Guest guest Posted October 8, 2002 Report Share Posted October 8, 2002 The rheumatoid factor level (it's more appropriate to refer to it as the RF level or RF titer, not " RA level " as certain doctors do, because this test is not specific to rheumatoid arthritis (RA)) is supposed to be used to help make an RA diagnosis, not monitor the disease. The " sed rate " is the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) which is a measure of inflammation. This test can be used to monitor RA. Below is a link below to a excellent article entitled " Clinical Utility of Common Serum Rheumatologic Tests. " http://www.aafp.org/afp/20020315/1073.html Two relevant quotes: " In patients with rheumatoid arthritis, the RF titer generally correlates with extra-articular manifestations and disease severity. RF testing may have prognostic value in these patients. However, RF titers are not helpful in following disease progression. Once a patient has a positive RF result, repeating the test is of no value. " and " The ESR is a means for staging rheumatoid arthritis, rather than a major diagnostic criterion. The ESR value tends to correlate with clinical disease activity and to parallel such symptoms as morning stiffness and fatigue, although joint examination is far more useful in assessing synovitis. The sensitivity of an elevated ESR value is approximately 50 percent in patients with signs of rheumatoid arthritis. However, the specificity of an elevated ESR is quite low, limiting its use as a diagnostic test. " [ ] > Is the RA level the same as the sed rate? Why would the doc be > watching this " level " so closely? > I'm a little confused I guess. > Thank You > Keri Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.