guest guest]

I second that. Want to see the dissertation too. Can you post it or does

it need to be sent direct? If the latter, my email address is on this.

Thanks,

-=d=-

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

At 10:32 AM 07/09/2002 +0100, you wrote:

>Yes, I would be interested to see this dissertation.

>

> King

> Re: confused about frequency effects

>

>

> This is to ascoon@... who wrote a very thoughtful post about

> radionics and scalar waves and obviously is knowledgeable on the

> subject. I

> also am familiar with the work of Bearden and, of course Maxwell's

> quadratic equations, not just the surface ones but the full four deep

> level. My

> background is not technical but my very first exposure to the " alternative

> universe " was with an anecdotal story about Radionics. I have yet to

> emerge

> from that rabbit hole.

>

> To cut to some sort of bottom line I would go way out on a limb and

> state that

> " quantum " anything is a crock of bullshit designed soley to seque from a

> misguided perpetration on the public of a misdirection designed to

> explain why

> " relativity physics " has led us nowhere and aether physics (which is

> ABSOLUTELY

> supported by hard evidence) has been suppressed for decades (ever since

> Einstein

> made a big splash - with a " special case of relativity " ). I have

> permission to

> post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY plain

> English

> if anybody wants to see. Enquiries invited.

[Guest guest]

Hello,

I would like to see the dissertation too. You can send it directly to my

email.

Sincerely, Boris

>

>Reply-To: Rife

>To: Rife

>Subject: Re: Re: confused about frequency effects

>Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2002 07:05:21 -0700

>

>I second that. Want to see the dissertation too. Can you post it or does

>it need to be sent direct? If the latter, my email address is on this.

>

>Thanks,

>

>-=d=-

>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

>

>At 10:32 AM 07/09/2002 +0100, you wrote:

> >Yes, I would be interested to see this dissertation.

> >

> > King

> > Re: confused about frequency effects

> >

> >

> > This is to ascoon@... who wrote a very thoughtful post

>about

> > radionics and scalar waves and obviously is knowledgeable on the

> > subject. I

> > also am familiar with the work of Bearden and, of course

>Maxwell's

> > quadratic equations, not just the surface ones but the full four deep

> > level. My

> > background is not technical but my very first exposure to the

> " alternative

> > universe " was with an anecdotal story about Radionics. I have yet to

> > emerge

> > from that rabbit hole.

> >

> > To cut to some sort of bottom line I would go way out on a limb and

> > state that

> > " quantum " anything is a crock of bullshit designed soley to seque from

>a

> > misguided perpetration on the public of a misdirection designed to

> > explain why

> > " relativity physics " has led us nowhere and aether physics (which is

> > ABSOLUTELY

> > supported by hard evidence) has been suppressed for decades (ever

>since

> > Einstein

> > made a big splash - with a " special case of relativity " ). I have

> > permission to

> > post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY plain

> > English

> > if anybody wants to see. Enquiries invited.

>

>

_________________________________________________________________

Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com

[Guest guest]

>>aether physics<<

Humm... the good stuff.

OK, lets see it...

runyan@...

Regards,

RN

---

Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.

Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Version: 6.0.370 / Virus Database: 205 - Release Date: 6/5/02

[Guest guest]

Me to thanks,

Rob

> > > made a big splash - with a " special case of relativity " ). I have

> > permission to

> > > post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY

> > plain English

> > > if anybody wants to see. Enquiries invited.

[Guest guest]

At 07:42 PM 07/08/2002 -0700, you wrote:

> " ). I have permission to

>post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY plain English

>if anybody wants to see. Enquiries invited.

Darrell, when are all us eager beavers who want to read that dissertation

going to get the chance?

I'm ready, I'm ready!!!

Best,

-=d=-

[Guest guest]

Darrell, Are you still around and on this BBS? Are you still planning to

post that dissertation?

Anyone else reading this post: Did Darrell already post the piece or

email it to individuals and I missed out? Anybody know what the story is here?

Thanks,

-=d=-

~~~~~~~~``

>Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 08:56:33 -0700

>To: Rife

>

>Subject: Re: Re: confused about frequency effects

>

>At 07:42 PM 07/08/2002 -0700, you wrote:

>> " ). I have permission to

>>post an 11 page dissertaion (from a VERY good reference) in VERY plain

>>English

>>if anybody wants to see. Enquiries invited.

>

>Darrell, when are all us eager beavers who want to read that dissertation

>going to get the chance?

>

>I'm ready, I'm ready!!!

>

>Best,

>

>-=d=-