Re: Molar Cracked in two

[Guest guest]

Hello Sheila,

Sorry, my use of the word " promote " was not intended to imply that you

were making money out it or doing it in a commercial sense etc.

Perhaps I should have said " advocate " .

Best wishes

Aubrey

[Guest guest]

At 05:53 PM 07/30/2002 -0400, you wrote:

>But what you have to realize

>is some of us don't really need to know how Rife got to where he did before

>he quit, or the booze got him.

Oh boy, I, too, wish it were that simple and Rife-tech was as settled a

matter as, say, the technology of building buggy whips.

But, nope, t'aint the case. More conflict and divergent opinions about

even the most basic issues in the field than a woods-ful of bull moose in

rutting season. (No offense, gents; the ladies Rifers are equally feisty

<gd & r>.)

Shiela, you sound as if you've concluded that Rifetech is developed enough

that it can simply be cook-booked. IMHO, though Rifestuff is more of a

nutznboltz technology than radionics, it's still chok-a-blok with question

marks and problematic assertions, missing and often contradictory, easily

misunderstood documentation. For a sampling about that matter, read Aubrey

Scoon's latest posts to the list as well as make a visit to his website,

<http://www.scoon.co.uk/>. Click on the " Electrotherapy " link on his intro

page, fasten your seat belt and settle back for an assumption-bumping ride.

-=d=-

[Guest guest]

Hello ,

The AZ-58 is not exactly a " true " Rife machine. It was made by

Crane in 1958 (that's where the 58 comes from). Although the design

was based roughly on the Beam Rays machines designed by Rife and

Hoyland in the 1930's.

The AZ-58 schematics have a few problems, I know of 4 people who have

built AZ-58's and I know that at least 3 of them had to make

modifications to get it to work.

If you look at my web site http://www.scoon.co.uk under Electrotherapy

and Rife sections, you'll find detailed schematics of a fully working

1939 Beam Rays machine that I reverse engineered a few months ago.

And just today I posted details of some even earlier machines, one of

them being around 1936 vintage and a possible candidate for the

original Rife (a modified naval transmitter) which is driven by two

Hartleys. Just place a switched capacitor bank on the Hartleys, and

substitute a plasma tube for the antenna and you have a truly variable

machine capable of the original Rife frequencies.

Your analysis of the AZ-58 is of course correct, but the earlier

machines were a bit different, they used sine waves not square and ran

in the 80m band for the carrier with modulation up to 200KHz.

Best wishes

Aubrey

> Dear Aubrey

>

> This was the first time I saw the scheamatic and pictures of

what they

> called the AZ-58. If that is supposedly a true Rife type machine,

then looking

> at the prints and the pictures show that they jive and seam to be

accurate. Many

> years ago I built an am transmitter using almost the same

components. For

> instance the 812 or 811A triode tube was a high power audio through

maybe 50MHZ

> RF Amplifier, and the 6AQ5 is a power pentode audio amplifier, 12AT7

is a dual

> triode audio amplifier. So if this unit is an original, then you

really can make

> some concrete assumtions, about the Frequencies it put out. Say the

RF section

> for instance, looking at the tank circuit, the cap and taped coil

with the extra

> winding for feedback make it a legitimate 4 MHZ RF power Oscillator,

very

> capable of the said 4.68 MHZ fequency.

> Then continuing on to the audio modulating part of the system, the

12AT7 dual

> triode makes an excellent variable frequency audio Oscillator

capable of 20HZ

> to 30KHZ, finally add a (6AQ5) for a little buffering for the audio

Osc., and

> power for the modulation of the RF Osc. and Walla, their you have

it. A RF power

> Osc. guessing (200-300Watts) around 4 MHZ, capable of being

modulated 20HZ -

> 30KHZ sign wave, but because it is driving the Power Osc. at the

control grid,

> it can easily, over power, the grid control, driving the tube into

the non

> linear operation and therefore Square waves...... Definitely fits

all the

> criteria. Anyway What do you think.

>

> Yours Truly

> R. Hausman

> <garyh@o...>

> {WB8ZZG}