has anyone seen this article?

[Guest guest]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/uk/england/newsid_1985000/1985548.stm

I was given this link off another web page, that happens to have a lot children

with DSI and a few other things.

Lynn

[Guest guest]

I had seen that too.

I keep wondering. Either their precious vaccines work or they don't - which is

it? Why are

they vaxing and still worrying about catching the disease? What good is the vax

if you still

have to worry about catching the very thing you were vaxed against? Now you

also have to

worry about vax reactions in addition to the disease?

Or does it all come down to - vaccines only work if 100% of the population gets

them? If

that's what they think (and that would be all unproven theory) then they may as

well not

get the vaccines because 100% vax rates are not likely to happen. Unless

everyone's

freedoms have been taken away and if that happens you've all got bigger things

to worry

about!

It just seems to me that they are themselves saying that vaccines aren't worth

getting and

don't work with all their fear of their vaxed kids still getting diseases. Am I

missing

something here?

>

> I just logged on to MSN and this was a headline that immediately jumped

> out:

>

> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26291109/

>

> I am just speechlees, but not surprised about the article to say the

> least.

>

>

> heather h.

>

[Guest guest]

Could this be any more one sided? I get so mad when I see how they try

to paint all of us who are anti vaccine as being nuts.

wrote:

>

> I had seen that too.

>

> I keep wondering. Either their precious vaccines work or they don't -

> which is it? Why are

> they vaxing and still worrying about catching the disease? What good

> is the vax if you still

> have to worry about catching the very thing you were vaxed against?

> Now you also have to

> worry about vax reactions in addition to the disease?

>

> Or does it all come down to - vaccines only work if 100% of the

> population gets them? If

> that's what they think (and that would be all unproven theory) then

> they may as well not

> get the vaccines because 100% vax rates are not likely to happen.

> Unless everyone's

> freedoms have been taken away and if that happens you've all got

> bigger things to worry

> about!

>

> It just seems to me that they are themselves saying that vaccines

> aren't worth getting and

> don't work with all their fear of their vaxed kids still getting

> diseases. Am I missing

> something here?

>

>

> >

> > I just logged on to MSN and this was a headline that immediately jumped

> > out:

> >

> > http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26291109/

> <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26291109/>

> >

> > I am just speechlees, but not surprised about the article to say the

> > least.

> >

> >

> > heather h.

> >

>

>